Sub-watershed prioritization for soil erosion potentiality estimation in tenughat catchment, India

References

• Aher PD, Adinarayana J, Gorantiwar SD. 2014. Quantification of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of India: a remote sensing and GIS approach. J Hydrol. 511:850–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahirwar R, Malik MS, Shukla JP. 2019. Prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil and water conservation in parts of Narmada River through morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS. J Geol Soc India. 94(5):515–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed R, Sajjad H, Husain I. 2018. Morphometric parameters-based prioritization of sub-watersheds using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process: a case study of lower Barpani Watershed. Nat Resour Res. 27(1):67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexakis DD, Hadjimitsis DG, Agapiou A. 2013. Integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and rainfall data for the assessment of soil erosion rate in the catchment area of “Yialias” in Cyprus. Atmos Res. 131:108–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri AA, Pourghasemi HR, Cerda A. 2018. Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: a comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models. Sci Total Environ. 613/614:1385–1400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angillieri MY. 2008. Morphometric analysis of Colangüil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan, Argentina. Environ Geol. 55(1):107–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian A, Duraisamy K, Thirumalaisamy S, Krishnaraj S, Yatheendradasan RK. 2017. Prioritization of subwatersheds based on quantitative morphometric analysis in lower Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu, India using DEM and GIS techniques. Arab J Geosci. 10(24):552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingfang W, Miaomiao L, Changzhen Y, Weifeng Z, Changzhen Y. 2004. Developing method of vegetation fraction estimation by remote sensing for soil loss equation: A case in the upper basin of Miyun Reservoir. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS 2004), p. 4352–4355.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas A, Biswas M. 2015. Morphometric and landuse and land cover change analysis of Lokjuriya River Basin, Jharkhand, India using remote sensing and GIS technique. J Humanit Soc Sci. 20(7):77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas H, Raizada A, Mandal D, Kumar S, Srinivas S, Mishra PK. 2015. Identification of areas vulnerable to soil erosion risk in India using GIS methods. Solid Earth. 6(4):1247–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai VR. 1999. Prioritisation of subwatersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin: A remote sensing and GIS approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 27(3):155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Cerda A, Rodrigo-Comino J, Novara A, Brevik EC, Vaezi AR, Pulido M, Gimenez-Morera A, Keesstra SD. 2018. Long-term impact of rainfed agricultural land abandonment on soil erosion in the Western Mediterranean basin. Prog Phys Geog. 42(2):202–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitra C, Alaguraja P, Ganeshkumari K, Yuvaraj D, Manivel M. 2011. Watershed characteristics of Kundah subbasin using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Geomatics Geosci. 2(1):311–335.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra R, Dhiman RD, Sharma PK. 2005. Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 33(4):531–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke JI. 1996. Morphometry from maps. In: G H Dury, editor. Essays in geomorphology. New York: Elsevier publication. Co. p. 235–274.
   Google Scholar
• Das D. 2014. Identification of erosion prone areas by morphometric analysis using GIS. J Inst Eng India Ser A. 95(1):61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Das B, Bordoloi R, Thungon LT, Paul A, Pandey PK, Mishra M, Tripathi OP. 2020. An integrated approach of GIS, RUSLE and AHP to model soil erosion in West Kameng watershed, Arunachal Pradesh. J Earth Syst Sci. 129(1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deju R. 1971. Regional hydrology fundamentals. Newark: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Donevska KR, Gorsevski PV, Jovanovski M, Peševski I. 2012. Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci. 67(1):121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faniran A. 1968. The index of drainage intensity: a provisional new drainage factor. Aust J Sci. 31(9):326–330.
   Google Scholar
• Fao I. 2015. Status of the world’s soil resources (SWSR)–main report. In Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations and intergovernmental technical panel on soils. Rome, Italy: Copernicus Publications; p. 650.
   Google Scholar
• Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T. 2014. A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput Geosci. 64:81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelagay HS. 2016. RUSLE and SDR model based sediment yield assessment in a GIS and remote sensing environment; a case study of Koga watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology Current Research. 7(2):239.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Guchhait SK. 2016. Geomorphic threshold estimation for gully erosion in the lateritic soil of Birbhum, West Bengal, India. SOIL Discuss.1–29. 10.5194/soil-2016-48.
   Google Scholar
• Hembram TK, Saha S. 2020. Prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil erosion based on morphometric attributes using fuzzy AHP and compound factor in Jainti River basin, Jharkhand, Eastern India. Environ Dev Sustain. 22(2):1241–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton R. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc America Bull. 56(3):275–370.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMD. 2017. Pune weather station report. Customized Rainfall Information System (CRIS), Hydromet Division Indian Meteorological Department-New Delhi, Viewed 21 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal M, Sajjad H. 2014. Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters of Dudhganga Catchment Kashmir Valley India using spatial technology. J Geophys Remote Sens. 3:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• ITPS: Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soil: State of the World's Soil Resources report, FAO Publication; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jaiswal RK, Ghosh NC, Lohani AK, Thomas T. 2015. Fuzzy AHP based multi criteria decision support for watershed prioritization. Water Resour Manage. 29(12):4205–4227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R. 2009. Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 37(2):261–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks GF. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. In Konrad Frenzel, editor. International Yearbook of Cartography. London: George Philip, vol. 7, p. 186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Eastman 2000. JR. Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 14(2):173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Huete AR, Li J, Qi J. 2007. Interpretation of the modified soil-adjusted vegetation index isolines in red-NIR reflectance space. J Appl Remote Sens. 1(1):013503.
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarzi A, Sarmadian F, Heidari A, Omid M. 2010. Land suitability evaluation using fuzzy continuous classification (a case study: Ziaran region). Mod. Appl. Sci. 4(7):72.
   Google Scholar
• Kharat MG, Kamble SJ, Raut RD, Kamble SS, Dhume SM. 2016. Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Model Earth Syst Environ. 2(2):53.
   Google Scholar
• King C, Baghdadi N, Lecomte V, Cerdan O. 2005. The application of remote-sensing data to monitoring and modelling of soil erosion. Catena. 62(2/3):79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhu J, Xiao Y, Wang R. 2010. A model-based observation-thinning scheme for the assimilation of high-resolution SST in the shelf and coastal seas around China. J Atmos Oceanic Technol. 27(6):1044–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykoudi E, Angelaki M. 2004. The contribution of the morphometric parameters of an hydrographic network to the investigation of the neotectonic activity: an application to the upper Acheloos River. geosociety. 36(2):1084–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Magesh NS, Jitheshlal KV, Chandrasekar N, Jini KV. 2013. Geographical information system-based morphometric analysis of Bharathapuzha river basin, Kerala. Appl Water Sci. 3(2):467–477.
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Malik MI, Bhat MS, Kuchay NA. 2011. Watershed based drainage morphometric analysis of Lidder catchment in Kashmir valley using geographical information system. Recent Res Sci Technol. 3(4):118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Masselink RJ, Heckmann T, Temme AJ, Anders NS, Gooren HP, Keesstra SD. 2017. A network theory approach for a better understanding of overland flow connectivity. Hydrol Process. 31(1):207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraj G, Romshoo SA, Ayoub S, Altaf S. 2018. Geoinformatics based approach for estimating the sediment yield of the mountainous watersheds in Kashmir Himalaya, India. Geocarto Int. 33(10):1114–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa LM. 2006. Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumam, Argentina). Environ Geol. 50(8):1235–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshram SG, Alvandi E, Singh VP, Meshram C. 2019. Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for prioritization of watersheds. Soft Comput. 23(24):13615–13625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller VC. 1953. A quantitative geomorphologic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Project NR 389042, Tech Report 3. New York: Columbia University Department of Geology, ONR Geography Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Miller W, Collins W, Steiner FR, Cook E. 1998. An approach for greenway suitability analysis landscape and urban planning. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 42(2-4):91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. 2020. Conversion of Barren Land into Arable Land [Press release]. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetailm.aspx?PRID=1607339.
   Google Scholar
• Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process. 5(1):3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooka Ratnam K, Srivastava Y, Venkateswara Rao V, Amminedu E, Murthy KSR. 2005. Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 33(1):25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyando JO, Kisoyan P, Chemelil MC. 2005. Estimation of potential soil erosion for river perkerra catchment in Kenya. Water Resour Manage. 19(2):133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DP, Dholakia MB, Naresh N, Srivastava PK. 2012. Water harvesting structure positioning by using geo-visualization concept and prioritization of mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis in the lower Tapi basin. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 40(2):299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DP, Gajjar CA, Srivastava PK. 2013. Prioritization of Malesari mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Environ Earth Sci. 69(8):2643–2656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DP, Srivastava PK. 2013. Flood hazards mitigation analysis using remote sensing and GIS: correspondence with town planning scheme. Water Resour Manage. 27(7):2353–2368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul II, Bayode EN. 2012. Watershed characteristics and their implication for hydrologic response in the upper Sokoto basin, Nigeria. J Geogr Geol. 4(2):147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips JD. 1990. Relative importance of factors influencing fluvial soil loss at the global scale. Am J Sci. 290(5):547–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Aghda SF. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Nat Hazards. 69(1):749–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramanik M, Paudel U, Mondal B, Chakraborti S, Deb P. 2018. Predicting climate change impacts on the distribution of the threatened Garcinia indica in the Western Ghats, India. Clim Risk Manag. 19:94–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahaman SA, Ajeez SA, Aruchamy S, Jegankumar R. 2015. Prioritization of Sub Watershed based on morphometric characteristics using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and geographical information system—a study of Kallar watershed, Tamil Nadu. Aquatic Proc. 4:1322–1330.
   Google Scholar
• Rai PK, Mishra VN, Mohan K. 2017. A study of morphometric evaluation of the Son basin, India using geospatial approach. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 7:9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rajbanshi J, Bhattacharya S. 2020. Assessment of soil erosion, sediment yield and basin specific controlling factors using RUSLE-SDR and PLSR approach in Konar river basin, India. J Hydrol. 587:124935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju KS, Kumar DN. 2011. Classification of micro watersheds based on morphological characteristics. J Hydro-Environ Res. 5(2):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2010.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigo Comino J, Iserloh T, Lassu T, Cerdà A, Keestra SD, Prosdocimi M, Brings C, Marzen M, Ramos MC, Senciales JM, et al. 2016. Quantitative comparison of initial soil erosion processes and runoff generation in Spanish and German vineyards. Sci Total Environ. 565:1165–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudraiah M, Govindaiah S, Vittala SS. 2008. Morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna river basin, Gulburga district, Karnataka, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 36(4):351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol. 15(3):234–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, Agricultural Economics Review.
   Google Scholar
• Saha S. 2017. Groundwater potential mapping using analytical hierarchical process: a study on Md. Bazar Block of Birbhum District, West Bengal. Spat Inf Res. 25(4):615–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo AK, Sarkar D, Singh Sk O, Reddy GP, Dhyani BL, Mishra PK, Sharda VN. 2014. Soil erosion in Jharkhand. Nagpur: NBSS Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm SA. 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc America Bull. 67(5):597–646.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta S, Srivastava YK, Rathore VS, Krishna AP, Sharma RK. 2018. Significance of Cartosat DEM in delineation of drainage network and watershed boundaries for morphometric analysis and prioritization. Ind Cartogr. 38:512–517.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Dubey A. 1994. Geo-environmental planning of watersheds in India. Chugh.
   Google Scholar
• Singh P, Gupta A, Singh M. 2014. Hydrological inferences from watershed analysis for water resource management using remote sensing and GIS techniques, Egypt. J. Remote. Sens. Space Sci. 17(2):111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Smith GH. 1935. The relative relief of Ohio. Geogr Rev. 25(2):272–284.
   Google Scholar
• Sridhar P, Ganapuram S. 2021. Morphometric analysis using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and geographic information systems (GIS) for the prioritization of watersheds. Arab J Geosci. 14(4):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc America Bull. 63(11):1117–1142.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1964. Part II. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In Ven Te Chow, editor. Handbook of applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 4–39.
   Google Scholar
• Survey of India 1981. Toposheet 73A/13, 73A/14, 73E/1, 73E/2, 73E/5, 73E/6, 73E/9, 73E/10, 73E/13, 73E/14 (scale 1:50,000). Government of India, Kolkata
   Google Scholar
• Tamene L, Adimassu Z, Ellison J, Yaekob T, Woldearegay K, Mekonnen K, Thorne P, Le QB. 2017. Mapping soil erosion hotspots and assessing the potential impacts of land management practices in the highlands of Ethiopia. Geomorphology. 292:153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji KP, Abe G, Kannan N. 2012. Morphometrical analysis of two tropical mountain river basins of contrasting environmental settings, the southern Western Ghats, India. Environ Earth Sci. 66(8):2353–2366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji KP. 2018. Assessment of soil erosion in a monsoon-dominated mountain river basin in India using RUSLE-SDR and AHP. Hydrol Sci J. 63(4):542–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorovski L, Džeroski S. 2006. Integrating knowledge-driven and data-driven approaches to modeling. Ecol Modell. 194(1-3):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincy MV, Rajan B, Pradeepkumar AP. 2012. Geographic information system–based morphometric characterization of sub-watersheds of Meenachil river basin, Kottayam district, Kerala, India. Geocarto Int. 27(8):661–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittala SS, Govindaiah S, Gowda HH. 2004. Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area of Tumkur district, South India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 32(4):351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JR, Berndt HD. 1974. Sediment yield computed with universal equation. J Hydr Div. 100(11):1719–1720.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav SK, Singh SK, Gupta M, Srivastava PK. 2014. Morphometric analysis of Upper Tons basin from Northern Foreland of Peninsular India using CARTOSAT satellite and GIS. Geocarto International. 29(8):895–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilnacar E, Topal T. 2005. Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol. 79(3-4):251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Hassan AM. 2011. Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ Earth Sci. 62(3):611–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control. 8(3):338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Fang C, Wang Z, Ma H. 2013. Urban construction land suitability evaluation based on improved multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS): case of New Hefei City. Chin Geogr Sci. 23(6):740–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar