Assessing the suitability of GlobeLand30 for land cover mapping and sustainable development in Malaysia using error matrix and unbiased area Estimation

References

• Aina YA, Adam E, Ahmed F, Wafer A, Alshuwaikhat HM. 2019. Using multisource data and the VIS model in assessing the urban expansion of Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Eur J Remote Sens. 52(1):557–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsanjani JJ. 2018. Characterizing, monitoring, and simulating land cover dynamics using GlobeLand30: a case study from 2000 to 2030. J Environ Manage. 214:66–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsanjani JJ, Tayyebi A, Vaz E. 2016. GlobeLand30 as an alternative fine-scale global land cover map: challenges, possibilities, and implications for developing countries. Habitat Int. 55:25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonato M, Cian F, Giupponi C. 2019. Combining LULC data and agricultural statistics for a better identification and mapping of high nature value farmland: a case study in the veneto Plain, Italy. Land Use Policy. 83:488–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brovelli MA, Molinari ME, Hussein E, Chen J, Li R. 2015. The first comprehensive accuracy assessment of GlobeLand30 at a national level: methodology and results. Remote Sens. 7(4):4191–4212.
   Google Scholar
• CCI-LC. 2014. CCI-LC product user guide. Belgium: UCL-Geomatics.
   Google Scholar
• Cegielska K, Noszczyk T, Kukulska A, Szylar M, Hernik J, Dixon-Gough R, Jombach S, Valánszki I, Kovács KF. 2018. Land use and land cover changes in post-socialist countries: some observations from Hungary and Poland. Land Use Policy. 78:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Chen J, Liao A, Cao X, Chen L, Chen X, He C, Han G, Peng S, Lu M, et al. 2015. Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 103:7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Wang K, Van de Voorde T, Tang TF. 2017a. Mapping urban land cover from high spatial resolution hyperspectral data: An approach based on simultaneously unmixing similar pixels with jointly sparse spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens Environ. 196:324–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Cao X, Peng S, Ren H. 2017b. Analysis and applications of GlobeLand30: a review. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 6(8):230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber AJ, Wadsworth RA, Fisher PF. 2008. Using semantics to clarify the conceptual confusion between land cover and land use: the example of ‘forest’. J Land Use Sci. 3(2–3):185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny P, Mayaux P, Herold M, Bontemps S. 2012. Global land-cover map validation experiences remote sensing of land use and land cover. CRC Press. p. 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Estoque RC, Pontius RG, Murayama Jr Y, Hou H, Thapa RB, Lasco RD, Villar MA. 2018. Simultaneous comparison and assessment of eight remotely sensed maps of Philippine forests. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 67:123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Yu G, He Z, Yu H, Bai R, Yang L, Wu D. 2017. Entropies of the Chinese land use/cover change from 1990 to 2010 at a county level. Entropy. 19(2):51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JR, Acosta EA, Dennedy-Frank PJ, Kroeger T, Boucher TM. 2018. Impact of satellite imagery spatial resolution on land use classification accuracy and modeled water quality. Remote. Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 4(2):137–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, Phalan B. 2008. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity?. Trends Ecol Evol. 23(10):538–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonte CC, Minghini M, Patriarca J, Antoniou V, See L, Skopeliti A. 2017. Generating up-to-date and detailed land use and land cover maps using OpenStreetMap and GlobeLand30. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inform. 6(4):125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A, Huang X. 2010. MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ. 114(1):168–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz S, See L, McCallum I, Schill C, Obersteiner M, Van der Velde M, Boettcher H, Havlík P, Achard F. 2011. Highlighting continued uncertainty in global land cover maps for the user community. Environ Res Lett. 6(4):044005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaitanis A, Kalogeropoulos K, Detsis V, Chalkias C. 2015. Monitoring 60 years of land cover change in the Marathon Area, Greece. Land. 4(2):337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondwe MF, Cho MA, Chirwa PW, Geldenhuys CJ. 2019. Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018). J Land Use Sci. 14(4–6):225–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong P, Wang J, Yu L, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Liang L, Niu Z, Huang X, Fu H, Liu S, et al. 2013. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM + data. Int J Remote Sens. 34(7):2607–2654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Lee E, Warner TA. 2017. A time series of annual land use and land cover maps of China from 1982 to 2013 generated using AVHRR GIMMS NDVI3g data. Remote Sens Environ. 199:201–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazak J. 2018. The use of a decision support system for sustainable urbanization and thermal comfort in adaptation to climate change actions-the case of the Wrocław Larger Urban Zone (Poland). Sustainability. 10(4):1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidane M, Bezie A, Kesete N, Tolessa T. 2019. The impact of land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics on soil erosion and sediment yield in Ethiopia. Heliyon. 5(12):e02981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagan P, Mannan S, Matsubayashi H. 2007. Sustainable use of tropical forests by reduced-impact logging in Deramakot Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia. In Sustainability and Diversity of Forest Ecosystems. Tokyo: Springer; p. 414–421.
   Google Scholar
• Laso Bayas JC, See L, Perger C, Justice C, Nakalembe C, Dempewolf J, Fritz S. 2017. Validation of automatically generated global and regional cropland data sets: the case of Tanzania. Remote Sens. 9(8):815.
   Google Scholar
• Liang L, Liu Q, Liu G, Li H, Huang C. 2019. Accuracy evaluation and consistency analysis of four global land cover products in the arctic region. Remote Sens. 11(12):1396.
   Google Scholar
• Loveland TR, Reed BC, Brown JF, Ohlen DO, Zhu Z, Yang L, Merchant JW. 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens. 21(6–7):1303–1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma LG, Deng JS, Yang H, Hong Y, Wang K. 2015. Urban landscape classification using Chinese advanced high-resolution satellite imagery and an object-oriented multi-variable model. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng. 16(3):238–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez YM, Coll DG, Aguayo M, Casas-Ledón Y. 2019. Effects of landcover changes on net primary production (NPP)-based exergy in south-central of Chile. Appl Geogr. 113:102101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMorrow J, Talip MA. 2001. Decline of forest area in Sabah, Malaysia: relationship to state policies, land code and land capability. Global Environ Chang. 11(3): 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed A, Worku H. 2020. Simulating urban land use and cover dynamics using cellular automata and Markov chain approach in Addis Ababa and the surrounding. Urban Clim. 31:100545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omran A, Schwarz-Herion O. 2020. Deforestation in Malaysia: the Current Practice and the Way Forward. In Sustaining our Environment for Better Future. Singapore: Springer; p. 175–193.
   Google Scholar
• Parvez IM, Aina YA, Balogun AL. 2019. The influence of urban form on the spatiotemporal variations in land surface temperature in an arid coastal city. Geocarto Int. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirker J, Mosnier A, Kraxner F, Havlík P, Obersteiner M. (2016). What are the limits to oil palm expansion?. Global Environ Chang. 40:73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Cai G, Zhao G, Li Z. 2018. Accuracy assessment of the GlobeLand30 dataset in Jiangxi Province. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 42(3):1481–1487.
   Google Scholar
• Roy A, Inamdar AB. 2019. Multi-temporal Land Use Land Cover (LULC) change analysis of a dry semi-arid river basin in western India following a robust multi-sensor satellite image calibration strategy. Heliyon. 5(4):e01478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupani PF, Singh RP, Ibrahim MH, Esa N. 2010. Review of current palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment methods: vermicomposting as a sustainable practice. World Appl. Sci. J.11(1): 70–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sallay A, Jombach S, Filepné KK. 2012. Landscape changes and function lost landscape values. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 10(2):157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt C, McCullum A. 2018. Assessing the accuracy of land cover classifications: unbiased area estimation. NASA’s Applied Remote Sensing Training Program. [accessed 2018 Oct]. https://arset.gsfc.nasa.gov/land/webinars/18adv-land-classification.
   Google Scholar
• See L, Laso Bayas J, Schepaschenko D, Perger C, Dresel C, Maus V, Salk C, Weichselbaum J, Lesiv M, McCallum I, et al. 2017. LACO-Wiki: a new online land cover validation tool demonstrated using GlobeLand30 for Kenya. Remote Sens. 9(7):754.
   Google Scholar
• Sun B, Chen X, Zhou Q. 2016. Uncertainty assessment of GlobeLand30 land cover data set over central Asia. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XLI-B8:1313–1317.
   Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Minaei M, Feng Y, Pontius RG. 2019. GlobeLand30 maps show four times larger gross than net land change from 2000 to 2010 in Asia. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 78:240–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevade VS, Loboda TV. 2019. Oil palm plantations in Peninsular Malaysia: determinants and constraints on expansion. PloS one, 14(2):e0210628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sory IT, Douglas AS, Hsiao-Chien S, John W, David L-C. 2018. Land cover and land use change analysis using multi-spatial resolution data and object-based image analysis. Remote Sens Environ. 210:259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straume K. 2014. The social construction of a land cover map and its implications for Geographical Information Systems (GIS) as a management tool. Land Use Policy. 39:44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symeonakis E. 2016. Modelling land cover change in a Mediterranean environment using Random Forests and a multi-layer neural network  model. 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS); Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Tirupathi C, Shashidhar T. 2020. Investigating the impact of climate and land-use land cover changes on hydrological predictions over the Krishna river basin under present and future scenarios. Sci Total Environ. 721:137736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsendbazar N-E, De Bruin S, Mora B, Schouten L, Herold M. 2016. Comparative assessment of thematic accuracy of GLC maps for specific applications using existing reference data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 44:124–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Li C, Ying Q, Cheng X, Wang XYi, Li X, Hu L, Liang L, Yu L, Huang H, et al. 2012. China’s urban expansion from 1990 to 2010 determined with satellite remote sensing. Chin Sci Bull. 57(22):2802–2812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Lu M, Wu W. 2018. A comparative analysis of five cropland datasets in Africa. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XLII-3:1863–1870.
   Google Scholar
• Yang B, Tong ST, Fan R. 2019. Sharpening land use maps and predicting the trends of land use change using high resolution airborne image: a geostatistical approach. Int J Appl Earth OBS, 79:141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Xiao P, Feng X, Li H. 2017. Accuracy assessment of seven global land cover datasets over China. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 125:156–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin H, Pflugmacher D, Li A, Li Z, Hostert P. 2018. Land use and land cover change in Inner Mongolia-understanding the effects of China’s re-vegetation programs. Remote Sens Environ. 204:918–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Woodcock CE. 2014. Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. Remote Sens Environ. 144:152–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar