ArcWaT: a model-based cell-by-cell GIS toolbox for estimating wave transformation during storm surge events

References

• Abroug I, Abcha N, Jarno A, Marin F. 2020. Laboratory study of non-linear wave-wave interactions of extreme focused waves in the nearshore zone. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 20(12):3279–3291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriolo U. 2019. Nearshore wave transformation domains from video imagery. J Mar Sci Eng. 7(6):186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArcGIS. 2018. Version Version 10.6. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Insitute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Atan R, Finnegan W, Nash S, Goggins J. 2019. The effect of arrays of wave energy converters on the nearshore wave climate. Ocean Eng. 172:373–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Roberts H, Hagen SC, Zou S, Bacopoulos, P, Medeiros, SC, Weishampel, JF, Cobell Z. 2011. Deriving frictional parameters and performing historical validation for an adcirc storm surge model of the Florida gulf coast. Florida Watershed. 4:22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Avila LA, Cangialosi J. 2011 Aug 21–28. Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Irene (AL092011). Florida: National Hurricane Center; p. 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Hyppolite C, Lashley CH, Garzon JL, Miesse T, Ferreira CM, Bricker JD. 2018. Comparison of implicit and explicit vegetation representations in SWAN hindcasting wave dissipation by coastal wetlands in Chesapeake Bay. Geosciences (Switzerland). 9(1):8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman M. 2011 Aug 27. Hurricane Irene aftermath: Dispatches from Virginia, Maryland, Delaware and the District. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post_now/post/hurricane-irene-aftermath-dispatches-from-virginia-marland-delaware-and-the-district/2011/08/28/gIQArS2gkJ_blog.html,A4.
   Google Scholar
• Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH. 1999. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions 1. Model description and validation. J Geophys Res. 104(C4):7649–7666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantero-Chinchilla FN, Bergillos RJ, Castro-Orgaz O. 2020. Nearshore coastal flow processes using weighted-averaged equations. Ocean Eng. 211:107480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Zheng J, Shi J, Zhang C, Zhang J. 2021. Evaluating the influence of slope limiters on nearshore wave simulation in a non-hydrostatic model. Appl Ocean Res. 112:102683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassalho F, Miesse TW, de Lima ADS, Khalid A, Ferreira CM, Sutton-Grier AE. 2021. Coastal wetlands exposure to storm surge and waves in the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine System during Extreme Events. Wetlands. 41(4):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesapeake Conservancy. 2018. High-resolution land use. (https://www.chesapeakeconservancy.org/conservation-innovation-center/high-resolution-data/land-use-data-project/).
   Google Scholar
• Coastal National Elevation Database (CoNED) Project. 2018. Hurricane Sandy Region - Topobathymetric Elevation Model of Chesapeake Bay. https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/eros/coned/science/hurricane-sandy-region-topobathymetric-elevation-model?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects
   Google Scholar
• Cyriac R. 2018. Wind and Plume driven circulation in estuarine systems. North Carolina: North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• de Lima ADS, Khalid A, Miesse T, Cassalho F, Ferreira C, Scherer MEG, Bonetti J. 2020. Hydrodynamic and waves response during storm surges on the Southern Brazilian coast: a hindcast study. Water. 12(12):3538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitz J. 2019. National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2016 Products: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P96HHBIE.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich CD, Proft JM, Howard MT, Wells G, Fleming JG, Luettich RA, Jr, et al. 2013. Computational challenges in the geosciences. Vol. 156. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7434-0.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich JC, Zijlema M, Westerink JJ, Holthuijsen LH, Dawson C, Luettich RA, Jensen RE, Smith JM, Stelling GS, Stone GW. 2011. Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations. Coastal Eng. 58(1):45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert GD, Erofeeva SY. 2002. Efficient inverse modeling of Barotropic Ocean tides. J Atmos Oceanic Technol. 19(2):183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldeberky Y, Battjes JA. 1996. Spectral modeling of wave breaking: application to Boussinesq equations. J Geophys Res. 101(C1):1253–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMRL (Environmental Modeling Research Laboratory). 1998. Surface-water modeling system, version 5.0, reference manual and tutorials, SMS V 5.0. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira CM, Olivera F, Irish JL. 2014. Arc stormsurge: integrating hurricane storm surge modeling and GIS. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 50(1):219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster-Martinez MR, Alizad K, Hagen SC. 2020. Estimating wave attenuation at the coastal land margin with a GIS toolbox. Environ Modell Software. 132:104788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garzon JL, Ferreira CM, Padilla-Hernandez R. 2018. Evaluation of weather forecast systems for storm surge modeling in the Chesapeake Bay. Ocean Dyn. 68(1):91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garzon JL, Maza M, Ferreira CM, Lara JL, Losada IJ. 2019. Wave attenuation by spartina saltmarshes in the Chesapeake Bay under storm surge conditions. J Geophys Res Oceans. 124(7):5220–5243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBCO Compilation Group. 2020. GEBCO 2020 Grid (https://doi.org/10.5285/a29c5465-b138-234d-e053-6c86abc040b9)
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith TM, Hornig KS, Hatchette JY. 2012. Final report on Hurricane Irene.
   Google Scholar
• Guisado-Pintado E. 2020. Shallow water wave modelling in the nearshore (SWAN). In: Derek W. T. Jackson, Andrew D. Short, editors. Sandy beach morphodynamics. The Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd; p. 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102927-5.00017-5.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad J, Lawler S, Ferreira CM. 2016. Assessing the relevance of wetlands for storm surge protection: a coupled hydrodynamic and geospatial framework. Nat Hazards. 80(2):839–861. Springer Netherlands:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselmann K. 1974. On the spectral dissipation of ocean waves due to white capping. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 6(1–2):107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Holthuijsen LH, Herman A, Booij N. 2003. Phase-decoupled refraction-diffraction for spectral wave models. Coastal Eng . 49(4):291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque MA, Perrie W, Solomon SM. 2020. Application of SWAN model for storm generated wave simulation in the Canadian Beaufort Sea. J Ocean Eng Sci. 5(1):19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta J, Oliveira S, Moura D, Ferreira Ó. 2018. Nearshore hydrodynamics at pocket beaches with contrasting wave exposure in southern Portugal. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 204:40–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joevivek VJ, Chandrasekar N, Jayangondaperumal R, Thakur VC, Purniema KS. 2019. An interpretation of wave refraction and its influence on foreshore sediment distribution. Acta Oceanol Sin. 38(5):151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid A, Ferreira CM. 2020. Advancing real-time flood prediction in large estuaries: iFLOOD a fully coupled surge-wave automated web-based guidance system. Environ Modell Software. 131:104748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiry SN, Ding Y, Wang SSY. 2014. Numerical simulations of morphological changes in barrier islands induced by storm surges and waves using a supercritical flow model. Front Struct Civ Eng. 8(1):57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lai YG, Kim HS. 2020. A near-shore linear wave model with the mixed finite volume and finite difference unstructured mesh method. Fluids. 5(4):199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhang F, Barnes S, Wang X. 2020. Assessing storm surge impacts on coastal inundation due to climate change: case studies of Baltimore and Dorchester County in Maryland. Nat Hazards. 103(2):2561–2588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen OS, Poon Y-K, Graber HC. 1988. Spectral wave attenuation by bottom friction: theory. In: 21st International Conference on Coastal Engineering; p. 492–504.
   Google Scholar
• Malheiros Miranda I, Toldo EE, da Fontoura Klein AH, Strauss D, Vieira da Silva G. 2020. The role of cuspate spits on wave attenuation and energy redistribution in a coastal lagoon, Lagoa dos Patos, Brazil. Geo-Mar Lett. 40(6):1069–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins K, Blenkinsopp CE, Power HE, Bruder B, Puleo JA, Bergsma EWJ. 2017. High-resolution monitoring of wave transformation in the surf zone using a LiDAR scanner array. Coastal Eng. 128:37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei CC. 2020. Tidal diffraction by a small island or cape, and tidal power from a coastal barrier. J Fluid Mech. 897:A13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercadé Ruiz P, Ferri F, Kofoed JP. 2017. Water-wave diffraction and radiation by multiple three-dimensional bodies over a mild-slope bottom. Ocean Eng. 143:163–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles JW. 1957. On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J Fluid Mech. 3(2):185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Geophysical Data Center. 1999. U.S. Coastal Relief Model - Southeast Atlantic. National Geophysical Data Center. NOAA. https://doi.org/10.7289/V53R0QR5
   Google Scholar
• Onea F, Rusu L, Carp GB, Rusu E. 2021. Wave farms impact on the coastal processes—a case study area in the Portuguese nearshore. J Mar Sci Eng. 9(3):262–220. AG:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey S, Rao AD. 2019. Impact of approach angle of an impinging cyclone on generation of storm surges and its interaction with tides and wind waves. J Geophys Res Oceans. 124(11):7643–7660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezerat M, Bertin X, Martins K, Mengual B, Hamm L. 2021. Simulating storm waves in the nearshore area using spectral model: current issues and a pragmatic solution. Ocean Modell. 158:101737. Elsevier Ltd.:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips OM. 1957. On the generation of waves by turbulent wind. J Fluid Mech. 2(05):417. Cambridge University Press:.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaie AM, Ferreira CM, Walls M, Chu Z. 2021. Natural hazards review quantifying the impacts of storm surge, sea level rise and potential reduction and changes in Wetlands in Coastal Areas of the Chesapeake Bay Region. Nat Hazards Rev. 22(4):04021044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts KJ, Pringle WJ, Westerink JJ. 2019. OceanMesh2D 1.0: MATLAB-based software for two-dimensional unstructured mesh generation in coastal ocean modeling. Geosci Model Dev. 12(5):1847–1868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford LP, Gao J. 2018. Influences of wave climate and sea level on shoreline erosion rates in the Maryland Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries Coasts. 41(S1):19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Shi J, Zheng J, Zhang C, Joly A, Zhang W, Xu P, Sui T, Chen T. 2019. A 39-year high resolution wave hindcast for the Chinese coast: model validation and wave climate analysis. Ocean Eng. 183:224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short AD. 2012. Coastal processes and beaches. Nat Educ Knowl. 3:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JM, Bryant MA, Wamsley TV. 2016. Wetland buffers: numerical modeling of wave dissipation by vegetation. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 41(6):847–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sous D, Forsberg PL, Touboul J, Nogueira GG. 2021. Laboratory experiments of surf zone dynamics under on- and offshore wind conditions. Coastal Eng. 163:103797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton-Grier A, Gittman R, Arkema K, Bennett R, Benoit J, Blitch S, Burks-Copes K, Colden A, Dausman A, DeAngelis B, et al. 2018. Investing in natural and nature-based infrastructure: Building better along our coasts. Sustainability (Switzerland. 10(2):523–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain J, Umesh PA, Bhaskaran PK, Balchand AN. 2021. Simulation of nearshore waves using boundary conditions from WAM and WWIII–a case study. ISH J Hydraul Eng. 27(sup1):506–520.
   Google Scholar
• Tang J, Li Q, Meng X, Shen Y, Zhang M. 2018. Numerical modeling of coastal waves and nearshore currents on adaptive quadtree grids. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 144(5):04018011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodoro JD, Nairn B. 2020. Understanding the knowledge and data landscape of climate change impacts and adaptation in the Chesapeake Bay region: a systematic review. Climate. 8(4):58–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ti Z, Wei K, Qin S, Li Y, Mei D. 2018. Numerical simulation of wave conditions in nearshore island area for sea-crossing bridge using spectral wave model. Adv Struct Eng. 21(5):756–768. SAGE Publications Inc.:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VD, Silva G, T, Murray D. Strauss 2018. Longshore wave variability along non-straight coastlines. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 212:318–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Stone G, Pepper D. 1998. A preliminary assessment of hydrodynamic and morphodynamic responses to detached, segmented breakwaters, South Central Louisiana. J Coastal Res. 26(201):201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Williams LL, Lück-Vogel M. 2020. Comparative assessment of the GIS based bathtub model and an enhanced bathtub model for coastal inundation. J Coast Conserv. 24(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Li M, Ni W. 2018. Roles of wind-driven currents and surface waves in sediment resuspension and transport during a tropical storm. J Geophys Res Oceans. 123(11):8638–8654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue L, Li X, Shi B, Yang B, Lin S, Yuan Y, Ma Y, Peng Z. 2021. Pattern-regulated wave attenuation by salt marshes in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Ocean Coastal Manage . 209:105686. Elsevier Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin K, Xu S, Zhao Q, Huang W, Yang K, Guo M. 2020. Effects of land cover change on atmospheric and storm surge modeling during typhoon event. Ocean Eng. 199:106971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zhang Q, Zheng J, Demirbilek Z. 2017. Parameterization of nearshore wave front slope. Coastal Eng. 127:80–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar