Crowdsourcing-based application to solve the problem of insufficient training data in deep learning-based classification of satellite images

References

• Agravat RR, Raval MS. 2018. Deep learning for automated brain tumor segmentation in mri images. In: Nilanjan D, Amira SA, Fuqian S, Valentina EB, editors. Soft computing based medical image analysis. United Kingdom: Academic Press; p. 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Arel I, Rose DC, Karnowski TP. 2010. Deep machine learning a new frontier in artificial intelligence research. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 5 (4):13–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolotto M, Mcardle G, Schoen-Phelan B. 2020. Volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information: the OpenStreetMap project. J Spatial Info Sci. 20:65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Weng Q, Resch B. 2011. Collective sensing: integrating geospatial technologies to understand urban systems—an overview. Remote Sens. 3 (8):1743–1776.
   Google Scholar
• Certoma C, Corsini F, Rizzi F. 2015. Crowdsourcing urban sustainability. Data, people and technologies in participatory governance. Futures. 74:93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi M, Sun Z, Qin Y, Shen J, Benediktsson JA. 2017. A novel methodology to label urban remote sensing images based on location-based social media photos. Proc IEEE. 105(10):1926–1936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clery D. 2011. Galaxy Zoo volunteers share pain and glory of research. Science. 333 (6039):173–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Luz EFP, Correa FR, González DL, Grey F, Ramos FM. 2014. The forestwatchers: a citizen cyberscience project for deforestation monitoring in the tropics. Hum Comput. 1(2):137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz S, McCallum I, Schill C, Perger C, Grillmayer R, Achard F, Kraxner F, Obersteiner M. 2009. Geo-Wiki. Org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens. 1(3):345–354.
   Google Scholar
• Honarparvar S, Forouzandeh Jonaghani R, Alesheikh AA, Atazadeh B. 2019. Improvement of a location-aware recommender system using volunteered geographic information. Geocarto Int. 34(13):1496–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe J. 2006 Jun. The rise of crowdsourcing, wired. [accessed 2019 November 10]. www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html
   Google Scholar
• Jokar AJ, Bakillah M. 2015. Understanding the potential relationship betweenthe socio-economic variables and contributions to OpenStreetMap. Int.J. Digital Earth. 8 (11):861–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman F, Hüroğlu C, İmamoğlu M, Özcan BY, Kalkan Mİ, Hocaoğlu MA, Kurt B. 2015. Enterprise crowdsourcing platform for geospatial image analysis. In: 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE; p. 1813–1816.
   Google Scholar
• Karathanassi V, Kolokousis P, Ioannidou S. 2007. A comparison study on fusion methods using evaluation indicators. Int J Remote Sens. 28 (10):2309–2341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatib F, DiMaio F, Cooper S, Kazmierczyk M, Gilski M, Krzywda S, Zabranska H, Pichova I, Thompson J, Popović Z, et al. 2011. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 18(10):1175–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klonus S, Ehlers M. 2009. Performance of evaluation methods in image fusion. In: Information Fusion, 2009. FUSION’09. 12th international conference on Information Fusion, Seattle, WA: IEEE; p. 1409–1416.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan F, Kussul N, Adamenko T, Skakun S, Kravchenko O, Kryvobok O, Shelestov A, Kolotii A, Kussul O, Lavrenyuk A. 2013. Winter wheat yield forecasting in ukraine based on earth observation, meteorological data and biophysical models. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 23 :192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolotii A, Kussul N, Shelestov A, Skakun S, Yailymov B, Basarab R, Ostapenko V. 2015 May. Comparison of biophysical and satellite predictors for wheat yield forecasting in Ukraine. In: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Berlin, Germany: Proceeding Book; p. 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, December, Lake Tahoe, NV: Proceeding Books; p. 1097–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Kussul N, Lavreniuk M, Skakun S, Shelestov A. 2017. Deep learning classification of land cover and crop types using remote sensing data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sensing Lett. 14 (5):778–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovici DG, Rosser JF, Hodges C, Evans B, Jackson MJ, Higgins CI. 2017. On data quality assurance and conflation entanglement in crowdsourcing for environmental studies. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 6(3):78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Liu L, Wang J, Zhao C, Wang R. 2004. Comparison of two methods of the fusion of remote sensing images with fidelity of spectral information. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS’04. Proceedings. IEEE International. Vol. 4. Anchorage, AK: IEEE; p. 2561–2564.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang H, Xue X, Jiang Y, Shen Q. 2018. Deep learning for remote sensing image classification. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Data Min Knowl Discovery. 8:6, e1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma D, Tang P, Zhao L. 2019. SiftingGAN: generating and sifting labeled samples to improve the remote sensing image scene classification baseline in vitro. IEEE Geosci Remote Sensing Lett. 16 (7):1046–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi N, Sedaghat A. 2019. A framework for classification of volunteered geographic data based on user’s need. Geocarto Int. 1–16. DOI:10.1080/10106049.2019.1641562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccardi MT. 2016. The power of crowdsourcing in disaster response operations. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 20:123–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saralıoğlu E, Görmüş ET, Güngör O. 2016 May 16–19. Mineral exploration with hyperspectral image fusion. In: 2016 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU), Zonguldak, Turkey: IEEE; p. 1281–1284.
   Google Scholar
• Saralioglu E, Gungor O. 2019. Use of crowdsourcing in evaluating post-classification accuracy. Eur J Remote Sens. 52(sup1):137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saralioglu E, Gungor O. 2020a. Crowdsourcing in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 8 (4):89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saralioglu E, Gungor O. 2020c. Semantic segmentation of land cover from high resolution multispectral satellite images by spectral-spatial convolutional neural network. Geocarto Int.DOI:10.1080/10106049.2020.1734871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saralioglu E, Gungor O. 2020b. Derin Öğrenme Amaçlı Etiketli Veri Üretimi İçin Bir Web Platformu. Turk J Remote Sens GIS. 1(10):24–33. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/rsgis/issue/50577/682018.
   Google Scholar
• Song J, Gao S, Zhu Y, Ma C. 2019. A survey of remote sensing image classification based on CNNs. Big Earth Data. 3 (3):232–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su W, Sui D, Zhang X. 2020. Satellite image analysis using crowdsourcing data for collaborative mapping: current and opportunities. Int J Digital Earth. 13(6):645–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldner F, Diakogiannis FI. 2020. Deep learning on edge: extracting field boundaries from satellite images with a convolutional neural network. Remote Sens Environ. 245:111741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welvaert M, Caley P. 2016. Citizen surveillance for environmental monitoring: combining the efforts of citizen science and crowdsourcing in a quantitative data framework. SpringerPlus. 5(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yaseen SG, Al Omoush KS. 2020. Mobile crowdsourcing technology acceptance and engagement in crisis management: the case of Syrian refugees. Int J Technol Human Interact. 16(3):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar