Improvement of the predictive performance of landslide mapping models in mountainous terrains using cluster sampling

References

• Abraham MT, Satyam N, Lokesh R, Pradhan B, Alamri A. 2021. Factors affecting landslide susceptibility mapping: assessing the influence of different machine learning approaches, sampling strategies and data splitting. Land. 10(9):989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achour Y, Pourghasemi HR. 2020. How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geosci Front. 11(3):871–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed KS, Basharat M, Riaz MT, Sarfraz Y, Shahzad A. 2021. Geotechnical investigation and landslide susceptibility assessment along the Neelum road: a case study from Lesser Himalayas, Pakistan. Arab J Geosci. 14(11):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed MF, Rogers JD, Ismail EH. 2014. A regional level preliminary landslide susceptibility study of the upper Indus river basin. Eur J Remote Sens. 47(1):343–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SA, Parvin F, Vojteková J, Costache R, Linh NTT, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Gigović L, Ahmad A, Ghorbani MA., 2021. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: a comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms. Geosci Front. 12(2):857–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Biermanns P, Haider R, Reicherter K. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (Karakoram Highway), Pakistan. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 19(5):999–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Najjar HH, Pradhan B. 2021. Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks. Geosci Front. 12(2):625–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B. 2014. An alternative technique for landslide inventory modeling based on spatial pattern characterization. In: Abdul Rahman A, Boguslawski P, Anton F, Said MN, Omar KM, editors. Geoinformation for informed decisions. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S. 2012. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci. 44:120–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S. 2016. A novel integrated model for assessing landslide susceptibility mapping using CHAID and AHP pair-wise comparison. Int J Remote Sens. 37(5):1190–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarafza M, Azarafza M, Akgün H, Atkinson PM, Derakhshani R. 2021. Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun A-L, Rezaie F, Pham QB, Gigović L, Drobnjak S, Aina YA, Panahi M, Yekeen ST, Lee S., 2021. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in western Serbia using hybrid support vector regression (SVR) with GWO, BAT and COA algorithms. Geosci Front. 12(3):101104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basharat M, Qasim M, Shafique M, Hameed N, Riaz MT, Khan MR., 2018. Regolith thickness modeling using a GIS approach for landslide distribution analysis NW. J Mt Sci. 15(11):2466–2479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basharat M, Riaz MT, Jan MQ, Xu C, Riaz S. 2021. A review of landslides related to the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake: implication and future challenges. Nat Hazards. 108(1):1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basharat M, Rohn J, Baig MS, Khan MR. 2014. Spatial distribution analysis of mass movements triggered by the 2005 Kashmir earthquake in the Northeast Himalayas of Pakistan. Geomorphology. 206:203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz SA, Blum P. 2019. Global detection of rainfall-triggered landslide clusters. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 19(7):1433–1444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini G, Guida M, Pizziolo M. 2005. Landslides in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy): strategies for hazard assessment and risk management. Landslides. 2(4):302–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini S, Cigna F, Righini G, Proietti C, Casagli N. 2012. Landslide hotspot mapping by means of persistent scatterer interferometry. Environ Earth Sci. 67(4):1155–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biasutti M, Seager R, Kirschbaum DB. 2016. Landslides in West Coast metropolitan areas: The role of extreme weather events. Weather Clim Extremes. 14:67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF. 1989. Weights of evidence modeling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential. In Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF, editors. Statistical Applications in the Earth Sciences. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper no. 89-9; p. 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter GF. 1994. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS. Comput Meth Geosci. 13:398.
   Google Scholar
• Brabb EE. 1991. The world landslide problem. Episodes J Int Geosci. 14(1):52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun A, Urquia ELG, Lopez RM, Yamagishi H. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, using data mining methods. In IAEG/AEG Annual Meeting Proceedings, San Francisco, California, 2018-Volume 1. Cham: Springer, p. 207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random Forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Cutler A. 2018. Package ‘randomForest’. 17. Date/Publication 2018-03-22).
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Last M, Rice J. 2003. Random forests: finding quasars. In: Statistical challenges in astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Nguyen VT, Van Liem N, Trinh PT. 2020. Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena. 188:104426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I. 2016. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides. 13(2):361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tuan TA, Hoang ND, Thanh NQ, Nguyen DB, Van Liem N, Pradhan B. 2017. Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced landslides for the Lao Cai area (Vietnam) using a hybrid intelligent approach of least squares support vector machines inference model and artificial bee colony optimization. Landslides. 14(2):447–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. 2018. Statistics versus machine learning. Nat Methods. 15(4):233–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canoglu MC, Aksoy H, Ercanoglu M. 2019. Integrated approach for determining spatio temporal variations in the hydrodynamic factors as a contributing parameter in landslide susceptibility assessments. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(5):3159–3174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao J, Zhang Z, Du J, Zhang L, Song Y, Sun G. 2020. Multi-geohazards susceptibility mapping based on machine learning – a case study in Jiuzhaigou. Nat Hazards. 102(3):851–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carranza JM. 2009. Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS. In M. Hale, editor, Handbook of exploration and environmental geochemistry. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, vol. 11, p. 351.
   Google Scholar
• Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V. 2013. Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 13(11):2815–2831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catani F, Tofani V, Lagomarsino D. 2016. Spatial patterns of landslide dimension: a tool for magnitude mapping. Geomorphology. 273:361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang KT, Merghadi A, Yunus AP, Pham BT, Dou J. 2019. Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining; p. 785–794. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JS, Huang HY, Hsu CY. 2020. A kNN based position prediction method for SNS places. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030-42058-1_22.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Panahi M, Tsangaratos P, Shahabi H, Ilia I, Panahi S, Li S, Jaafari A, Ahmad BB. 2019. Applying population-based evolutionary algorithms and a neuro-fuzzy system or modeling landslide susceptibility. Catena. 172:212–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Xie X, Peng J, Wang J, Duan Z, Hong H. 2017. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modelling: a comparative assessment of kernel logistic regression, Naïve-Bayes tree, and alternating decision tree models. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 8(2):950–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Xie X, Wang J, Pradhan B, Hong H, Bui DT, Duan Z, Ma J. 2017. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena. 151:147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Zhang S, Li R, Shahabi H. 2018. Performance evaluation of the gis-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling. Sci Total Environ. 644:1006–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy P. 2021. Torrential rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning and statistical methods of eastern Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 107(1):697–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark PJ, Evans FC. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology. 35(4):445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conoscenti C, Rotigliano E, Cama M, Caraballo-Arias NA, Lombardo L, Agnesi V. 2016. Exploring the effect of absence selection on landslide susceptibility models: a case study in Sicily. Italy. Geomorphology. 261:222–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo D, Rotigliano E, Irigaray C, Jiménez-Perálvarez JD, Chacón J. 2012. Factors selection in landslide susceptibility modelling on large scale following the gis matrix method: application to the river Beiro basin (Spain). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 12(2):327–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 44(3):837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 65(1):135–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yamagishi H, Zhu Z, Yunus AP, Chen CW. 2018. TXT-tool 1.081-6.1 A comparative study of the binary logistic regression (BLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for GIS-based spatial predicting landslides at a regional scale. In Landslide dynamics: ISDR-ICL landslide interactive teaching tools. Cham: Springer, p. 139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Bui DT, Merghadi A, Sahana M, Zhu Z, Chen C-W, Han Z, Pham BT. 2020. Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan. Landslides. 17(3):641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Tien Bui D, Merghadi A, Sahana M, Zhu Z, Chen CW, Khosravi K, Yang Y, Pham BT. 2019. Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan. Sci Total Environ. 662:332–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Tien Bui D, Sahana M, Chen C-W, Zhu Z, Wang W, Pham BT. 2019. Evaluating GIS-based multiple statistical models and data mining for earthquake and rainfall -induced landslide susceptibility using the LiDAR DEM. Remote Sens. 11(6):638.
   Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Xu Y, Zhu Z, Chen C-W, Sahana M, Khosravi K, Yang Y, Pham BT. 2019. Torrential rainfall-triggered shallow landslide characteristics and susceptibility assessment using ensemble data-driven models in the Dongjiang Reservoir Watershed, China. Nat Hazards. 97(2):579–609. 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami SN, Yousefi S, Pourghasemi HR, Tavangar S, Santosh M. 2020. A comparative study on machine learning modeling for mass movement susceptibility mapping (a case study of Iran). Bull Eng Geol Environ. 79(10):5291–5308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Scaringi G, Korup O, West AJ, Westen CJ, Tanyas H, Hovius N, Hales TC, Jibson RW, Allstadt KE, et al. 2019. Earthquake-induced chains of geologic hazards: patterns, mechanisms, and impacts. Rev Geophys. 57(2):421–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontan D. 1998. [Regional geological mapping, metamorphic P-T-t paths evaluation and ore potential assessment in Neelum Valley (Azad Kashmir, NE Pakistan]. [PhD thesis]. Belgium: Universite Catholique de Louvain-La-Neuve.
   Google Scholar
• Fontan D, Schouppe M, Hunziker CJ, Martinotti G, Verkaeren J. 2000. Metamorphic evolution, 40Ar-39Ar chronology and tectonic model for the Neelum valley, Azad Kashmir, NE Pakistan. In Khan MA, editors, Tectonics of the Nanga Parbat syntaxis and the Western Himalaya: Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 170, p. 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.170.01.23.
   Google Scholar
• Gaidzik K, Ramírez-Herrera MT. 2021. The importance of input data on landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazanfar M, Baig MS, Chaudhry MN. 1983. Geology of Tithwal Kel area Neelum Valley, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Kashmir J Geol. 1:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gorum T, Fan X, van Westen CJ, Huang RQ, Xu Q, Tang C, Wang G. 2011. Distribution pattern of earthquake-induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Geomorphology. 133(3-4):152–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez H, Kavzoglu T. 2005. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol. 78(1-2):11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Galli M, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali MJNH. 2006. Landslide hazard assessment in the Collazzone area, Umbria, Central Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 6(1):115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F. 2005. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology. 72(1-4):272–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang K. 2012. Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem. Earth-Science Rev. 112(1-2):42–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckmann T, Gegg K, Gegg A, Becht M. 2014. Sample size matters: investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14(2):259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjort J, Marmion M. 2008. Effects of sample size on the accuracy of geomorphological models. Geomorphology. 102(3-4):341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Liu J, Bui DT, Pradhan B, Acharya TD, Pham BT, Zhu A-X, Chen W, Ahmad BB. 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). Catena. 163:399–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Miao Y, Liu J, Zhu AX. 2019. Exploring the effects of the design and quantity of absence data on the performance of random forest-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena. 176:45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied logistic regression. New York, Chichester: Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hussin HY, Zumpano V, Reichenbach P, Sterlacchini S, Micu M, van Westen C, Bălteanu D. 2016. Different landslide sampling strategies in a grid-based bi-variate statistical susceptibility model. Geomorphology. 253:508–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson JN. 1988. Morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. In Proc., Fifth International Symposium on Landslides, 1988. Lausanne, AA.
   Google Scholar
• Jaboyedoff M, Oppikofer T, Abellán A, Derron M-HH, Loye A, Metzger R, Pedrazzini A, Abellan A, Derron M-HH, Loye A, et al. 2012. Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review. Nat Hazards. 61(1):5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadoon IA, Hinderer M, Kausar AB, Qureshi AA, Baig MS, Basharat M, Frisch W. 2015. Structural interpretation and geo-hazard assessment of a locking line: 2005 Kashmir Earthquake, western Himalayas. Environ Earth Sci. 73(11):7587–7602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman D. 2006. Large rock slope failures in the Highlands of Scotland: characterisation, causes and spatial distribution. Eng Geol. 83(1-3):161–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen DR, Ramirez DE. 2013. Revision: variance inflation in regression. Adv Dec Sci. 2013:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantar B, Pradhan B, Naghibi SA, Motevalli A, Mansor S. 2018. Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 9(1):49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp U, Growley BJ, Khattak GA, Owen LA. 2008. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology. 101(4):631–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I, Sahin EK. 2019. Machine learning techniques in landslide susceptibility mapping: a survey and a case study. In Landslides: theory, practice and modelling. Berlin, Germany: Springer, p. 283–301.
   Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides. 11(3):425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I. 2015. Selecting optimal conditioning factors in shallow translational landslide susceptibility mapping using genetic algorithm. Eng Geol. 192:101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer DK. 1984. Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Bull. 95(4):406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Basharat M, Riaz MT, Sarfraz Y, Farooq M, Khan AY, Pham QB, Ahmed S, Shahzad A. 2021. An integrated geotechnical and geophysical investigation of a catastrophic landslide in the Northeast Himalayas of Pakistan. Geol J. 1:19.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Pham BT, Adamowski J, Shirzadi A, Pradhan B, Dou J, Ly HB, Gróf G, Ho HL, et al. 2019. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. J Hydrol. 573:311–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschbaum D, Stanley T, Zhou Y. 2015. Spatial and temporal analysis of a global landslide catalog. Geomorphology. 249:4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornejady A, Ownegh M, Rahmati O, Bahremand A. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment using three bivariate models considering the new topo-hydrological factor: HAND. Geocarto Int. 33(11):1155–1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn M. 2015. A Short Introduction to the caret Package. R Found Stat Comput. 1:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, Li W. 2005. Applied linear statistical models (Vol. 5). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lacoste A, Loncke L, Chanier F, Bailleul J, Vendeville BC, Mahieux G. 2009. Morphology and structure of a landslide complex in an active margin setting: The Waitawhiti complex, North Island, New Zealand. Geomorphology. 109(3-4):184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai JS, Chiang SH, Tsai F. 2019. Exploring influence of sampling strategies on event based landslide susceptibility modeling. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 8(9):397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. 2005. Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens. 26(7):1477–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Lee MJ, Jung HS. 2017. Data mining approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Umyeonsan, Seoul, South Korea. Appl Sci. 7(7):683.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Pradhan B. 2007. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides. 4(1):33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu X, Han Z, Dou J. 2020. Spatial proximity -based geographically weighted regression model for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Qingchuan Area, China. Appl. Sci. 10(3):1107.
   Google Scholar
• Lin YP, Chu HJ, Wu CF. 2010. Spatial pattern analysis of landslide using landscape metrics and logistic regression: a case study in Central Taiwan. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. 7(3):3423–3451.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Su P, Li Y, Xu R, Zhang J, Yang T, Guo X, Jiang N. 2021. Spatial patterns and scaling distributions of earthquake-induced landslides—a case study of landslides in watersheds along Dujiangyan-Wenchuan highway. Front Earth Sci. 9:196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu P, Bai S, Casagli N. 2014. Investigating spatial patterns of persistent scatterer interferometry point targets and landslide occurrences in the Arno River Basin. Remote Sens. 6(8):6817–6843.
   Google Scholar
• Lu P, Casagli N, Catani F, Tofani V. 2012. Persistent scatterers interferometry hotspot and cluster analysis (PSI-HCA) for detection of extremely slow-moving landslides. Int J Remote Sens. 33(2):466–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchese LV, de Oliveira GG, Pedrollo OC. 2021. Investigation of the influence of nonoccurrence sampling on landslide susceptibility assessment using Artificial Neural Networks. Catena. 198:105067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P. 2004. Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 29(6):687–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik RH, Schouppe M, Fontan D, Verkaeren J, Martinotti G, Ahmed KS, Qureshi S. 1996. Geology of the Neelum valley, district Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Univ Peshawar Geol Bull. 29:91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Marjanovic M, Bajat B, Kovacevic M. 2009. Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithms. In 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, pp. 273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Martelloni G, Segoni S, Fanti R, Catani F. 2012. Rainfall thresholds for the forecasting of landslide occurrence at regional scale. Landslides. 9(4):485–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier P, Hovius N, Haines JA. 2008. Topographic site effects and the location of earthquake induced landslides. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 275(3-4):221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merghadi A, Abderrahmane B, Tien Bui D. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment at Mila Basin (Algeria): a comparative assessment of prediction capability of advanced machine learning methods. IJGI. 7(7):268.
   Google Scholar
• Merghadi A, Yunus AP, Dou J, Whiteley J, ThaiPham B, Bui DT, Avtar R, Abderrahmane B., 2020. Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance. Earth Sci Rev. 207:103225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer D, Dimitriadou E, Hornik K, Weingessel A, Leisch F. 2020. Misc functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Formerly: E1071). TU Wien. R package version 1.7-2.: e1071.
   Google Scholar
• Miner A, Vamplew P, Windle DJ, Flentje P, Warner P. 2010. A comparative study of various data mining techniques as applied to the modeling of landslide susceptibility on the Bellarine Peninsula, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Mehrabi M, Mosallanezhad M, Rashid ASA, Pradhan B. 2019. Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique. Eng Comput. 35(3):967–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orme AR. 2002. Shifting paradigms in geomorphology: the fate of research ideas in an educational context. Geomorphology. 47(2-4):325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz JAV, Martínez-Graña AM. 2018. A neural network model applied to landslide susceptibility analysis (Capitanejo, Colombia). Geomatics Natural Hazards Risk. 9(1):1106–1128. doi:10.1080/19475705.2018.1513083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panahi M, Gayen A, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaie F, Lee S. 2020. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using hybrid support vector regression (SVR) and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with various metaheuristic algorithms. Sci Total Environ. 741:139937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Kim J. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on random forest and boosted regression tree models, and a comparison of their performance. Appl. Sci. 9(5):942.
   Google Scholar
• Petley D, Dunning S, Rosser N, Kausar AB. 2006. Incipient landslides in the Jhelum Valley, Pakistan following the 8th October 2005 earthquake. In: Marui H, editor, Disaster mitigation of debris flows, slope failures and landslides, frontiers of science series. Tokyo: Universal Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Petschko H, Brenning A, Bell R, Goetz J, Glade T. 2014. Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps–case study Lower Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14(1):95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia MB. 2017. Hybrid integration of multilayer perceptron neural networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS. Catena. 149:52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia M. 2016. Rotation forest fuzzy rule-based classifer ensemble for spatial prediction of landslides using GIS. Nat Hazards. 83(1):97–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D, Prakash I, Dholakia MB. 2016. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Softw. 84:240–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Dou J, Singh SK, Trinh PT, Tran HT, Le TM, Van Phong T, Khoi DK, Shirzadi A, et al. 2019. A novel hybrid approach of landslide susceptibility modelling using rotation forest ensemble and different base classifiers. Geocarto Int. 0:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Pourghasemi HR, Indra P, Dholakia M. 2017. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: a comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods. Theor Appl Climatol. 128(1-2):255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QB, Achour Y, Ali SA, Parvin F, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Al-Ansari N, Achu AL, Costache R, Khedher KM, et al. 2021. A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):1741–1777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokharel B, Althuwaynee OF, Aydda A, Kim SW, Lim S, Park HJ. 2021. Spatial clustering and modelling for landslide susceptibility mapping in the north of the athmandu Valley, Nepal. Landslides. 18(4):1403–1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Rahmati O. 2018. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: which algorithm, which precision? Catena. 162:177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Gayen A, Panahi M, Rezaie F, Blaschke T. 2019. Multi-hazard probability assessment and mapping in Iran. Sci Total Environ. 692:556–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Sadhasivam N, Amiri M, Eskandari S, Santosh M. 2021. Landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping using state-of-the art machine learning techniques. Nat Hazards. 108(1):1291–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan A, Kim YT. 2014. Relative effect method of landslide susceptibility zonation in weathered granite soil: a case study in Deokjeok-ri Creek. Nat Hazards. 72(2):1189–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S. 2010. Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural networks model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides. 7(1):13–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raines GL. 1999. Evaluation of weights of evidence to predict epithermal-gold deposits in the Great Basin of the Western United States. Nat Resour Res. 8(4):257–276.
   Google Scholar
• Rault C, Robert A, Marc O, Hovius N, Meunier P. 2019. Seismic and geologic controls on spatial clustering of landslides in three large earthquakes. Earth Surf Dynam. 7(3):829–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz MT, Basharat M, Hameed N, Shafique M, Luo J. 2018. A data-driven approach to landslide-susceptibility mapping in mountainous terrain: case study from the Northwest Himalayas, Pakistan. Nat Hazards Rev. 19(4):05018007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samia J, Temme A, Bregt AK, Wallinga J, Stuiver J, Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Rossi M. 2018. Implementing landslide path dependency in landslide susceptibility modelling. Landslides. 15(11):2129–2144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samia J, Temme A, Bregt A, Wallinga J, Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Rossi M. 2017. Do landslides follow landslides? Insights in path dependency from a multi-temporal landslide inventory. Landslides. 14(2):547–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouppe M, Fontan D, Verkaeren J, Laduron D, Martinotti G. 1993. Regional geological mapping and ore potential assessment in Neelum valley, Azad Kashmir (Pakistan): Periodical Report, 1993, EEC CII-05 71-M(GDF), 27. p
   Google Scholar
• Soma AS, Kubota T, Mizuno H. 2019. Optimization of causative factors using logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility assessment in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi Indonesia. J Mt Sci. 16(2):383–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter DJ, Knill‐Jones RP. 1984. Statistical and knowledge‐based approaches to clinical decision‐support systems, with an application in gastroenterology. J Royal Stat Soc Series A (General). 147(1):35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sun D, Xu J, Wen H, Wang D. 2021. Assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping based on Bayesian hyperparameter optimization: a comparison between logistic regression and random forest. Eng. Geol. 281:105972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanyas H, Rossi M, Alvioli M, van Westen CJ, Marchesini I. 2019. A global slope unit-based method for the near real-time prediction of earthquake-induced landslides. Geomorphology. 327:126–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai B, Pradhan B, Tien D, Prakash I, Dholakia MB. 2016. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Softw. 84:240–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tianqi C, He T, Benesty M. 2015. Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting; R Package Version 0.3-1; Technical Report, pp. 1–4. http://cran.fhcrc.org/web/packages/xgboost/vignettes/xgboost.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tonini M, Pecoraro G, Romailler K, Calvello M. 2020. Spatio-temporal cluster analysis of recent Italian landslides. Georisk: Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards. 1–19. doi:10.1080/17499518.2020.1861634
   Google Scholar
• Tonini M, Abellan A. 2014. Rockfall detection from terrestrial LiDAR point clouds: a clustering approach using R. J Spatial Inform Sci. (8):95–110. doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2014.8.123
   Google Scholar
• Tonini M, Pedrazzini A, Penna I, Jaboyedoff M. 2014. Spatial pattern of landslides in Swiss Rhone Valley. Nat Hazards. 73(1):97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torizin J, Fuchs M, Awan AA, Ahmad I, Akhtar SS, Sadiq S, Razzak A, Weggenmann D, Fawad F, Khalid N, et al. 2017. Statistical landslide susceptibility assessment of the Mansehra and Torghar districts, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Nat Hazards. 89(2):757–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauth MH, Bookhagen B, Marwan N, Strecker MR. 2003. Multiple landslide clusters record Quaternary climate changes in the northwestern Argentine Andes. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 194(1-3):109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsangaratos P, Ilia I. 2016. Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: The influence of models complexity and training dataset size. Catena. 145:164–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Eeckhaut M, Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Vandekerckhove L. 2006. Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology. 76(3-4):392–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Liu Q, Liu Y. 2020. Mapping landslide susceptibility using machine learning algorithms and GIS: A case study in Shexian County, Anhui Province, China. Symmetry. 12(12):1954.
   Google Scholar
• Witt A, Malamud BD, Rossi M, Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S. 2010. Temporal correlations and clustering of landslides. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 35(10):1138–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Tian Y, Shi W, Guo Q, Wu L. 2010. A new method of pseudo absence data generation in landslide susceptibility mapping with a case study of Shenzhen. Sci China Technol Sci. 53(S1):75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao T, Yin K, Yao T, Liu S. 2019. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using GIS-based statistical and machine learning models in Wanzhou County, Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Acta Geochim. 38(5):654–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Sun M, Zhang H, Cheng W, Yang Y, Sun M, Cao Y, Wang J. 2019. Application of the Levenburg–Marquardt back propagation neural network approach for landslide risk assessments. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 19(3):629–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz I. 2010. The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability and artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci. 60(3):505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz I, Ercanoglu M. 2019. Landslide inventory, sampling and effect of sampling strategies on landslide susceptibility/hazard modelling at a glance. In Natural hazards GIS based spatial modeling using data mining techniques. Cham: Springer, p. 205–224.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz I. 2009. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat Turkey). Comput. Geosci. 35(6):1125–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Geosci Front. 12(2):639–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunus AP, Fan X, Tang X, Jie D, Xu Q, Huang R. 2020. Decadal vegetation succession from MODIS reveals the spatio -temporal evolution of post -seismic landsliding after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Remote Sens Environ. 236:111476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Wu X, Niu R, Yang K, Zhao L. 2017. The assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and decision tree methods in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 76(11):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu AX, Miao Y, Liu J, Bai S, Zeng C, Ma T, Hong H. 2019. A similarity-based approach to sampling absence data for landslide susceptibility mapping using data-driven methods. Catena. 183:104188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu AX, Miao Y, Yang L, Bai S, Liu J, Hong H. 2018. Comparison of the presence only method and presence-absence method in landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena. 171:222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar