Landslide susceptibility modeling using different artificial intelligence methods: a case study at Muong Lay district, Vietnam

References

• Ahmed B. 2015. Landslide susceptibility mapping using multi-criteria evaluation techniques in Chittagong metropolitan area, Bangladesh. Landslides 12(6):1077–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I. 2016. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 13(2):361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W-H, Hsu S-H, Shen H-P. 2005. Application of SVM and ANN for intrusion detection. Comput Oper Res. 32(10):2617–2634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Zhao Z. 2017a. A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 32(4):367–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Shahabi H, Zhang S, Khosravi K, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Pham B, Zhang T, Zhang L, Chai H, et al. 2018. Landslide susceptibility modeling based on GIS and novel bagging-based kernel logistic regression. Appl Sci. 8(12):2540.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Ahmad BB, Zhang S, Hong H, Zhang N. 2017b. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and naïve Bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):1955–1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai F, Lee C. 2002. Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42(3–4):213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai F, Lee C, Li J, Xu Z. 2001. Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol. 40(3):381–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das I, Sahoo S, Van Westen C, Stein A, Hack R. 2010. Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India). Geomorphology 114(4):627–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehnavi A, Aghdam IN, Pradhan B, Varzandeh MHM. 2015. A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (Anfis) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran. Catena 135:122–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Tien Bui D, Sahana M, Chen C-W, Zhu Z, Wang W, Pham BT. 2019a. Evaluating GIS-based multiple statistical models and data mining for earthquake and rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility using the Lidar Dem. Remote Sens. 11(6):638.
   Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Xu Y, Zhu Z, Chen C-W, Sahana M, Khosravi K, Yang Y, Pham BT. 2019b. Torrential rainfall-triggered shallow landslide characteristics and susceptibility assessment using ensemble data-driven models in the Dongjiang reservoir watershed, China. Nat Hazards 97:1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreiseitl S, Ohno-Machado L. 2002. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform. 35(5–6):352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dung TT, Minh NQ. 2017. Eruptive-volcanic-basalt structures in the Truong Sa-Spratly islands and adjacent areas from interpreting gravity and magnetic data. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 39(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Francis J, Tontisirin N, Anantsuksomsri S, Vink J, Zhong V. 2015. Alternative strategies for mapping acs estimates and error of estimation. In: Emerging techniques in applied demography. Berlin (Germany): Springer; p. 247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Froude MJ, Petley D. 2018. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 18(8):2161–2181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye C. 2007. About the geometrical interval classification method. Redlands (CA): Environment Systems Research Institute, Inc. Online verfügbar unter. https://blogs.esri.com/esri/arcgis/2007/10/18/about-thegeometrical-interval-classification-method.
   Google Scholar
• Galathiya A, Ganatra A, Bhensdadia C. 2012. Improved decision tree induction algorithm with feature selection, cross validation, model complexity and reduced error pruning. Int J Comput Sci Inform Technol. 3(2):3427–3431.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez H, Kavzoglu T. 2005. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa river basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol. 78(1–2):11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handmer J, Honda Y, Kundzewicz ZW, Arnell N, Benito G, Hatfield J, Mohamed IF, Peduzzi P, Wu S, Sherstyukov B. 2012. Changes in impacts of climate extremes: human systems and ecosystems. In: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 231–290.
   Google Scholar
• Haykin S. 1999. Support vector machines. Neural Networks318–350.
   Google Scholar
• Hens L, Thinh NA, Hanh TH, Cuong NS, Lan TD, Van Thanh N, Le DT. 2018. Sea-level rise and resilience in Vietnam and the Asia-pacific: a synthesis. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 40(2):127–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hoan VT, Lu NT, Rodkin M, Quang N, Huong PT. 2018. Seismic activity characteristics in the east sea area. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 40(3):240–252.
   Google Scholar
• Hoan VT, Lu NT, Rodkin M, Tuyen NH, Hang PTT, Phuong TV. 2016. Prediction of maximum earthquake magnitude for northern Vietnam region based on the Gev distribution. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 38(4):339–344.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang N, Shakirov RB, Huong TT. 2017. Geochemistry of late Miocene-Pleistocene basalts in the Phu Quy island area (east Vietnam sea): implication for mantle source feature and melt generation. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 39(3):270–288.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Jaafari A, Zenner EK. 2019a. Predicting spatial patterns of wildfire susceptibility in the Huichang county, China: AN integrated model to analysis of landscape indicators. Ecol Indicators 101:878–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kornejady A, Soltani A, Termeh SVR, Liu J, Zhu A-X, Hesar AY, Ahmad BB, Wang Y. 2018a. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Anfu county, China: comparing different statistical and probabilistic models considering the new topo-hydrological factor (hand). Earth Sci Inform. 11(4):605–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Miao Y, Liu J, Zhu A-X. 2019b. Exploring the effects of the design and quantity of absence data on the performance of random forest-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena 176:45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Bui DT, Xu C, Akgun A. 2016. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the luxi area (China) using support vector machines. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Chen W, Chapi K, Ahmad BB, Roodposhti MS, Hesar AY, Tian Y, Bui DT. 2018b. Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods. Nat Hazards. 96(1):173–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung LQ, Van NTH, Van Son P, Ninh NH, Tam N, Huyen NT. 2017. Landslide inventory mapping in the fourteen northern provinces of Vietnam: achievements and difficulties. In: Workshop on world landslide forum. Berlin, Germany: Springer; p. 501–510.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafari A, Mafi-Gholami D, Thai Pham B, Tien Bui D. 2019a. Wildfire probability mapping: bivariate vs. multivariate statistics. Remote Sens. 11(6):618.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafari A, Panahi M, Pham BT, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Rezaie F, Lee S. 2019b. Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena 175:430–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari A, Zenner EK, Pham BT. 2018. Wildfire spatial pattern analysis in the Zagros mountains, Iran: a comparative study of decision tree based classifiers. Ecol Informatics 43:200–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungjit S, Michaelis M, Freitas AA, Cinatl J. 2013. Two extensions to multi-label correlation-based feature selection: a case study in bioinformatics. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Manchester: IEEE; p. 1519–1524.
   Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping using gis-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides 11(3):425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pham BT, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I, Prakash I, Bui DT. 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Sci Tot Environ. 627:744–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A. 2012. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor river basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 67(1):251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai K-Y, Chen Y-G, Lâm DĐ. 2012. Pliocene-to-present morphotectonics of the Dien Bien Phu fault in northwest Vietnam. Geomorphology 173:52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Dan NT. 2005. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the lai chau province of vietnam: Focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environ Geol. 48(6):778–787.
   Google Scholar
• Marjanović M, Kovačević M, Bajat B, Voženílek V. 2011. Landslide susceptibility assessment using svm machine learning algorithm. Eng Geol. 123(3):225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezaal M, Pradhan B, Rizeei H. 2018. Improving landslide detection from airborne laser scanning data using optimized dempster–shafer. Remote Sens. 10(7):1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheletti N, Foresti L, Robert S, Leuenberger M, Pedrazzini A, Jaboyedoff M, Kanevski M. 2014. Machine learning feature selection methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Math Geosci. 46(1):33–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraki S, Zanganeh SH, Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Pham BT. 2019. Mapping groundwater potential using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Water Resour Manage. 33(1):281–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed WNHW, Salleh MNM, Omar AH. 2012. A comparative study of reduced error pruning method in decision tree algorithms. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on IEEE control system, computing and engineering (ICCSCE). IEEE; p. 392–397.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi SZ, Kavian A, Soleimani K, Mousavi SR, Shirzadi A. 2011. Gis-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using logistic regression model. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 2(1):33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhung BT, Phuong NH, Nam NT. 2017. Assessment of earthquake-induced ground liquefaction susceptibility for Hanoi city using geological and geomorphologic characteristics. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 39(2):139–154.
   Google Scholar
• Nhung BT, Phuong NH, Nam NT. 2018. Assessment of earthquake-induced liquefaction hazard in urban areas of Hanoi city using LPI-based method. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 40(1):78–96.
   Google Scholar
• Nohani E, Moharrami M, Sharafi S, Khosravi K, Pradhan B, Pham BT, Lee S, Melesse AM. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping using different GIS-based bivariate models. Water 11(7):1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh H-J, Lee S. 2011. Landslide susceptibility mapping on Panaon island, Philippines using a geographic information system. Environ Earth Sci. 62(5):935–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petley D. 2010. Landslide hazards. Geomorphological hazards and disaster prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Petley D. 2012. Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40(10):927–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT. 2018. A novel classifier based on composite hyper-cubes on iterated random projections for assessment of landslide susceptibility. J Geol Soc India 91(3):355–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Bui DT, Dholakia M, Prakash I, Pham HV, Mehmood K, Le HQ. 2017. A novel ensemble classifier of rotation forest and naïve Bayer for landslide susceptibility assessment at the Luc Yen district, Yen Bai province (Vietnam) using GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):649–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Prakash I, Bui DT. 2018. A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the multiboost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(4):2865–2886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Prakash I, Bui DT. 2019a. A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the multiboost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(4):2865–2886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Prakash I, Singh SK, Quoc NK, Bui DT. 2019b. Hybrid computational intelligence models for groundwater potential mapping. Catena 182:104101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Nguyen MD, Dao DV, Prakash I, Ly H-B, Le T-T, Ho LS, Nguyen KT, Ngo TQ, Hoang V, et al. 2019c. Development of artificial intelligence models for the prediction of compression coefficient of soil: an application of Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. Sci Tot Environ. 679:172–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Pradhan B, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia M. 2016. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Softw. 84:240–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I. 2017. A novel hybrid model of bagging-based naïve Bayes trees for landslide susceptibility assessment. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I. 2019a. Evaluation and comparison of logitboost ensemble, fisher’s linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression and support vector machines methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 34(3):316–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I. 2019b. A novel hybrid model of bagging-based naïve Bayes trees for landslide susceptibility assessment. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(3):1911–1925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Dou J, Singh SK, Trinh PT, Trung Tran H, Minh Le T, Tran VP, Kim Khoi D, Shirzadi A. 2018a. A novel hybrid approach of landslide susceptibility modeling using rotation forest ensemble and different base classifiers. Geocarto Int. 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Singh SK, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Tran T-T-T, Bui DT. 2019d. Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: hybrid machine learning approaches. Catena 175:203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Omidvar E, Singh SK, Sahana M, Asl DT, Ahmad BB, Quoc NK, Lee S.. 2019e. Landslide susceptibility assessment by novel hybrid machine learning algorithms. Sustainability. 11(6):4386.
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Prakash I. 2018b. Landslide susceptibility modelling using different advanced decision trees methods. Civil Eng Environ Syst. 35(1–4):139–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using gis. Comput Geosci. 51:350–365.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2019. Artificial intelligence and spatial modelling in natural hazards and environmental applications. Advances in remote sensing and geo informatics applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer; p. 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Mezaal MR. 2017. Optimized rule sets for automatic landslide characteristic detection in a highly vegetated forests. Laser scanning applications in landslide assessment. Berlin, Germany: Springer; p. 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR. 1987. Simplifying decision trees. Int J Man-Mach Stud. 27(3):221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart DE, Mcclelland JL. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saha A, Gupta R, Arora M. 2002. Gis-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) valley, himalayas. Int J Remote Sens. 23(2):357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabi H, Khezri S, Ahmad BB, Hashim M. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping at central Zab basin, Iran: A comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Catena 115:55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirzadi A, Bui DT, Pham BT, Solaimani K, Chapi K, Kavian A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I. 2017a. Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Environ Earth Sci. 76(2):60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Shahabi H, Solaimani K, Kavian A, Ahmad BB. 2017b. Rock fall susceptibility assessment along a mountainous road: an evaluation of bivariate statistic, analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio. Environ Earth Sci. 76(4):152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidle RC, Ochiai H. 2006. Landslides: processes, prediction, and land use. Water Resources Monograph Series. Washington (DC): American Geophysical Union.
   Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Taylor RW, Rahman MM, Pradhan B. 2018. Developing robust arsenic awareness prediction models using machine learning algorithms. J Environ Manage. 211:125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits GF, Jordaan EM. 2002. Improved svm regression using mixtures of Kernels. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN'02 (Cat. No. 02CH37290). Honolulu (HI): IEEE; p. 2785–2790.
   Google Scholar
• Son PQ, Anh ND. 2016. Evolution of the coastal zone in Hai Hau district (Nam Dinh province) and nearest region over the last 100 years based on analysis topographic maps and multi-temporal remote sensing data. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 38(1):118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Talebi A, Uijlenhoet R, Troch PA. 2007. Soil moisture storage and hillslope stability. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 7(5):523–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeh SVR, Khosravi K, Sartaj M, Keesstra SD, Tsai FT-C, Dijksma R, Pham BT. 2019. Optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for groundwater potential mapping. Hydrogeol J. 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai TH, Thao NP, Dieu BT. 2017. Assessment and simulation of impacts of climate change on erosion and water flow by using the soil and water assessment tool and GIS: case study in upper Cau river basin in Vietnam. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 39(4):376–392.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Xu C, Hong H, Zhou Q, Wang D. 2019. Mapping earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility by use of artificial neural network (ann) models: AN example of the 2013 Minxian (China) mw 5.9 event. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 10(1):1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Pham BT, Nguyen QP, Hoang N-D. 2016. Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using hybrid integration approach of least squares support vector machines and differential evolution optimization: a case study in central Vietnam. Int J Digital Earth 9(11):1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I. 2012. Landslide susceptibility assessment in vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and naive Bayes models. Math Prob Eng. 2012:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Alizadeh M, Chen W, Mohammadi A, Ahmad B, Panahi M, Hong H, Tian Y. 2018. Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping by Airsar data using support vector machine and index of entropy models in Cameron highlands, Malaysia. Remote Sens. 10(10):1527.
   Google Scholar
• Van Duan B, Duong NA. 2017. The relation between fault movement potential and seismic activity of major faults in northwestern Vietnam. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 39(3):240–255.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hung N, Vinh HQ, Huong NV. 2016. Tectono-structural system and geodynamic features of northwest Vietnam in the late cenozoic period. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 38(1):38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liem N, Dat NP, Dieu BT, Van Phai V, Trinh PT, Vinh HQ, Van Phong T. 2016a. Assessment of geomorphic processes and active tectonics in Con Voi mountain range area (northern Vietnam) using the hypsometric curve analysis method. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 38(2):202–216.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liem N, Trinh PT, Vinh HQ, Van Huong N, Quan NC, Van Phong T, Dat NP. 2016b. Analyze the correlation between the geomorphic indices and recent tectonic active of the Lo river fault zone in southwest of Tam Dao range. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 38(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Van Thanh N, Le DT, Thinh NA, Lan TD, Hens L. 2017. Shifting challenges for coastal green cities. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 39(2):109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. 1995. In: Jordan M, Lauritzen SL, Lawless JL, Nair V, editors. The nature of statistical learning theory. NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Shi P, Jiang P, Hu J, Qu S, Chen X, Chen Y, Dai Y, Xiao Z. 2017. Application of bp neural network algorithm in traditional hydrological model for flood forecasting. Water 9(1):48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Liang S, Gui X, Xie Y, Zhao H. 2018. Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kongtong district, NW China: comparing the subdivision criteria of factors. Geocarto Int. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao X, Tham L, Dai F. 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 101(4):572–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz I. 2010. Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci. 61(4):821–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (mlp) and radial basic function (rbf) algorithms. Arab J Geosci. 6(8):2873–2888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Yin K, Cao Y, Ahmed B. 2016. Application of time series analysis and pso–svm model in predicting the Bazimen landslide in the three gorges reservoir, China. Eng Geol. 204:108–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Yin K, Cao Y, Ahmed B, Fu X. 2018. A novel method for landslide displacement prediction by integrating advanced computational intelligence algorithms. Sci Rep. 8(1):7287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar