The morphing for continuous generalization of linear features based on Dynamic Time Warping distance

References

• Belgiu M, Zhou Y, Marshall M, Stein A. 2020. Dynamic time warping for crops mapping. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 43:947–951.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt DJ, Clifford J. 1994. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Seattle, WA: AAAI Press; p. 359–370.
   Google Scholar
• Cecconi A, Galanda M. 2002. Adaptive zooming in web cartography. In: Computer Graphics Forum. Vol. 21; p. 787–799.
   Google Scholar
• Cecconi A. 2003. Integration of cartographic generalization and multi-scale databases for enhanced web mapping [doctoral dissertation]. Switzerland: ETH Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Csillik O, Belgiu M, Asner GP, Kelly M. 2019. Object-based time-constrained dynamic time warping classification of crops using sentinel-2. Remote Sensing. 11(10):1257. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/10/1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danciger J, Devadoss SL, Mugno J, Sheehy D, Ward R. 2009. Shape deformation in continuous map generalization. Geoinformatica. 13(2):203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng M, Peng D. 2015. Morphing linear features based on their entire structures. Trans GIS. 19(5):653–677. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/tgis.12111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Wu F, Xing R, Gong X, Yu L. 2022. Segmentation and sampling method for complex polyline generalization based on a generative adversarial network. Geocarto Int. 37(14):4158–4180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan W. 2014. Matching and classification model for multi-scale transformation and representation of spatial data. J Geomatics Sci Technol. 31(4):331–335.
   Google Scholar
• Gao A, Li J, Chen K. 2020. A morphing approach for continuous generalization of linear map features. PLoS ONE. 15(12):e0243328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan X, Liu G, Huang C, Meng X, Liu Q, Wu C, Ablat X, Chen Z, Wang Q. 2018. An open-boundary locally weighted dynamic time warping method for cropland mapping. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 7(2):75. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/7/2/75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han L, Gao C, Zhang S, Li D, Sun Z, Yang G, Li J, Zhang C, Shao G. 2019. Speech recognition algorithm of substation inspection robot based on improved DTW. In: Advances in Intelligent, Interactive Systems and Applications: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent, Interactive Systems and Applications (IISA2018) 3. Springer; p. 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Izakian H, Pedrycz W, Jamal I. 2015. Fuzzy clustering of time series data using dynamic time warping distance. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 39:235–244. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197614003078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Qi Y, Wang W, Bent B, Avram R, Olgin J, Dunn J. 2020. EventDTW: An improved dynamic time warping algorithm for aligning biomedical signals of nonuniform sampling frequencies. Sensors. 20(9):2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya H, Gündüz-Öğüdücü Ş., Ş., 2015. A distance based time series classification framework. Inf Syst. 51:27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Ai T, Liu P, Yang M. 2017a. Continuous scale transformations of linear features using simulated annealing-based morphing. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 6(8):242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Fang W. 2018. Morphing polylines by preserving local neighborhood structures. Geomatics Inf Sci Wuhan Univ. 43(08):1138–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Li X, Xie T. 2017b. Morphing of building footprints using a turning angle function. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 6(6):173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Liu P, Yu W, Cheng X. 2018. The morphing of geographical features by Fourier transformation. PLoS ONE. 13(1):e0191136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhou Q. 2012. Integration of linear and areal hierarchies for continuous multi-scale representation of road networks. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 26(5):855–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Wang G, Zhang B, Guo B, Shum H-Y. 2004. Perceptually based approach for planar shape morphing. In: 12th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2004. PG 2004. Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Liu P, Li X, Liu W, Ai T. 2016. Fourier-based multi-scale representation and progressive transmission of cartographic curves on the internet. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci. 43(5):454–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Xiao T, Xiao J, Ai T. 2020. A multi-scale representation model of polyline based on head/tail breaks. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 34(11):2275–2295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonergan M, Jones C. 2001. An iterative displacement method for conflict resolution in map generalization. Algorithmica. 30(2):287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka A, Yoshioka F, Ozawa S, Takebe J. 2019. Development of three-dimensional facial expression models using morphing methods for fabricating facial prostheses. J Prosthodontic Res. 63(1):66–72. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1883195818302287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nöllenburg M, Merrick D, Wolff A, Benkert M. 2008. Morphing polylines: A step towards continuous generalization. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 32(4):248–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantazis D, Karathanasis B, Kassoli M, Koukofikis A, Stratakis P. 2009b. Morphing techniques: towards new methods for raster based cartographic generalization. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Cartographic Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Pantazis DN, Karathanasis B, Kassoli M, Koukofikis A. 2009a. Are the morphing techniques useful for cartographic generalization? In: Alenka Krek, Massimo Rumor, Sisi Zlatanova, Elfriede M. Fendel, editors. Urban and regional data management. London: CRC Press; p. 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Peng D, Wolff A, Haunert J-H. 2016. Continuous generalization of administrative boundaries based on compatible triangulations. In: Geospatial Data in a Changing World: Selected Papers of the 19th Agile Conference on Geographic Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Permanasari Y, Harahap EH, Ali EP. 2019. Speech recognition using dynamic time warping. In: Journal of physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1366. IOP Publishing; p. 012091.
   Google Scholar
• Sederberg T, Gao P, Wang G, Mu H. 1993. 2-D shape blending: An intrinsic solution to the vertex path problem. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Sederberg T, Greenwood E. 1992. A physically based approach to 2-d shape blending. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. Vol. 26; p. 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Ai T, Li J, Huang L, Li W. 2020. A progressive method for the collapse of river representation considering geographical characteristics. Int J Digital Earth. 13(12):1366–1390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyvers M. 1999. Morphing techniques for manipulating face images. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 31(2):359–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoter J, Burghardt D, Duchêne C, Baella B, Bakker N, Blok C, Pla M, Regnauld N, Touya G, Schmid S. 2009. Methodology for evaluating automated map generalization in commercial software. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 33(5):311–324. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971509000465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šuba R, Meijers M, Oosterom P. 2016. Continuous road network generalization throughout all scales. Int J Geo-Inf. 5(8):145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surazhsky V, Gotsman C. 2003. Intrinsic morphing of compatible triangulations. Int J Shape Model. 09(02):191–201.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kreveld M. 2001. Smooth generalization for continuous zooming. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Geographic Conference; p. 2180–2185.
   Google Scholar
• Whited B, Rossignac J. 2009. B-morphs between b-compatible curves in the plane. In: 2009 SIAM/ACM Joint Conference on Geometric and Physical Modeling
   Google Scholar
• Wilson ID, Ware JM, Ware JA. 2003. A genetic algorithm approach to cartographic map generalisation. Comput Ind. 52(3):291–304. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361503001325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki S. 2007. Warping and morphing. In: Benjamin W. Wah, editor. Wiley encyclopedia of computer science and engineering. Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Yang B, Purves R, Weibel R. 2007. Efficient transmission of vector data over the internet. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 21(2):215–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Feng J. 2009. 2d shape morphing via automatic feature matching and hierarchical interpolation. Comput Graphics. 33(3):414–423. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097849309000387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuefeng Z. 1996. A fuzzy approach to digital image warping. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl. 16(4):34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Zhong S, Tu W, Zheng J, He S, Bao J, Huang C. 2019. Assessing spatial accessibility to medical resources at the community level in shenzhen, china. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(2):242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar