Social media, dress and body marking: exploring young women's imaginative, “languages of the self”

References

• Barclay K & Richardson S (2013) ‘Introduction: Performing the self: women’s lives in historical perspective’, in Women’s History Review, 22, 2, 177–181. doi: 10.1080/09612025.2012.726108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard M (2015) ‘The public voice of women’, in Women's History Review, 24, 5, 809–818. doi: 10.1080/09612025.2015.1023023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley T (2005) ‘Foucault, truth telling and technologies of the self in the schools’, in Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6, 1, 76–89.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely K (2007) ‘Reflections on the role of emotion in feminist research’, in International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6, 2, available at: http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/6_2blakely.html (accessed 11 November 2017). doi: 10.1177/160940690700600206
   Google Scholar
• Butler J (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caillois R (1958) Man, Play and Games, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craighead C (2011) ‘(Monstrous) Beauty (Myths): The commodification of women’s bodies and the potential for tattooed subversions’, in Agenda, 25, 4, 42–49. doi: 10.1080/10130950.2011.630530
   Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1963) Experience and Education, New York: Collier.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein J (1997) ‘Chic theory’, in Australian Humanities Review, available at: http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/ (accessed 20 September 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher J (2002) ‘Tattooing the body, marking culture’, in Body Society, 8, 4, 91–107. doi: 10.1177/1357034X02008004005
   Google Scholar
• Freire P (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Harmonsdworth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gill R (2007) ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility’, in European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, 2, available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1367549407075898 (accessed 20 September 2016). doi: 10.1177/1367549407075898
   Google Scholar
• Graves DH (2003) Writing: Teachers and Children at Work, Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway D (1988) ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, in Feminist Studies, 14, 3, 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway D (1991) ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the late twentieth century’, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• hooks b (1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• hooks b (2010) Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• hooks b & McKinnon T (1996) ‘Sisterhood: Beyond public and private’, in Signs, 21, 4, 814–829. doi: 10.1086/495122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaak J (1996) Feminism & Contemporary Art, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones A (1988) Body Art/ Performing the Subject, London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Lightfoot S & Hoffman-Davis J (1997) The Art and Science of Portraiture, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Shewarega Hussen T & Van Vuuren M (2013) ‘Exploring new media technologies among young South African women’, in Feminist Africa, 18, 43, 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ligaga D (2012) ‘“Virtual Expressions”: Alternative online spaces and the staging of Kenyan popular cultures’, in Research in African Literatures, 43, 4, 1–16. doi: 10.2979/reseafrilite.43.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligaga D (2014) ‘Mapping emerging constructions of good time girls in Kenyan popular media’, in Journal of African Cultural Studies, 26, 3, 249–261. doi: 10.1080/13696815.2014.927324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligaga D (2016) ‘Presence, agency and popularity: Kenyan “socialites”, femininities and digital media’, in Eastern African Literary and Cultural Studies, 2, 3–4, 111–123. doi: 10.1080/23277408.2016.1272184
   Google Scholar
• Lorde A (2004) ‘Conversations with Audre Lorde’ in JW Hall (ed) Literary Conversations Series, Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Lusty N (2017) ‘Riot Grrrl manifestos and radical vernacular feminism’, in Australian Feminist Studies, 3, 93, 219–239. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2017.1407638
   Google Scholar
• Mishra S & Singh P (2015) ‘Reflections of Indian Sensibility: A study of complex saga of man–woman relationships in Bimal Roy’s Bandini’, in New Academia, 4, 3, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty CT (2013) ‘Transnational feminist crossings: On neoliberalism and radical critique’, in Signs, 38, 4, 967–991. doi: 10.1086/669576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muenter O (2014) ‘What does “On Fleek” mean? A brief timeline of the phrase that no one really understands, but everyone keeps saying anyway’, available at: https://www.bustle.com/articles/559402-what-does-on-fleek-mean-a-brief-timeline-of-the-phrase-that-no-one-really-understands (accessed 25 July, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Mugo K & Antonites C (2014) ‘#FillThisSpaceIfYou'reAnAfricanWoman’, in Agenda, 28, 1, 29–36. doi: 10.1080/10130950.2014.871858
   Google Scholar
• Muholi Z & Le Roux G (2014) ‘queer & trans Art-iculations: Collaborative Art for Social Change’, in Agenda, 28, 4, 9–19. doi: 10.1080/10130950.2014.970393
   Google Scholar
• Mupotsa D & Mhishi L (2008) ‘This little rage of poetry/ Researching gender and sexuality’, in Feminist Africa, 11, 5, 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar R (2014) Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ndlovu H (2017) ‘Womxn’s bodies reclaiming the picket line: The ‘nude’ protest during #FeesMustFall’, in Agenda, 31, 3–4, 68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong A (2007) ‘Neoliberalism as a mobile technology’, in Royal Geographical Society (With the Institute of British Geographers), 32, 1, available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00234.x (accessed 15 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Osgood CE, May WH & Miron MS (1975) Crosscultural Universals of Affective Meaning, University of Illinois Press: Urbana.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkola Estés C (1996) Women Who Run With The Wolves, New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Purgar K (2017) ‘Essentialism, subjectivism, visual studies: Concerning non-disciplinary ontology of images’, in Revista de Comunicação e Linguagens: Journal of Communication and Languages, 47: Visual Culture, 78–96.
   Google Scholar
• Rich A (1972) ‘When we dead awaken: writing as re-vision’, in College English, 34, 1, available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/375215 (accessed 11 November 2016). doi: 10.2307/375215
   Google Scholar
• Richardson L (2000) ‘Writing: a method of inquiry’ in NK Denizen & YS Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roy B (2015) ‘Niedecker Blue: Proofs and poetics’, in Contemporary Literature, 56, 3, 476–504. doi: 10.3368/cl.56.3.476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan A (1997) ‘Feminist subjectivities: sources for a politicized practice of women’s personal development education’, Doctoral thesis, Maynooth, National University of Ireland, available at: http://eprints.maynoothuniversity.ie/5283 (accessed 20 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Sanger N (2009) ‘New women, old messages? Constructions of femininities, race and hypersexualised bodies in selected South African magazines, 2003—2006’, in Social Dynamics, 35, 1, 137–148. doi: 10.1080/02533950802667301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirt W (1818) Sketches of the Life and Character of Patrick Henry, Philadelphia: James Webster.
   Google Scholar