10
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

US Military-Security Policy toward the Korean Peninsula in the 1990s

Pages 237-262 | Published online: 25 Mar 2009

  • Arkin , William and Fieldhouse , Richard . 1985 . Nuclear Battlefields 120 Cambridge, MA : Ballinger Pub. Co. .
  • The author argued in 1990 that the ROK enjoyed qualitative superiority over the DPRK in military weapons system and equipment although the latter had quantitative advantages. For a comparative analysis of the two Koreas' military capabilities, see Tae-Hwan Kwak, “Military Capabilities of South and North Korea: A Comparative Study,” Asian Perspective, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring-Summer 1990), pp. 113–66.
  • For further details, see Tae-Hwan Kwak, “ROK National Security in the 1990s,” Korean Journal of lnternational Studies, Vol. XIX, No. 3 (1988), pp. 389–414; also see Tae-Hwan Kwak, Korea-US Security Relations in the 1990s: A Creative Adjustment,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Winter 1989), pp. 143–66.
  • US Department of Defense . 1992 . A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim: Report to Congress 1992 18 – 21 . Washington, DC : Department of Defense . For further details, see (pp.
  • For further details, see Les Aspin, Report on the Bottom-Up Review (US Department of Defense, October 1993).
  • New York Times, September 2, 1993.
  • Aspin, op. cit., p. 23.
  • For further details, see Michael R. Gordon & David E. Sanger, “North Korea's Hugh Military Spurs New Strategy in South,” New York Times, February 6, 1994.
  • For further details, see Joseph L. Galloway, “Korea: The Next War?,” US News and World Report, June 20, 1994; and Kim Dang, “CFC OPLAN 5027,” Sisa Journal, NO. 218 (December 30, 1993), pp. 24–27.
  • US Department of Defense . April 18 1990 . A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim: Looking toward the 21st Century April 18 , 15 – 17 . Washington, DC : Department of Defense . For further details, see (pp.
  • US Department of Defense . February 1995 . United States Security Strategy, for the East Asia-Pacific Region February , 25 Washington, DC : Department of Defense .
  • Ibid., p. 29.
  • For further details, see the Korea Herald, November 16 & 17, 1990.
  • Korea Herald, March 25, 1991.
  • For further details, see Korea Newsreview, November 30, 1991.
  • Korea Newsreview, October 17, 1992. For joint communiqué of 24th ROK-US SCM, see the Korea Herald, October 9, 1992.
  • Pyongyang Times, October 17, 1992.
  • Korea Newsreview, November 6, 1993, pp. 7–8.
  • For further details, see the Korea Herald, October 7 & 9, 1994.
  • For further details, see the Korea Herald, November 4, 1995.
  • For further details, see Tae-Hwan Kwak and Seung-Ho Joo, “The Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula: Problems and Prospects,” Arms Control, Vol. 14, No. 2 (August 1993), pp. 65–92; Tae-Hwan Kwak, “North Korea's Nuclear Issue and Inter-Korean Relations,” paper presented at the 5th Korean-American University Professors Association Conference, Sheraton Century Center Hotel, Atlanta, Georgia, October 20–23, 1994.
  • US News & World Report, February 22, 1993; New York Times, February 11, 1993; Stephen Engelberg and Michael Gordon, “North Korea Likely to Have Developed Own Atomic Bomb, CIA Tells President,” New York Times, December 26, 1993.
  • For details of a statement by Kang Sok-ju, see Rodong Shinmun, November 12, 1993.
  • Ibid.
  • For further details, see the New York Times & Washington Post, June 19 & 20, 1994.
  • For details, see the Korea Herald, August 14, 1994.
  • Alan Riding, “US and North Korea Announce Pause in Talks, but No Progress,” New York Times, September 30, 1994.
  • For further details, see Michael R. Gordon, “US-North Korea Accord Has a 10-Year Timetable.” New York Times, October 21, 1994; Allan Riding, “US and North Korea Sign Pact to End Nuclear Dispute,” New York Times, October 22, 1994; William Drozdiak, “N. Korea, US Sign Broad Pact,” Washington Post, October 22, 1994; R. Jeffrey Smith, “US Accord with North Korea May Open Country to Change,” Washington Post, October 23, 1994.
  • For further details, see David E. Sanger, “Who Won in the Korea Deal,” New York Times, October 23, 1994; Michael Kramer, “A Tough, Smart Deal,” Time, October 31, 1994; Steven Strasser, et al., “Let the Moneymaking begin,” Newsweek, October 31, 1994.
  • Korea Herald, July 7, 1992.
  • Ibid., June 28, 1992.
  • Joong-Ang Ilbo, September 28, 1995.
  • The author argued for the first time that the US troop withdrawal issue should be used as a political bargaining chip in negotiations with the DPRK in 1983, see “How to Deal with the Stalemated Inter-Korean Dialogue: The Non-Zero Sum Formula,” paper presented at the Fifth Joint Conference of the Korean Political Science Association and the Association of Korean Political Scientists in North America, August 8–10, 1983, Seoul, Korea.
  • For further details, see Aspin, op. cit.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.