Cropping intensity mapping in Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8/9 remote sensing data using temporal transfer of a stacked ensemble machine learning model within google earth engine

References

• Abdali E, Valadan Zoej MJ, Taheri Dehkordi A, Ghaderpour E. 2023. A parallel-cascaded ensemble of machine learning models for crop type classification in google earth engine using multi-temporal sentinel-1/2 and landsat-8/9 remote sensing data. Remote Sens. 16(1):127. doi: 10.3390/rs16010127.
   Google Scholar
• Alazba A, Aljamaan H. 2021. Code smell detection using feature selection and stacking ensemble: an empirical investigation. Inf Softw Technol. 138:106648. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljenaid SS, Kadhem GR, AlKhuzaei MF, Alam JB. 2022. Detecting and assessing the spatio-temporal land use land cover changes of Bahrain Island during 1986–2020 using remote sensing and GIS. Earth Syst Environ. 6(4):787–802. doi: 10.1007/s41748-022-00315-z.
   Google Scholar
• Arfasa GF, Owusu-Sekyere E, Doke DA. 2023. Past and future land use/land cover, and climate change impacts on environmental sustainability in Vea Catchment, Ghana. Geocarto Int. 38(1):1–44. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2289458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Islam MT, Kabir ME, Kabir MM. 2021. Land-use and land-cover change detection in a north-eastern wetland ecosystem of Bangladesh using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Earth Syst Environ. 5(2):319–340. doi: 10.1007/s41748-021-00228-3.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning. 45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. 1984. Classification and regression trees (1st ed.). New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi: 10.1201/9781315139470.
   Google Scholar
• Das B, Rathore P, Roy D, Chakraborty D, Jatav RS, Sethi D, Kumar P. 2022. Comparison of bagging, boosting and stacking algorithms for surface soil moisture mapping using optical-thermal-microwave remote sensing synergies. Catena. 217:106485. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehkordi AT, Zoej MJV, Chegoonian AM, Mehran A, Jafari M. 2023. Improved water chlorophyll-A retrieval method based on mixture density networks using in-situ hyperspectral remote sensing data. IGARSS 2023-2023 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Dehkordi AT, Zoej MJV, Mehran A, Jafari M, Chegoonian AM. 2024. Fuzzy similarity analysis of effective training samples to improve machine learning estimations of water quality parameters using sentinel-2 remote sensing data. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens. 17:5121–5136. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3364020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drusch M, Del Bello U, Carlier S, Colin O, Fernandez V, Gascon F, Hoersch B, Isola C, Laberinti P, Martimort P, et al. 2012. Sentinel-2: ESA's optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sens Environ. 120:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Statist. 29(5):1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galar M, Fernandez A, Barrenechea E, Bustince H, Herrera F. 2012. A review on ensembles for the class imbalance problem: bagging-, boosting-, and hybrid-based approaches. IEEE Trans Syst ManCybern C. 42(4):463–484. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2161285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F, Jennewein J, Hively WD, Soroka A, Thieme A, Bradley D, Keppler J, Mirsky S, Akumaga U. 2023. Near real-time detection of winter cover crop termination using harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 (HLS) to support ecosystem assessment. Sci Remote Sens. 7:100073. doi: 10.1016/j.srs.2022.100073.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaderpour E, Mazzanti P, Mugnozza GS, Bozzano F. 2023. Coherency and phase delay analyses between land cover and climate across Italy via the least-squares wavelet software. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 118:103241. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Nanda MK, Sarkar D, Sarkar S, Brahmachari K, Mainuddin M. 2023. Assessing the cropping intensity dynamics of the Gosaba CD block of Indian Sundarbans using satellite-based remote sensing. Environ Dev Sustain. 26(3):6341–6376. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-02966-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González S, García S, Del Ser J, Rokach L, Herrera F. 2020. A practical tutorial on bagging and boosting based ensembles for machine learning: algorithms, software tools, performance study, practical perspectives and opportunities. Inform Fus. 64:205–237. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. 2017. Google earth engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ. 202:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray J, Friedl M, Frolking S, Ramankutty N, Nelson A, Gumma MK. 2014. Mapping Asian cropping intensity with MODIS. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sensing. 7(8):3373–3379. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2344630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumma MK, Thenkabail PS, Panjala P, Teluguntla P, Yamano T, Mohammed I. 2022. Multiple agricultural cropland products of South Asia developed using Landsat-8 30 m and MODIS 250 m data using machine learning on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud and spectral matching techniques (SMTs) in support of food and water security. GIScience Remote Sens. 59(1):1048–1077. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2022.2088651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Xia H, Pan L, Zhao X, Li R. 2022. Mapping the northern limit of double cropping using a phenology-based algorithm and google earth engine. Remote Sens. 14(4):1004. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/4/1004. doi: 10.3390/rs14041004.
   Google Scholar
• Hao X, Liu L, Yang R, Yin L, Zhang L, Li X. 2023. A review of data augmentation methods of remote sensing image target recognition. Remote Sens. 15(3):827. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/3/827. doi: 10.3390/rs15030827.
   Google Scholar
• Hearst MA, Dumais ST, Osuna E, Platt J, Scholkopf B. 1998. Support vector machines. IEEE Intell Syst Their Appl. 13(4):18–28. doi: 10.1109/5254.708428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson ME. 1988. Reducing the computational requirements of the minimum-distance classifier. Remote Sens Environ. 25(1):117–128. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90045-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Wang J, Khayatnezhad M. 2021. Estimation of actual evapotranspiration using soil moisture balance and remote sensing. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. 45(4):2779–2786. doi: 10.1007/s40996-020-00575-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Chen Y, Clinton N, Wang J, Wang X, Liu C, Gong P, Yang J, Bai Y, Zheng Y, et al. 2017. Mapping major land cover dynamics in Beijing using all Landsat images in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens Environ. 202:166–176. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Tang L, Hupy JP, Wang Y, Shao G. 2021. A commentary review on the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the era of popular remote sensing. J For Res. 32(1):1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01155-1.
   Google Scholar
• Jana A, Jat MK, Saxena A, Choudhary M. 2022. Prediction of land use land cover changes of a river basin using the CA-Markov model. Geocarto Int. 37(26):14127–14147. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2086634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir S, Pahlevan N, O'Shea RE, Barnes BB. 2023. Leveraging Landsat-8/-9 underfly observations to evaluate consistency in reflectance products over aquatic environments. Remote Sens Environ. 296:113755. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanal S, Kc K, Fulton JP, Shearer S, Ozkan E. 2020. Remote sensing in agriculture—accomplishments, limitations, and opportunities. Remote Sens. 12(22):3783. doi: 10.3390/rs12223783.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Mehta M. 2023. Investigating the applicability of a simple iterative approach for aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrieval over diverse land surface types from Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 using visible and near-infrared (VNIR) spectral bands. Atmos Environ. 314:120082. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Zhang Q, Tao S, Qi J, Ding M, Guan Q, Wu B, Zhang M, Nabil M, Tian F, et al. 2020. A new framework to map fine resolution cropping intensity across the globe: algorithm, validation, and implication. Remote Sens Environ. 251:112095. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Xiao X, Qin Y, Wang J, Xu X, Hu Y, Qiao Z. 2020. Mapping cropping intensity in China using time series Landsat and Sentinel-2 images and Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens Environ. 239:111624. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zheng J, Yu L, Hao P, Chen B, Xin Q, Fu H, Gong P. 2021. Annual dynamic dataset of global cropping intensity from 2001 to 2019. Sci Data. 8(1):283. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01065-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobell DB, Asner GP. 2004. Cropland distributions from temporal unmixing of MODIS data. Remote Sens Environ. 93(3):412–422. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main-Knorn M, Pflug B, Louis J, Debaecker V, Müller-Wilm U, Gascon F. (2017). Sen2Cor for sentinel-2. Image and signal processing for remote sensing XXIII. doi: 10.1117/12.2278218.
   Google Scholar
• Masek JG, Wulder MA, Markham B, McCorkel J, Crawford CJ, Storey J, Jenstrom DT. 2020. Landsat 9: Empowering open science and applications through continuity. Remote Sens Environ. 248:111968. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell AE, Warner TA, Fang F. 2018. Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review. Int J Remote Sens. 39(9):2784–2817. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MohanRajan SN, Loganathan A, Manoharan P. 2020. Survey on Land Use/Land Cover (LU/LC) change analysis in remote sensing and GIS environment: techniques and Challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(24):29900–29926. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09091-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullapudi A, Vibhute AD, Mali S, Patil CH. 2023. Spatial and seasonal change detection in vegetation cover using time-series landsat satellite images and machine learning methods. SN Comput Sci. 4(3):254. doi: 10.1007/s42979-023-01710-7.
   Google Scholar
• Norris JR. 2012. Markov chains. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810633.
   Google Scholar
• Palanisamy PA, Jain K, Bonafoni S. 2023. Machine learning classifier evaluation for different input combinations: a case study with landsat 9 and sentinel-2 data. Remote Sensing. 15(13):3241. doi: 10.3390/rs15133241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettinger LR. 1971. Field data collection–an essential element in remote sensing applications. proceedings of the international workshop on earth resources survey systems, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Pluto-Kossakowska J. 2021. Review on multitemporal classification methods of satellite images for crop and arable land recognition. Agriculture. 11(10):999. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/999. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11100999.
   Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Jr, Millones M. 2011. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens. 32(15):4407–4429. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2011.552923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG. Jr, 2000. Comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 66(20):25.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmati A, Zoej MJV, Dehkordi AT. 2022. Early identification of crop types using Sentinel-2 satellite images and an incremental multi-feature ensemble method (Case study: shahriar, Iran). Adv Space Res. 70(4):907–922. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini R, Ghosh SK. 2017. Ensemble classifiers in remote sensing: a review. 2017 international conference on computing, communication and automation (ICCCA). doi: 10.1109/CCAA.2017.8229969.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz K, Hänsch R, Sörgel U. 2018. Machine learning methods for remote sensing applications: an overview. Earth resources and environmental remote sensing/GIS applications IX, 10790, 1079002. doi: 10.1117/12.2503653.
   Google Scholar
• Selvaraj JJ, Pérez BEG. 2023. An enhanced approach to mangrove forest analysis in the Colombian Pacific coast using optical and SAR data in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 30:100938. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100938.
   Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Lunetta RS, Wheeler B, Iiames JS, Campbell JB. 2016. An evaluation of time-series smoothing algorithms for land-cover classifications using MODIS-NDVI multi-temporal data. Remote Sens Environ. 174:258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shawky M, Ahmed MR, Ghaderpour E, Gupta A, Achari G, Dewan A, Hassan QK. 2023. Remote sensing-derived land surface temperature trends over South Asia. Ecol Inf. 74:101969. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Zhang X, Yang Z, Ye Y, Wang J, Gao S, Liu Y, Wang W, Tran KH, Ju J. 2023. Developing an operational algorithm for near-real-time monitoring of crop progress at field scales by fusing harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 time series with geostationary satellite observations. Remote Sens Environ. 296:113729. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherpa SF, Shirzaei M. 2022. Country‐wide flood exposure analysis using Sentinel‐1 synthetic aperture radar data: case study of 2019 Iran flood. J Flood Risk Manag. 15(1):e12770. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibabaw A, Berhane T, Awgichew G, Walelgn A, Muhamed AA. 2023. Hedging the effect of climate change on crop yields by pricing weather index insurance based on temperature. Earth Syst Environ. 7(1):211–221. doi: 10.1007/s41748-022-00298-x.
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu N, Pebesma E, Câmara G. 2018. Using Google Earth Engine to detect land cover change: Singapore as a use case. Eur J Remote Sens. 51(1):486–500. doi: 10.1080/22797254.2018.1451782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvero NEQ, Demattê JAM, Amorim MTA, dos Santos NV, Rizzo R, Safanelli JL, Poppiel RR, de Sousa Mendes W, Bonfatti BR. 2021. Soil variability and quantification based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 bare soil images: a comparison. Remote Sens Environ. 252:112117. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Biswas M, Pal M. 2022. Cloud detection using sentinel 2 imageries: a comparison of XGBoost, RF, SVM, and CNN algorithms. Geocarto Int. 38(1):1–32. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2146211.
   Google Scholar
• Sishodia RP, Ray RL, Singh SK. 2020. Applications of remote sensing in precision agriculture: A review. Remote Sens. 12(19):3136. doi: 10.3390/rs12193136.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P. 2013. Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Global Food Sec. 2(1):18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.008.
   Google Scholar
• Taheri Dehkordi A, Valadan Zoej MJ, Ghasemi H, Ghaderpour E, Hassan QK. 2022. A new clustering method to generate training samples for supervised monitoring of long-term water surface dynamics using landsat data through google earth engine. Sustainability. 14(13):8046. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8046. doi: 10.3390/su14138046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri Dehkordi A, Valadan Zoej MJ, Ghasemi H, Jafari M, Mehran A. 2022. Monitoring long-term spatiotemporal changes in iran surface waters using landsat imagery. Remote Sens. 14(18):4491. doi: 10.3390/rs14184491.
   Google Scholar
• Tao J, Wang Y, Qiu B, Wu W. 2022. Exploring cropping intensity dynamics by integrating crop phenology information using Bayesian networks. Comput Electron Agric. 193:106667. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq A, Yan J, Gagnon AS, Riaz Khan M, Mumtaz F. 2023. Mapping of cropland, cropping patterns and crop types by combining optical remote sensing images with decision tree classifier and random forest. Geo-Spatial Inform Sci. 26(3):302–320. doi: 10.1080/10095020.2022.2100287.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilakos C, Kavroudakis D, Georganta A. 2020. Machine learning classification ensemble of multitemporal sentinel-2 images: the case of a mixed mediterranean ecosystem. Remote Sens. 12(12):2005. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/12/2005. doi: 10.3390/rs12122005.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Zheng Y, Huang C, Meng R, Pang Y, Jia W, Zhou J, Huang Z, Fang L, Zhao F. 2022. Assessing Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 spectral-temporal features for mapping tree species of northern plantation forests in Heilongjiang Province, China. Forest Ecosyst. 9:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Yu Q, You L, Chen K, Tang H, Liu J. 2018. Global cropping intensity gaps: increasing food production without cropland expansion. Land Use Policy. 76:515–525. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulder MA, Loveland TR, Roy DP, Crawford CJ, Masek JG, Woodcock CE, Allen RG, Anderson MC, Belward AS, Cohen WB, et al. 2019. Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications. Remote Sens Environ. 225:127–147. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang M, Yu Q, Wu W. 2019. From multiple cropping index to multiple cropping frequency: observing cropland use intensity at a finer scale. Ecol Indic. 101:892–903. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan H, Liu F, Qin Y, Niu Z, Doughty R, Xiao X. 2019. Tracking the spatio-temporal change of cropping intensity in China during 2000–2015. Environ Res Lett. 14(3):035008. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf9c7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You L, Sun Z. 2022. Mapping global cropping system: challenges, opportunities, and future perspectives. Crop and Environ. 1(1):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.crope.2022.03.006.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Wu B, Zeng H, He G, Liu C, Tao S, Zhang Q, Nabil M, Tian F, Bofana J, et al. 2021. GCI30: a global dataset of 30 m cropping intensity using multisource remote sensing imagery. Earth Syst Sci Data. 13(10):4799–4817. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-4799-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu J, Shen W. 2022. A review of ensemble learning algorithms used in remote sensing applications. Appl Sci. 12(17):8654. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/17/8654. doi: 10.3390/app12178654.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Feng J, Luo L, Bai L, Wan H, Ren H. 2021. Monitoring cropping intensity dynamics across the North China Plain from 1982 to 2018 using GLASS LAI products. Remote Sens. 13(19):3911. doi: 10.3390/rs13193911.
   Google Scholar