High-resolution land use and land cover change analysis using GEOBIA and landscape metrics: A case of Istanbul, Turkey

References

• Airbus Defence and Space. 2018. https://www.intelligence-airbusds.com/en/147-spot-6-7-satellite-imagery.
   Google Scholar
• Alawamy JS, Balasundram SK, Hanif AHM, Sung CTB. 2020. Detecting and analyzing land use and land cover changes in the region of Al-Jabal Al-Akhdar, Libya using time-series landsat data from 1985 to 2017. Sustainability. 12(11):4490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alganci U, Sertel E, Ozdogan M, Ormeci C. 2013. Parcel-level identification of crop types using different classification algorithms and multi-resolution imagery in Southeastern Turkey. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 79(11):1053–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alganci U, Kuru GN, Yay Algan I, Sertel E. 2019. Vineyard site suitability analysis by use of multicriteria approach applied on geo-spatial data. Geocarto Int. 34 (12):1286–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amarsaikhan D, Blotevogel HH, Ganzorig M, Moon TH. 2009. Applications of remote sensing and geographic information systems for urban land-cover change studies in Mongolia. Geocarto Int. 24(4):257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop M. 2001. The language of landscape ecologists and planners: A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landscape Urban Plann. 55(3):163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnavutkoy. bel. [accessed 2021 July 7]. https://www.arnavutkoy.bel.tr/arnavutkoy-hakkinda.
   Google Scholar
• Belgiu M, Dr Guţ L, Strobl J. 2014. Quantitative evaluation of variations in rule-based classifications of land cover in urban neighbourhoods using WorldView-2 imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 87(100):205–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object-based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65(1):2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Weng Q, Resch B. 2011. Collective sensing: Integrating geospatial technologies to understand urban systems—An overview. Remote Sens. 3(8):1743–1776.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G, Weng Q, Hay GJ, He Y. 2018. Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA): emerging trends and future opportunities. GISci & Remote Sens. 55(2):159–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman SA, McGarigal K, Neel MC. 2008. Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality, and consistency. Ecol Indic. 8(5):691–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drǎguţ L, Tiede D, Levick SR. 2010. ESP: a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data. Int J Geographical Information Sci. 24(6):859–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eCognition. 2017. Trimble eCognition© Developer 9.3 for Windows Operating System Referans Book Trimble. Germany (DE): Munich Press.
   Google Scholar
• EU—European Union. 2016. Mapping guide for a European Urban Atlas. [accessed 2020 December 20]. http://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/urban-atlas-mapping.guide.
   Google Scholar
• Forman RT. 1995. Land mosaics. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ge M, Fang S, Gong Y, Tao P, Yang G, Gong W. 2021. Understanding the correlation between landscape pattern and vertical urban volume by time-series remote sensing data: A case study of Melbourne. IJGI. 10(1):14.
   Google Scholar
• Gemitzi A, Albarakat R, Kratouna F, Lakshmi V. 2021. Land cover and vegetation carbon stock changes in Greece: A 29-year assessment based on CORINE and Landsat land cover data. Sci Total Environ. 786:147408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goksel C, Kaya S, Musaoglu N. 2021. Using satellite data for land use change detection: a case study for Terkos water basin, Istanbul. In Observing our environment from space. London: CRC Press; p. 299–302.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MD, Chen D. 2019. Segmentation for Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA): A review of algorithms and challenges from remote sensing perspective. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 150:115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkoom JN, Frank S, Greve K, Walz U, Fürst C. 2018. Suitability of different landscape metrics for the assessments of patchy landscapes in West Africa. Ecol Indic. 85:117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbarian Amiri B, Asgarian A, Sakieh Y. 2017. Introducing landscape accuracy metric for spatial performance evaluation of land use/land cover change models. Geocarto International. 32(11):1171–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe IT. 2002. Principal component analysis. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman C, Alkan G. 2018. Istanbul’s third airport in terms of transportation geography: geopolitics, regional and economic effects. PIJSS. 3(3):1252–1261.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi JD, Corstanje R, Harris JA. 2021. Understanding the importance of landscape configuration on ecosystem service bundles at a high resolution in urban landscapes in the UK. Landscape Ecol. 36(7):2007–2024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara A. 2017. Practical guide to principal component methods in R: PCA, M (CA), FAMD, MFA, HCPC, factoextra. (Vol. 2). [place unknown]: Sthda.
   Google Scholar
• Kotaridis I, Lazaridou M. 2021. Remote sensing image segmentation advances: A meta-analysis. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 173:309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupfer JA. 2012. Landscape ecology and biogeography: rethinking landscape metrics in a post-FRAGSTATS landscape. Prog Phys Geogr. 36(3):400–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamine S, Petropoulos GP, Singh SK, Szabó S, Bachari NEI, Srivastava PK, Suman S. 2018. Quantifying land use/land cover spatio-temporal landscape pattern dynamics from Hyperion using SVMs classifier and FRAGSTATS®. Geocarto Int. 33(8):862–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitao AB, Miller J, Ahern J, McGarigal K. 2006. Measuring landscapes, A Planner's Handbook. Washington (WA): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li E, EndterWada J, Li S. 2019. Dynamics of Utah's agricultural landscapes in response to urbanization: A comparison between irrigated and non-irrigated agricultural lands. Applied Geography. 105:58–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Reynolds JF. 1994. A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology. 75(8):2446–2455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Yang X. 2015. Monitoring land changes in an urban area using satellite imagery, GIS, and landscape metrics. Appl Geogr. 56:42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal K. 2002. Encyclopedia of environmetric. Chichester (UK): Wiley. Landscape pattern metrics; Vol. 2; p. 1135–1142.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Cushman S. 2005. Chapter 12, The gradient concept of landscape structure. In: Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 112–119.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E. 2015. FRAGSTAT S v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E. 2012. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal K. 2015. FRAGSTATs: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Amherst (USA): UMass Landscape Ecology Lab; [accessed 2019 April 15]. https://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats.help.4.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mears M, Brindley P, Jorgensen A, Ersoy E, Maheswaran R. 2019. Greenspace spatial characteristics and human health in an urban environment: An epidemiological study using landscape metrics in Sheffield, UK. Ecol Indic. 106:105464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller D, Morrice J, Anderson L, Durozard E, Fidalgo B, Fry G, … Horne P. 2005. Visualization tools for public participation in the management of landscape change. Final Report. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Motlagh ZK, Lotfi A, Pourmanafi S, Ahmadizadeh S, Soffianian A. 2020. Spatial modeling of land-use changes in a rapidly urbanizing landscape in central Iran: integration of remote sensing, CA-Markov, and landscape metrics. Environ Monit Assess. 192(11):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narumalani S, Mishra DR, Rothwell RG. 2004. Change detection and landscape metrics for inferring anthropogenic processes in the greater EFMO area. Remote Sens Environ. 91(3-4):478–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento FS, Gastauer M, Souza-Filho PWM, Nascimento WR, Santos DC, Costa MF. 2020. Land cover changes in open-cast mining complexes based on high-resolution remote sensing data. Remote Sensing. 12(4):611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wu J, Li W, Li Y. 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial patterns. Ecol Indic. 10(2):217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu R, Landry S, Yu Q. 2011. Object-based urban detailed land cover classification with high spatial resolution IKONOS imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 32(12):3285–3308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riitters KH, O'Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol. 10(1):23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal DR, Gedam SS. 2015. Monitoring land-use changes associated with urbanization: An object-based image analysis approach. Eur J Remote Sens. 48(1):85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sertel E, Akay SS. 2015. High-resolution mapping of urban areas using SPOT-5 images and ancillary data. Int J Environ Geoinformatics. 2(2):63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sertel E, Topaloğlu RH, Şallı B, Yay Algan I, Aksu GA. 2018. Comparison of landscape metrics for three different level land cover/land use maps. IJGI. 7(10):408.
   Google Scholar
• Şimşek D, Sertel E. 2018. Spatial analysis of two different urban landscapes using satellite images and landscape metrics. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 84(11):711–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Szabó S, Petropoulos GP, Gupta M, Islam T. 2017. Landscape transform and spatial metrics for mapping spatiotemporal land cover dynamics using Earth Observation data-sets. Geocarto Int. 32(2):113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southworth J, Nagendra H, Tucker C. 2002. Fragmentation of a landscape: Incorporating landscape metrics into satellite analyses of land-cover change. Landscape Res. 27(3):253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó S, Bertalan L, Kerekes Á, Novák TJ. 2016. Possibilities of land-use change analysis in a mountainous rural area: a methodological approach. Int J Geographical Information Sci. 30(4):708–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa RB, Murayama Y. 2009. Urban mapping, accuracy, & image classification: A comparison of multiple approaches in Tsukuba City, Japan. Appl Geogr. 29(1):135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tischendorf L. 2001. Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landscape Ecol. 16(3):235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toure SI, Stow DA, Shih HC, Weeks J, Lopez-Carr D. 2018. Land cover and land-use change analysis using multi-spatial resolution data and object-based image analysis. Remote Sens Environ. 210:259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner B, Skole D, Sanderson S, Fischer G, Fresco L, Leemans R. 1995. Land-use and land-cover change: science/research plan. Stockholm: International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme; Report, 35.
   Google Scholar
• Uuemaa E, Antrop M, Roosaare J, Marja R, Mander Ü. 2009. Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Rev Landscape Res. 3(1):1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xia T, Zhang L, Ding Z, He S, Peng Y. 2021. Analysis of scale effect and change characteristics of ecological landscape pattern in urban waters. Arab J Geosci. 14(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Weigand M, Staab J, Wurm M, Taubenböck H. 2020. Spatial and semantic effects of LUCAS samples on fully automated land use/land cover classification in high-resolution Sentinel-2 data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 88:102065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Q. 2012. Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sens Environ. 117:34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witharana C, Civco DL. 2014. Optimizing multi-resolution segmentation scale using empirical methods: exploring the sensitivity of the supervised discrepancy measure Euclidean distance 2 (ED2). ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 87:108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff S, Hüttel S, Nendel C, Lakes T. 2021. Agricultural landscapes in Brandenburg, Germany: an analysis of characteristics and spatial patterns. Int J Environ Res. 15(3):487–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H. 2013. Rule-based impervious surface mapping using high spatial resolution imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 34(1):27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Haase D, Su M, Wang Y, Pauleit S. 2020. Assessment of landscape changes under different urban dynamics based on a multiple-scenario modeling approach. Environ Plan B: Urban Anal City Sci. 47(8):1361–1379.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Liu ZHI. 2005. Quantifying landscape pattern and its change in an estuarine watershed using satellite imagery and landscape metrics. Int J Remote Sens. 26(23):5297–5323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. 2004. Understanding image fusion. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 70(6):657–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Chen C, Wang J, Yang D, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Gao M. 2020. The spatial granularity effect, changing landscape patterns, and suitable landscape metrics in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, 1995–2015. Ecol Indic. 114:106259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Du L, Tan S, Wu F, Zhu L, Zeng Y, Wu B. 2021. Land use and land cover mapping using RapidEye imagery based on a novel band attention deep learning method in the three gorges reservoir area. Remote Sensing. 13(6):1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar