Vegetation structural composition mapping of a complex landscape using forest cover density transformation and random decision forest classifier: a comparison

References

• Abdollahnejad A, Panagiotidis D, Surovy P. 2017. Forest canopy density assessment using different approaches – Review. J For Sci. 63(3):107–116. doi: 10.17221/110/2016-JFS.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed R. 2020. Temporal assessment of forest canopy density around Hojai-Diphu railway line in Assam, India. Int J Sci Technol Res. 9(03):3040–3043.
   Google Scholar
• Arjasakusuma S, Swahyu Kusuma S, Phinn S. 2020. Evaluating variable selection and machine learning algorithms for estimating forest heights by combining lidar and hyperspectral data. IJGI. 9(9):507. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9090507.
   Google Scholar
• Arjasakusuma S, Kusuma S, Mahendra W, Astriviany N. 2021. Mapping paddy field extent and temporal pattern variation in a complex terrain area using Sentinel 1-Time Series Data: case study of Magelang District, Indonesia. IJG. 17(2):79–88. doi: 10.52939/ijg.v17i2.1763.
   Google Scholar
• Bera B, Saha J, Bhattacharjee S. 2020. Estimation of forest canopy cover and forest fragmentation mapping using Landsat Satellite Data of Silabati river basin (India). KN J Cartogr Geogr Inf. 70(4):181–197. doi: 10.1007/s42489-020-00060-1.
   Google Scholar
• Biau G. 2012. Analysis of a random forests model. J Mach Learn Res. 13(1):1063–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Cutler A. 2005. Random Forests. Available at http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/∼breiman/RandomForests/.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez PS. Jr., 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections revisited and improved. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 62(9):1025–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Green K. 2019. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data - principles and practices. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Costa H, Almeida D, Vala F, Marcelino F, Caetano M. 2018. Land cover mapping from remotely sensed and auxiliary data for harmonized official statistics. IJGI. 7(4):157–177. doi: 10.3390/ijgi7040157.
   Google Scholar
• Danoedoro P. 2019. Multidimensional land-use information for local planning and land resources assessment in Indonesia: classification scheme for information extraction from high-spatial resolution imagery. IJG. 51(2):131–146. doi: 10.22146/ijg.32781.
   Google Scholar
• Danoedoro P, Ananda IN, Kartika CSD, Umela AF, Indayani AB. 2020. Testing a detailed classification scheme for land-cover/land-use mapping of typical Indonesian landscapes: case study of Sarolangun, Jambi and Salatiga, Central Java. IJG. 52(3):327–340. doi: 10.22146/ijg.50080.
   Google Scholar
• Danoedoro P, Gupita DD. 2022. Combining pan-sharpening and forest cover density transformation methods for vegetation mapping using Landsat-8 Satellite Imagery. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inform Technol. 12(3):881–891. doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.12514.
   Google Scholar
• Danoedoro P, Gupita DD, Afwani MZ, Hadi HA, Mahendra WK. 2022. Preliminary study on the use of digital surface models for estimating vegetation cover density in a mountainous area. IJG. 54(3):333–342. doi: 10.22146/ijg.60659.
   Google Scholar
• Deka J, Tripathi P, Khan ML, Srivastava VK. 2019. Study on land-use and land-cover change dynamics in Eastern Arunachal Pradesh, N.E. India using remote sensing and GIS. Trop Ecol. 60(2):199–208. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s42965-019-00022-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman JR. 2019. Idrisi TerrSet – Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Clark Labs, Worchester, MA: Clark University.
   Google Scholar
• Fawagreh K, Gaber MM, Elyan E. 2014. Random forests: from early developments to recent advancements. Syst Sci Control Eng. 2(1):602–609. doi: 10.1080/21642583.2014.956265.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin J. 2013. Mapping vegetation from landscape to regional scales. In: van der Maarel E, Franklin J, editors. Vegetation ecology, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fu B, Wang Y, Campbell A, Li Y, Zhang B, Yin S, Xing Z, Jin X. 2017. Comparison of object-based and pixel-based Random Forest algorithm for wetland vegetation mapping using high spatial resolution GF-1 and SAR data. Ecol Indic. 73:105–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri CP. 2012. Remote sensing of land use and land cover: principles and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press
   Google Scholar
• Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. 2017. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ. 202:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi HA, Danoedoro P. 2021. Comparing several pixel-based classification methods for vegetation structural composition mapping using Sentinel 2A Imagery in Salatiga Area, Central Java. Proc. SPIE 12082, Seventh Geoinformation Science Symposium 2021, 120820T (22 December 2021). doi: 10.1117/12.2621965.
   Google Scholar
• Hartoyo APP, Prasetyo LB, Siregar IZS, Theilade I, Siregar UJ. 2019. Carbon stock assessment using forest canopy density mapper in agroforestry land in Berau, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 20(9):2661–2676. 2019, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d200931.
   Google Scholar
• Ho TK. 1995. Random Decision Forests. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 1995, pp. 278–282, vol.1, doi: 10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994.
   Google Scholar
• Himayah S, Danoedoro, P, Hartono. 2016. The utilization of Landsat 8 multitemporal imagery and forest canopy density (FCD) model for forest reclamation priority of natural disaster areas at Kelud mountain, East Java. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 47(1):012043., doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/47/1/012043.
   Google Scholar
• Huggett R, Cheesman J. 2002. Topography and the Environment. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). 1997. Utilization of Remote Sensing in Site 22 Assessment and Planning for Rehabilitation of Logged-Over Forests. Project Report on PD 32193 23 Rev.2 (F): Rehabilitation of Logged-Over Forests in Asia/Pacific Region, Sub-Project III.
   Google Scholar
• International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO)/JOFCA. 2003. FCD-Mapper Ver.2 User Guide, Semi-Expert Remote Sensing System for Canopy Density Mapping.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail M, Danoedoro, P, Hartono. 2017. The application of forest cover density (FCD) model for structural composition of vegetation changes in part of Lore Lindu National Park, Central Sulawesi Province. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 98(1):012056., doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/98/1/012056.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JR. 2015. Introductory digital image processing – a remote sensing perspective. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Küchler AW, Zonneveld IS. 1988. Vegetation mapping. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3083-4.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadpour P, Viegas DX, Viegas C. 2022. Vegetation mapping with random forest using Sentinel 2 and GLCM texture feature—a case study for Lousã Region, Portugal. Remote Sens. 14(18):4585.doi: 10.3390/rs14184585.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno K. 1991. A vegetation-ecological approach to the classification and evaluation of potential natural vegetation of the Fagetea crenatae region in Tohoku (northern Honshu), Japan. Ecol Res. 6(1):29–49. doi: 10.1007/BF02353868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratama LDY, Danoedoro P. 2020. Above-ground carbon stock estimates of rubber (hevea brasiliensis) using Sentinel 2A imagery: a case study in rubber plantation of PTPN IX Kebun Getas and Kebun Ngobo, Semarang Regency. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 0(1):012087.
   Google Scholar
• Piranti A, Waluyo G, Rahayu DRUS. 2019. The possibility of using Lake Rawa Pening as a source of drinking water. J Water Land Dev. 41(1):111–119. doi: 10.2478/jwld-2019-0034.
   Google Scholar
• Rikimaru A, Roy PS, Miyatake S. 2002. Tropical forest cover density mapping. Trop Ecol. 43(1):39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Salsabila HN, Danoedoro P. 2021. The effect of atmospheric and topographic corrections on the vegetation density mapping using several vegetation indices: a case study in Arjuno-Welirang volcanoes. East Java. Seventh Geoinformation Science Symposium 2021. 12082, 279–284.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PF, Ganesh S, Liu P. 2013. A comparison of random forest regression and multiple linear regression for prediction in neuroscience. J Neurosci Methods. 220(1):85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.08.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukarna RM. 2008. Aplikasi Model Forest Canopy Density Citra Landsat 7 ETM untuk Menentukan Indeks Luas Tajuk (Crown Area Index) Dan Kerapatan Tegakan (Stand Density) Hutan Rawa Gambut Di DAS Sebangau Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Maj Geogr Indones. 22(1):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• van Bemmelen RW. 1949. The Geology of Indonesia. The Hague: V.F.A. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• van Gils H, van Wijngaarden W, Huizing H, van der Zee D. 1990. Land Ecology and Land-use Survey. Enschede: International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Xue J, Su B. 2017. Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications. J Sensors. 2017(17):1–17. doi: 10.1155/2017/1353691.
   Google Scholar
• Zaehringer JG, Llopis JC, Latthachack P, Thein TT, Heinimann A. 2018. A novel participatory and remote-sensing-based approach to mapping annual land use change on forest frontiers in Laos, Myanmar, and Madagascar. J. Land Use Sci. 13(1-2):16–31. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2018.1447033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar