Application of novel framework approach for assessing rainfall induced future landslide hazard to world heritage sites in Indo-Nepal-Bhutan Himalayan region

References

• Alexandrakis G, Manasakis C, Kampanis NA. 2019. Economic and societal impacts on cultural heritage sites, resulting from natural effects and climate change. Heritage. 2(1):279–305.
   Google Scholar
• Al‐Ghussain L. 2019. Global warming: review on driving forces and mitigation. Environ Progress Sustainable Energ. 38:13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Chandra Pal S, Costache R, Saha A, Rezaie F, Seyed Danesh A, Pradhan B, Lee S, Hoang N-D. 2021. Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility mapping using novel ensemble machine learning algorithms. Geomatics Natural Hazards Risk. 12(1):469–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Saha S, Roy J, Chen W, Blaschke T, Tien Bui D. 2020. Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the Gallicash River Watershed, Iran. Remote Sensing. 12(3):475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeza C, Lantada N, Amorim S. 2016. Statistical and spatial analysis of landslide susceptibility maps with different classification systems. Environ Earth Sci. 75(19):1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai S, Lü G, Wang J, Zhou P, Ding L. 2011. GIS-based rare events logistic regression for landslide-susceptibility mapping of Lianyungang, China. Environ Earth Sci. 62(1):139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Wasson RJ, Ziegler AD, Chow WT, Sundriyal YP. 2019. Characteristics of rain-induced landslides in the Indian Himalaya: a case study of the Mandakini catchment during the 2013 flood. Geomorphology. 330:100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilham R. 2019. Himalayan earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential. SP. 483(1):423–482.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaard TA, Greco R. 2016. Landslide hydrology: from hydrology to pore pressure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water. 3(3):439–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 24(2):123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Nguyen V-T, Liem NV, Trinh PT. 2020. Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA. 188:104426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonincontri P, Marasco A, Ramkissoon H. 2017. Visitors’ experience, place attachment and sustainable behaviour at cultural heritage sites: a conceptual framework. Sustainability. 9(7):1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can R, Kocaman S, Gokceoglu C. 2021. A comprehensive assessment of XGBoost algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping in the upper basin of Ataturk Dam, Turkey. Appl Sci. 11(11):4993.
   Google Scholar
• Centre UWH. 2021. India [WWW Document]. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. URL https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/in. (accessed 8.29.21).
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Goswami A, Scotese CR. 2013. The longest voyage: tectonic, magmatic, and paleoclimatic evolution of the Indian plate during its northward flight from Gondwana to Asia. Gondwana Res. 23(1):238–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhri RS. 1972. Heavy minerals from the Siwalik formations of the northwestern Himalayas. Sedimentary Geol. 8(1):77–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen W, Pal SC, Saha A, Chowdhuri I, Adeli B, Janizadeh S, Dineva AA, Wang X, Mosavi A. 2022. Evaluation efficiency of hybrid deep learning algorithms with neural network decision tree and boosting methods for predicting groundwater potential. Geocarto Intern. 37(19):5564–5584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Li W, Chai H, Hou E, Li X, Ding X. 2016. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and certainty factor (CF) models for the Baozhong region of Baoji City, China. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Li Y, Xue W, Shahabi H, Li S, Hong H, Wang X, Bian H, Zhang S, Pradhan B, et al. 2020. Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Sci Total Environ. 701:134979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Arabameri A, Ngo PTT, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy P. 2020a. Ensemble approach to develop landslide susceptibility map in landslide dominated Sikkim Himalayan region, India. Environ Earth Sci. 79(20):1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy P, Sen K. 2021b. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using projected storm rainfall and land use in Himalayan region. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(7):5237–5258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy P. 2021a. Torrential rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning and statistical methods of eastern Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 107(1):697–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R. 2020b. Flood susceptibility mapping by ensemble evidential belief function and binomial logistic regression model on river basin of eastern India. Adv Space Res. 65(5):1466–1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Ali SA, Parvin F, Pham QB, Arabameri A, Nguyen H, Crăciun A, Anh DT. 2021. Detection of areas prone to flood-induced landslides risk using certainty factor and its hybridisation with FAHP, XGBoost, and deep learning neural network. Geocarto Intern. 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehn M, Bürger G, Buma J, Gasparetto P. 2000. Impact of climate change on slope stability using expanded downscaling. Engng Geol. 55(3):193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Napoli M, Carotenuto F, Cevasco A, Confuorto P, Di Martire D, Firpo M, Pepe G, Raso E, Calcaterra D. 2020. Machine learning ensemble modelling as a tool to improve landslide susceptibility mapping reliability. Landslides. 17(8):1897–1914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikshit A, Sarkar R, Pradhan B, Segoni S, Alamri AM. 2020. Rainfall induced landslide studies in Indian Himalayan region: a critical review. Appl Sci. 10(7):2466.
   Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Bui DT, Merghadi A, Sahana M, Zhu Z, Chen C-W, Khosravi K, Yang Y, Pham BT. 2019a. Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan. Sci Total Environ. 662:332–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Tien Bui D, Sahana M, Chen C-W, Zhu Z, Wang W, Thai Pham B. 2019b. Evaluating GIS-based multiple statistical models and data mining for earthquake and rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility using the LiDAR DEM. Remote Sensing. 11(6):638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragičević N, Karleuša B, Ožanić N. 2018. Improvement of drainage density parameter estimation within erosion potential method. In: Multidisciplinary digital publishing institute proceedings; p. 620.
   Google Scholar
• Du J, Glade T, Woldai T, Chai B, Zeng B. 2020. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on an incomplete landslide inventory in the Jilong Valley, Tibet, Chinese Himalayas. Engng Geol. 270:105572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansser A. 1981. The geodynamic history of the Himalaya. Zagros Hindu Kush Himalaya Geodynamic Evol. 3:111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Gariano SL, Guzzetti F. 2016. Landslides in a changing climate. Earth-Sci Rev. 162:227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena SR, Tiede D, Aryal J. 2019. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sensing. 11(2):196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Crivellari A, Ghamisi P, Shahabi H, Blaschke T. 2021. A comprehensive transferability evaluation of U-Net and ResU-Net for landslide detection from Sentinel-2 data (case study areas from Taiwan, China, and Japan). Sci Rep. 11(1):14629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Xu Y, Ghamis P, Kopp M, Kreil D. 2022. Landslide4Sense: reference benchmark data and deep learning models for landslide detection. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2206.00515.
   Google Scholar
• Gislason PO, Benediktsson JA, Sveinsson JR. 2006. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recog Letter. 27(4):294–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Warming of 1.5 °C —,. 2021. URL https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ [accessed 2021 August 29].
   Google Scholar
• Gnyawali KR, Zhang Y, Wang G, Miao L, Pradhan AMS, Adhikari BR, Xiao L. 2020. Mapping the susceptibility of rainfall and earthquake triggered landslides along China–Nepal highways. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 79(2):587–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorum T, Fan X, van Westen CJ, Huang RQ, Xu Q, Tang C, Wang G. 2011. Distribution pattern of earthquake-induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Geomorphology. 133(3–4):152–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P. 1999. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology. 31(1–4):181–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh M, Rawat JS. 2011. Landslide causes: human impacts on a Himalayan landslide swarm. Belgeo Revue belge de géographie. (3–4):201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. 2009. Boosting and additive trees. In: The elements of statistical learning. Berlin: Springer; p. 337–387.
   Google Scholar
• Hervás J. 2013. Landslide inventory. In: Bobrowsky PT, editor. Encyclopedia of natural hazards. Netherlands: Springer; p. 610–611.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt K, Mehta M. 2012. Rethinking risk and disasters in mountain areas. RGA. (100-1)
   Google Scholar
• Himalayas | Definition, Location, History, Countries, Mountains, Map, & Facts [www Document]. 2021. Encyclopedia Britannica. URL https://www.britannica.com/place/Himalayas [accessed 2021 August 29].
   Google Scholar
• Jogdand OK. 2020. Study on the effect of global warming and greenhouse gases on environmental system. In: Green chemistry and sustainable technology. New Jersey: Apple Academic Press, p. 275–306.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi V, Kumar K. 2006. Extreme rainfall events and associated natural hazards in Alaknanda valley, Indian Himalayan region. J Mt Sci. 3(3):228–236.
   Google Scholar
• Karakas G, Kocaman S, Gokceoglu C. 2022. Comprehensive performance assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping with MLP and random forest: a case study after Elazig earthquake (24 Jan 2020, Mw 6.8), Turkey. Environ Earth Sci. 81(5):144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegler E, O’Neill BC, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Lempert RJ, Moss RH, Wilbanks T. 2012. The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environ Change. 22(4):807–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Asthana AKL, Priyanka RS, Jayangondaperumal R, Gupta AK, Bhakuni SS. 2017. Assessment of landslide hazards induced by extreme rainfall event in Jammu and Kashmir Himalaya, northwest India. Geomorphology. 284:72–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Gupta V, Jamir I. 2018. Hazard evaluation of progressive Pawari landslide zone, Satluj valley, Himachal Pradesh, India. Nat Hazards. 93(2):1029–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE. 86(11):2278–2324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Cao Y, Li S, Zhao J, Sun Y. 2020. XGBoost model and its application to personal credit evaluation. IEEE Intell Syst. 35(3):52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Chen J, Tan C, Zhou X, Li Y, Han M. 2021. Debris flow susceptibility assessment based on topo-hydrological factors at different unit scales: a case study of Mentougou district, Beijing. Environ Earth Sci. 80(9):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Li L, Pirasteh S, Lai Z, Yang X, Shahabi H. 2021. Correction to: the performance quality of LR, SVM, and RF for earthquake-induced landslides susceptibility mapping incorporating remote sensing imagery. Arab J Geosci. 14(5):1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Fan B, Wang L, Bai J, Xiang S, Pan C. 2018. Semantic labeling in very high resolution images via a self-cascaded convolutional neural network. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sensing. 145:78–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik S, Pal SC, Sattar A, Singh SK, Das B, Chakrabortty R, Mohammad P. 2020. Trend of extreme rainfall events using suitable Global Circulation Model to combat the water logging condition in Kolkata Metropolitan Area. Urban Climate. 32:100599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megeirhi HA, Woosnam KM, Ribeiro MA, Ramkissoon H, Denley TJ. 2020. Employing a value-belief-norm framework to gauge Carthage residents’ intentions to support sustainable cultural heritage tourism. J Sustainable Tourism. 28(9):1351–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard S. 2002. Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster–Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci. 61:221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Mandal S. 2018. RS & GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping of the Balason River basin, Darjeeling Himalaya, using logistic regression (LR) model. Georisk Assess Manage Risk Engineered Syst Geohazards. 12(1):29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Mandal S. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping of Darjeeling Himalaya, India using index of entropy (IOE) model. Appl Geomat. 11(2):129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naithani AK, Kumar D, Prasad C. 2002. The catastrophic landslide of 16 July 2001 in Phata Byung area, Rudraprayag District, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Current Sci. 82:921–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo PTT, Panahi M, Khosravi K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Kariminejad N, Cerda A, Lee S. 2021. Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. Geosci Frontier. 12(2):505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhu V-H, Mohammadi A, Shahabi H, Ahmad BB, Al-Ansari N, Shirzadi A, Geertsema M, R. Kress V, Karimzadeh S, Valizadeh Kamran K, et al. 2020a. Landslide detection and susceptibility modeling on Cameron highlands (Malaysia): a comparison between random forest, logistic regression and logistic model tree algorithms. Forests. 11(8):830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhu V-H, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Chen W, Clague JJ, Geertsema M, Jaafari A, Avand M, Miraki S, Talebpour Asl D, et al. 2020b. Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping by random forest base classifier and its ensembles in a semi-arid region of Iran. Forests. 11(4):421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novellino A, Cesarano M, Cappelletti P, Di Martire D, Di Napoli M, Ramondini M, Sowter A, Calcaterra D. 2021. Slow-moving landslide risk assessment combining machine learning and InSAR techniques. Catena. 203:105317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill BC, Carter TR, Ebi K, Harrison PA, Kemp-Benedict E, Kok K, Kriegler E, Preston BL, Riahi K, Sillmann J, et al., 2020. Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nat Clim Chang. 10(12):1074–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C, van Vuuren DP, Eyring V, Friedlingstein P, Hurtt G, Knutti R, Kriegler E, Lamarque J-F, Lowe J, et al., 2016. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci Model Dev. 9(9):3461–3482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onagh M, Kumra VK, Rai PK. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping in a part of Uttarkashi district (India) by multiple linear regression method. Intern J Geol Earth Environ Sci. 2:102–120.
   Google Scholar
• Pal SC, Chowdhuri I. 2019. GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using frequency ratio model of Lachung River basin, North Sikkim, India. SN Appl Sci. 1(5):416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey VK, Sharma KK, Pourghasemi HR, Bandooni SK. 2019. Sedimentological characteristics and application of machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility modelling along the highway corridor Nahan to Rajgarh (Himachal Pradesh), India. CATENA. 182:104150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panthi J, Dahal P, Shrestha ML, Aryal S, Krakauer NY, Pradhanang SM, Lakhankar T, Jha AK, Sharma M, Karki R. 2015. Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall in the Gandaki River Basin of Nepal Himalaya. Climate. 3(1):210–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Singh SK, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Tran T-T-T, Bui DT. 2019. Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: hybrid machine learning approaches. Catena. 175:203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QB, Mukherjee K, Norouzi A, Linh NTT, Janizadeh S, Ahmadi K, Cerdà A, Doan TNC, Anh DT. 2020. Head-cut gully erosion susceptibility modelling based on ensemble random forest with oblique decision trees in Fareghan watershed, Iran. Geomatics Natural Hazards Risk. 11(1):2385–2410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QB, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Norouzi A, Golshan M, Ogunrinde AT, Janizadeh S, Khedher KM, Anh DT. 2021. Evaluation of various boosting ensemble algorithms for predicting flood hazard susceptibility areas. Geomatics Natural Hazards Risk. 12(1):2607–2628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. J Earth Syst Sci. 122(2):349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C. 2012. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards. 63(2):965–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan AMS, Kim Y-T. 2020. Rainfall-induced shallow landslide susceptibility mapping at two adjacent catchments using advanced machine learning algorithms. IJGI. 9(10):569.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S. 2010. Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides. 7(1):13–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2011a. Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 63(2):329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2011b. An assessment of the use of an advanced neural network model with five different training strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. J Data Sci. 9:65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan SP, Panda SD, Roul AR, Thakur M. 2019. Insights into the recent Kotropi landslide of August 2017, India: a geological investigation and slope stability analysis. Landslides. 16(8):1529–1537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Yousefi S, Kalantari Z, Uuemaa E, Teimurian T, Keesstra S, Pham TD, Tien Bui D. 2019. Multi-hazard exposure mapping using machine learning techniques: a case study from Iran. Remote Sensing. 11(16):1943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Cañón AM, Prada-Sarmiento LF, Trujillo-Vela MG, Macías JP, Santos-r AC. 2016. Linear discriminant analysis to describe the relationship between rainfall and landslides in Bogotá, Colombia. Landslides. 13(4):671–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy P, Chandra Pal S, Arabameri A, Chakrabortty R, Pradhan B, Chowdhuri I, Lee S, Tien Bui D. 2020a. Novel ensemble of multivariate adaptive regression spline with spatial logistic regression and boosted regression tree for gully erosion susceptibility. Remote Sensing. 12(20):3284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy P, Chandra Pal S, Chakrabortty R, Chowdhuri I, Malik S, Das B. 2020b. Threats of climate and land use change on future flood susceptibility. J Cleaner Product. 272:122757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy P, Martha TR, Jain N, Kumar KV. 2018. Reactivation of minor scars to major landslides: a satellite-based analysis of Kotropi landslide (13 August 2017) in Himachal Pradesh, India. Curr Sci. 115(3):395–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Pal SC, Arabameri A, Chowdhuri I, Rezaie F, Chakrabortty R, Roy P, Shit M. 2021a. Optimisation modelling to establish false measures implemented with ex-situ plant species to control gully erosion in a monsoon-dominated region with novel in-situ measurements. J Environ Manage. 287:112284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Pal SC, Santosh M, Janizadeh S, Chowdhuri I, Norouzi A, Roy P, Chakrabortty R. 2021b. Modelling multi-hazard threats to cultural heritage sites and environmental sustainability: the present and future scenarios. J Cleaner Product. 320:128713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin EK, Colkesen I, Kavzoglu T. 2020. A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Intern. 35(4):341–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin EK. 2020. Assessing the predictive capability of ensemble tree methods for landslide susceptibility mapping using XGBoost, gradient boosting machine, and random forest. SN Appl Sci. 2(7):1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameen MI, Pradhan B, Lee S. 2020. Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimisation for landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena. 186:104249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardana S, Verma AK, Singh A. 2019. Comparative analysis of rockmass characterisation techniques for the stability prediction of road cut slopes along NH-44A, Mizoram, India. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(8):5977–5989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Patra AK, Kumar P. 2012. GIS Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping–A Case Study in Indian Himalaya.
   Google Scholar
• Schandl H, Lu Y, Che N, Newth D, West J, Frank S, Obersteiner M, Rendall A, Hatfield-Dodds S. 2020. Shared socio-economic pathways and their implications for global materials use. Resource Conserv Recyc. 160:104866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahri AA, Spross J, Johansson F, Larsson S. 2019. Landslide susceptibility hazard map in southwest Sweden using artificial neural network. Catena. 183:104225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakoor A, Ashraf F, Shakoor S, Mustafa A, Rehman A, Altaf MM. 2020. Biogeochemical transformation of greenhouse gas emissions from terrestrial to atmospheric environment and potential feedback to climate forcing. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(31):38513–38536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Sharma A, Sur U, Rai PK. 2021. Comparative landslide susceptibility assessment using statistical information value and index of entropy model in Bhanupali-Beri region, Himachal Pradesh, India. Environ Dev Sustain. 23(4):5233–5250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Shi S, Wen H, Xu J, Zhou X, Wu J. 2021. A hybrid optimisation method of factor screening predicated on geodetector and random forest for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomorphology. 379:107623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Wen H, Wang D, Xu J. 2020. A random forest model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimisation using Bayes algorithm. Geomorphology. 362:107201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sur U, Singh P, Rai PK, Thakur JK. 2021. Landslide probability mapping by considering fuzzy numerical risk factor (FNRF) and landscape change for road corridor of Uttarakhand, India. Environ Dev Sustain. 23(9):13526–13554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temme AJ. 2021. Relations between soil development and landslides. Hydrogeol Chem Weather Soil Formation. 177–185.
   Google Scholar
• Thai Pham B, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Omidvar E, Singh SK, Sahana M, Talebpour Asl D, Bin Ahmad B, Kim Quoc N, Lee S. 2019. Landslide susceptibility assessment by novel hybrid machine learning algorithms. Sustainability. 11(16):4386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng CM, Lin CW, Hsieh WD. 2015. Landslide susceptibility analysis by means of event-based multi-temporal landslide inventories. Natural Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discussions. 3:1137–1173.
   Google Scholar
• Umrao RK, Singh R, Sharma LK, Singh TN. 2017. Soil slope instability along a strategic road corridor in Meghalaya, north-eastern India. Arab J Geosci. 10(12):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque J-F, et al. 2011. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change. 109(1–2):5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R. 2003. Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Natural Hazards. 30(3):399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Westen CJ. 2000. The modelling of landslide hazards using GIS. Surveys in Geophysics. 21(2/3):241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnes DJ. 1984. Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. Natural Hazards.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Dong P, Tian Y. 2017. A novel method of statistical line loss estimation for distribution feeders based on feeder cluster and modified XGBoost. Energies. 10(12):2067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Hong H. 2019. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China. Sci Total Environ. 666:975–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Shan D, Wang G, Jiang X. 2016. Multimodal medical image fusion using PCNN optimised by the QPSO algorithm. Appl Soft Comput. 46:588–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Sargent I, Pan X, Li H, Gardiner A, Hare J, Atkinson PM. 2018. An object-based convolutional neural network (OCNN) for urban land use classification. Remote Sensing Environ. 216:57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Ge T, Tian W, Liou Y-A. 2019a. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using machine-learning techniques in Shigatse area, China. Remote Sensing. 11(23):2801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Masoumi Z, Kalantari M, Aflaki M, Mansourian A. 2022. A GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping and variable importance analysis using artificial intelligent training-based methods. Remote Sensing. 14(1):211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Yuan J, Chen L. 2017. Short-term load forecasting using EMD-LSTM neural networks with a Xgboost algorithm for feature importance evaluation. Energies. 10(8):1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhongming Z, Linong L, Wangqiang Z, Wei L. 2021. AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang X, Yao Y, Li JJ. 2019. Sociocultural impacts of tourism on residents of world cultural heritage sites in China. Sustainability. 11(3):840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar