Vertical stripe correction in Hyperion image using wavelet transformation and singular value decomposition (SVD)

References

• Anderson C, Naughton D, Brunn A, Thiele M. 2011, October. Radiometric correction of RapidEye imagery using the on-orbit side-slither method. In Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XVII. Vol. 8180. International Society for Optics and Photonics; p. 818008.
   Google Scholar
• Cao W, Wang K, Han G, Yao J, Cichocki A. 2018. A robust PCA approach with noise structure learning and spatial–spectral low-rank modeling for hyperspectral image restoration. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 11(10):3863–3879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Xu Z, Meng D. 2019b. Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification via robust low-rank feature extraction and Markov random field. Remote Sens. 11(13):1565.
   Google Scholar
• Cao C, Yu J, Zhou C, Hu K, Xiao F, Gao X. 2019a. Hyperspectral image denoising via subspace-based nonlocal low-rank and sparse factorization. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 12(3):973–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carp J. 2013. Optimizing the order of operations for movement scrubbing: Comment on Power et al. Neuroimage. 76:436–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Lin H, Shao Y, Yang L. 2006. Oblique striping removal in remote sensing imagery based on wavelet transform. Int J Remote Sens. 27(8):1717–1723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Qian S-E. 2008. Simultaneous dimensionality reduction and denoising of hyperspectral imagery using bivariate wavelet shrinking and principal component analysis. Can J Remote Sens. 34(5):447–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Qian S-E. 2009. Denoising and dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet packets, neighbour shrinking and principal component analysis. Int J Remote Sens. 30(18):4889–4895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Qian S-E. 2011. Denoising of hyperspectral imagery using principal component analysis and wavelet shrinkage. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 49(3):973–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datt B, Jupp DLB. 2004. Hyperion data processing workshop: hands-on processing instructions. Canberra: CSIRO Office of Space Science & Applications Earth Observation Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Fahimnejad H, Soofbaf SR, Alimohammadi A, Zoej MV. 2007. Crop type classification by Hyperion data and unmixing algorithm. In Hyderabad, India: GIS development, Map World Forum. http://www.geospatialworld.net/images/pdf/MWF_Poster_40.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Folkman MA, Pearlman J, Liao LB,Jarecke PJ. 2001. EO-1/Hyperion hyperspectral imager design, development, characterization, and calibration. In Proc. SPIE 4151, Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of the Land and Atmosphere, 8 February 2001. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417022
   Google Scholar
• Gasquet C, Witomski P. 2013. Fourier analysis and applications: filtering, numerical computation, wavelets. Vol. 30. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough DG, Dyk A, Niemann KO, Pearlman JS, Chen H, Han T, Murdoch M, West C. 2003. Processing Hyperion and ALI for forest classification. Geosci Remote Sens IEEE Trans. 41(6):1321–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han T, Goodenough DG, Dyk A, Love J. 2002. Detection and correction of abnormal pixels in Hyperion images. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS’02. Vol. 3, IEEE; p. 1327–1330. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1026105.
   Google Scholar
• Jia J, Wang Y, Cheng X, Yuan L, Zhao D, Ye Q, Zhuang X, Shu R, Wang J. 2019. Destriping algorithms based on statistics and spatial filtering for visible-to-thermal infrared pushbroom hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 57(6):4077–4091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupp DLB, Datt B, Lovell J, Campbell S, King E. 2002. Discussions around Hyperion data: background notes for the Hyperion data users workshop. In: CSIRO EOC, Canberra, Australia. http://ftp://150.229.2.108/pub/djupp/Hyperion/Workshop/Minimal_Set/Documents/Hyp_Wsn.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Letexier D, Bourennane S, Blanc-Talon J. 2008. Nonorthogonal tensor matricization for hyperspectral image filtering. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 5(1):3–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Zhong R, Wang Y. 2019. A method for the destriping of an orbita hyperspectral image with adaptive moment matching and unidirectional total variation. Remote Sens. 11(18):2098.
   Google Scholar
• Liu N, Li W, Tao R, Fowler JE. 2019. Wavelet-domain low-rank/group-sparse destriping for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 57(12):10310–10321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu N, Li W, Tao R, Fowler JE, Yang L. 2019, September. Hyperspectral stripes removal with wavelet-domain low-rank/group-sparse decomposition. In 2019 10th Workshop on Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). IEEE; pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mallat SG. 1999. A wavelet tour of signal processing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://www.engineeringvillage.com/controller/servlet/OpenURL?genre=book&isbn=9780124666061
   Google Scholar
• Münch B, Trtik P, Marone F, Stampanoni M. 2009. Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined wavelet-Fourier filtering. Opt Express. 17(10):8567–8591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie B, Yang L, Jing J, Zhou J. 2018. Hyperspectral image destriping method based on time-frequency joint processing method. Optik. 172:317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman H, Qian S-E. 2006. Noise reduction of hyperspectral imagery using hybrid spatial-spectral derivative-domain wavelet shrinkage. Geosci Remote Sens IEEE Trans. 44(2):397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozaktas HM, Barshan B, Mendlovic D, Onural L. 1994. Convolution, filtering, and multiplexing in fractional Fourier domains and their relation to chirp and wavelet transforms. J Opt Soc Am A. 11(2):547–559.
   Google Scholar
• Pan C, Tan K, Du Q, Yan Q, Ding J. 2016, August. Hyperspectral image destriping using unmixing-based kriging interpolation. In 2016 8th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). IEEE; pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pande-Chhetri R, Abd-Elrahman A. 2011. De-striping hyperspectral imagery using wavelet transform and adaptive frequency domain filtering. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 66(5):620–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman J, Segal C, Clancy P, Nelson N, Jarecke P, Ono M, Beiso D, Liao L, Yokoyama K, Carman S. 2001. The EO-1 Hyperion imaging spectrometer. In IEEE Aerospace Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Rudin LI, Osher S, Fatemi E. 1992. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference of the Center for Nonlinear Studies on Experimental Mathematics: Computational Issues in Nonlinear Science: Computational Issues in Nonlinear Science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.; p. 259–268. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=142269.142312.
   Google Scholar
• Sun YJ, Huang TZ, Ma TH, Chen Y. 2019. Remote sensing image stripe detecting and destriping using the joint sparsity constraint with iterative support detection. Remote Sens. 11(6):608.
   Google Scholar
• Sun L, Neville R, Staenz K, White HP. 2008. Automatic destriping of Hyperion imagery based on spectral moment matching. Can J Remote Sens. 34(sup1):S68–S81. doi: 10.5589/m07-067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Sun J, Xu Z, Shum H-Y. 2008. Image super-resolution using gradient profile prior. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008; pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Tang YY, Zou C, Yang L. 2017, June. Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image destriping using sparse learning and spatial unidirection prior. In 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF). IEEE; pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Xu D, Sun L, Luo J. 2013, January. Denoising of hyperspectrl remote sensing image using multiple linear regression and wavelet shrinkage. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information, Business and Education Technology, ICIBET-13; pp. 1951–6851.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Fang H, Lu C, Wang S, Zuo Z, Hu J. 2015. Robust destriping of MODIS and hyperspectral data using a hybrid unidirectional total variation model. Optik. 126(7–8):838–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar