A Practical Approach for Tunnel Fire Verification

References

• Beard A, Carvel R (eds), The Handbook of Tunnel Fire Safety. Thomas Telford: London, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland CJ. The fire in the Channel Tunnel, 2002 ITA open session: fire and life safety. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech. 2002; 17: 129–132. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00014-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettelini M. Tunnel safety. Active risk reduction. Gallerie e Grandi Opere Sotterranee. 2003; 69: 60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Voeltzel A, Dix A. A comparative analysis of the Mont Blanc, Tauern and Gotthard tunnel fires. Routes/Roads. 2004; 324: 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Henke A, Gagliardi M. The 2001 Gotthard fire—how was the fast reopening of the tunnel possible? TME 5th International Conference Safety in Road and Rail Tunnels. Marseille, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Henke A, Gagliardi M. The 2001 Gotthard road tunnel fire. Tunn. Manag. Int. 2004; 7(1): 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Maraveas C, Vrakas AA. Design of concrete tunnel linings for fire safety. Struct. Eng. Int. 2014; 24: 319–329. doi: 10.2749/101686614X13830790993041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caner A, Zlatanic S, Munfah N. Structural fire performance of concrete and shotcrete tunnel liners. J. Struct. Eng. 2005; 131(12): 745–763. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1920)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler C, Lackner R, Mang HA. Safety assessment of concrete tunnel linings under fire load. J. Struct. Eng. 2006; 132: 961–969. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:6(961)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savov K, Lackner R, Mang HA. Stability assessment of shallow tunnels subjected to fire load. Fire Saf. J. 2005; 40: 745–763. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 1-2: General actions—Actions on structures exposed to fire. EN 1991-1-2, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1–2: General rules—Structural fire design. EN 1992-1-2, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• American Concrete Institute (ACI). Fire endurance of concrete elements. ACI 2003 manual of concrete practice, ACI216R-89, Farmington Hills, Mich. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Schrefler BA, Codina R, Pasavento F, Principe J. Thermal coupling of fluid flow and structural response of a tunnel induced fire. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 2011; 87: 361–385. doi: 10.1002/nme.3077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrefler BA, Brunello P, Gawin D, Majorana CE, Pasavento F. Concrete at high temperature with application to tunnel fire. Comput Mech. 2002; 29: 43–51. doi: 10.1007/s00466-002-0318-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury GA. Effect of fire on concrete and concrete structures. Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 2000; 2: 429–447. doi: 10.1002/pse.51
   Google Scholar
• Bailey CG, Khoury GA. Performance of Concrete Structures in Fire. MPA—The Concrete Centre: Cambereley; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bazant ZP, Kaplan MF. Concrete at High Temperatures: Material Properties and Mathematical Models. Longman: Harlow; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). Fire design of concrete structures—materials, structures and modelling. fib Bulletin. 2007; 38.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). Fire design of concrete structures—structural behaviour and assessment. fib Bulletin. 2008; 46.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg Y, Thelandersson S. Stress and deformation characteristics of concrete at high temperatures, 2. Experimental investigation and material behaviour model. Lund Institute of Technology, Bulletin 54, Lund; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider U. Concrete at high temperatures—a general review. Fire Saf. J. 1988; 13: 55–68. doi: 10.1016/0379-7112(88)90033-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawin D, Pesavento F, Schrefler BA. What physical phenomena can be neglected when modelling concrete at high temperature? A comparative study. Part 1: Physical phenomena and mathematical model. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2001; 48: 1927–1944. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Gawin D, Pesavento F, Schrefler BA. What physical phenomena can be neglected when modelling concrete at high temperature? A comparative study. Part 2: Comparison between models. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2001; 48: 1945–1961. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Chen FP, Kodur VKR, Wang TC. Stress-strain curves for high strength concrete at elevated temperatures. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2004; 16(1): 84–90. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:1(84)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva P. Structural behaviour of continuous beams and frames. Chapter 4 of FIB Bulletin N.46. Fire design of concrete structures—Structural behaviour and assessment. 2008; 32–54.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1–2: General rules—Structural fire design. ENV 1992-1-2, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• British Standard, Structural use of concrete. BS 8110-2, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. EN 1992-1-1, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Amberg F. Thermal analysis of a RCC dam during construction. Proc. of the 7th Benchmark Workshop on Numerical Analysis of Dams, 2003, 172–187.
   Google Scholar
• Bamonte P, Gambarova PG, Meda A. Today’s concretes exposed to fire—test results and sectional analysis. Struct. Concr. 2008; 9(1): 19–29. doi: 10.1680/stco.2008.9.1.19
   Google Scholar