Topographic indices and two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling for flood hazard mapping in a data-scarce plain area: a case study of Oued Laou catchment (Northern of Morocco)

References

• Afshari S, Tavakoly AA, Rajib MA, Zheng X, Follum ML, Omranian E, Fekete BM. 2018. Comparison of new generation low-complexity flood inundation mapping tools with a hydrodynamic model. J Hydrol 556:539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike H, Csaki, F, editors. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Petrov BN International Symposium on Information Theory, p. 267–281. References - Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/%28S%28vtj3fa45qm1ean45vvffcz55%29%29/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=1741007.
   Google Scholar
• Alaghmand S, Abdullah R, Abustan I, Behdokht V. 2010. GIS-based river flood hazard mapping in urban area (A case study in Kayu Ara River Basin, Malaysia). Int J Eng Technol 2.
   Google Scholar
• Amellah O, El Morabiti K. 2021. Assessment of soil erosion risk severity using GIS, remote sensing and RUSLE model in Oued Laou Basin (North Morocco). Soil Sci Ann 72(3):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amellah O, El Morabiti K, Ouchar Al-djazouli M. 2020. Spatialization and assessment of flood hazard using 1D numerical simulation in the plain of Oued Laou (North Morocco). Arab J Geosci 13(14):635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anees MT, Abdullah K, Nawawi M, Norulaini N, Syakir MI, Kadir M. 2017. One- and two-dimensional hydrological modelling and their uncertainties. 2017 ISBN 978-953-51-3465-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bărbulescu A, Maftei C. 2021. Statistical approach of the behavior of Hamcearca River (Romania). Rom Rep Phys 73(1):703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barling RD, Moore ID, Grayson RB. 1994. A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and soil water content. Water Resour Res 30(4):1029–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/un modèle à base physique de zone d’appel variable de l’hydrologie. Du Bassin Versant. Hydrol Sci Bull 24(1):43–69.
   Google Scholar
• Böhner J, Selige T. 2002. Spatial prediction of soil attributes using terrain analysis and climate regionalization. Gottinger geograpihsche abhandlungen. Göttingen, Germany: Geographischen Instituts der Universität Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Bomers A, Schielen RMJ, Hulscher SJMH. 2019. Hulsche SJM H. The influence of grid shape and grid size on hydraulic river modelling performance. Environ Fluid Mech 19(5):1273–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner GW. 2010. United states army; corps of engineers. Davis (CA): Institute for Water Resources (U.S.); Hydrologic Engineering Center (U.S.) HEC-RAS River Analysis System: Hydraulic Reference Manual; US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan BP, Fleming M, Schneider RL, Richards BK, Archibald J, Qiu Z, Walter MT. 2014. Evaluating topographic wetness indices across central New York agricultural landscapes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18(8):3279–3299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt T, Butcher D. 1986. Stimulation from simulation? A teaching model of hillslope hydrology for use on microcomputers. J Geograph Higher Educ 10(1):23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow VT. 1959. Open-channel hydraulics. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-085906-7.
   Google Scholar
• Colomina I, Molina P. 2014. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 92:79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook A, Merwade V. 2009. Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. J Hydrol 377(1–2):131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverribar I, Morales-Hernández M, Brufau P, Garcia-Navarro P. 2019. 2D numerical simulation of unsteady flows for large scale floods prediction in real time. Adv Water Resour 134:103444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erena SH, Worku H, De Paola F. 2018. Flood hazard mapping using FLO-2D and local management strategies of dire Dawa City, Ethiopia. J Hydrol Reg Stud 19:224–239.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Liu J, Gong J. 2015. Urban flood mapping based on unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and random forest classifier—A case of Yuyao, China. Water 7(12):1437–1455.
   Google Scholar
• Forkuo EK. 2011. Flood hazard mapping using Aster image data with GIS. Int J Geomatics Geosci 1:932–950.
   Google Scholar
• Fustos I, Abarca-del-Rio R, Ávila A, Orrego RA. 2017. Simple logistic model to understand the occurrence of flood events into the Biobío River Basin in central Chile. J Flood Risk Manag. 10(1):17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaume E, Bain V, Bernardara P, Newinger O, Barbuc M, Bateman A, Blaškovičová L, Blöschl G, Borga M, Dumitrescu A, et al. 2009. compilation of data on European flash floods. J Hydrol 367(1–2):70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geravand F, Hosseini SM, Ataie-Ashtiani B. 2020. Influence of river cross-section data resolution on flood inundation modeling: case study of Kashkan River Basin in Western Iran. J Hydrol 584:124743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados-Bolaños S, Quesada-Román A, Alvarado GE. 2021. Low-cost UAV applications in dynamic tropical volcanic landforms. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 410:107143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntner A, Seibert J, Uhlenbrook S. 2004. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: an evaluation of different terrain indices. Water Resour Res40(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjerdt N, McDonnell J, Seibert J, Rodhe AA. 2004. New topographic index to quantify downslope controls on local drainage. Water Resour Res 40(5):W05602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali B, Löwe R, Bach PM, Urich C, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, Deletic AA. 2018. Rapid urban flood inundation and damage assessment model. J Hydrol 564:1085–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller T, Sutter JA, Nissen K, Rydberg T. 2012. Using field measurement of saturated soil hydraulic conductivity to detect low-yielding zones in three Swedish fields. Soil Tillage Res 124:68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheradmand S, Seidou O, Konte D, Barmou Batoure MB. 2018. Evaluation of adaptation options to flood risk in a probabilistic framework. J Hydrol Reg Stud 19:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Komi K, Neal J, Trigg MA, Diekkrüger B. 2017. Modelling of flood hazard extent in data sparse areas: a case study of the oti River Basin, West Africa. J Hydrol Reg Stud 10:122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kossin JP. 2018. A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed. Nature 558(7708):104–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuha J. 2004. AIC and BIC: comparisons of assumptions and performance. Sociol Methods Res 33(2):188–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laio F, Di Baldassarre G, Montanari A. 2009. Model selection techniques for the frequency analysis of hydrological extremes. Water Resour Res. 45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhammer J, Bernsteinová J, Miřijovský J. 2017. Building a high-precision 2D hydrodynamic flood model using UAV photogrammetry and sensor network monitoring. Water 9(11):861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maftei C, Papatheodorou K. 2015. Flash flood prone area assessment using geomorphological and hydraulic model. J Environ Prot Ecol 16:63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfreda S, Di Leo M, Sole A. 2011. Detection of flood-prone areas using digital elevation models. J Hydrol Eng 16(10):781–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchi L, Borga M, Preciso E, Sangati M, Gaume E, Bain V, Delrieu G, Bonnifait L, PogacÌOEnik N. 2009. Comprehensive post-event survey of a flash flood in Western Slovenia: observation strategy and lessons learned. Hydrol Process23(26):n/a–3770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5(1):3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neelz S, Pender G. 2010. Benchmarking of 2D dyfraulic modelling packages. Bristol: DEFRA/Environment Agency. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neelz S Pender G. 2013. Benchmarking the latest generation of 2D hydraulic modelling packages. Bristol: DEFRA/Environment Agency. http://evidence.Environmentagency.gov.uk/FCERM/Libraries/FCERM_Project_Documents/SC120002_Benchmarking_2D_hydraulic_models_Report.sflb.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin EM. 1986. Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resour Res 22:794–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oueslati A. 2008. Le littoral de Oued Laou de l'apport de l'étude géomorphologique à la connaissance de ses aptitudes à l'aménagement et à la prévention des risques naturels et de la dégradation des paysages. Travaux L'Inst Sci Rabat Sér Gén 5:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Papatheodorou K. 2015. Earthquake landslide and flood disaster prevention: the SciNetNatHaz project. Vol. 53.
   Google Scholar
• Patel DP, Ramirez JA, Srivastava PK, Bray M, Han D. 2017. Assessment of flood inundation mapping of Surat city by coupled 1D/2D hydrodynamic modeling: a case application of the new HEC-RAS 5. Nat Hazards 89(1):93–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinos J, Timbe L. 2019. Performance assessment of two-dimensional hydraulic models for generation of flood inundation maps in mountain River Basins. Water Sci Eng 12(1):11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plate EJ. 2002. Flood risk and flood management. J Hydrol 267(1–2):2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourali S, Arrowsmith C, Chrisman N, Matkan A, Mitchell D. 2016. Topography wetness index application in flood-risk-based land use planning. Appl Spatial Anal 9(1):39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin C, Zhu AX, Pei T, Li B, Zhou C, Yang L. 2007. An adaptive approach to selecting a flow‐partition exponent for a multiple‐flow‐direction algorithm. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 21(4):443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin CZ, Zhu AX, Pei T, Li BL, Scholten T, Behrens T, Zhou CH. 2011. An approach to computing topographic wetness index based on maximum downslope gradient. Precision Agric 12(1):32–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada-Román A, Villalobos-Portilla E, Campos-Durán D. 2021. Hydrometeorological disasters in urban areas of Costa Rica, Central America. Environ Hazard 20(3):264–278.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn P, Beven K, Chevallier P, Planchon O. 1991. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol Proc. 5:59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirogaa VM, Kurea S, Udoa K, Manoa A. 2016. Application of 2D numerical simulation for the analysis of the February 2014 Bolivian Amazonia flood: application of the new HEC-RAS version 5. Ribagua 3(1):25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saksena S, Merwade V. 2015. Incorporating the effect of DEM resolution and accuracy for improved flood inundation mapping. J Hydrol 530:180–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal J, Lu XX. 2004. Application of remote sensing in flood management with special reference to monsoon Asia: a review. Nat Hazard 33(2):283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapountzis M, Kastridis A, Kazamias AP, Karagiannidis A, Nikopoulos P, Lagouvardos K. 2021. Utilization and uncertainties of satellite precipitation data in flash flood hydrological analysis in ungauged watersheds. Glob Nest J. 23(3):388–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist 6(2):461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şerban G, Rus I, Vele D, Breţcan P, Alexe M, Petrea D. 2016. Flood-prone area delimitation using UAV technology, in the areas hard-to-reach for classic aircrafts: case study in the North-East of apuseni Mountains, Transylvania. Nat Hazard 82(3):1817–1832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA. 1989. Regional flood frequency analysis using extreme order statistics of the annual peak record. Water Resour Res 25(2):311–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J. 2006. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10(1):101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng J, Jakeman AJ, Vaze J, Croke BFW, Dutta D, Kim S. 2017. Flood inundation modelling: a review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis. Environ Modell Softw 90:201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa S, Shrestha A, Lamichhane S, Adhikari R, Gautam D. 2020. Catchment-scale flood hazard mapping and flood vulnerability analysis of residential buildings: the case of Khando River in Eastern Nepal. J Hydrol Reg Stud 30:100704.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oldenborgh GJ, Philip S, Kew S, van Weele M, Uhe P, Otto F, Singh R, Pai I, Cullen H, AchutaRao K. 2018. Extreme heat in India and anthropogenic climate change. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci18(1):365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang QJ. 1991. The POT model described by the generalized pareto distribution with poisson arrival rate. J Hydrol 129(1–4):263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin E. 2020. Assessing the impact of topography and land cover data resolutions on two-dimensional HEC-RAS hydrodynamic model simulations for urban flood hazard analysis. Nat Hazards 101(3):995–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong B, Ren LL, Hong Y, Gourley JJ, Chen X, Zhang YJ, Yang XL, Zhang ZX, Wang WG. 2012. A novel multiple flow direction algorithm for computing the topographic wetness index. Hydrol Res 43(1–2):135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuhlke M, Fomferra N, Brockmann C, Peters M, Veci L, Malik J, Regner P. 2015. SNAP (sentinel application platform) and the ESA sentinel 3 toolbox. Sentinel-3 for Science Workshop. A work held 2–5 June, 2015 Venice, Italy. pp. 12–21.
   Google Scholar