Use of SfM-MVS approach to nadir and oblique images generated throught aerial cameras to build 2.5D map and 3D models in urban areas

References

• Anguelov D, Dulong C, Filip D, Frueh C, Lafon S, Lyon R, Ogale A, Vincent L, Weaver J. 2010. Google street view: capturing the world at street level. Computer. 43(6):32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arza-García M, Gil-Docampo M, Ortiz-Sanz J. 2019. A hybrid photogrammetry approach for archaeological sites: block alignment issues in a case study (the Roman camp of A Cidadela). J Cult Herit. 38:195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arza-García M, Gil-Docampo M, Ortiz-Sanz J, Martínez-Rodríguez S. 2019. Virtual globes for UAV-based data integration: Sputnik GIS and Google Earth™ applications. Int J Digital Earth. 12(5):583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantino D, Angelini M G, Settembrini F. 2017. Point cloud management through the realization of the intelligent cloud viewer software. Int Arch Photogramm, Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 42: 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer M. 2001. On the use of direct geo-referencing in airborne photogrammetry. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology; Jan 3–5; Cairo, Egypt. Calgary: University of Calgary. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dold J, Flint D. 2007. Leica geosystems photogrammetric sensor and workflow developments. In: Fritsch D, editor. Photogrammetrische Woche 2007. Vol. 1. Heidelberg: Wichmann Verlag; p. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Everaerts J. 2008. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for remote sensing and mapping. Int Arch Photogramm. Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 37(2008):1187–1192.
   Google Scholar
• Falchi U. 2017. Spatial data: from cartography to geodatabase. Geodesy and Cartography. 43(4):142–146.
   Google Scholar
• Fischler M, Bolles R. 1987. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. In Readings in computer vision: issues. Problems, principles, and paradigms. p. 726–740.
   Google Scholar
• Gruen A, Spiess E. 1987. Point positioning and mapping with large format camera data. Geocarto Int. 2(2):3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hidayat H, Cahyono AB. 2016. Combined aerial and terrestrial images for complete 3D documentation of Singosari Temple based on Structure from Motion algorithm”. In. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 47(1) :012004. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Höhle J. 2013. Oblique aerial images and their use in cultural heritage documentation. Proc. Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Volume XL-5/W2, XXIV International CIPA Symposium, 2 – 6 September 2013, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hӧhle J. 2011. DEM generation by means of new digital aerial camera. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 38 (3/W22):185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JR, Cowen DC. 1999. Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 65:611–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe D. G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV. 60(2):91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle S, Harley I. 2007. Close range photogrammetry. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D, Falkner E. 2001. Aerial mapping: methods and applications. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann K, Welzenbach M, Timm M. 2016. CMOS imaging sensor technology for aerial mapping cameras. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 41(B1):69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen RC, Olsen RC. 2007. Remote sensing from air and space (Vol. 1). Bellingham: SPIE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlidis G, Koutsoudis A, Arnaoutoglou F, Tsioukas V, Chamzas C. 2007. Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. J Cult Herit. 8(1):93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-Villasenín S, Gil-Docampo M, Ortiz-Sanz J. 2017. 3-D modeling of historic façades using SFM photogrammetry metric documentation of different building types of a historic center. Int J Architect Herit. 11(6):871–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepe M. 2018. CORS architecture and evaluation of positioning by low-cost GNSS receiver. Geodesy Cartography. 44(2):36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pepe M. 2018a. Image-Based Methods for metric surveys of buildings using modern optical sensors and tools: from 2D approach to 3D and vice versa. Int J Civil Eng and Technol. 9(9):729–745.
   Google Scholar
• Pepe M, Fregonese L, Scaioni M. 2018. Planning airborne photogrammetry and remote-sensing missions with modern platforms and sensors. Eur J Remote Sens. 51(1):412–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepe M, Prezioso G. 2016. Two approaches for dense DSM generation from aerial digital oblique camera system. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management; April 26–27; Rome, Italy. p. 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Pepe M, Prezioso G, Santamaria R. 2015. Impact of vertical deflection on direct georeferencing of airborne images. Surv Rev. 47(340):71–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie G, Walker A. S. 2007. Airborne digital imaging technology: a new overview. Photogramm Record. 22(119):203–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarlatos D, Kiparissi S. 2012. Comparison of laser scanning, photogrammetry and SFM-MVS pipeline applied in structures and artificial surfaces. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 3:299–304.
   Google Scholar
• Sketchfab 2019. Your 3D content on web, mobile, AR, and VR. [accessed 2019 Aug 12]. https://sketchfab.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Snavely N. 2008. Scene reconstruction and visualization from internet photo collections [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Washington (DC): University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Tran G, Nguyen D, Milenkovic M, Pfeifer N. 2015. Potential of full waveform airborne laser scanning data for urban area classification-Transfer of classification approaches between missions. Int Arch Photogramm. Remote Sensd Spatial Inf Sci. 40(7):1317.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner R, Lieckfeldt P, Rothe R, Markram J. 2013. The Leica geosystems citymapper solution. In: Fritsch D, editor. Photogrammetric Week ’13. Stuttgart: Wichmann; p. 89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Steve S, Frank G. 2008. Pictometry’s proprietary airborne digital imaging system and its application in 3D city modelling. Int Arch Photogramm. Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 37(Part B1):1065–1070.
   Google Scholar
• Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM. 2012. Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology. 179:300–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Xie L, Hu H, Zhu Q, Yau E. 2018. Integration of aerial oblique imagery and terrestrial imagery for optimized 3D modeling in urban areas. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 139:119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar