Semi-empirical model for upscaling leaf spectra (SEMULS): a novel approach for modeling canopy spectra from in situ leaf reflectance spectra

References

• Alton PB, North P, Kaduk L, Los S. 2005. Radiative transfer modeling of direct and diffuse sunlight in a Siberian pine forest. J Geophys Res. 110(D23):34–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casa R, Jones HG. 2004. Retrieval of crop canopy properties: a comparison between model inversión from hyperspectral data and image classification. Int J Remote Sens. 25(6):1119–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiariello N. 1984. Leaf energy balance in the wet lowland tropics. In: Medina E, Mooney HA, and Vázquez-Yánes C. Physiological ecology of plants of the wet tropics. Tasks for vegetation science, 12. Boston: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; p. 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo R, Meroni M, Marchesi A, Busetto L, Rossini M, Giardino C, Panigada C. 2008. Estimation of leaf and canopy wáter content in polar plantations by means of hyperspectral índices and inverse modeling. Remote Sens Environ. 112(4):1820–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson TP, Curran PJ, Plummer SE. 1998. LIBERTY – modeling the effects of leaf biochemical concentration on reflectance spectra. Remote Sens Environ. 65(1):50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson TP, North PRJ, Plummer SE, Curran PJ. 2003. Forest ecosystem chlorophyll content: Implications for remotely sensed estimates of net primary productivity. Int J Remote Sens. 24(3):611–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pury DGG, Farquhar GD. 1997. Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant Cell Environ. 20(5):537–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demarez V, Gastellu-Etchegorry JP, Mougin E, Marty G, Proisy C, Dufrêne E, Le Dantec V. 1999. In: Ross J, editor. Seasonal variation of leaf chlorophyll content of a temperate forest. Inversion of the PROSPECT model. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 45–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gastellu-Etchegorry JP, Demarez V, Pinel V, Zagolski F. 1996. Modeling radiative transfer in heterogeneous 3-D vegetation canopies. Remote Sens Environ. 58(2):131–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Z‐M, Guo H‐Q, Zhao B, Zhang L‐Q. 2014. Plant invasion impacts on the gross and net primary production of the salt marsh on the eastern coast of China: insights from leaf to the ecosystem. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 120(1):169–186. VolumeIssuepp
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitelson AA, Gritz U, Merzlyak MN. 2003. Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. J Plant Physiol. 160(3):271–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemoud S, Verhoef W, Baret F, Bacour C, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Asner GP, François C, Ustin SL. 2009. PROSPECT SAIL models: a review of use for vegetation characterization. Remote Sensing of Environment. 113(1):S56–S66.
   Google Scholar
• Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Coppin P, Weiss M, Baret F. 2004. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination. Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agric For Meteorol. 121(1-2):19–35. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempeneers P, Zarco‐Tejada PJ, North PRJ, de Backer S, Delalieux S, Sepulcre‐Cantó G, Morales F, van Aardt JAN, Sagardoy R, Coppin P, Scheunders P. 2008. Model inversion for chlorophyll estimation in open canopies from hyperspectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 29(17–18):5093–5111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moubasher MH, Abdel-Hafez SII, Abdel-Fattah HM, Mohanram AM. 1982. Direct estimation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. J Agric Res. 46:1467–1476.
   Google Scholar
• North PRJ. 1996. Three-dimensional forest light interaction model using a Monte Carlo method. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 34(4):946–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology. 44(2):322–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panigada C, Rossini M, Busetto L, Meroni M, Fava F, Colombo R. 2010. Chlorophyll concentration mapping with MIVIS data to assess crown discoloration in the Ticino Park oak forest. Int J Remote Sens. 31(12):3307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peracy RW. 2007. The response of plants to hetrogeneous light environments. In Pugnaire F, Valadares F, editors. Functional plant ecology. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; p. 2013–258.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto P, Pineda M, Aguilar M. 1999. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal Biochem. 269(2):337–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reji J, Nidamanuri RR, Ramiya AM, Moeckel T, Nautiyal S, Wachendorf M, Buerkert A. 2019. Multi-temporal estimation of biophysical parameters of vegetable crops at different levels of nitrogen using terrestrial laser scanner. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens. XXXVI-8/W2. (accepted).
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey TD, Singsaas EL, Vanderveer PJ, Geron C. 1996. Field measurements of isoprene emission from trees in response to temperature and light. Tree Physiol. 16(7):649–654. [PubMed]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoef W. 1984. Light scattering by leaf layers with applications to canopy reflectance model: the SAIL mode. Remote Sens Environ. 16(2):125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares F, Niinemets Ü. 2007. The architecture of plant crowns: from design rules to light capture and performance. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F, editors. Handbook of functional plant ecology, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; p. 101–149.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss M, Baret F, Smith GJ, Jonckheere I, Coppin P. 2004. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination. Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling. Agric For Meteorol. 121(1–2):37–53. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar