A moving window-based spatial assessment method for dynamic urban growth simulations

References

• Akin A, Berberoglu S, Erdogan MA, Donmez C. 2012. Modelling land-use change dynamics in a Mediterranean coastal wetland using CA-Markov chain analysis. Fresen Environ Bull. 21:386–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-shalabi M, Billa L, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Al-Sharif AA. 2013. Modelling urban growth evolution and land-use changes using GIS based cellular automata and SLEUTH models: the case of Sana’a metropolitan city, Yemen. Environ Earth Sci. 70(1):425–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basse RM, Omrani H, Charif O, Gerber P, Bódis K. 2014. Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: Cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale. Appl Geograph. 53:160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham T, Duan Q, Kroese DP, Liquet B. 2015. CEoptim: cross-entropy R package for optimization. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1503.01842. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1503.01842.
   Google Scholar
• Berger P, Pascal L, Sartor C, Delorme J, Monge P, Ragon CP, Charbit M, Sambuc R, Drancourt M. 2003. Generalized additive model demonstrates fluoroquinolone use/resistance relationships for Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Epidemiol. 19(5):453–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Zhang X, Fu Y, Lu Z, Shen X. 2020. Urban spatial growth modeling using logistic regression and cellular automata: a case study of Hangzhou. Ecol Indicat. 113:106200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazal JD, Rounsevell MDA. 2009. Land-use and climate change within assessments of biodiversity change: a review. Global Environ Change. 19(2):306–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Feng Y, Ye Z, Tong X, Wang R, Zhai S, Gao C, Lei Z, Jin Y. 2020. A cellular automata approach of urban sprawl simulation with Bayesian spatially-varying transformation rules. GISci Remote Sens. 57(7):924–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Green K. 2019. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Tong X. 2017. Using exploratory regression to identify optimal driving factors for cellular automaton modeling of land use change. Environ Monit Assess. 189(10):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Tong X. 2020. A new cellular automata framework of urban growth modeling by incorporating statistical and heuristic methods. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 34(1):74–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Wang J, Tong X, Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Cai Z, Chen S, Lei Z, Gao C. 2019. Urban expansion simulation and scenario prediction using cellular automata: comparison between individual and multiple influencing factors. Environ Monit Assess. 191(5):1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Wang R, Tong X, Zhai S. 2021. Comparison of change and static state as the dependent variable for modeling urban growth. Geocarto Int. 1–24. doi:10.1080/10106049.2021.1959657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galante G, Mandrone S, Funaro M, Cotroneo R, Panetta S. 2009. Spatial and temporal changes in Aniene river basin (Latium, Italy) using landscape metrics and moving window technique. Eur J Remote Sens. 41:157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Gao C, Feng Y, Tong X, Jin Y, Liu S, Wu P, Ye Z, Gu C. 2020. Modeling urban encroachment on ecological land using cellular automata and cross-entropy optimization rules. Sci Total Environ. 744:140996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Edwards TC, Jr, Hastie T. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model. 157(2–3):89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman LA, Escobar F, Peña J, Cardona R. 2020. A cellular automata-based land-use model as an integrated spatial decision support system for urban planning in developing cities: The case of the Bogotá region. Land Use Policy. 92:104445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen-Zanker A, Martens P. 2008. Map comparison methods for comprehensive assessment of geosimulation models. International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Springer, pp. 194–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hamad R, Balzter H, Kolo K. 2018. Predicting land use/land cover changes using a CA-Markov model under two different scenarios. Sustainability. 10(10):3421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyassova A, Kantakumar LN, Boyd D. 2021. Urban growth analysis and simulations using cellular automata and geo-informatics: comparison between Almaty and Astana in Kazakhstan. Geocarto Int. 36(5):520–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Shelley MK. 2004. Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 31(2):251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Z, Feng Y, Tong X, Liu S, Gao C, Chen S. 2022. A spatial error-based cellular automata approach to reproducing and projecting dynamic urban expansion. Geocarto Int. 37(2):560–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, Li X, Li S, Wen Y. 2020. What is the influence of landscape metric selection on the calibration of land-use/cover simulation models? Environ Modell Softw. 129:104719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liang X, Li X, Xu X, Ou J, Chen Y, Li S, Wang S, Pei F. 2017. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landsc Urban Plan. 168:94–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal B, Das DN, Bhatta B. 2017. Integrating cellular automata and Markov techniques to generate urban development potential surface: a study on Kolkata agglomeration. Geocarto Int. 32(4):401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murase H, Nagashima H, Yonezaki S, Matsukura R, Kitakado T. 2009. Application of a generalized additive model (GAM) to reveal relationships between environmental factors and distributions of pelagic fish and krill: a case study in Sendai Bay, Japan. ICES J Marine Sci. 66(6):1417–1424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Boersma W, Castella J-C, Clarke K, de Nijs T, Dietzel C, Duan Z, Fotsing E, Goldstein N, Kok K, et al. 2008. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann Reg Sci. 42(1):11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Si K. 2014. The total operating characteristic to measure diagnostic ability for multiple thresholds. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 28(3):570–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodposhti MS, Aryal J, Bryan BA. 2019. A novel algorithm for calculating transition potential in cellular automata models of land-use/cover change. Environ Modell Softw. 112:70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein R. 1999. The cross-entropy method for combinatorial and continuous optimization. Methodol Comput Appl Probabil. 1(2):127–190.
   Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh‐Moghadam H, Valavi R, Asghari A, Minaei M, Murayama Y. 2022. On the spatiotemporal generalization of machine learning and ensemble models for simulating built‐up land expansion. Trans GIS. 26(2):1080–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H. 2019. Improving spatial accuracy of urban growth simulation models using ensemble forecasting approaches. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 76:91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao W. 2010. Effectiveness of water protection policy in China: A case study of Jiaxing. Sci Total Environ. 408(4):690–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinzawa H, Morita S, Noda I, Ozaki Y. 2006. Effect of the window size in moving-window two-dimensional correlation analysis. J Mol Struct. 799(1–3):28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojaei H, Nadi S, Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Tayyebi A, Van Genderen J. 2022. An efficient built-up land expansion model using a modified U-Net. Int J Digital Earth. 15(1):148–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solanki H, Bhatpuria D, Chauhan P. 2017. Applications of generalized additive model (GAM) to satellite-derived variables and fishery data for prediction of fishery resources distributions in the Arabian Sea. Geocarto Int. 32(1):30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayyebi A, Pijanowski BC. 2014. Modeling multiple land use changes using ANN, CART and MARS: comparing tradeoffs in goodness of fit and explanatory power of data mining tools. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 28:102–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong X, Feng Y. 2020. A review of assessment methods for cellular automata models of land-use change and urban growth. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 34(5):866–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet J, White R, Dragicevic S. 2009. Modeling urban growth using a variable grid cellular automaton. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 33(1):35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldkamp A, Verburg PH, Kok K, Koning G, Priess J, Bergsma AR. 2001. The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modeling. Environ Model Assess. 6(2):111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser H, De Nijs T. 2006. The map comparison kit. Environ Modell Softw. 21(3):346–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Feng Y, Ye Z, Tong X, Wang R, Gao C, Chen S, Lei Z, Liu S, Jin Y. 2022. Simulating the effect of urban light rail transit on urban development by coupling cellular automata and conjugate gradients. Geocarto Int. 37(8):2346–2364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F. 2002. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 16(8):795–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Hu D, Wang R, Li H, He Y, Wang M, Wang B. 2006. A GIS-based moving window analysis of landscape pattern in the Beijing metropolitan area, China. Int J Sustain Develop World Ecol. 13(5):419–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Li Z, Clarke KC, Shi W, Fang L, Lin A, Zhou J. 2019. Examining the sensitivity of spatial scale in cellular automata Markov chain simulation of land use change. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 33(5):1040–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Lin A, Clarke KC, Shi W, Cardenas-Tristan A, Tu Z. 2021. A comprehensive quality assessment framework for linear features from volunteered geographic information. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 35(9):1826–1847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Liu W, Li Y, Li X, Ge Q. 2018. Simulating intraurban land use dynamics under multiple scenarios based on fuzzy cellular automata: a case study of Jinzhou district, Dalian. Complexity. 2018:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wang F, Huang K, Zhang H, Yu J, Han AY. 2021. System dynamics-multiple objective optimization model for water resource management: a case study in Jiaxing City, China. Water. 13(5):671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZiaeeVafaeyan H, Moattar MH, Forghani Y. 2018. Land use change model based on bee colony optimization, Markov chain and a neighborhood decay cellular automata. Nat Res Model. 31(2):e12151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar