Understanding the scale effects of topographical variables on landslide susceptibility mapping in Sikkim Himalaya using deep learning approaches

References

• Abdolhosseini Moghaddam M. 2020. Application and limitation of deep learning algorithms to hydrogeology-data driven approaches to understanding effective hydraulic conductivity, flux, and monitoring network design. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona).
   Google Scholar
• Achour Y, Pourghasemi HR. 2020. How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geosci Front. 11(3):871–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allocca V, Di Napoli M, Coda S, Carotenuto F, Calcaterra D, Di Martire D, De Vita P. 2021. A novel methodology for Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility assessment through Machine Learning techniques in a mixed-land use aquifer. Sci Total Environ. 790:148067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Najjar HH, Pradhan B. 2021. Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks. Geosci Front. 12(2):625–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Chandra Pal S, Costache R, Saha A, Rezaie F, Seyed Danesh A, Pradhan B, Lee S, Hoang N-D. 2021a. Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility mapping using novel ensemble machine learning algorithms. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):469–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Chandra Pal S, Rezaie F, Chakrabortty R, Saha A, Blaschke T, Di Napoli M, Ghorbanzadeh O, Thi Ngo PT. 2021b. Decision Tree based ensemble machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 37(16):4594–4627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Karimi-Sangchini E, Pal SC, Saha A, Chowdhuri I, Lee S, Tien Bui D. 2020. Novel credal decision tree-based ensemble approaches for predicting the landslide susceptibility. Remote Sens. 12(20):3389.
   Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Rezaie F, Pal SC, Cerda A, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Lee S. 2021c. Modelling of piping collapses and gully headcut landforms: Evaluating topographic variables from different types of DEM. Geosci Front. 12(6):101230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayinde BO, Inanc T, Zurada JM. 2019. Redundant feature pruning for accelerated inference in deep neural networks. Neural Netw. 118:148–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Band SS, Janizadeh S, Chandra Pal S, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Melesse AM, Mosavi A. 2020a. Flash flood susceptibility modeling using new approaches of hybrid and ensemble tree-based machine learning algorithms. Remote Sens. 12(21):3568.
   Google Scholar
• Band SS, Janizadeh S, Chandra Pal S, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Shokri M, Mosavi A. 2020b. Novel ensemble approach of Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) model and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm for prediction of gully erosion susceptibility. Sensors. 20(19):5609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera S, Upadhyay VK, Guru B, Oommen T. 2021. Landslide inventory and susceptibility models considering the landslide typology using deep learning: Himalayas, India. Nat Hazards. 108(1):1257–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari RK. 2006. The Indian landslide scenario, strategic issues and action points, in: India Disaster Management Congress. New Delhi: Citeseer; p. 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budimir MEA, Atkinson PM, Lewis HG. 2015. A systematic review of landslide probability mapping using logistic regression. Landslides. 12(3):419–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui Q-T, Nguyen Q-H, Nguyen XL, Pham VD, Nguyen HD, Pham V-M. 2020. Verification of novel integrations of swarm intelligence algorithms into deep learning neural network for flood susceptibility mapping. J Hydrol. 581:124379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Nguyen V-T, Van Liem N, Trinh PT. 2020. Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena. 188:104426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlini M, Chelli A, Vescovi P, Artoni A, Clemenzi L, Tellini C, Torelli L. 2016. Tectonic control on the development and distribution of large landslides in the Northern Apennines (Italy). Geomorphology. 253:425–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabortty R, Pal SC, Roy P, Saha A, Chowdhuri I. 2022. Novel ensemble approach for landslide susceptibility index assessment in a mountainous environment of India. Geocarto Int:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty I, Ghosh S, Bhattacharya D, Bora A. 2011. Earthquake induced landslides in the Sikkim-Darjeeling Himalayas—An aftermath of the 18th September 2011 Sikkim earthquake. Report of Geological Survey of India, Kolkata, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Chang K-T, Merghadi A, Yunus AP, Pham BT, Dou J. 2019. Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques. Sci Rep. 9(1):12296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen W, Chai H, Sun X, Wang Q, Ding X, Hong H. 2016. A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, statistical index and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Arab J Geosci. 9(3):204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen W, Chandra Pal S, Saha A, Chowdhuri I, Adeli B, Janizadeh S, Dineva AA, Wang X, Mosavi A. 2022. Evaluation efficiency of hybrid deep learning algorithms with neural network decision tree and boosting methods for predicting groundwater potential. Geocarto Int. 37(19):5564–5584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Kornejady A, Zhang N. 2017a. Landslide spatial modeling: Introducing new ensembles of ANN, MaxEnt, and SVM machine learning techniques. Geoderma. 305:314–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Xie X, Wang J, Pradhan B, Hong H, Bui DT, Duan Z, Ma J. 2017b. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena. 151:147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Ye F, Fu W, Ke Y, Hong H. 2020. The influence of DEM spatial resolution on landslide susceptibility mapping in the Baxie River basin, NW China. Nat Hazards. 101(3):853–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal S, Arabameri A, Ngo P, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy P. 2020a. Ensemble approach to develop landslide susceptibility map in landslide dominated Sikkim Himalayan region, India. Environ Earth Sci. 79(20):1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Arabameri A, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Blaschke T, Pradhan B, Band SS. 2020b. Implementation of artificial intelligence based ensemble models for gully erosion susceptibility assessment. Remote Sens. 12(21):3620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy P. 2021. Torrential rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning and statistical methods of eastern Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 107(1):697–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Janizadeh S, Saha A, Ahmadi K, Chakrabortty R, Islam A, Roy P, Shit M. 2022a. Application of novel deep boosting framework-based earthquake induced landslide hazards prediction approach in Sikkim Himalaya. Geocarto Int:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Roy P. 2022b. Mapping of earthquake hotspot and coldspot zones for identifying potential landslide hotspot areas in the Himalayan region. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 81(7):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens L, Heuvelink GBM, Schoorl JM, Veldkamp A. 2005. DEM resolution effects on shallow landslide hazard and soil redistribution modelling. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 30(4):461–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho IM, Coelho VN, Luz EdS, Ochi LS, Guimarães FG, Rios E. 2017. A GPU deep learning metaheuristic based model for time series forecasting. Appl Energy. 201:412–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Ngo PTT, Bui DT. 2020. Novel ensembles of deep learning neural network and statistical learning for flash-flood susceptibility mapping. Water. 12(6):1549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 44(3):837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Merghadi A, Shirzadi A, Nguyen H, Hussain Y, Avtar R, Chen Y, Pham BT, Yamagishi H. 2020. Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning. Sci Total Environ. 720:137320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Wang Y, Peng L, Hong H. 2021. A comparative study of heterogeneous ensemble-learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Geograph Information Sc. 35(2):321–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froude MJ, Petley DN. 2018. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 18(8):2161–2181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaidzik K, Ramírez-Herrera MT. 2021. The importance of input data on landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garosi Y, Sheklabadi M, Pourghasemi HR, Besalatpour AA, Conoscenti C, Van Oost K. 2018. Comparison of differences in resolution and sources of controlling factors for gully erosion susceptibility mapping. Geoderma. 330:65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena SR, Tiede D, Aryal J. 2019. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens. 11(2):196.
   Google Scholar
• Gokceoglu C. 2012. Discussion on “combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using aster images and gis” by choi et al.(2012), engineering geology, 124, 12–23. Eng Geol. 129–130:104–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves A, Mohamed A, Hinton G. 2013. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE. p. 6645–6649.
   Google Scholar
• Guan Z, Wang J, Wang X, Xin W, Cui J, Jing X. 2021. A comparative study of RNN-based methods for web malicious code detection. 2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS). IEEE. p. 769–773.
   Google Scholar
• Han H, Guo X, Yu H. 2016. Variable selection using mean decrease accuracy and mean decrease gini based on random forest. 2016 7th Ieee International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (Icsess). IEEE. p. 219–224.
   Google Scholar
• Harilal GT, Madhu D, Ramesh MV, Pullarkatt D. 2019. Towards establishing rainfall thresholds for a real-time landslide early warning system in Sikkim, India. Landslides. 16(12):2395–2408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Q, Xu Z, Li S, Li R, Zhang S, Wang N, Pham BT, Chen W. 2019. Novel entropy and rotation forest-based credal decision tree classifier for landslide susceptibility modeling. Entropy. 21(2):106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengl T. 2006. Finding the right pixel size. Comput Geosci. 32(9):1283–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Sameen MI, Kalantar B, Zhu A, Chen W. 2018. Improving the accuracy of landslide susceptibility model using a novel region-partitioning approach. Landslides. 15(4):753–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini H, Xiao B, Jaiswal M, Poovendran R. 2017. On the limitation of convolutional neural networks in recognizing negative images. 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, p. 352–358.
   Google Scholar
• Huang R, Fan X. 2013. The landslide story. Nature Geosci. 6(5):325–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L. 2014. The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides. 11(2):167–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam A, Saha A, Ghose B, Pal SC, Chowdhuri I, Mallick J. 2021. Landslide susceptibility modeling in a complex mountainous region of Sikkim Himalaya using new hybrid data mining approach. Geocarto Int:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janizadeh S, Pal SC, Saha A, Chowdhuri I, Ahmadi K, Mirzaei S, Mosavi AH, Tiefenbacher JP. 2021. Mapping the spatial and temporal variability of flood hazard affected by climate and land-use changes in the future. J Environ Manage. 298:113551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena R, Pradhan B, Alamri AM. 2020. Susceptibility to seismic amplification and earthquake probability estimation using recurrent Neural Network (RNN) model in Odisha, India. Appl Sci. 10(15):5355.
   Google Scholar
• Kamiński M. 2020. The impact of quality of digital elevation models on the result of landslide susceptibility modeling using the method of weights of evidence. Geosciences. 10(12):488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamran KV, Feizizadeh B, Khorrami B, Ebadi Y. 2021. A comparative approach of support vector machine kernel functions for GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Appl Geomat. 13(4):837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Bhambri R, Tiwari SK, Verma A, Gupta AK, Kawishwar P. 2019. Evolution of debris flow and moraine failure in the Gangotri Glacier region, Garhwal Himalaya: Hydro-geomorphological aspects. Geomorphology. 333:152–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanaras C, Bioucas-Dias J, Galliani S, Baltsavias E, Schindler K. 2018. Super-resolution of Sentinel-2 images: Learning a globally applicable deep neural network. ISPRS J Photogr Remote Sens. 146:305–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner AM, Stein A, Jones SD, Ferwerda JG. 2009. Remote sensing of small and linear features: Quantifying the effects of patch size and length, grid position and detectability on land cover mapping. Remote Sens Environ. 113(10):2194–2204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. 2015. Deep learning. Nature. 521(7553):436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang Y, Huang X, Yuille AL. 2018. Deep networks under scene-level supervision for multi-class geospatial object detection from remote sensing images. ISPRS J Photogrammetr Remote Sens. 146:182–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchese LV, de Oliveira GG, Pedrollo OC. 2021. Mamdani fuzzy inference systems and artificial neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards. 106(3):2381–2405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalingam R, Olsen MJ, O'Banion MS. 2016. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility mapping techniques using lidar-derived conditioning factors (Oregon case study). Geomatics, Nat Hazards and Risk. 7(6):1884–1907.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi M, Moayedi H. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using artificial neural network tuned by metaheuristic algorithms. Environ Earth Sci. 80(24):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merghadi A, Yunus AP, Dou J, Whiteley J, ThaiPham B, Bui DT, Avtar R, Abderrahmane B. 2020. Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance. Earth-Sci Rev. 207:103225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakileza BR, Nedala S. 2020. Topographic influence on landslides characteristics and implication for risk management in upper Manafwa catchment, Mt Elgon Uganda. Geoenviron Disasters. 7(1):27.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo PTT, Panahi M, Khosravi K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Kariminejad N, Cerda A, Lee S. 2021. Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. Geosci Front. 12(2):505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugraha H, Wacano D, Dipayana GA, Cahyadi A, Mutaqin BW, Larasati A. 2015. Geomorphometric characteristics of landslides in the Tinalah watershed, Menoreh Mountains, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Proc Environ Sci. 28:578–586.
   Google Scholar
• Pal SC, Arabameri A, Blaschke T, Chowdhuri I, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Lee S, Band SS. 2020. Ensemble of machine-learning methods for predicting gully erosion susceptibility. Remote Sens. 12(22):3675.
   Google Scholar
• Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Saha A, Bozchaloei SK, Pham QB, Linh NTT, Anh DT, Janizadeh S, Ahmadi K. 2022. Evaluation of debris flow and landslide hazards using ensemble framework of Bayesian-and tree-based models. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 81(1):25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Chowdhuri I. 2019. GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using frequency ratio model of Lachung River basin, North Sikkim, India. SN Appl Sci. 1(5):416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Kim J. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on random forest and boosted regression tree models, and a comparison of their performance. Appl Sci. 9(5):942.
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Luu C, Van Dao D, Van Phong T, Nguyen HD, Van Le H, von Meding J, Prakash I. 2021a. Flood risk assessment using deep learning integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis. Knowledge-Based Syst. 219:106899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Dou J, Singh SK, Trinh PT, Tran HT, Le TM, Phong TV, Khoi DK, Shirzadi A, et al. 2020. A novel hybrid approach of landslide susceptibility modelling using rotation forest ensemble and different base classifiers. Geocarto Int. 35(12):1267–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Van Dao D, Acharya TD, Van Phong T, Costache R, Van Le H, Nguyen HBT, Prakash I. 2021b. Performance assessment of artificial neural network using chi-square and backward elimination feature selection methods for landslide susceptibility analysis. Environ Earth Sci. 80(20):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N. 2016. Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 75(3):185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Sameen MI. 2017. Effects of the spatial resolution of digital elevation models and their products on landslide susceptibility mapping. In: Laser scanning applications in landslide assessment. Berlin: Springer, Verlag; p. 133–150.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Loveson VJ, Das B, Kotha M. 2022. Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 37(16):4571–4593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi-Termeh SV, Shirani K, Pasandi M. 2021. Mapping of landslide susceptibility using the combination of neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), ant colony (ANFIS-ACOR), and differential evolution (ANFIS-DE) models. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(3):2045–2067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F. 2018. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Sci Rev. 180:60–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Pal SC, Arabameri A, Chowdhuri I, Rezaie F, Chakrabortty R, Roy P, Shit M. 2021a. Optimization modelling to establish false measures implemented with ex-situ plant species to control gully erosion in a monsoon-dominated region with novel in-situ measurements. J Environ Manage. 287:112284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Pal SC, Santosh M, Janizadeh S, Chowdhuri I, Norouzi A, Roy P, Chakrabortty R. 2021b. Modelling multi-hazard threats to cultural heritage sites and environmental sustainability: The present and future scenarios. J Cleaner Produc. 320:128713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Roy AK, Martha TR. 2013. Landslide susceptibility assessment using information value method in parts of the Darjeeling Himalayas. J Geol Soc India. 82(4):351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sati VP. 2007. Environmental impacts of debris flows-A case study of the two debris-flow zones in the Garhwal Himalaya. Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Chen & Major, eds. p. 715–723.
   Google Scholar
• Sbroglia RM, Reginatto GMP, Higashi RAR, Guimarães RF. 2018. Mapping susceptible landslide areas using geotechnical homogeneous zones with different DEM resolutions in Ribeirão Baú basin, Ilhota/SC/Brazil. Landslides. 15(10):2093–2106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlögel R, Marchesini I, Alvioli M, Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malet J-P. 2018. Optimizing landslide susceptibility zonation: Effects of DEM spatial resolution and slope unit delineation on logistic regression models. Geomorphology. 301:10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber J. 2015. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Netw. 61:85–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta A, Gupta S, Anbarasu K. 2010. Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslide at Lanta Khola in north Sikkim, India. Nat Hazards. 52(1):31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SERIES-E. 2011. Geoseismological report on Sikkim earthquake.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Prakash C, Manivasagam VS. 2021. Entropy-based hybrid integration of random forest and support vector machine for landslide susceptibility analysis. Geomatics. 1(4):399–416.
   Google Scholar
• Sun D, Xu J, Wen H, Wang D. 2021. Assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping based on Bayesian hyperparameter optimization: A comparison between logistic regression and random forest. Engin Geol. 281:105972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svalova VB, Zaalishvili VB, Ganapathy GP, Nikolaev AV, Melkov DA. 2019. Landslide risk in mountain areas. Geol South of Russia. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Taalab K, Cheng T, Zhang Y. 2018. Mapping landslide susceptibility and types using random forest. Big Earth Data. 2(2):159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Tanyu BF, Abbaspour A, Alimohammadlou Y, Tecuci G. 2021. Landslide susceptibility analyses using Random Forest, C4. 5, and C5. 0 with balanced and unbalanced datasets. Catena. 203:105355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Hoang N-D, Martínez-Álvarez F, Ngo P-TT, Hoa PV, Pham TD, Samui P, Costache R. 2020. A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: A case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci Total Environ. 701:134413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dao D, Jaafari A, Bayat M, Mafi-Gholami D, Qi C, Moayedi H, Phong TV, Ly H-B, Le T-T, Trinh PT, et al. 2020. A spatially explicit deep learning neural network model for the prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena. 188:104451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent P, Larochelle H, Lajoie I, Bengio Y, Manzagol P-A, Bottou L. 2010. Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. J Machine Learn Res. 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Hong H. 2019. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China. Sci Total Environ. 666:975–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Wang M, Peng L, Hong H. 2020. Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks. Comput Geosci. 138:104445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Lei X, Chen W, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A. 2020. Hybrid computational intelligence methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Symmetry. 12(3):325.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler SP. 2007. Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 11(4):1481–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Niu R. 2018. Displacement prediction of Baijiabao landslide based on empirical mode decomposition and long short-term memory neural network in Three Gorges area, China. Comput Geosci. 111:87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yordanov V, Brovelli MA. 2020. Comparing model performance metrics for landslide susceptibility mapping. In: 2020 24th ISPRS Congress-Technical Commission III. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, p. 1277–1284.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi S, Sadhasivam N, Pourghasemi HR, Ghaffari Nazarlou H, Golkar F, Tavangar S, Santosh M. 2020. Groundwater spring potential assessment using new ensemble data mining techniques. Measurement. 157:107652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JX, Chang K-T, Wu JQ. 2008. Effects of DEM resolution and source on soil erosion modelling: a case study using the WEPP model. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 22(8):925–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Han L, Han J, Li X, Zhang H, Wang H. 2019. Assessment of landslide susceptibility using integrated ensemble fractal dimension with Kernel logistic regression model. Entropy. 21(2):218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Isola P, Efros AA. 2017. Split-brain autoencoders: Unsupervised learning by cross-channel prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. p. 1058–1067.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Sargent I, Pan X, Li H, Gardiner A, Hare J, Atkinson PM. 2018. An object-based convolutional neural network (OCNN) for urban land use classification. Remote Sens Environ. 216:57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar