Deep learning methods applied to digital elevation models: state of the art

References

• Adam JM, Liu W, Zang Y, Afzal MK, Bello SA, Muhammad AU, Wang C, Li J. 2023. Deep learning-based semantic segmentation of urban-scale 3d meshes in remote sensing: a survey. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 121:103365. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali-Dib M, Menou K, Jackson AP, Zhu C, Hammond N. 2020. Automated crater shape retrieval using weakly-supervised deep learning. Icarus. 345:113749. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachhofner S, Loghin A, Otepka J, Pfeifer N, Hornacek M, Siposova A, Schmidinger N, Hornik K, Schiller N, Kähler O. 2020. Generalized sparse convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation of point clouds derived from tri-stereo satellite imagery. Remote Sens. 12(8):1289. doi: 10.3390/rs12081289.
   Google Scholar
• Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for gis-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 58(3-4):239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65(1):2–16. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton SJ, Stokes M. 2018. Which DEM is best for analyzing fluvial landscape development in mountainous terrains? Geomorphology. 310:168–187. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga JR, Peripato V, Dalagnol R, P. Ferreira M, Tarabalka Y, Aragão LE, F. de Campos Velho H, Shiguemori EH, Wagner FH. 2020. Tree crown delineation algorithm based on a convolutional neural network. Remote Sens. 12(8):1288. doi: 10.3390/rs12081288.
   Google Scholar
• Che E, Jung J, Olsen MJ. 2019. Object recognition, segmentation, and classification of mobile laser scanning point clouds: a state of the art review. Sensors. 19(4):810. doi: 10.3390/s19040810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Fan R, Yang X, Wang J, Latif A. 2018. Extraction of urban water bodies from high-resolution remote-sensing imagery using deep learning. Water. 10(5):585. doi: 10.3390/w10050585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Tang L, Kan Z, Bilal M, Li Q. 2020. A novel water body extraction neural network (wbe-nn) for optical high-resolution multispectral imagery. J Hydrol. 588:125092. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Wang X, Xu Z. 2016. Convolutional neural network based DEM super resolution. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 41:247–250
   Google Scholar
• Cheng G, Han J, Lu X. 2017. Remote sensing image scene classification: benchmark and state of the art. Proc IEEE. 105(10):1865–1883. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2675998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng G, Xie X, Han J, Guo L, Xia G. 2020. Remote sensing image scene classification meets deep learning: challenges, methods, benchmarks, and opportunities. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 13:3735–3756. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3005403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clubb FJ, Mudd SM, Milodowski DT, Hurst MD, Slater LJ. 2014. Objective extraction of channel heads from high-resolution topographic data. Water Resour Res. 50(5):4283–4304. doi: 10.1002/2013WR015167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JP, Ding W. 2014. Crater detection via genetic search methods to reduce image features. Adv Space Res. 53(12):1768–1782. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2013.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JP, Liu S, Ding W. 2011. Genetically enhanced feature selection of discriminative planetary crater image features. AI 2011: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 24th Australasian Joint Conference, Perth, Australia, December 5–8, 2011. Proceedings 24. Springer. p. 61–71
   Google Scholar
• Cohen JP, Lo HZ, Lu T, Ding W. 2016. Crater detection via convolutional neural networks. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1601.00978.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell A, White T, Dumoulin V, Arulkumaran K, Sengupta B, Bharath AA. 2018. Generative adversarial networks: an overview. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 35(1):53–65. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Qi H, Xiong Y, Li Y, Zhang G, Hu H, Wei Y. 2017. Deformable convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. p. 764–773.
   Google Scholar
• Demiray BZ, Sit M, Demir I. 2021. D-srgan: dem super-resolution with generative adversarial networks. SN Comput Sci. 2:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s42979-020-00442-2.
   Google Scholar
• Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li L, Li K, Fei-Fei L. 2009. Imagenet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. . IEEE. p. 248–255.
   Google Scholar
• Di K, Li W, Yue Z, Sun Y, Liu Y. 2014. A machine learning approach to crater detection from topographic data. Adv Space Res. 54(11):2419–2429. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong C, Loy CC, Tang X. 2016. Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network. Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14. Springer. p. 391–407.
   Google Scholar
• Dong G, Chen F, Ren P. 2018. Filling srtm void data via conditional adversarial networks. IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE. p. 7441–7443.
   Google Scholar
• Dong G, Huang W, Smith WA, Ren P. 2019. Filling voids in elevation models using a shadow-constrained convolutional neural network. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 17(4):592–596. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2926530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong G, Huang W, Smith WA, Ren P. 2020. A shadow constrained conditional generative adversarial net for srtm data restoration. Remote Sens Environ. 237:111602. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drăguţ L, Blaschke T. 2006. Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis. Geomorphology. 81(3–4):330–344. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan L, Hu X. 2019. Multiscale refinement network for water-body segmentation in high-resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 17(4):686–690. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2926412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsani AH, Quiel F. 2008. Geomorphometric feature analysis using morphometric parameterization and artificial neural networks. Geomorphology. 99(1-4):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami E, Bebis G, Nefian A, Fong T. 2015. Automatic crater detection using convex grouping and convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Visual Computing: 11th International Symposium, ISVC 2015, Las Vegas, NV, USA, December 14 – 16, 2015, Proceedings, Part II 11. Springer. p. 213–224.
   Google Scholar
• Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L. 2007. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys. 45(2):1–33 doi: 10.1029/2005RG000183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng W, Sui H, Huang W, Xu C, An K. 2018. Water body extraction from very high-resolution remote sensing imagery using deep u-net and a superpixel-based conditional random field model. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 16(4):618–622. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2879492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganerød AJ, Bakkestuen V, Calovi M, Fredin O, Rød JK. 2023. Where are the outcrops? Automatic delineation of bedrock from sediments using deep-learning techniques. Appl Comput Geosci. 18:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.acags.2023.100119.
   Google Scholar
• Gavriil K, Muntingh G, Barrowclough OJ. 2019. Void filling of digital elevation models with deep generative models. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 16(10):1645–1649. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2902222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebrehiwot A, Hashemi-Beni L, Thompson G, Kordjamshidi P, Langan TE. 2019. Deep convolutional neural network for flood extent mapping using unmanned aerial vehicles data. Sensors. 19(7):1486. doi: 10.3390/s19071486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girshick R. 2015. Fast r-Cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision . p. 1440–1448.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y. 2020. Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM. 63(11):139–144. doi: 10.1145/3422622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilli E, Özdemir E, Remondino F. 2019. Application of machine and deep learning strategies for the classification of heritage point clouds. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 42:447–454.
   Google Scholar
• Hall O, Falorni G, Bras RL. 2005. Characterization and quantification of data voids in the shuttle radar topography mission data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2(2):177–181. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2004.842447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han K, Xiao A, Wu E, Guo J, Xu C, Wang Y. 2021. Transformer in transformer. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 34:15908–15919.
   Google Scholar
• Han X, Ma X, Li H, Chen Z. 2023. A global-information-constrained deep learning network for digital elevation model super-resolution. Remote Sens. 15(2):305. doi: 10.3390/rs15020305.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto S, Mori K. 2019. Lunar crater detection based on grid partition using deep learning. 2019 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI). IEEE . p. 75–80. doi: 10.1109/SACI46893.2019.9111474.
   Google Scholar
• Hay GJ, Castilla G, Wulder MA, Ruiz JR. 2005. An automated object-based approach for the multiscale image segmentation of forest scenes. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 7(4):339–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2005.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, Girshick R. 2017. Mask r-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision . p. 2961–2969.
   Google Scholar
• He P, Cheng Y, Qi M, Cao Z, Zhang H, Ma S, Yao S, Wang Q. 2022. Super-resolution of digital elevation model with local implicit function representation. 2022 International Conference on Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems Engineering (MLISE). IEEE . p. 111–116 doi: 10.1109/MLISE57402.2022.00030.
   Google Scholar
• Heung B, Ho HC, Zhang J, Knudby A, Bulmer CE, Schmidt MG. 2016. An overview and comparison of machine-learning techniques for classification purposes in digital soil mapping. Geoderma. 265:62–77. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller JK, Smith M. 2008. Residual relief separation: digital elevation model enhancement for geomorphological mapping. Earth Surf Processes Landforms. 33(14):2266–2276. doi: 10.1002/esp.1659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Yuan Y. 2016. Deep-learning-based classification for DTM extraction from ALS point cloud. Remote Sens. 8(9):730. doi: 10.3390/rs8090730.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Rathod V, Sun C, Zhu M, Korattikara A, Fathi A, Fischer I, Wojna Z, Song Y, Guadarrama S. 2017. Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 7310–7311.
   Google Scholar
• Hui J, Du M, Ye X, Qin Q, Sui J. 2019. Effective building extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images with multitask driven deep neural network. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 16(5):786–790. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2880986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iizuka S, Simo-Serra E, Ishikawa H. 2017. Globally and locally consistent image completion. ACM Trans Graph. 36(4):1–14. doi: 10.1145/3072959.3073659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny B. 2001. An interactive approach to analytical relief shading. Cartogr: Int J Geogr Inf Geovisualization. 38(1–2):67–75. doi: 10.3138/F722-0825-3142-HW05.
   Google Scholar
• Jenny B, Heitzler M, Singh D, Farmakis-Serebryakova M, Liu JC, Hurni L. 2021. Cartographic relief shading with neural networks. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 27(2):1225–1235. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhaldiyal A, Chaudhary N. 2023. Semantic segmentation of 3d lidar data using deep learning: a review of projection-based methods. Appl Intell. 53(6):6844–6855. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03930-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia Y, Wan G, Liu L, Wang J, Wu Y, Xue N, Wang Y, Yang R. 2021. Split-attention networks with self-calibrated convolution for moon impact crater detection from multi-source data. Remote Sens. 13(16):3193. doi: 10.3390/rs13163193.
   Google Scholar
• Karkee M, Steward BL, Aziz SA. 2008. Improving quality of public domain digital elevation models through data fusion. Biosyst Eng. 101(3):293–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattenborn T, Leitloff J, Schiefer F, Hinz S. 2021. Review on convolutional neural networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 173:24–49. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemker R, Salvaggio C, Kanan C. 2018. Algorithms for semantic segmentation of multispectral remote sensing imagery using deep learning. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 145:60–77. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham BA, Charters S. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,
   Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. 2017. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM. 60(6):84–90. doi: 10.1145/3065386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. 2015. Deep learning. Nature. 521(7553):436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledig C, Theis L, Huszár F, Caballero J, Cunningham A, Acosta A, Aitken A, Tejani A, Totz J, Wang Z. 2017. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 4681–4690.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Heap AD. 2011. A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: performance and impact factors. Ecol Inf. 6(3-4):228–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Xiong L, Tang G, Strobl J. 2020. Deep learning-based approach for landform classification from integrated data sources of digital elevation model and imagery. Geomorphology. 354:107045. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Hu G, Cheng X, Xiong L, Tang G, Strobl J. 2022a. Integrating topographic knowledge into deep learning for the void-filling of digital elevation models. Remote Sens Environ. 269:112818. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Yin G, Ma J, Wen B, Zhou Z. 2022b. Generation method for shaded relief based on conditional generative adversarial nets. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 11(7):374. doi: 10.3390/ijgi11070374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Hsu C. 2020. Automated terrain feature identification from remote sensing imagery: a deep learning approach. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 34(4):637–660. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1542697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Zhou B, Hsu C, Li Y, Ren F. 2017. Recognizing terrain features on terrestrial surface using a deep learning model: an example with crater detection. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning for Geographic Knowledge Discovery . p. 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Cheng X, Chen W, Chen G, Liu S. 2015. Identification of forested landslides using lidar data, object-based image analysis, and machine learning algorithms. Remote Sens. 7(8):9705–9726. doi: 10.3390/rs70809705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wu B, Ge X. 2019. Structural segmentation and classification of mobile laser scanning point clouds with large variations in point density. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 153:151–165. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin P, Pan M, Wood EF, Yamazaki D, Allen GH. 2021. A new vector-based global river network dataset accounting for variable drainage density. Sci Data. 8(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00819-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin T, Dollár P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S. 2017. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 2117–2125.
   Google Scholar
• Lin X, Zhu Z, Yu X, Ji X, Luo T, Xi X, Zhu M, Liang Y. 2022. Lunar crater detection on digital elevation model: a complete workflow using deep learning and its application. Remote Sens. 14(3):621. doi: 10.3390/rs14030621.
   Google Scholar
• Ling F, Zhang QW, Wang C. 2007. Filling voids of SRTM with Landsat sensor imagery in rugged terrain. Int J Remote Sens. 28(2):465–471. doi: 10.1080/01431160601075509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Szegedy C, Reed S, Fu C, Berg AC. 2016. Ssd: single shot multibox detector. Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14 . Springer . p. 21–37
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zhong R, Chen D, Ke Y, Peethambaran J, Chen C, Sun L. 2018. Multilevel building detection framework in remote sensing images based on convolutional neural networks. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 11(10):3688–3700. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2866284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llamas J, M. Lerones P, Medina R, Zalama E, Gómez-García-Bermejo J. 2017. Classification of architectural heritage images using deep learning techniques. Appl Sci. 7(10):992. doi: 10.3390/app7100992.
   Google Scholar
• López J, Torres D, Santos S, Atzberger C. 2020. Spectral imagery tensor decomposition for semantic segmentation of remote sensing data through fully convolutional networks. Remote Sens. 12(3):517. doi: 10.3390/rs12030517.
   Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liu Y, Zhang X, Ye Y, Yin G, Johnson BA. 2019. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: a meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 152:166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Li H, Chen Z. 2023. Feature enhanced deep learning network for digital elevation model super-resolution. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 16:5670–5685. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3288296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macher H, Landes T, Grussenmeyer P. 2017. From point clouds to building information models: 3d semi-automatic reconstruction of indoors of existing buildings. Appl Sci. 7(10):1030. doi: 10.3390/app7101030.
   Google Scholar
• Marmanis D, Datcu M, Esch T, Stilla U. 2015. Deep learning earth observation classification using imagenet pretrained networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 13(1):105–109. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2499239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana D, Scherer S. 2015. Voxnet: a 3d convolutional neural network for real-time object recognition. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). p . 922–928. IEEE, doi: 10.1109/IROS.2015.7353481.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell AE, Shobe CM. 2022. Land-surface parameters for spatial predictive mapping and modeling. Earth Sci Rev. 226:103944. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa-Mingorance JL, Ariza-López FJ. 2020. Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models (DEMs): a critical review of practices of the past three decades. Remote Sens. 12(16):2630. doi: 10.3390/rs12162630.
   Google Scholar
• Mi L, Chen Z. 2020. Superpixel-enhanced deep neural forest for remote sensing image semantic segmentation. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 159:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Z, Fu K, Sun H, Sun X, Yan M. 2018. Automatic water-body segmentation from high-resolution satellite images via deep networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 15(4):602–606. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2794545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan DJ, Heritage GL, Large AR, Fuller IC. 2011. Filtering spatial error from DEMs: implications for morphological change estimation. Geomorphology. 125(1):160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minár J, Evans IS, Jenčo M. 2020. A comprehensive system of definitions of land surface (topographic) curvatures, with implications for their application in geoscience modelling and prediction. Earth Sci Rev. 211:103414. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza M, Osindero S. 2014. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1411.1784.
   Google Scholar
• Miyoshi GT, Arruda MS, Osco LP, Marcato Junior J, Gonçalves DN, Imai NN, Tommaselli AMG, Honkavaara E, Gonçalves WN,. 2020. A novel deep learning method to identify single tree species in uav-based hyperspectral images. Remote Sens. 12(8):1294. doi: 10.3390/rs12081294.
   Google Scholar
• Mullissa AG, Persello C, Stein A. 2019. Polsarnet: a deep fully convolutional network for polarimetric sar image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 12(12):5300–5309. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2956650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtiyoso A, Grussenmeyer P. 2019a. Point cloud segmentation and semantic annotation aided by gis data for heritage complexes. 8th International Workshop “3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architecture” (3D-ARCH) . Vol. 42. Bergamo, Italy: Copernicus Publications. p. 523–528. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-523-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Murtiyoso A, Grussenmeyer P. 2019b. Automatic heritage building point cloud segmentation and classification using geometrical rules. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 42:821–827. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-821-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Na J, Ding H, Zhao W, Liu K, Tang G, Pfeifer N. 2021. Object-based large-scale terrain classification combined with segmentation optimization and terrain features: a case study in China. Trans GIS. 25(6):2939–2962. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman DR, Lindsay JB, Cockburn JMH. 2018. Evaluating metrics of local topographic position for multiscale geomorphometric analysis. Geomorphology. 312:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palafox LF, Hamilton CW, Scheidt SP, Alvarez AM. 2017. Automated detection of geological landforms on mars using convolutional neural networks. Comput Geosci. 101:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.12.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passalacqua P, Do Trung T, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Sapiro G, Dietrich WE. 2010. A geometric framework for channel network extraction from lidar: nonlinear diffusion and geodesic paths. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf. 115(F1):1–18. doi: 10.1029/2009JF001254.
   Google Scholar
• Pierdicca R, Paolanti M, Matrone F, Martini M, Morbidoni C, Malinverni ES, Frontoni E, Lingua AM. 2020. Point cloud semantic segmentation using a deep learning framework for cultural heritage. Remote Sens. 12(6):1005. doi: 10.3390/rs12061005.
   Google Scholar
• Qi CR, Su H, Mo K, Guibas LJ. 2017a. Pointnet: deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 652–660.
   Google Scholar
• Qi CR, Yi L, Su H, Guibas LJ. 2017b. Pointnet++: deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. Adv Neu Inf Process Syst. 30:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu Z, Yue L, Liu X. 2019. Void filling of digital elevation models with a terrain texture learning model based on generative adversarial networks. Remote Sens. 11(23):2829. doi: 10.3390/rs11232829.
   Google Scholar
• Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J. 2015. Faster r-cnn: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 28:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter HI, Nelson A, Jarvis A. 2007. An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for srtm data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 21(9):983–1008. doi: 10.1080/13658810601169899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. 2015. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5 – 9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, Springer . p. 234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Shaker A, Yan WY, LaRocque PE. 2019. Automatic land-water classification using multispectral airborne lidar data for near-shore and river environments. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 152:94–108. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi S, Wang X, Li H. 2019. PointrCNN: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 770–779.
   Google Scholar
• Shi W, Caballero J, Huszár F, Totz J, Aitken AP, Bishop R, Rueckert D, Wang Z. 2016. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 1874–1883.
   Google Scholar
• Shin S, Paik K. 2017. An improved method for single flow direction calculation in grid digital elevation models. Hydrol Processes. 31(8):1650–1661. doi: 10.1002/hyp.11135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silburt A, Ali-Dib M, Zhu C, Jackson A, Valencia D, Kissin Y, Tamayo D, Menou K. 2019. Lunar crater identification via deep learning. Icarus. 317:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.06.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonyan K, Zisserman A. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1409.1556.
   Google Scholar
• Sofia G. 2020. Combining geomorphometry, feature extraction techniques and earth-surface processes research: the way forward. Geomorphology. 355:107055. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song S, Xiao J. 2014. Sliding shapes for 3d object detection in depth images. Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part VI 13. Springer. p. 634–651
   Google Scholar
• Song S, Xiao J. 2016. Deep sliding shapes for amodal 3D object detection in RGB-d images. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 808–816.
   Google Scholar
• Spina S, Debattista K, Bugeja K, Chalmers A. 2011. Point cloud segmentation for cultural heritage sites. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage . p. 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislawski L, Brockmeyer T, Shavers E. 2018. Automated road breaching to enhance extraction of natural drainage networks from elevation models through deep learning. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 42:597–601.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislawski L, Brockmeyer T, Shavers E. 2019. Automated extraction of drainage channels and roads through deep learning. Abstr Int Cartogr Assoc. 1:350. doi: 10.5194/ica-abs-1-350-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislawski LV, Shavers EJ, Wang S, Jiang Z, Usery EL, Moak E, Duffy A, Schott J. 2021. Extensibility of u-net neural network model for hydrographic feature extraction and implications for hydrologic modeling. Remote Sens. 13(12):2368. doi: 10.3390/rs13122368.
   Google Scholar
• Sun L, Guo H, Wang H, Zhang B, Feng H, Wu S, Siddique KH. 2023. Deep learning for check dam area extraction with optical images and digital elevation model: a case study in the hilly and gully regions of the Loess Plateau, China. Earth Surf Processes Landforms. 2023:1–16. doi: 10.1002/esp.5652.
   Google Scholar
• Tamke M, Evers HL, Zwierzycki M, Wessel R, Ochmann S, Vock R, Klein R. 2016. An automated approach to the generation of structured building information models from unstructured 3d point cloud scans. Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia . Vol. 17. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS). p. 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Tang P, Huber D, Akinci B, Lipman R, Lytle A. 2010. Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: a review of related techniques. Autom Constr. 19(7):829–843. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Targ S, Almeida D, Lyman K. 2016. Resnet in resnet: generalizing residual architectures. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1603.08029.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson C, Boehm J. 2015. Automatic geometry generation from point clouds for BIM. Remote Sens. 7(9):11753–11775. doi: 10.3390/rs70911753.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Shen C, Chen H, He T. 2019. Fcos: fully convolutional one-stage object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision . p. 9627–9636.
   Google Scholar
• Torres RN, Fraternali P, Milani F, Frajberg D. 2020. Mountain summit detection with deep learning: evaluation and comparison with heuristic methods. Appl Geomat. 12:225–246. doi: 10.1007/s12518-019-00295-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai RY, Huang TS. 1984. Multiframe image restoration and registration. Multiframe Image Restor Regist. 1:317–339.
   Google Scholar
• Ureña-Cámara MA, Mozas-Calvache AT. 2023. Identification of highlighted cells in low-variance raster data application to digital elevation models. Algorithms. 16(6):302. doi: 10.3390/a16060302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I. 2017. Attention is all you need. Adv Neu Inform Process Syst. 30:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Vaz DA, Sarmento PT, Barata MT, Fenton LK, Michaels TI. 2015. Object-based dune analysis: automated dune mapping and pattern characterization for ganges chasma and gale crater, mars. Geomorphology. 250:128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen P, Drăguţ L. 2012. Object-based landform delineation and classification from DEMs for archaeological predictive mapping. J Archaeolog Sci. 39(3):698–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Laffan SW, Liu Y, Wu L. 2010. Morphometric characterisation of landform from DEMs. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 24(2):305–326. doi: 10.1080/13658810802467969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Wu M, Wei X, Song H. 2020a. Water identification from high-resolution remote sensing images based on multidimensional densely connected convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 12(5):795. doi: 10.3390/rs12050795.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Jiang J, Zhang G. 2018a. Crateridnet: an end-to-end fully convolutional neural network for crater detection and identification in remotely sensed planetary images. Remote Sens. 10(7):1067. doi: 10.3390/rs10071067.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Fan Z, Li Z, Zhang H, Wei C. 2020b. An effective lunar crater recognition algorithm based on convolutional neural network. Remote Sens. 12(17):2694. doi: 10.3390/rs12172694.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yu K, Wu S, Gu J, Liu Y, Dong C, Qiao Y, Loy CC. 2018b. Esrgan: enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops . p. 0–0.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow K, Lindsay JB, Berg AA. 2016. Evaluating DEM conditioning techniques, elevation source data, and grid resolution for field-scale hydrological parameter extraction. J Hydrol. 540:1022–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Li R, Rekabdar B, Talbert C, Edidem M, Wang G. 2023. Classification of drainage crossings on high-resolution digital elevation models: a deep learning approach. GIScience Remote Sens. 60(1):2230706. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2023.2230706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Wan G, Liu L, Wei Z, Wang S. 2021. Intelligent crater detection on planetary surface using convolutional neural network. 2021 IEEE 5th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC). Vol. 5 . IEEE . p. 1229–1234. doi: 10.1109/IAEAC50856.2021.9391002.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong L, Tang G, Li F, Yuan B, Lu Z. 2014. Modeling the evolution of loess-covered landforms in the loess plateau of china using a DEM of underground bedrock surface. Geomorphology. 209:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong L, Li S, Tang G, Strobl J. 2022. Geomorphometry and terrain analysis: data, methods, platforms and applications. Earth Sci Rev. 233:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Wang X, Chen Z, Xiong D, Ding M, Hou W. 2015. Nonlocal similarity based DEM super resolution. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 110:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Guan K, Casler N, Peng B, Wang S. 2018. A 3D convolutional neural network method for land cover classification using LIDAR and multi-temporal Landsat imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 144:423–434. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Wang S, Stanislawski LV, Jiang Z, Jaroenchai N, Sainju AM, Shavers E, Usery EL, Chen L, Li Z. 2021. An attention u-net model for detection of fine-scale hydrologic streamlines. Environ Modell Softw. 140:104992. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki D, Ikeshima D, Tawatari R, Yamaguchi T, O’Loughlin F, Neal JC, Sampson CC, Kanae S, Bates PD. 2017. A high-accuracy map of global terrain elevations. Geophys Res Lett. 44(11):5844–5853. doi: 10.1002/2017GL072874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki D, Ikeshima D, Sosa J, Bates PD, Allen GH, Pavelsky TM. 2019. Merit hydro: a high-resolution global hydrography map based on latest topography dataset. Water Resour Res. 55(6):5053–5073. doi: 10.1029/2019WR024873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Yan H, Guo J, Dai H. 2020. Classification and segmentation of mining area objects in large-scale spares LIDAR point cloud using a novel rotated density network. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 9(3):182. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9030182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Xu J, Lv Y, Zhou C, Zhu Y, Cheng W. 2023. Deep learning-based automated terrain classification using high-resolution DEM data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 118:103249 doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao X, Han J, Cheng G, Qian X, Guo L. 2016. Semantic annotation of high-resolution satellite images via weakly supervised learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 54(6):3660–3671. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2523563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Q, Shen H, Li T, Li Z, Li S, Jiang Y, Xu H, Tan W, Yang Q, Wang J. 2020. Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: achievements and challenges. Remote Sens Environ. 241:111716. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiler MD, Fergus R. 2014. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6 – 12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13. Springer . p. 818–833.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Shi S, Ge Y, Liu H, Cui W. 2020. DEM void filling based on context attention generation model. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 9(12):734. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9120734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Hao M, Wang J, de Silva CW, Fu C. 2019. Linked dynamic graph CNN: learning on point cloud via linking hierarchical features. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1904.10014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Li G, Li M, Wang L. 2018. Fusion of images and point clouds for the semantic segmentation of large-scale 3d scenes based on deep learning. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 143:85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Bian S, Li H. 2021. RSPCN: super-resolution of digital elevation model based on recursive sub-pixel convolutional neural networks. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 10(8):501. doi: 10.3390/ijgi10080501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu W. 2022. Comparison of DEM super-resolution methods based on interpolation and neural networks. Sensors. 22(3):745. doi: 10.3390/s22030745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu W, Zhu D. 2022. Terrain feature-aware deep learning network for digital elevation model superresolution. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 189:143–162. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou A, Chen Y, Wilson JP, Su H, Xiong Z, Cheng Q. 2021. An enhanced double-filter deep residual neural network for generating super resolution DEMs. Remote Sens. 13(16):3089. doi: 10.3390/rs13163089.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Song B, Liang P, Xu J, Yue T. 2022. Voids filling of DEM with multiattention generative adversarial network model. Remote Sens. 14(5):1206. doi: 10.3390/rs14051206.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Tuzel O. 2018. Voxelnet: end-to-end learning for point cloud based 3d object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . p. 4490–4499.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu D, Cheng X, Zhang F, Yao X, Gao Y, Liu Y. 2020. Spatial interpolation using conditional generative adversarial neural networks. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 34(4):735–758. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2019.1599122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar