Remote sensing change detection: a comparative study of spectral distances

References

• Alberga V. 2009. Similarity measures of remotely sensed multi-sensor images for change detection applications. Remote Sens. 1(3):122–143. doi: 10.3390/rs1030122.
   Google Scholar
• Bao Q, Guo P. 2004. Comparative studies on similarity measures for remote sensing image retrieval. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat No 04CH37583); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bovolo F, Bruzzone L. 2006. A theoretical framework for unsupervised change detection based on change vector analysis in the polar domain. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 45(1):218–236. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.885408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruzzone L, Prieto DF. 2000. Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 38(3):1171–1182. doi: 10.1109/36.843009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruzzone L, Prieto DF. 2002. An adaptive semiparametric and context-based approach to unsupervised change detection in multitemporal remote-sensing images. IEEE Trans Image Process. 11(4):452–466. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2002.999678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun Y, Han Y, Chae T. 2015. Image fusion-based change detection for flood extent extraction using bi-temporal very high-resolution satellite images. Remote Sens. 7(8):10347–10363. doi: 10.3390/rs70810347.
   Google Scholar
• Cao CC. 2019. Exploring deep learning methods for analyzing land use change. Environment: Department of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho Júnior OA, Guimarães RF, Gillespie AR, Silva NC, Gomes RA. 2011. A new approach to change vector analysis using distance and similarity measures. Remote Sens. 3(11):2473–2493. doi: 10.3390/rs3112473.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho Júnior OA, Meneses PR. 2000. Spectral Correlation Mapper (SCM): an improving Spectral Angle Mapper. Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Gong P, He C, Pu R, Shi P. 2003. Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 69(4):369–379. doi: 10.14358/PERS.69.4.369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Lu M, Chen X, Chen J, Chen L. 2013. A spectral gradient difference based approach for land cover change detection. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 85:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury A, Dwarakish GS. 2022. Selection of algorithm for land use land cover classification and change detection. IJARSCT. 2(1):15–24. doi: 10.48175/IJARSCT-2610.
   Google Scholar
• Colditz RR, Acosta-Velázquez J, Díaz Gallegos JR, Vázquez Lule AD, Rodríguez-Zúñiga MT, Maeda P, Cruz López MI, Ressl R. 2012. Potential effects in multi-resolution post-classification change detection. Int J Remote Sens. 33(20):6426–6445. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2012.688148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 37(1):35–46. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppin PR, Bauer ME. 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens Rev. 13(3-4):207–234. doi: 10.1080/02757259609532305.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter LL, Hope AS, Stow DA, Lippitt CD, Lathrop SJ. 2011. Time–space radiometric normalization of TM/ETM + images for land cover change detection. Int J Remote Sens. 32(22):7539–7556. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.524676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong KL, Bosman AS 2019. Unsupervised change detection in satellite images using convolutional neural networks. In 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Deepthy R, Vasuki A 2013. Fusion of difference images for change detection. In IJCA Proc on Int Conf on Innovations in Intelligent Instrumentation, Optimization and Electrical Sciences ICIIIOES.
   Google Scholar
• Dibs H, Hasab HA, Mahmoud AS, Al-Ansari N. 2021. Fusion methods and multi-classifiers to improve land cover estimation using remote sensing analysis. Geotech Geol Eng. 39(8):5825–5842. doi: 10.1007/s10706-021-01869-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. 2012. Pattern classification. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Eismann M. 2012. Hyperspectral remote sensing. Bellingham, Washington DC: SPIE Press.
   Google Scholar
• El-Hattab MM. 2015. Change detection and restoration alternatives for the Egyptian Lake Maryut. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 18(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• El-Hattab MM. 2016. Applying post classification change detection technique to monitor an Egyptian coastal zone (Abu Qir Bay). Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 19(1):23–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi Nasrabadi SB. 2019. Questions of concern in drawing up a remote sensing change detection plan. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 47(9):1455–1469. doi: 10.1007/s12524-019-00997-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody GM. 2009. Classification accuracy comparison: hypothesis tests and the use of confidence intervals in evaluations of difference, equivalence and non-inferiority. Remote Sens Environ. 113(8):1658–1663. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholinejad S, Fatemi SB. 2019. Optimum indices for vegetation cover change detection in the Zayandeh-rud river basin: a fusion approach. Int J Image Data Fusion. 10(3):199–216. doi: 10.1080/19479832.2019.1601642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez C, White JC, Wulder MA. 2016. Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 116:55–72. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong M, Zhou Z, Ma J. 2011. Change detection in synthetic aperture radar images based on image fusion and fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans Image Process. 21(4):2141–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami M, Khire M. 2016. Land use and land cover change detection for urban sprawl analysis of Ahmedabad city using multitemporal landsat data. IJARSG. 5(1):1670–1677. –doi: 10.23953/cloud.ijarsg.51.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami A, Sharma D, Mathuku H, Gangadharan SM, Yadav CS, Sahu SK, Pradhan MK, Singh J, Imran H. 2022. Change detection in remote sensing image data comparing algebraic and machine learning methods. Electronics. 11(3):431. doi: 10.3390/electronics11030431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain M, Chen D, Cheng A, Wei H, Stanley D. 2013. Change detection from remotely sensed images: from pixel-based to object-based approaches. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 80:91–106. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JR. 2009. Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective 2/e. Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Ji H. 2010. Challenges from information extraction to information fusion. Coling 2010: posters.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang D, Huang Y, Zhuang D, Zhu Y, Xu X, Ren H. 2012. A simple semi-automatic approach for land cover classification from multispectral remote sensing imagery.
   Google Scholar
• Kesikoglu MH, Atasever UH, Dadaser-Celik F, Ozkan C. 2019. Performance of ANN, SVM and MLH techniques for land use/cover change detection at Sultan Marshes wetland, Turkey. Water Sci Technol. 80(3):466–477. doi: 10.2166/wst.2019.290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse FA, Lefkoff A, Boardman J, Heidebrecht K, Shapiro A, Barloon P, Goetz A. 1993. The spectral image processing system (SIPS)‐interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens Environ. 44(2–3):145–163. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(93)90013-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Denis DM, Singh SK, Szabó S, Suryavanshi S. 2018. Landscape metrics for assessment of land cover change and fragmentation of a heterogeneous watershed. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 10:224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kusetogullari H, Yavariabdi A. 2018. Unsupervised change detection in landsat images with atmospheric artifacts: a fuzzy multiobjective approach. Math Prob Eng. 2018:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2018/7274141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Chen W, Ling W. 2005. An image fusion method based on directional contrast and area-based standard deviation. Electronic Imaging and Multimedia Technology IV. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar
• Liu D, Yu J. 2009. Otsu method and K-means. In 2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E. 2004. Change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sens. 25(12):2365–2401. doi: 10.1080/0143116031000139863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunetta RS, Knight JF, Ediriwickrema J, Lyon JG, Worthy LD. 2006. Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Remote Sens Environ. 105(2):142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Li M, Blaschke T, Ma X, Tiede D, Cheng L, Chen Z, Chen D. 2016. Object-based change detection in urban areas: the effects of segmentation strategy, scale, and feature space on unsupervised methods. Remote Sens. 8(9):761. doi: 10.3390/rs8090761.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez M, Martinez ME, Martinez E, Renza D. 2017. Detection of changes in natural aquifer reservoirs based on the index of drought. IEEE Latin Am Trans. 15(11):2059–2063. doi: 10.1109/TLA.2017.8070408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller A, Bryant E, Birnie R. 1998. An analysis of land cover changes in the Northern Forest of New England using multitemporal Landsat MSS data. Int J Remote Sens. 19(2):245–265. doi: 10.1080/014311698216233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Shrivastava P, Dhurvey P. 2017. Change detection techniques in remote sensing: a review. IJWMCIS. 4(1):1–8. doi: 10.21742/ijwmcis.2017.4.1.01.
   Google Scholar
• Nemmour H, Chibani Y. 2006. Multiple support vector machines for land cover change detection: an application for mapping urban extensions. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 61(2):125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsu N. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 9(1):62–66. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacifici F, Del Frate F, Solimini C, Emery WJ. 2007. An innovative neural-net method to detect temporal changes in high-resolution optical satellite imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 45(9):2940–2952. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.902824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parihar SM, Sarkar S, Dutta A, Sharma S, Dutta T. 2013. Characterizing wetland dynamics: a post-classification change detection analysis of the East Kolkata Wetlands using open source satellite data. Geocarto Int. 28(3):273–287. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2012.705337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry LM, Soares A, Bogorny V, Matwin S. 2019. Unsupervised behavior change detection in multidimensional data streams for maritime traffic monitoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:190805103.
   Google Scholar
• Pillai KG, Vatsavai RR. 2013. Multi-sensor remote sensing image change detection: an evaluation of similarity measures. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops; IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Renza D, Martinez E, Arquero A. 2013. A new approach to change detection in multispectral images by means of ERGAS index. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 10(1):76–80. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2193372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renza D, Martinez E, Molina I, Ballesteros L DM. 2017. Unsupervised change detection in a particular vegetation land cover type using spectral angle mapper. Adv Space Res. 59(8):2019–2031. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards JA, Jia X. 1999. Remote sensing digital image analysis. Vol. 3. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ridd MK, Liu J. 1998. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sens Environ. 63(2):95–100. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00112-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaum A, Stocker A. 1995. Chronochrome image processing for infrared target detection. IRIS Specialty Group on Targets Backgrounds and Discrimination. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Schaum A, Stocker A. 2003. Linear chromodynamics models for hyperspectral target detection. 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat No 03TH8652); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier H, Orteu J-J, Sutton MA. 2009. Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Vol. 1. New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Serra P, Pons X, Saurí D. 2003. Post-classification change detection with data from different sensors: some accuracy considerations. Int J Remote Sens. 24(16):3311–3340. doi: 10.1080/0143116021000021189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Batra A. 2014. Analysis of distance measures in content based image retrieval. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 14(2).
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Sharma B. 2019. Thresholding algorithms for image segmentation-entropy based comparison. Glob J Enterp Inf Syst. 11(4):19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sheoran A, Haack B. 2014. Optical and radar data comparison and integration: Kenya example. Geocarto Int. 29(4):370–382. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2013.769027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A. 1989. Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens. 10(6):989–1003. doi: 10.1080/01431168908903939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Laari PB, Mustak S, Srivastava PK, Szabó S. 2018. Modelling of land use land cover change using earth observation data-sets of Tons River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India. Geocarto International. 33(11):1202–1222. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1343390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Singh KK. 2018. Unsupervised change detection in remote sensing images using fusion of spectral and statistical indices. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 21(3):345–351. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.01.006.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Ongsomwang S. 2020. Multitemporal land use and land cover classification from time-series landsat datasets using harmonic analysis with a minimum spectral distance algorithm. IJGI. 9(2):67. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9020067.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó S, Novák T, Elek Z. 2012. Distance models in ecological network management: a case study of patch connectivity in a grassland network. J Nat Conserv. 20(5):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theiler J. 2008. Quantitative comparison of quadratic covariance-based anomalous change detectors. Appl Opt. 47(28):F12–F26. doi: 10.1364/ao.47.000f12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toosi NB, Soffianian AR, Fakheran S, Pourmanafi S, Ginzler C, Waser LT. 2019. Comparing different classification algorithms for monitoring mangrove cover changes in southern Iran. Global Ecol Conserv. 19:e00662. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touati S, Naylor M, Main I. 2016. Detection of change points in underlying earthquake rates, with application to global mega-earthquakes. Geophys J Int. 204(2):753–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullis JA, Jensen JR. 2003. Expert system house detection in high spatial resolution imagery using size, shape, and context. Geocarto International. 18(1):5–15. doi: 10.1080/10106040308542258.
   Google Scholar
• Tung F, LeDrew E. 1988. The determination of optimal threshold levels for change detection using various accuracy indexes. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 54(10):1449–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dongen S, Enright AJ. 2012. Metric distances derived from cosine similarity and Pearson and Spearman correlations. arXiv preprint arXiv:12083145.
   Google Scholar
• Virk R, King D. 2006. Comparison of techniques for forest change mapping using Landsat data in Karnataka, India. Geocarto Int. 21(4):49–57. doi: 10.1080/10106040608542402.
   Google Scholar
• Wu D, Yuan C. 2022. Threshold image segmentation based on improved sparrow search algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl. 81(23):33513–33546. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13073-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan L, Xia W, Zhao Z, Wang Y. 2018. A novel approach to unsupervised change detection based on hybrid spectral difference. Remote Sens. 10(6):841. doi: 10.3390/rs10060841.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Lo C. 2002. Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. Int J Remote Sens. 23(9):1775–1798. doi: 10.1080/01431160110075802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You Y, Cao J, Zhou W. 2020. A survey of change detection methods based on remote sensing images for multi-source and multi-objective scenarios. Remote Sens. 12(15):2460. doi: 10.3390/rs12152460.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi S, Mirzaee S, Tazeh M, Pourghasemi H, Karimi H. 2015. Comparison of different algorithms for land use mapping in dry climate using satellite images: a case study of the Central regions of Iran. Desert. 20(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Sawaya KE, Loeffelholz BC, Bauer ME. 2005. Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ. 98(2–3):317–328. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakeri F, Saradjian MR. 2022. Change detection in multispectral images based on fusion of change vector analysis in posterior probability space and posterior probability space angle mapper. Geocarto Int. 37(5):1450–1464. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2020.1768595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zewdie W, Csaplovies E. 2015. Remote sensing based multi-temporal land cover classification and change detection in northwestern Ethiopia. Eur J Remote Sens. 48(1):121–139. doi: 10.5721/EuJRS20154808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar