Land use/land cover mapping from airborne hyperspectral images with machine learning algorithms and contextual information

References

• Akar A, Gökalp E, Akar Ö, Yılmaz V. 2017. Improving classification accuracy of spectrally similar land covers in the rangeland and plateau areas with a combination of WorldView-2 and UAV images. Geocarto Int. 32(9):990–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar Ö, Güngör O. 2015. Integrating multiple texture methods and NDVI to the Random Forest classification algorithm to detect tea and hazelnut plantation areas in northeast Turkey. Int J Remote Sens. 36(2):442–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akçay HG, Aksoy S. 2008. Automatic detection of geospatial objects using multiple hierarchical segmentations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 46(7):2097–2111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali MU, Ahmed S, Ferzund J, Mehmood A, Rehman A. 2017. Using PCA and factor analysis for dimensionality reduction of bio-informatics data. Int J Adv Comp Sci Appl. 8(5)1–12.
   Google Scholar
• AlSuwaidi A, Grieve B, Yin H. 2018. Combining spectral and texture features in hyperspectral image analysis for plant monitoring. Meas Sci Technol. 29(10):104001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anys H, Bannari A, He D, Morin D. 1994. Texture analysis for the mapping of urban areas using airborne meis-ii images. Proceedings of the First International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition. Vol. 3. p. 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Archer KJ, Kimes RV. 2008. Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures. Comput Stat Data Anal. 52(4):2249–2260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz M. 2000. Multi resolution segmentation: an optimum approach for high quality multi scale image segmentation. Beutrage Zum AGIT-Symposium. Salzburg, Heidelberg. p. 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Baysal G. 2013. Urban land use and land cover change analysis and modeling a case study area Malatya, Turkey [master’s thesis]. Münster (Germany): Institute for Geoinformatics (IFGI), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Benediktsson JA, Palmason JA, Sveinsson JR. 2005. Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 43(3):480–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2002. Manual on setting up, using, and understanding random forests V3.1. Vol. 1. Berkeley (CA): Statistics Department, University of California. p. 58.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Cutler A. 2005. Random forests. Berkeley. [accessed 2021 Sep 10]. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/∼breiman/RandomForests/
   Google Scholar
• Bülbül S, Köse A. 2010. Türkiye’de bölgeleraras i iç göç hareketlerinin çok boyutlu ölçekleme yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration. 39(1):75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-h. 2007. Image processing for remote sensing. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Jiang H, Li C, Jia X, Ghamisi P. 2016. Deep feature extraction and classification of hyperspectral images based on convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 54(10):6232–6251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comon P. 1994. Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process. 36(3):287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Green K. 2019. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; p. 328.
   Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Green K. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publications; p. 137.
   Google Scholar
• Cox MA, Cox TF. 2008. Multidimensional scaling. In Handbook of data visualization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. p. 315–347.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Mura M, Benediktsson JA, Waske B, Bruzzone L. 2010. Morphological attribute profiles for the analysis of very high resolution images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 48(10):3747–3762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Mura M, Fauvel M. 2014. Image analysis of hyperspectral data using mathematical morphology. Zenodo. http://prodinra.inra.fr/?locale=fr#!ConsultNotice:391260.
   Google Scholar
• Daugman JG. 1980. Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vision Res. 20(10):847–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir B, Ertürk S. 2009. Improving SVM classification accuracy using a hierarchical approach for hyperspectral images. 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). p. 2849–2852.
   Google Scholar
• Dronova I, Gong P, Wang L. 2011. Object-based analysis and change detection of major wetland cover types and their classification uncertainty during the low water period at Poyang Lake, China. Remote Sens Environ. 115(12):3220–3236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleyan A, Demirel H. 2011. Co-occurrence matrix and its statistical features as a new approach for face recognition. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 19(1):97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Envi user manuel. 2019. [accessed 2019 April 5]. https://www.harrisgeospatial.com/docs/backgroundtexturemetrics.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fauvel M, Benediktsson JA, Chanussot J, Sveinsson JR. 2008. Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 46(11):3804–3814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel I, Sagi D. 1989. Gabor filters as texture discriminator. Biol Cybern. 61(2):103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody GM. 2004. Thematic map comparison. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 70(5):627–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor D. 1946. Theory of communication. Part 1: the analysis of information. J Inst Electr Eng III. 93(26):429–441.
   Google Scholar
• Gao J. 2009. Digital analysis of remotely sensed imagery. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ghamisi P, Ali A-R, Couceiro MS, Benediktsson JA. 2015. A novel evolutionary swarm fuzzy clustering approach for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens. 8(6):2447–2456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghamisi P, Couceiro MS, Fauvel M, Benediktsson JA. 2014. Integration of segmentation techniques for classification of hyperspectral images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 11(1):342–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghamisi P, Couceiro MS, Martins FM, Benediktsson JA. 2014. Multilevel image segmentation based on fractional-order Darwinian particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 52(5):2382–2394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghamisi P, Plaza J, Chen Y, Li J, Plaza A. 2017. Advanced spectral classifiers for hyperspectral images: a review. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 5(1):8–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghamisi P, Yokoya N, Li J, Liao W, Liu S, Plaza J, Rasti B, Plaza A. 2017. Advances in hyperspectral image and signal processing: a comprehensive overview of the state of the art. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 5(4):37–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri C. 2016. Remote sensing of land use and land cover: principles and applications. CRC Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=uyjNBQAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Gormus ET, Akar O. 2019. Land use mapping of Bergama test area using headwall hyperspec VNIR images. International Symposium on Applied Geoinformatics. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gormus ET, Canagarajah N, Achim A. 2012. Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images using empirical mode decompositions and wavelets. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens. 5(6):1821–1830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghighat M. 2016. Gabor feature extraction-file exchange-MATLAB Central. December 10, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Haghighat M, Zonouz S, Abdel-Mottaleb M. 2015. Cloudid: trustworthy cloud-based and cross-enterprise biometric identification. Expert Syst Appl. 42(21):7905–7916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern. SMC-3(6):610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HGK. 2019. Harita Genel Komutanlɩğɩ veri taleb formu. HGK. https://www.harita.gov.tr/images/kurumsal/ec160682cb3586d.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu P-H. 2007. Feature extraction of hyperspectral images using wavelet and matching pursuit. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 62(2):78–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu M-K. 1962. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans Inf Theory. 8(2):179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imani M, Ghassemian H. 2016. GLCM, Gabor, and Morphology profiles fusion for hyperspectral image classification. 2016 24th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). p. 460–465.
   Google Scholar
• Landgrebe DA. 2005. Signal theory methods in multispectral remote sensing. Vol. 29. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and regression by random forest. R News. 2(3):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Melgani F, Bruzzone L. 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 42(8):1778–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavitha K, Arivazhagan S. 2010. Combined feature based hyperspectral image classification technique using support vector machines. Zenodo.
   Google Scholar
• Pal M. 2005. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int J Remote Sens. 26(1):217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaresi M, Benediktsson JA. 2001. A new approach for the morphological segmentation of high-resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 39(2):309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Jr, Millones M. 2011. Death to kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens. 32(15):4407–4429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodarmel C, Shan J. 2002. Principal component analysis for hyperspectral image classification. Surv Land Inf Sci. 62(2):115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Maaten L, Postma E, Herik JVd. 2009. Dimensionality reduction: a comparative review. J Mach Learn Res. 13:1066–1071.
   Google Scholar
• Watts JD, Powell SL, Lawrence RL, Hilker T. 2011. Improved classification of conservation tillage adoption using high temporal and synthetic satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 115(1):66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong AG, Pearce S. 2013. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. TQMP. 9(2):79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Yuan L, Wang S, Yu H, Zhang C, He D, Han G, Wang J, Wang Y. 2019. Wide swath and high resolution airborne hyperspectral imaging system and flight validation. Sensors. 19(7):1667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar