Groundwater vulnerability assessment of the chalk aquifer in the northern part of France

References

• Abiy AZ, Melesse AM, Behabtu YM, Abebe B. 2016. Groundwater vulnerability analysis of the Tana sub-basin: an application of DRASTIC Index Method. In: Landscape dynamics, soils and hydrological processes in varied climates. Cham: Springer; p. 435–461.
   Google Scholar
• Added A, Hamza MH. 2000. Evaluation of the vulnerability to pollution in Metline aquifer (North-East of Tunisia) (master’s thesis). Tunisia: University of Tunis II, Geologic Department.
   Google Scholar
• Agence Régionale de la Santé (ARS) de Beauvais. 2016. Données et Rapports Hydrogéolohues Des Communes D'Ons-enBray, Lacroix-Saint-Ouen, Baugy, Dieudonné, Puiseux-le-Hauberger et Saint-Just-en-Chaussée (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Adamat RAN, Foster IDL, Baban S. 2003. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, remote sensing and DRASTIC. Appl Geogr. 23(4):303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aller L, Bennet T, Leher JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G. 1987. DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. Ada, Oklahoma 74820: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, . EPA 600/2-87-035. p. 662.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur JD, Wood HAR, Baker AE, Cichon JR, Raines GL. 2007. Development and implementation of a Bayesian-based aquifer vulnerability assessment in Florida. Nat Res Res. 16(2):93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Baghapour MA, Nobandegani AF, Talebbeydokhti N, Bagherzadeh S, Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Chitsazan N. 2016. Optimization of DRASTIC method by artificial neural network, nitrate vulnerability index, and composite DRASTIC models to assess groundwater vulnerability for unconfined aquifer of Shiraz Plain, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 14:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baize D, Girard M-C. 2008. et Association Française pour l’Etude du sol. Référentiel Pédologique. Versailles, France: Editions Quae; p. 435.
   Google Scholar
• Bault V, Borde J, Follet R, Laurent A, Tourlière B, Leveau E, Willefert V. 2012. Atlas Hydrogéologique numérique de l'Oise. Phase 3: Notice. Rapport finale. Ed. BRGM/RP-61081-FR. p. 325.
   Google Scholar
• Benedini M, Masciopinto C, Vurro M. 1994. An approach to describing problems of artificial groundwater recharge by means of the Hantush model. Proc Int Conf Hydrosoft. 94:21–23. September, Port Garros, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Kabbour B, Zouhri L, Mania J, Colbeaux J-P. 2006. Assessing groundwater contamination risk using the DASTI/IDRISI GIS Method: Coastal System of Western Mamora, Morocco. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 65(4):463–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRGM, 2009. Cartographie de la vulnérabilité intrinsèque des aquifères karstiques. Guide Méthodologique de la méthode PaPRIKa. BRGM/RP-57527-FR. Orléans, France.
   Google Scholar
• Civita MV. 2008. The Italian “combined” approach in assessing and mapping the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination. Groundwater Symposium on Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling; Ljubljana, Slovenia: Agencija RS za okolje. p. 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Civita M, De Maio M, Berberi F. 1997. SINTACS. Un sistema parametrico per la valutazione e lacartografia della vulnerabilita’ degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Metodologia and utomatizzazione. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna. p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Dávila Pórcel RA, Schüth C, De León-Gómez H, Hoppe A, Lehné R. 2014. Land-use impact and nitrate analysis to validate DRASTIC vulnerability maps using a GIS platform of Pablillo River Basin, Linares, N.L., Mexico. IJG. 05(12):1468–1489.
   Google Scholar
• Denny SC, Allen DM, Journeay JM. 2007. DRASTIC-Fm: a modified vulnerability mapping method for structurally controlled aquifers in the southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia, Canada. Hydrogeol J. 15(3):483–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfliger N. 1996. Advances in karst groundwater protection strategy using artificial tracer tests analysis and multiattribute vulnerability mapping (EPIK method). Thèse Sciences Neuchâtel, Literaturverz. Switzerland: University of Neuchâtel; p. 311.
   Google Scholar
• Domenico PA, Schwartz FW. 1998. Physical and chemical hydrogeology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; p. 505
   Google Scholar
• Duarte L, Teodoro AC, Gonçalves JA, Guerner Dias AJ, Marques JE. 2014. Assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution through the DRASTIC method. In: Murgante B., editors. Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2014. ICCSA 2014. Lecture notes in computer science. Vol. 8582. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ducommun R. 2010. Estimation et cartographie de la vulnérabilité des eaux souterraines en milieu urbain. Thèse, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Neuchâtel. p. 328.
   Google Scholar
• Elfarrak H, Hakdaoui M, Fikri A. 2014. Development of vulnerability through the DRASTIC method and geographic information system (GIS) (case groundwater of Berrchid), Morocco. JGIS. 06(01):45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Foster SSD. 1987. Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Van Duijvenbooden, W, Van Waegenigh, H.G., editors. Vulnerability of soil and ground water pollutants. The Hague: TNO Committee on Hydrological Research Information; p. 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gogu R-C, Dassargues A. 2000. Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium. Hydrogeol J. 8(3):337–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S, Hötzl H. 2000. The PI method – a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability, with special consideration of karst aquifers. Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Geologie. 46(3):157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Herlinger R Jr, Viero AP. 2007. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in coastal plain of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, using drastic and adsorption capacity of soils. Environ Geol. 52(5):819–829.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannin P-Y, Cornaton F, Zwahlen F, Perrochet P. 2001. VULK: a tool for intrinsic vulnerability assessment and validation. 7th Conference on Limestone Hydrology and FissuredMedia. Sciences et Techniques de L’Environnement, Mémoire Hors-Série. 13:185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Sartaj M, Tsai FT-C, Singh VP, Kazakis N, Melesse AM, Prakash I, Tien Bui D, Pham BT. 2018. A comparison study of DRASTIC methods with various objective methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Sci Tot Environ. 642:1032–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Hamm S. 1999. Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGISTechnique, Cheongju Area, South Korea. Hydrogeol J. 7(2):227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodwick W, Monson W, Svoboda L. 1990. Attribute error and sensitivity analysis of map operations in geographical information systems: suitability analysis. Int J Geogr Inform Syst. 4(4):413–428.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler BJ, Valdes D, Musgrove M, Massei N. 2008. Nutrient dynamics as indicators of karst processes: comparison of the Chalk aquifer (Normandy, France) and the Edwards aquifer (Texas, USA). J Contam. 98(1–2):36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Margat J. 1968. Vulnerabilite des nappes d’eau souterrune a la pollution (Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination). Bases de al Cartographie (Doc.). 68 SGC 198HYD. Orleans: BRGM.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant JM. 1994. GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 60(9):1117–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• METEOFRANCE 2016. Site de prévision et de référencement météorologique de France [en ligne]. http://www.meteofrance.com/accueil.
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano P, Fabbri AG. 1996. Single parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In: Kovar K, Nachtnebel HP, editors. Proc HydroGIS: application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management. Vol. 235. Wallingford: IAHS Publication; p. 559–566.
   Google Scholar
• Nazzal Y, Howari FM, Iqbal J, Ahmed I, Orm NB, Yousef A. 2019. Investigating aquifer vulnerability and pollution risk employing modified DRASTIC model and GIS techniques in Liwa area, United Arab Emirates. Groundwater Sus Dev. 8:567–578.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1993. Ground water vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; p. 224. ISBN: 978-0-309-04799-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ouedraogo I, Defourny P, Vanclooster M. 2016. Mapping the groundwater vulnerability for pollution at the pan African scale. Sci Total Environ. 544:939–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos GP, Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ. 2006. Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol J. 14(6):894–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman A. 2008. A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr. 28(1):32–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen L. 1994. A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions. Ground Water. 32(2):278–285.
   Google Scholar
• Rupert MG. 2001. Calibration of the DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping method. Ground Water. 39(4):625–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidi S, Bouri S, Ben Dhia H. 2010. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping of the Hajeb-jelma aquifer (Central Tunisia) using a GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ Earth Sci. 7:1579–1588.
   Google Scholar
• Schnebelen N, Platel JP, Lenindre Y, Baudry D. 2002. Gestion des eaux souterraines en Aquitaine Année 5. Opération Sectorielle Protectionde la Nappe de L’Oligocène en Région Bordelaise – Rapport. Orléans, France: BRGM.
   Google Scholar
• Sinan M, Razack M. 2009. An extension to the DRASTIC model to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution: application to the Haouz aquifer of Marrakech (Morocco). Environ Geol. 57(2):349–363.
   Google Scholar
• Stigter TY, Almeida P, Carvalho Dill A, Ribeiro L. 2002. Influence of irrigation on groundwater nitrate concentrations in areas considered to have low vulnerability to contamination. Proceedings of the XXXII IAH & VI ALHSUD Congress; Oct 2002; Mar del Plata, Argentina (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• Stigter TY, Ribeiro L, Dill AMMC. 2006. Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal. Hydrogeol J. 14(1–2):79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vías J, Andreo B, Ravbar N, Hötzl H. 2010. Mapping the vulnerability of groundwater to the contamination of four carbonate aquifers in Europe. J Environ Manage. 91(7):1500–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrba J, Zoporozec A. 1994. Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH-International Contributions to Hydrogeology. Vol. 16. Hannover: H. Heise; p. 131.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Merkel BJ, Li Y, Ye H, Fu S, Ihm D. 2007. Vulnerability of groundwater in quaternary aquifers to organic contaminants: a case study in Wuhan City, China. Environ Geol. 53(3):479–484.
   Google Scholar
• Wyns R, Hardy R, Feugueur L, Monciardini C. 1979. Notice, Carte Géologique de la France à (1/50 000). Feuille Méru, Orléans, No. 126.
   Google Scholar
• Zghibi A, Merzougui A, Chenini I, Ergaieg K, Zouhri L, Tarhouni J. 2016. Groundwater vulnerability analysis of Tunisian coastal aquifer: an application of DRASTIC Index Method in GIS environment. Groundwater Sust Dev. 2–3:169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Zwahlen F. 2004. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers. Final Report. COST Action 620. Brussels: European Cooperation in the field of scientific and technical research (COST).
   Google Scholar