An Efficient Hybrid Particle Swarm and Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization for Arch-Dam Shape Design

References

• Kaveh A. Advances in metaheuristic algorithms for optimal design of structures. 3rd ed. Springer International Publishing; 2021. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59392-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bonabeau E, Dorigo M, Theraulaz G. Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial isystems. Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dorigo M, Stutzle T. The ant colony optimization metaheuristic: algorithms, applications, and advances. Handb. Metaheuristics SE – Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 2003;57:250–285. doi:10.1007/0-306-48056-5_9.
   Google Scholar
• Karaboga D, Akay B. A survey: algorithms simulating bee swarm intelligence. Artif Intell Rev. 2009;31:61–85. doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9127-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X-S. Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. Int J Bio-Ins Comput. 2010;2:1–12. doi:10.1504/IJBIC.2010.032124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XS. A new metaheuristic Bat-inspired algorithm. Stud Comput Intell. 2010;284:65–74. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng MY, Prayogo D. Symbiotic organisms search: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct. 2014;139:98–112. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili S-A, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM. Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw. 2017;114:163–191. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierezan J, Coelho L. Coyote optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic for global optimization problems. 2018 IEEE Congr. Evol. Comput. CEC 2018 – Proc. IEEE; 2018, p. 1–8. doi:10.1109/CEC.2018.8477769.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M. Optimal spectral matching of strong ground motion by opposition-switching search. Engopt 2018 proc. 6th Int. conf. eng. optim., Lisbon, Purtugal: Springer International Publishing; 2019, p. 713–724. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97773-7.
   Google Scholar
• Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Stephens B, Mirjalili S. Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2020;191:105190. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M. Switching teams algorithm for sizing optimization of truss structures. Int J Optim Civ Eng. 2020;10:365–389.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Wang L, Zhang Z. Atom search optimization and its application to solve a hydrogeologic parameter estimation problem. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2019;163:283–304. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Mirjalili S-A, Gandomi AH. Marine predators algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;152:113377. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. IEEE Int. Conf. Part. Swarm Optim. 1995;4:1942–1948. doi:10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968.
   Google Scholar
• Parpinelli RS, Lopes HS. New inspirations in swarm intelligence: A survey. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput. 2011;3:1–16. doi:10.1504/IJBIC.2011.038700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X. Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. 2010. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-416743-8.00005-1.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M. Pseudo-random directional search: a new heuristic for optimization. Int J Optim Civ Eng. 2011;1:341–355.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M, Pashaei M. Stochastic directional search : an efficient heuristic for structural optimization of building frames. Sci Iran. 2013;20:1124–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Wang Z, Liu X, Zeng N, Bell D. A novel particle swarm optimization approach for patient clustering from emergency departments. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2019;23:632–644. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2018.2878536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana S, Jasola S, Kumar R. A review on particle swarm optimization algorithms and their applications to data clustering. Artif Intell Rev. 2011;35:211–222. doi:10.1007/s10462-010-9191-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Roy A, Purkayastha B. Application of particle swarm optimization in data clustering: A survey. Int J Comput. 2013;65:38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR. A hybrid CBO-PSO algorithm for optimal design of truss structures with dynamic constraints. Appl Soft Comput J. 2015;34:260–273. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Q, Wang L. An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2007;20:89–99. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2006.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Xiao Z, Li H, Liu D, Hu X, Malik OP. Accurate parameter estimation of a hydro-turbine regulation system using adaptive fuzzy particle swarm optimization. Energies. 2019;12:3903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng N, Wang Z, Liu W, Zhang H, Hone K, Liu X. A dynamic neighborhood-based switching particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2022;52:9290–9301. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2020.3029748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng N, Hung Y-S, Li Y, Du M. A novel switching local evolutionary PSO for quantitative analysis of lateral flow immunoassay. Expert Syst Appl. 2014;41:1708–1715. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang JJ, Qin AK, Suganthan PN, Baskar S. Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2006;10:281–295. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2005.857610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imran M, Hashim R, Khalid NEA. An overview of particle swarm optimization variants. Procedia Eng. 2013;53:491–496. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.063.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan E, Mohan CK. Analysis of a simple particle optimization system. Intell Eng Syst Through Artif Neural Networks. 1998:253–258.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Gurwinder, Singh A. Effect of inertia and constriction factors on PSO and quantum behaved PSO. Soft Comput. Springer Berlin Heidelberg;2018;22:387–408. doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2474-6.
   Google Scholar
• Almufti M, Zebari A, Omer H, others. A comparative study of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm. J Adv Comput Sci Technol 2019;8:40–45. doi:10.14419/jacst.v8i2.29401.
   Google Scholar
• Clerc M, Kennedy J. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2002;6:58–73. doi:10.1109/4235.985692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocente MS, Sienz J. Particle swarm optimization with inertia weight and constriction factor. Int. conf. swarm intell., Cergy, France; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nickabadi A, Ebadzadeh MM, Safabakhsh R. A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive inertia weight. Appl Soft Comput J. 2011;11:3658–3670. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Eberhart R. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. IEEE Congr Evol Comput. Washington DC; 1999, p. 1945–1950.
   Google Scholar
• He S, Wu QH, Wen JY, Saunders JR, Paton RC. A particle swarm optimizer with passive congregation. BioSystems. 2004;78:135–147. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell T, Kennedy J. Impact of communication topology in particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2019;23:689–702. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2018.2880894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BH, Xue B, Andreae P, Zhang M. A new binary particle swarm optimization approach: momentum and dynamic balance between exploration and exploitation. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021;51:589–603. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2019.2944141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Wang Z, Yuan Y, Zeng N, Hone K, Liu X. A novel sigmoid-function-based adaptive weighted particle swarm optimizer. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021;51:1085–1093. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2019.2925015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Zhang H, Li W, Zhou M, Zhang Y, Chaovalitwongse WA. Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization algorithm with local search for multimodal functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2019;23:718–731. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2018.2885075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M, Farahabadi H. A fast fuzzy-tuned multi-objective optimization for sizing problems. Int J Optim Civ Eng. 2018;8:53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kao Y-T, Zahara E. A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions. Appl Soft Comput. 2008;8:849–857. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2007.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M. A new hybrid genetic and swarm optimization for earthquake accelerogram scaling. Int J Optim Civ Eng. 2011;1:127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Cai Z, Wang Y. Hybridizing particle swarm optimization with differential evolution for constrained numerical and engineering optimization. Appl Soft Comput J. 2010;10:629–640. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Singh SB. Hybrid algorithm of particle swarm optimization and grey wolf optimizer for improving convergence performance. J Appl Math. 2017;2017:1–15. doi:10.1155/2017/2030489.
   Google Scholar
• Molina D, Poyatos J, Del SJ, García S, Hussain A, Herrera F. Comprehensive taxonomies of nature- and Bio-inspired optimization: inspiration versus algorithmic behavior, critical analysis recommendations. Cognit Comput. 2020;12:897–939. doi:10.1007/s12559-020-09730-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhart R, Kennedy J. New optimizer using particle swarm theory. Proc Int Symp Micro Mach Hum Sci. 1995;39–43. doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215.
   Google Scholar
• Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP. Teaching-learning-based optimization: an optimization method for continuous non-linear large scale problems. Inf Sci (Ny). 2012;183:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim. 1997;11:341–359. doi:10.1023/A:1008202821328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M, Kaveh A. An efficient derivative-free optimization algorithm inspired by avian life-saving manoeuvres. J Comput Sci. 2022;57:101483. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamil M, Yang XS. A literature survey of benchmark functions for global optimisation problems. Int J Math Model Numer Optim. 2013;4:150–194. doi:10.1504/IJMMNO.2013.055204.
   Google Scholar
• Clerck M, Kennedy J. The particle swarm—explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2002;6:58–73. doi:10.1109/4235.985692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkan AI. A hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithm for computationally expensive numerical problems. Appl Soft Comput. 2018;66:232–249. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naserifar Y, Shahrouzi M. A reliability approach to compare optimal seismic designs of multiple-tuned-mass-damper. Int J Optim Civ Eng. 2020;10:553–570.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert DH, Macready WG. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 1997;1:67–82. doi:10.1109/4235.585893.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan B, Ölmez T. A new metaheuristic for numerical function optimization: vortex search algorithm. Inf Sci (Ny). 2015;293:125–145. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili S-A. The ant lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw. 2015;83:80–98. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveh A, Dadras A. A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm: thermal exchange optimization. Adv Eng Softw. 2017;110:69–84. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari A, Mirjalili S-A, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H. Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2019;97:849–872. doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SS. Engineering optimization: theory and practice: fourth edition. New Jersy: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. doi:10.1002/9780470549124.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu YL, Liu TC. Developing a fuzzy proportional-derivative controller optimization engine for engineering design optimization problems. Eng Optim. 2007;39:679–700. doi:10.1080/03052150701252664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha AMAC, Fernandes EMGP. Hybridizing the electromagnetism-like algorithm with descent search for solving engineering design problems. Int J Comput Math. 2009;86:1932–1946. doi:10.1080/00207160902971533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi AH, Yang XS, Alavi AH. Cuckoo search algorithm: A metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Eng Comput. 2013;29:17–35. doi:10.1007/s00366-011-0241-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi AH, Alavi AH. An introduction of Krill Herd algorithm for engineering optimization. J Civ Eng Manag. 2016;22:302–310. doi:10.3846/13923730.2014.897986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora JS. Introduction to optimum design. London, UK: Elsevier; 2017. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-61700-1.
   Google Scholar
• He Q, Wang L. A hybrid particle swarm optimization with a feasibility-based rule for constrained optimization. Appl Math Comput. 2007;186:1407–1422. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili S, Lewis A. The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;95:51–67. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askarzadeh A. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct. 2016;169:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandgren E. Nonlinear integer and discrete programming in mechnical design optimization. J Mech Transm Autom Des. 1990;112:223–229. doi:10.1115/1.2912596.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X-S, Huyck C, Karamanoglu M, Khan N. True global optimality of the pressure vessel design problem: A benchmark for bio-inspired optimisation algorithms. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput. 2013;5:329–335. doi:10.4018/jdsst.2013040103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan BK, Kramer SN. An augmented Lagrange multiplier based method for mixed integer discrete continuous optimization and its applications to mechanical design. J Mech Des. 1994;116:405–411. doi:10.1115/1.2919393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KS, Geem ZW. A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2005;194:3902–3933. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadollah A, Bahreininejad A, Eskandar H, Hamdi M. Mine blast algorithm: A new population based algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput. 2013;13:2592–2612. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoqlu A, Akpinar Ş. Weighted superposition attraction (WSA): A swarm intelligence algorithm for optimization problems – part 2: constrained optimization. Appl Soft Comput J. 2015;37:396–415. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MD, Zhao H, Weng XW, Han T. A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: virus colony search. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;92:65–88. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR. Colliding bodies optimization: extensions and applications. Springer International Publishing; 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19659-6.
   Google Scholar
• AISC. Manual of steel construction: allowable stress design. 9th ed. Chicago (Illinois): American Institute of Steel Constuction, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KS, Geem ZW. A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Comput Struct. 2004;82:781–798. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveh A, Talatahari S. Particle swarm optimizer, ant colony strategy and harmony search scheme hybridized for optimization of truss structures. Comput Struct. 2009;87:267–283. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrouzi M, Salehi A. Imperialist competitve learner-based optimization: a hybrid method to solve engineering problems. Int J Optim Civ Eng. 2020;10:155–180.
   Google Scholar
• Kaveh A, Khayatazad M. A new meta-heuristic method: Ray optimization. Comput Struct. 2012;112–113:283–294. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedro JO. Arch dams: deisging and monotoring for safety. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1999. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-2488-8.
   Google Scholar
• Duron ZH, Hall JF. Experimental and finite element studies of the forced vibration response of morrow point dam. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1988;16:1021–1039. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290160706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USACE. Earthquake design and evaluation of concrete hydraulic structures. Washington (DC): US Army Corps of Engineers, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• MathWorks. MATLAB, The language of technical programming 2006.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS. ANSYS advanced analysis techniques guide. Ansys Help. 2007;1:724–746.
   Google Scholar
• USBR. Design of arch dams: design manual for concrete arch dams. Denver (Colorado): United States Bureau of Reclamation, 1977.
   Google Scholar