The impact of earth fissures on flood hazard extent for the Northern part of the Qaa’Jahran Basin, Dhamar, Yemen

References

• Al-Areeq NM, Albaroot M, Ahmad AHM, Alshayef MS. 2016. Tectonostratigraphy of Yemen and geological evolution: a new prospective. Int J New Technol Res. 2(2):19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Areeq A, Al-Zahrani M, Chowdhury S. 2021. Rainfall Intensity–Duration–Frequency (IDF) curves: effects of uncertainty on flood protection and runoff quantification in Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Arab J Sci Eng. 46(11):10993–11007. doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-06142-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Areeq AM, Al-Zahrani MA, Sharif HO. 2021a. Physically-based, distributed hydrologic model for Makkah Watershed using GPM satellite rainfall and ground rainfall stations. 12(1):1234–1257.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Areeq AM, Al-Zahrani MA, Sharif HO. 2021b. The performance of physically based and conceptual hydrologic models: a case study for Makkah Watershed, Saudi Arabia. Water. 13(8):1098. doi: 10.3390/w13081098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Areeq AM, Saleh RAA, Ghanim AAJ, Ghaleb M, Areeq NMAl, Al-Wajih E, Al E. 2023. Flood hazard assessment in Yemen using a novel hybrid approach of grey wolf and Levenberg Marquardt optimizers. Geocarto Int. 38(1):1–20. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2243884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SA, Parvin F, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Costache R, Thuy Linh NT, Nguyen HQ, Ahmad A, Ali Ghorbani M. 2020. GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naïve bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: a case of Topľa Basin, Slovakia. Ecol Indicat. 117:106620. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Masnay YA, Al-Areeq NM, Ullah K, Al-Aizari AR, Rahman M, Wang C, Zhang J, Liu X. 2022. Estimate earth fissure hazard based on machine learning in the QA’ Jahran Basin, Yemen. Sci Rep. 12(1):21936. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26526-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbero G, Costabile P, Costanzo C, Ferraro D, Petaccia G. 2022. 2D hydrodynamic approach supporting evaluations of hydrological response in small watersheds: implications for lag time estimation. J Hydrol. 610:127870. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breisinger C, Ecker O, Thiele R, Wiebelt M. 2012. The impact of the 2008 Hadramout flash flood in Yemen on economic performance and nutrition: a simulation analysis. Hindenburgufer. 66:24105.
   Google Scholar
• David A, Rodriguez ER, Schmalz B. 2023. Importance of catchment hydrological processes and calibration of hydrological-hydrodynamic rainfall-runoff models in small rural catchments. J Flood Risk Manag. 16(3):e12901. doi: 10.1111/JFR3.12901.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Andino D,Beven K,Halldin S,Xu C-Y,Reynolds JE,Di Baldassarre G. 2017. Reproducing an extreme flood with uncertain post-event information. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 21(7):3597–3618. doi: 10.5194/hess-21-3597-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Alén G, González-Cao J, Fernández-Nóvoa D, Gómez-Gesteira M, Cea L, Puertas J. 2022. Analysis of two sources of variability of basin outflow hydrographs computed with the 2D shallow water model Iber: digital terrain model and unstructured mesh size. J Hydrol. 612:128182. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery. 2010. Probabilistic risk assessment studies in Yemen. Washington (DC): Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery.
   Google Scholar
• Guha-Sapir D, Below R, Hoyois P. 2016. EM-DAT: the CRED/OFDA international disaster database – Www.Emdat.Be– Université Catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium. https://www.carismand.eu/resources/em-dat-the-credofda-international-disaster-database.html
   Google Scholar
• Janizadeh S, Avand M, Jaafari A, Phong TV, Bayat M, Ahmadisharaf E, Prakash I, Pham BT, Lee S. 2019. Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility mapping in the Tafresh Watershed, Iran. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11(19):5426. doi: 10.3390/su11195426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J. 2012. Cities and flooding; a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. Electronic document. http://www.gfdrr.org/gfdrr/sites/gfdrr.org/files/urbanfloods/pdf/Cities and Flooding Guidebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang AL, Hsu K, Sanders BF, Sorooshian S. 2023. Topographic hydro-conditioning to resolve surface depression storage and ponding in a fully distributed hydrologic model. Adv Water Resour. 176:104449. doi: 10.1016/J.ADVWATRES.2023.104449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkman SN. 2005. Global perspectives on loss of human life caused by floods. Nat Hazards. 34(2):151–175. doi: 10.1007/s11069-004-8891-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu D, Luo P, Lyu J, Zhou M, Huo A, Duan W, Nover D, He B, Zhao X. 2021. Impact of temporal rainfall patterns on flash floods in Hue City, Vietnam. J Flood Risk Manag. 14(1):1–15. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-Hernández MI, Valdes-Abellan J, Tomás R, Tessitore S, Ezquerro P, Herrera G. 2023. Analysing the impact of land subsidence on the flooding risk: evaluation through InSAR and modelling. Water Resour Manage. 37(11):4363–4383. doi: 10.1007/s11269-023-03561-6.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce VM, Hawkins R. 1996. Runoff CN has it reached maturity? J Hydrol Eng. 1(1):11–19. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinger M. 2005. Climate variability and change: past, present and future - an overview. Clim Change. 70(1–2):9–29. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-5936-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharffenberg WA. 2013. Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS - user’ s manual. p. 442. https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/documentation/HEC-HMS_Users_Manual_4.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sharifian MK,Kesserwani G,Chowdhury AA,Neal J,Bates P. 2023. LISFLOOD-FP 8.1: new GPU-accelerated solvers for faster fluvial/pluvial flood simulations. Geosci Model Dev. 16(9):2391–2413. doi: 10.5194/gmd-16-2391-2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha MN. 2003. Spatially distributed hydrological modelling considering land ­ use changes using remote sensing and GIS. In Map Asia Conference (pp. 1–8). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=966ebfedaf68053580a6ae38b7ac63967ac28322
   Google Scholar
• Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds (technical release 55). Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). 2013. HEC-GeoHMS geospatial hydrologic modeling extension user’ s manual. Washington (DC): USACE.
   Google Scholar
• USACE. 2010. HEC river analysis system (HEC-RAS). User’s manual 4.1. USACE hydrologic engineering Center computer program documentation 68. Davis (CA): USACE.
   Google Scholar
• WMS. 2018. WMS user manual (V10. 1) the watershed modeling system. p. 1–738. http://wmsdocs.aquaveo.com/WMS_User_Manual_(v10.1).pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 2011. Weather extremes in a changing climate: hindsight on foresight. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yemen Red Crescent Society (YRCS). 2007. Yemen: floods. Vol. 41. Aden, Yemen: Yemen Red Crescent Society.
   Google Scholar
• Zanchetta ADL, Coulibaly P. 2020. Recent advances in real-time pluvial flash. Water. 12(2):570. doi: 10.3390/w12020570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar