Modelling water richness in riparian flood plain wetland using bivariate statistics and machine learning algorithms and figuring out the role of damming

References

• Almuktar SA, Abed SN, Scholz M. 2018. Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 25(24):23595–23623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-sharif AA, Pradhan B. 2016. Spatio-temporal prediction of urban expansion using bivariate statistical models: assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and frequency ratio models. Appl Spat Anal Policy. 9(2):213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S. 2012. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci. 44:120–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardon M, Morse JL, Doyle MW, Bernhardt ES. 2010. The water quality consequences of restoring wetland hydrology to a large agricultural watershed in the southeastern coastal plain. Ecosystems. 13(7):1060–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora A, Pandey M, Siddiqui, MA, Hong H, Mishra VN. 2019. Spatial flood susceptibility prediction in Middle Ganga Plain: comparison of frequency ratio and Shannon's entropy models. Geocarto Int. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi A, Chauhan SS. 2011. Using AHP and Dempster–Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environ Model Softw. 26(6):787–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi N, Kumar MD, Sharma A, Pardha-Saradhi P. 2014. Status of wetlands in India: a review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 2:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Behnia P, Blais-Stevens A. 2018. Landslide susceptibility modelling using the quantitative random forest method along the northern portion of the Yukon Alaska Highway Corridor. Nat Hazards. 90(3):1407–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bein B. 2006. Entropy. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 20(1):101–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertassello LE, Jawitz JW, Aubeneau AF, Botter G, Rao PSC. 2019. Stochastic dynamics of wetland scapes: ecohydrological implications of shifts in hydro-climatic forcing and landscape configuration. Sci Tot Environ. 694:133765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borro M, Morandeira N, Salvia M, Minotti P, Perna P, Kandus P. 2014. Mapping shallow lakes in a large South American floodplain: a frequency approach on multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM data. J Hydrol. 512:39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregoli F, Crosato A, Paron P, McClain ME. 2019. Humans reshape wetlands: unveiling the last 100 years of morphological changes of the Mara Wetland, Tanzania. Sci Tot Environ. 691:896–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB. 2012. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena. 96:28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinaux F, Enenkl M, Giron F, Kemp T, Uhlich S, Sony Corp. 2020. Method, system and artificial neural network. U.S. Patent 10,564,923.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Hong H, Li S, Shahabi H, Wang Y, Wang X, Ahmad BB. 2019. Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles. J Hydrol. 575:864–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi C, Kim J, Han H, Han D, Kim HS. 2019. Development of water level prediction models using machine learning in wetlands: a case study of Upo Wetland in South Korea. Water. 12(1):93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou KP, Lin CT, Lin WC. June 2019. A self-adaptive artificial bee colony algorithm with local search for TSK-type neuro-fuzzy system training. In 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). IEEE; p. 1502–1509.
   Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Tot Environ. 651(Pt 2):2087–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLEAR 2002. Forest Fragmentation in Connecticut: 1985–2006. Center for Land Use Education and Research. University of Connecticut, Middlesex County Extension Centre, USA. http://clear.uconn.edu/projects/landscape/forestfrag. Accessed September 7, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland HE, Tessman SA, Girvetz EH, Roberts L, Enquist C, Orabona A, Patla S, Kiesecker J. 2010. A geospatial assessment on the distribution, condition, and vulnerability of Wyoming's wetlands. Ecol Indic. 10(4):869–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R. 2019. Flood susceptibility assessment by using bivariate statistics and machine learning models: a useful tool for flood risk management. Water Resour Manage. 33(9):3239–3256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ Change. 26:152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das AK, Pratihar DK. 2019. A novel approach for neuro-fuzzy system-based multi-objective optimization to capture inherent fuzziness in engineering processes. Knowledge-Based Syst. 175:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson NC. 2014. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res. 65(10):934–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debanshi S, Pal S. 2020a. Wetland delineation simulation and prediction in deltaic landscape. Ecol Indic. 108:105757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debanshi S, Pal S. 2020b. Modelling water richness and habitat suitability of the wetlands and measuring their spatial linkages in mature Ganges delta of India. J Environ Manage. 271:110956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deforet T, Marmonier P, Rieffel D, Crini N, Giraudoux P, Gilbert D. 2009. Do parafluvial zones have an impact in regulating river pollution? Spatial and temporal dynamics of nutrients, carbon, and bacteria in a large gravel bar of the Doubs River (France). Hydrobiologia. 623(1):235–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP. 2008. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. In Classic works of the Dempster–Shafer theory of belief functions. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer; p. 57–72
   Google Scholar
• Donchyts G, Schellekens J, Winsemius H, Eisemann E, Van de Giesen N. 2016. A 30 m resolution surface water mask including estimation of positional and thematic differences using landsat 8, srtm and openstreetmap: a case study in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Remote Sens. 8(5):386.
   Google Scholar
• Du J, Wu X, Wang Z, Li J, Chen X. 2020. Reservoir-induced hydrological alterations using ecologically related hydrologic metrics: case study in the Beijing River, China. Water. 12(7):2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du L, McCarty GW, Zhang X, Lang MW, Vanderhoof MK, Li X, Huang C, Lee S, Zou Z. 2020. Mapping forested wetland inundation in the Delmarva Peninsula, USA using deep convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 12(4):644.
   Google Scholar
• Duan G, Niu R. 2018. Lake area analysis using exponential smoothing model and long time-series Landsat images in Wuhan, China. Sustainability. 10(2):149.
   Google Scholar
• Duc NA, Nguyen LT, Thai TH, Khan A, Rautenstrauch K, Schmidt C. 2020. Assessing cumulative impacts of the proposed Lower Mekong Basin hydropower cascade on the Mekong River floodplains and Delta–overview of integrated modeling methods and results. J Hydrol. 581:122511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada GCD, Soares MLG, Fernadez V, de Almeida PMM. 2015. The economic evaluation of carbon storage and sequestration as ecosystem services of mangroves: a case study from southeastern Brazil. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Services Manage. 11(1):29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes MR, Aguiar FC, Martins MJ, Rivaes R, Ferreira MT. 2020. Long-term human-generated alterations of Tagus River: effects of hydrological regulation and land-use changes in distinct river zones. Catena. 188:104466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman M. 1937. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc. 32(200):675–701.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg R, Kalantari Z, Cvetkovic V, Mörtberg U, Deal B, Destouni G. 2017. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services. Sci Tot Environ. 593–594:599–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselink JG, Turner RE. 1978. Role of hydrology in freshwater wetland ecosystems. Freshw Wetlands. 1978:63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Ohman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I. 2013. Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature. 495(7441):305–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez ME, Marín-Muñiz JL, Moreno-Casasola P, Vázquez V. 2015. Comparing soil carbon pools and carbon gas fluxes in coastal forested wetlands and flooded grasslands in Veracruz, Mexico. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Services Manage. 11(1):5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali A. 2019. Evaluation and comparison of eight machine learning models in land use/land cover mapping using Landsat 8 OLI: a case study of the northern region of Iran. SN Appl Sci. 1(11):1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez Cisneros BE, Oki T, Arnell NW, Benito G, Cogley JG, Döll P, Jiang T, 2014. Mwakalila, SS. Freshwater resources. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel, ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL, editors. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 229–269.
   Google Scholar
• Karim F, Petheram C, Marvanek S, Ticehurst C, Wallace J, Hasan M. 2016. Impact of climate change on floodplain inundation and hydrological connectivity between wetlands and rivers in a tropical river catchment. Hydrol Process. 30(10):1574–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pourghasemi HR, Chapi K, Bahri M. 2016. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon’s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess. 188(12):656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopeć D, Michalska-Hejduk D, Krogulec E. 2013. The relationship between vegetation and groundwater levels as an indicator of spontaneous wetland restoration. Ecol Eng. 57:242–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornejady A, Ownegh M, Rahmati O, Bahremand A. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment using three bivariate models considering the new topo-hydrological factor: HAND. Geocarto Int. 33(11):1155–1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CN, Shao YH, Yin W, Liu MZ. 2020. Robust and sparse linear discriminant analysis via an alternating direction method of multipliers. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 31(3):915–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Nahayo L, Habiyaremye G, Christophe M. 2020. Applicability and performance of statistical index, certain factor and frequency ratio models in mapping landslides susceptibility in Rwanda. Geocarto Int. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Jiang W, Wang W, Chen Z, Ling Z, Lv J. 2020. Ecological risk assessment of the wetlands in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecol Indic. 117:106677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhang J, Zhang X, Xie S. 2014. Depth-related changes of sediment ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms in a high-altitude freshwater wetland. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 98(12):5697–5707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Xu N, Sun J, Wang XH, Yang F, Li S. 2019. Estimating water levels and volumes of lakes dated back to the 1980s using Landsat imagery and photon-counting lidar datasets. Remote Sens Environ. 232:111287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkowski P, Grygoruk M. 2017. Long-term downstream effects of a dam on a lowland river flow regime: case study of the Upper Narew. Water. 9(10):783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng L, Dong J. 2019. LUCC and ecosystem service value assessment for wetlands: a case study in Nansi Lake, China. Water. 11(8):1597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Nahlik AM, Mander Ü, Zhang L, Anderson CJ, Jørgensen SE, Brix H. 2013. Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landscape Ecol. 28(4):583–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed WNHW, Salleh MNM, Omar AH. 2012. November. A comparative study of reduced error pruning method in decision tree algorithms. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering. IEEE; p. 392–397.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal B, Dolui G, Pramanik M, Maity S, Biswas SS, Pal R. 2017. Urban expansion and wetland shrinkage estimation using a GIS-based model in the East Kolkata Wetland, India. Ecol Indic. 83:62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal D, Pal S. 2018. Monitoring dual-season hydrological dynamics of seasonally flooded wetlands in the lower reach of Mayurakshi River, Eastern India. Geocarto Int. 33(3):225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Mandal S. 2020. Data-driven evidential belief function (EBF) model in exploring landslide susceptibility zones for the Darjeeling Himalaya, India. Geocarto Int. 35(8):818–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi A, Ozturk P, Chau KW. 2018. Flood prediction using machine learning models: literature review. Water. 10(11):1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozumder C, Tripathi NK. 2014. Geospatial scenario based modelling of urban and agricultural intrusions in Ramsar wetland Deepor Beel in Northeast India using a multi-layer perceptron neural network. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform. 32:92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahayo L, Mupenzi C, Habiyaremye G, Kalisa E, Udahogora M, Nzabarinda V, Li L. 2019. Landslides hazard mapping in Rwanda using bivariate statistical index method. Environ Eng Sci. 36(8):892–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nampak H, Pradhan B, Abd Manap M. 2014. Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation. J Hydrol. 513:283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen H, Drebenstedt C, Bui XN, Bui DT. 2020. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration in an open-pit mine by a novel hybrid model based on clustering and artificial neural network. Nat Resour Res. 29(2):691–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohani E, Moharrami M, Sharafi S, Khosravi K, Pradhan B, Pham BT, Lee S, M Melesse A. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping using different GIS-based bivariate models. Water. 11(7):1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyarko BK. 2020. Wetland river flow interaction in a sedimentary formation of the White Volta Basin of Ghana. ESR. 9(1):15.
   Google Scholar
• Orimoloye IR, Kalumba AM, Mazinyo SP, Nel W. 2020. Geospatial analysis of wetland dynamics: wetland depletion and biodiversity conservation of Isimangaliso Wetland, South Africa. J King Saud Univ Sci. 32(1):90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Paul S. 2020. Assessing wetland habitat vulnerability in moribund Ganges delta using bivariate models and machine learning algorithms. Ecol Indic. 119:106866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Saha TK. 2018. Identifying dam-induced wetland changes using an inundation frequency approach: the case of the Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 18(1):66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Sarda R. 2020. Damming effects on the degree of hydrological alteration and stability of wetland in lower Atreyee River basin. Ecol Indic. 116:106542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Sarda R. 2021. Measuring the degree of hydrological variability of riparian wetland using hydrological attributes integration (HAI) histogram comparison approach (HCA) and range of variability approach (RVA). Ecol Indic. 120:106966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Talukdar S, Ghosh R. 2020. Damming effect on habitat quality of riparian corridor. Ecol Indic. 114:106300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S. 2016. Impact of water diversion on hydrological regime of the Atreyee river of Indo-Bangladesh. Int J River Basin Manage. 14(4):459–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paola JD, Schowengerdt RA. 1995. A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely-sensed multi-spectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 16(16):3033–3058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park NW. 2011. Application of Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence to GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis. Environ Earth Sci. 62(2):367–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Singh SK, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Tran T-T-T, Bui DT. 2019. Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: hybrid machine learning approaches. Catena. 175:203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piégay H, Bornette G, Citterio A, H⏧Rouin E, Moulin B, Statiotis C. 2000. Channel instability as a control on silting dynamics and vegetation patterns within perifluvial aquatic zones. Hydrol Process. 14(16–17):3011–3029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci. 51:350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR. 1987, January. Decision trees as probabilistic classifiers. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann; p. 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid T, Suzuki S, Sato H, Monsur MH, Saha SK. 2013. Relative sea-level changes during the Holocene in Bangladesh. J Asian Earth Sci. 64:136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabater S, Butturini A, Clement J-C, Burt T, Dowrick D, Hefting M, Matre V, Pinay G, Postolache C, Rzepecki M, et al. 2003. Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic gradient: patterns and factors of variation. Ecosystems. 6(1):0020–0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha TK, Pal S. 2019a. Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee river basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches. Ecol Indic. 98:251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha TK, Pal S. 2019b. Emerging conflict between agriculture extension and physical existence of wetland in post-dam period in Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain. 21(3):1485–1505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin EK, Colkesen I, Kavzoglu T. 2020. A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 35(4):341–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikhina T, Lowe D, Daga S, Briggs D, Higgins R, Khovanova N. 2019. Decision tree and random forest models for outcome prediction in antibody incompatible kidney transplantation. Biomed Signal Process Control. 52:456–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singha P, Das P, Talukdar S, Pal S. 2020. Modeling livelihood vulnerability in erosion and flooding induced river island in Ganges riparian corridor, India. Ecol Indic. 119:106825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A, Tetzlaff D, Gelbrecht J, Kleine L, Soulsby C. 2020. Riparian wetland rehabilitation and beaver re-colonization impacts on hydrological processes and water quality in a lowland agricultural catchment. Sci Tot Environ. 699:134302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Space Applications Centre (SAC), 2011. National wetland atlas.
   Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Pal S, Chakraborty A, Mahato S. 2020. Damming effects on trophic and habitat state of riparian wetlands and their spatial relationship. Ecol Indic. 118:106757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Pal S, Singha P. 2021. Proposing artificial intelligence based livelihood vulnerability index in river islands. J Clean Prod. 284:124707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Pal S. 2018. Impact of dam on flow regime and flood plain modification in Punarbhaba River Basin of Indo-Bangladesh Barind tract. Water Conserv Sci Eng. 3(2):59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Pal S. 2020. Modeling flood plain wetland transformation in consequences of flow alteration in Punarbhaba river in India and Bangladesh. J Clean Prod. 261:120767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur JK, Singh SK, Ekanthalu VS. 2017. Integrating remote sensing, geographic information systems and global positioning system techniques with hydrological modeling. Appl Water Sci. 7(4):1595–1608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Xu C, Hong H, Zhou Q, Wang D, 2019. Mapping earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility by use of artificial neural network (ANN) models: an example of the 2013 Minxian (China) Mw 5.9 event. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 10(1):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Omidavr E, Pham BT, Talebpour Asl D, Khaledian H, Pradhan B, Panahi M, et al. 2019. A novel ensemble artificial intelligence approach for gully erosion mapping in a semi-arid watershed (Iran). Sensors. 19(11):2444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toghraie D, Sina N, Jolfaei NA, Hajian M, Afrand M. 2019. Designing an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the viscosity of silver/ethylene glycol nanofluid at different temperatures and volume fraction of nanoparticles. Phys A. 534:122142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varin M, Theau J, Fournier RA. 2019. Mapping ecosystem services provided by wetlands at multiple spatiotemporal scales: a case study in Quebec, Canada. J Environ Manage. 246:334–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven JT, Arheimer B, Yin C, Hefting MM. 2006. Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol Evol. 21(2):96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa JA, Mitsch WJ. 2015. Carbon sequestration in different wetland plant communities in the Big Cypress swamp region of Southwest Florida. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Services Manage. 11(1):17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD. 2007. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecol. 22(2):171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Zhang S, Wang G, Han Q, Huang G, Wang H, Liu Y, Zhang Y. 2019. Quantitative assessment of the influences of three Gorges Dam on the water level of Poyang Lake, China. Water. 11(7):1519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lei X, Wen X, Fang G, Tan Q, Tian Y, Wang C, Wang H. 2019. Effects of damming and climatic change on the eco-hydrological system: a case study in the Yalong River, Southwest China. Ecol Indic. 105:663–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolson RF. 2007. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Wiley Encycl Clin Trials. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C, Chen W. 2020. Indicator system construction and health assessment of wetland ecosystem—Taking Hongze Lake Wetland, China as an example. Ecol Indic. 112:106164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Chen J, Xu J, Zeng G, Sang L, Liu Q, Yin Z, Dai J, Yin D, Liang J, et al. 2019. Effects of dam construction on biodiversity: a review. J Clean Prod. 221:480–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing J, Wang H, Luo K, Wang S, Bai Y, Fan J. 2019. Predictive single-step kinetic model of biomass devolatilization for CFD applications: a comparison study of empirical correlations (EC), artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forest (RF). Renew Energy. 136:104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS, Al-Katheeri MM. 2016. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Landslides. 13(5):839–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Liu S, Deng L, Dong S, Yang Z, Yang J. 2012. Landscape change and hydrologic alteration associated with dam construction. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 16:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Lou Y, Chen Y, Lin H, Li R, Yu G. 2019. Prediction of interfacial interactions related with membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor based on radial basis function artificial neural network (ANN). Bioresour Technol. 282:262–268.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Zhang G, Wu Y, Xu YJ, Dai C. 2019. Dam effects on downstream riparian wetlands: The Nenjiang River, Northeast China. Water. 11(10):2038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu AX, Miao Y, Wang R, Zhu T, Deng Y, Liu J, Yang L, Qin CZ, Hong H. 2018. A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena. 166:317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziaul S, Pal S. 2017. Estimating wetland insecurity index for Chatra wetland adjacent English Bazar Municipality of West Bengal. Spat Inform Res. 25(6):813–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar