A national fuel type mapping method improvement using sentinel-2 satellite data

References

• Alonso-Benito A, Arroyo LA, Arbelo M, Hernández-Leal P. 2016. Fusion of WorldView-2 and LiDAR data to map fuel types in the Canary Islands. Remote Sens. 8(8):669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Benito A, Arroyo LA, Arbelo M, Hernández-Leal P, González-Calvo A. 2013. Pixel and object-based classification approaches for mapping forest fuel types in Tenerife Island from ASTER data. Int J Wildland Fire. 22(3):306–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Benito A, Hernandez-Leal PA, Arbelo M, Gonzalez-Calvo A, Moreno-Ruiz JA, Garcia-Lazaro JR. 2016. Satellite image based methods for fuels maps updating. [Internet]. In: Neale CMU, Maltese A, editors. Edinburgh, United Kingdom; [accessed 2019 Sep 3]; p. 999821. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.2241990.
   Google Scholar
• Arellano-Pérez S, Castedo-Dorado F, López-Sánchez C, González-Ferreiro E, Yang Z, Díaz-Varela R, Álvarez-González J, Vega J, Ruiz-González A. 2018. Potential of sentinel-2A data to model surface and canopy fuel characteristics in relation to crown fire hazard. Remote Sensing. 10(10):1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo L, Healey S, Cohen W, Cocero D, Manzanera JA. 2005. Regional fuel mapping using an object-oriented Classification of Quickbird imagery. Proceedings of Semana Geomática.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo LA, Healey SP, Cohen WB, Cocero D, Manzanera JA. 2006. Using object-oriented classification and high-resolution imagery to map fuel types in a Mediterranean region. J Geophys Res. 111, p. G04S04.doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000120
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo LA, Pascual C, Manzanera JA. 2008. Fire models and methods to map fuel types: the role of remote sensing. For Ecol Manage. 256(6):1239–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz M, Benz U, Dehghani S, Heynen M, Höltje A, Hofmann P, Lingenfelder I, Mimler M, Sohlbach M, Weber M. 2004. eCognition professional user guide 4. Definiens Imaging, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Baatz M, Schäpe A. 2000. Multiresolution Segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Boschetti M, Stroppiana D, Brivio PA. 2010. Mapping burned areas in a mediterranean environment using soft integration of spectral indices from high-resolution satellite images. Earth Interact. 14(17):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butsic V, Kelly M, Moritz M. 2015. Land use and wildfire: a review of local interactions and teleconnections. Land. 4(1):140–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuvieco E, Riaño D, Van Wagtendok J, Morsdof F. 2003. Fuel loads and fuel type mapping. In: Wildland fire danger estimation and mapping: The role of remote sensing data. Singapore: World Scientific; p. 119–142.
   Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Green K. 2008. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Rigo D, Libertà G, H, Durrant T, A, Vivancos T, San-Miguel-Ayanz J. 2017. Forest fire danger extremes in Europe under climate change: variability and uncertainty. European Union: Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Delwart S. 2015. Sentinel-2 user handbook. European Space Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Dragozi E, Gitas I, Stavrakoudis D, Theocharis J. 2014. Burned area mapping using support vector machines and the FuzCoC feature selection method on VHR IKONOS imagery. Remote Sens. 6(12):12005–12036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftychidis G, Laneve G, Ferrucci F, Lopez AS, Lourenco L, Clandillon S, Tampellini L, Hirn B, Diagourtas D, Leventakis G. 2015. PREFER: a European service providing forest fire management support product. s. In: Third International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2015). Vol. 9535. [place unknown]: International Society for Optics and Photonics; p. 953517.
   Google Scholar
• Elhag M. 2017. Consideration of Landsat-8 Spectral Band Combination in Typical Mediterranean Forest Classification in Halkidiki, Greece. Open Geosciences [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Sep 11] 9(1). http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/geo.2017.9.issue-1/geo-2017-0036/geo-2017-0036.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Álvarez M, Armesto J, Picos J. 2019. LiDAR-Based Wildfire Prevention in WUI: The Automatic Detection, Measurement and Evaluation of Forest Fuels. Forests. 10(2):148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody GM. 2004. Thematic map comparison. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 70(5):627–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füssel H-M, Jol A, Marx A, Hildén M, Aparicio A, Bastrup-Birk A, Bigano A, Castellari S, Erhard M, Georgi B. 2017. Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016-An indicator-based report. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Gamon JA, Peñuelas J, Field CB. 1992. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sens. Environ. 41(1):35–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(92)90059-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García M, Saatchi S, Ustin S, Balzter H. 2018. Modelling forest canopy height by integrating airborne LiDAR samples with satellite Radar and multispectral imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 66:159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giakoumakis MN, Gitas Iz, San-Miguel J. 2002. Object-oriented classification modelling for fuel type mapping in the Mediterranean, using LANDSAT TM and IKONOS imagery—preliminary results. Forest Fires Research & Wildland Fire Safety Millpress, Rotterdam; p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gitas IZ, Mitri GH, Kazakis G, Ghosn D, Xanthopoulos G. 2006. Fuel type mapping in Anopolis, Crete by employing QuickBird imagery and object-based classification. For Ecol Manage. 234(1):S228.
   Google Scholar
• Gitelson A A, Merzlyak M N, Chivkunova O B. 2001. Optical Properties and Nondestructive Estimation of Anthocyanin Content in Plant Leaves¶. Photochem Photobiol. 74(1):38 doi:https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074<0038:OPANEO>2.0.CO;2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitelson A A, Merzlyak M N. 1997. Remote estimation of chlorophyll content in higher plant leaves. Int. J. Remote Sens. 18(12):2691–2697. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697217558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gounaridis D, Chorianopoulos I, Symeonakis E, Koukoulas S. 2019. A Random Forest-Cellular Automata modelling approach to explore future land use/cover change in Attica (Greece), under different socio-economic realities and scales. Sci Total Environ. 646:320–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isida D, Maria I. 2016. Fuel type classification in the Mediterranean basin context: state of the art and future research. IJESD. 7(7):546–552.
   Google Scholar
• Kalabokidis K, Palaiologou P, Gerasopoulos E, Giannakopoulos C, Kostopoulou E, Zerefos C. 2015. Effect of climate change projections on forest fire behavior and values-at-risk in Southwestern Greece. Forests. 6(12):2214–2240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman Y J, Tanré D. 1996. Strategy for direct and indirect methods for correcting the aerosol effect on remote sensing: From AVHRR to EOS-MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 55(1):65–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00193-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane RE. 2015. Wildland fuel fundamentals and applications [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; [accessed 2018 Jul 10]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-09015-3.
   Google Scholar
• Keane RE, Burgan R, van Wagtendonk J. 2001. Mapping wildland fuels for fire management across multiple scales: integrating remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical modeling. Int J Wildland Fire. 10(4):301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane RE, Mincemoyer SA, Schmidt KM, Long DG, Garner JL. 2000. Mapping vegetation and fuels for fire management on the Gila National Forest Complex, New Mexico. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-46-CD.
   Google Scholar
• Keane RE, Reeves M. 2012. Use of expert knowledge to develop fuel maps for wildland fire management. In: Expert knowledge and its application in landscape ecology. New York (NY): Springer; p. 211–228.
   Google Scholar
• Lamelas-Gracia MT, Riaño D, Ustin S. 2019. A LiDAR signature library simulated from 3-dimensional Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model to classify fuel types using spectral matching algorithms. GIScience Remote Sens. 56(7):988–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanorte A, Lasaponara R. 2008. Fuel type characterization based on coarse resolution MODIS satellite data. iForest. 1(1):60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanorte A, Lasaponara R. 2011. On the use of satellite remote sensing data to characterize and map fuel types. In: International conference on computational science and its applications. Santander, Spain: Springer; p. 344–353.
   Google Scholar
• Lasaponara R, Lanorte A, Pignatti S. 2006. Multiscale fuel type mapping in fragmented ecosystems: preliminary results from Hyperspectral MIVIS and Multispectral Landsat TM data. Int J Remote Sens. 27(3):587–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw J, Jia H, Yang L, Liu X, Schmidt K, Skidmore AK. 2006. Comparing accuracy assessments to infer superiority of image classification methods. Int J Remote Sens. 27(1):223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis J, Debaecker V, Pflug B, Main-Knorn M, Bieniarz J, Mueller-Wilm U, Cadau E, Gascon F. 2016. Sentinel-2 SEN2COR: L2A processor for users. In: Living planet symposium. Prague, Czech Republic; p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2015. LUCAS 2015 (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey). Technical reference document C1 Instructions for Surveyors. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/205002/6786255/LUCAS2015-C1-Instructions-20150227.pdf (14 July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Main-Knorn M, Pflug B, Louis J, Debaecker V, Müller-Wilm U, Gascon F. 2017. Sen2Cor for Sentinel-2. In: Bruzzone L, Bovolo F, Benediktsson JA, editors. Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXIII [Internet]. Warsaw, Poland: SPIE; [accessed 2019 Sep 13]. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/10427/2278218/Sen2Cor-for-Sentinel-2/10.1117/12.2278218.full.
   Google Scholar
• Mallinis G, Galidaki G, Gitas I. 2014. A comparative analysis of EO-1 Hyperion, Quickbird and Landsat TM imagery for fuel type mapping of a typical Mediterranean landscape. Remote Sensing. 6(2):1684–1704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinis G, Mitsopoulos ID, Dimitrakopoulos AP, Gitas IZ, Karteris M. 2007. Integration of local scale fuel type mapping and fire behavior prediction using high spatial resolution imagery. TOWARDS AN OPERATIONAL USE OF REMOTE SENSING IN FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT.:111.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer B, Kylling A. 2005. Technical note: The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations – description and examples of use. Atmos Chem Phys.:23.
   Google Scholar
• Mcfeeters S K. 1996. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int. J. Remote Sens. 17(7):1425–1432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608948714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill DF, Alexander ME. 1987. Glossary of forest fire management terms.
   Google Scholar
• Mutanga O, Adam E, Cho M A. 2012. High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 18:399–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Park Service (NPS). U.S. Department of the Interior USD of the I. Fire Terminology [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Feb 24]. https://www.fs.fed.us/nwacfire/home/terminology.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ng W-T, Rima P, Einzmann K, Immitzer M, Atzberger C, Eckert S. 2017. Assessing the Potential of Sentinel-2 and Pléiades Data for the Detection of Prosopis and Vachellia spp. in Kenya. Remote Sensing. 9(1):74 doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman LM, Middleton BR. 2018. Remote sensing analysis of vegetation at the San Carlos Apache Reservation, Arizona and surrounding area. J Appl Rem Sens. 12(02):1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira S, Félix F, Nunes A, Lourenço L, Laneve G, Sebastián-López A. 2018. Mapping wildfire vulnerability in Mediterranean Europe. Testing a stepwise approach for operational purposes. J Environ Manage. 206:158–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panajiotidis S, Papadopoulou ML. 2016. Human-landscape interactions in Halkidiki (NC Greece) over the last 3.5 millennia, revealed through palynological, and archaeological-historical archives. J Archaeolog Sci Rep. 7:138–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pausas JG, Keeley JE. 2009. A Burning Story: The Role of Fire in the History of Life. BioScience. 59(7):593–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson SH, Franklin J, Roberts DA, van Wagtendonk JW. 2013. Mapping fuels in Yosemite National Park. Can J for Res. 43(1):7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettinari ML, Chuvieco E. 2016. Generation of a global fuel data set using the Fuel Characteristic Classification System. Biogeosciences. 13(7):2061–2076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce AD, Farris CA, Taylor AH. 2012. Use of random forests for modeling and mapping forest canopy fuels for fire behavior analysis in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, USA. For Ecol Manage. 279:77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyne SJ. 1984. Introduction to wildland fire. Fire management in the United States. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Razali SM, Nurud AA. 2012. A method of mapping forest fuel types in peat swamp forest. African J Agric Res. 7(12):1901–1909.
   Google Scholar
• Reich RM, Lundquist JE, Bravo VA. 2004. Spatial models for estimating fuel loads in the Black Hills, South Dakota, USA. Int J Wildland Fire. 13(1):119–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.L. Pearson, L.D. Miller. 1972. Remote mapping of standing crop biomass for estimation of the productivity of the short-grass Prairie, Pawnee National Grasslands, ColoradoProc. 8th Int. Symp. on Remote Sens. of Environ., ERIM, Ann Arbor, MI .1357–1381.
   Google Scholar
• Romero Ramirez FJ, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Varo-Martínez MÁ, Quero JL, Doerr S, Hernández-Clemente R. 2018. Determination of forest fuels characteristics in mortality-affected Pinus forests using integrated hyperspectral and ALS data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 68:157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondeaux G, Steven M, Baret F. 1996. Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 55(2):95–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00186-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa MF, Stow DA. 2014. Mapping fuels at the wildland-urban interface using colour ortho-images and LiDAR data. Geocarto International. 29(5):570–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermel RC. 1983. How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires.
   Google Scholar
• Roujean J-L, Breon F-M. 1995. Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 51(3):375–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)00114-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse Jr JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW. 1973.  Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation of natural vegetation. NASA/GSFCT Type II Report, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Durrant T, Boca R, Liberta G, Branco A, de Rigo D, Ferrari D, Maianti P, A, Vivancos T, Pfeifer H, et al. 2019. Advance EFFIS report on forest fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2018.
   Google Scholar
• San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Moreno JM, Camia A. 2013. Analysis of large fires in European Mediterranean landscapes: lessons learned and perspectives. For Ecol Manage. 294:11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JH, Burgan RE. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model.
   Google Scholar
• Sesnie S, Eagleston H, Johnson L, Yurcich E. 2018. In-situ and remote sensing platforms for mapping fine-fuels and fuel-types in sonoran semi-desert grasslands. Remote Sens. 10(9):1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims D A, Gamon J A. 2002. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sens. Environ. 81(2-3):337–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00010-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavros EN, Coen J, Peterson B, Singh H, Kennedy K, Ramirez C, Schimel D. 2018. Use of imaging spectroscopy and LIDAR to characterize fuels for fire behavior prediction. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 11:41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanidou A, Dragozi E, Stavrakoudis D, Gitas IZ. 2018. Fuel type mapping using object-based image analysis of DMC and Landsat-8 OLI imagery. Geocarto Int. 33(10):1064–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker T. 2014. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumnall M, Fox TR, Wynne RH, Thomas VA. 2017. Mapping the height and spatial cover of features beneath the forest canopy at small-scales using airborne scanning discrete return Lidar. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 133:186–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanase MA, Gitas IZ. 2008. An examination of the effects of spatial resolution and image analysis technique on indirect fuel mapping. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 1(4):220–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompoulidou M, Stefanidou A, Grigoriadis D, Dragozi E, Stavrakoudis D, Gitas IZ. 2016. The Greek National Observatory of Forest Fires (NOFFi). In: Fourth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2016). Vol. 9688. Cyprus: International Society for Optics and Photonics; p. 96880N.
   Google Scholar
• Toukiloglou P, Eftychidis G, Gitas I, Tompoulidou M. 2013. ArcFuel methodology for mapping forest fuels in Europe. In: First International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2013). Vol. 8795. International Society for Optics and Photonics; p. 87951J.
   Google Scholar
• US Wildland Fire Leadership Council. 2004. Strategic issues panel on fire suppression costs. Large fire suppression costs: strategies for cost management. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wagtendonk JW, Root RR. 2003. The use of multi-temporal Landsat Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data for mapping fuel models in Yosemite National Park, USA. Int J Remote Sens. 24(8):1639–1651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga TA, Asner GP. 2008. Hyperspectral and LiDAR remote sensing of fire fuels in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Ecol Appl. 18(3):613–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Ow CF, Heathcott M, Milne D, McCaffrey TM, Ghitter G, Franklin SE. 1994. Landsat MSS classification of fire fuel types in Wood Buffalo National Park. Northern Canada. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett. 4(2):33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao-Rui T, McRae DJ, Li-Fu S, Ming-Yu W. 2005. Fuel classification and mapping from satellite imagines. J Res. 16(4):311–316.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon Y-S, Kim Y-S. 2007. Application of hyperion hyperspectral remote sensing data for wildfire fuel mapping. Korean J Remote Sens. 23(1):21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Gong P, Clinton N, Biging G, Kelly M, Schirokauer D. 2006. Object-based detailed vegetation classification with airborne high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 72(7):799–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Liu D. 2014. Accurate mapping of forest types using dense seasonal Landsat time-series. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 96:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar