Bleed, kill, cut, kin: Uterine violence, body-talk, and feminist subjectivities

References

• Appadurai, A 1996, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Arderne, M 2020, Mermaid Fillet, Kwela Books, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K 2007, Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L 2008, ‘Introduction: Intimacy, publicity, and femininity’, The Female Complaint, Duke University Press, Durham and London, pp. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, S 2018, ‘Biopolitical metaphor: Habitualized embodiment between discourse and affect’, Body & Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 95–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, A 2012, ‘From the blackhand side: Twitter as a cultural conversation’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 529–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, J 2009, ‘The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research’, Field Methods, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 181–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08329699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J 2011, Bodies That Matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’, Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Butler-Kisber, L 2010, ‘Introduction’, in Qualitative Inquiry: Thematic, Narrative and Arts-Informed Perspectives, SAGE Publications, pp. 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435408
   Google Scholar
• Chikafa-Chipiro, R 2019, ‘Racialisation and Imagined Publics in Southern Feminisms’ Solidarities’, Agenda, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 8–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2019.1683459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K 1989. ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracistpolitics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 140, pp. 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Das, V 2008, ‘Violence, gender, and subjectivity’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 37, pp. 283–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyer, JI 2007, ‘Prophecy and the near future: Thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time, American Ethnologist, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 409–421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.3.409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S & Piatelli, D 2012, ‘The synergistic practice of theory and method’, in Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (2nd ed.), SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 176–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384740
   Google Scholar
• Lange, P 2008, ‘Publicly private and privately public: Social Networking on YouTube’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 361–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S 2018, ‘Cyborg uterine geography, Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 300–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820618804625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, LA 2014, ‘Beyond an easy sense: A diffractive analysis’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 742–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, O, Hawkins, R & Kern, L 2015, ‘Feminist research in online spaces’, Gender, Place & Culture, vol. 22 no. 4, pp. 526–543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.879108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, N 1992, ‘The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A critical essay’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 21, pp. 93–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakassis, C 2016, ‘Linguistic Anthropology in 2015: Not the study of language’, American Anthropologist, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 330–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M 2015, The Argonauts, Graywolf Press, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Oyěwùmí, O 2016, ‘Conclusion. Motherhood in the quest for social transformation’, What Gender is Motherhood, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, LJ 2017, ‘Reproductive Justice as intersectional feminist activism’, Souls, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 286–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, E & Moolman, B 2013, ‘Biology, bodies and human rights’, Agenda, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Scheper-Hughes, N & Bourgois, P 2003, ‘Introduction; Making Sense of Violence’ in N Scheper-Hughes & P Bourgois (eds), Violence in War and Peace: An Anthology, Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, LG, Ligaga, D & Musila, GA 2018, ‘Gender and Popular Imaginaries in Africa’, Agenda, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, HL 2012, ‘A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data’, Feminist Theory, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 265–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ussher, J 2006, Managing the Monstrous Feminine: Regulating the Reproductive Body, Women and Psychology, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J & Perz, J 2020, ‘Resisting the Mantle of the Monstrous Feminine: Women’s Construction and Experience of Premenstrual Embodiment’, in C. Bobel et al. (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies (1st ed.), Springer Singapore, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren, M 2018, ‘Social media, dress and body marking: exploring young women's imaginative, “languages of the self”’, Agenda, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 21–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2018.1499307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, T 2017, ‘#Intersectionality: The Fourth Wave Feminist Twitter Community’, Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 54–70.
   Google Scholar