Investigating Partial Factors for the Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges

References

• JCSS. JCSS probabilistic model code (periodically updated online publication). Joint Committee on Structural Safety; 2001. www.jcss.byg.dtu.dk.
   Google Scholar
• JCSS. Probabilistic assessment of existing structures (Diamantidis D editor). France: RILEM Publications S.A.R.L, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cost Action 345. Procedure required for the assessment of highway structures - final report. European Cooperation in Science And Technology (COST); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• fib MC2010. fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin (Germany): Ernst & Sohn; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 13822:2010. Bases for design of structures – Assessment of existing structures.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 2394:2015. General principles on reliability for structures.
   Google Scholar
• fib COM3 TG3.1. Partial factor methods for existing concrete structures (fib Bulletin 80). Fédération internationale du béton (fib), fib COM3 TG3.1; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantidis D, Bazzuro P. Safety acceptance criteria for existing structures. Special Workshop on Risk Acceptance and Risk Communication, Stanford University, Australia; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen RDJM, Vrouwenvelder ACWM. Safety philosophy for existing structures and partial factors for traffic load on bridges. Heron. 2010;55(2):123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen R, Sýkora M, Diamantidis D, et al. Economic and human safety reliability levels for existing structures. Struct Concr. 2015;16(3):323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRC report of CEN/TC250/WG2. New European technical rules for the assessment and retrofitting of existing structures; 2015. ISBN 978-92-79-46023-4.
   Google Scholar
• AS 5104. General principles on reliability for structures standard by Standards Australia; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• CEN/TS 17440:2020. Assessment and retrofitting of existing structures.
   Google Scholar
• prEN 1990-2:2021. Eurocode – Basis of assessment and retrofitting of existing structures: general rules and actions; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews S. Fib model code 2020-a new development in structural codes. Struct Concr. 2017;18(5):651–652. doi:10.1002/suco.201770052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews S, Bigaj-van Vliet A, Walraven J, et al. Fib model code 2020: towards a general code for both new and existing concrete structures. Struct Concr. 2018;19(4):969–979. doi:10.1002/suco.201700198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronelli D, Walraven J, Zandi K, Matthews S. Fib model code 2020 - structural models for existing concrete structures. In: Foster S, Gilbert RI, Mendis P, Al-Mahaidi R, Millar D, editors. fib 2018 - Proceedings for the 2018 fib congress: better, smarter, stronger. Melbourne, Australia: Federation Internationale du Beton (fib), 2019; p. 3019–3040.
   Google Scholar
• Ueda T. Intervention to allow integration of existing structures with new structures in fib MC2020. In: Derkowski W, Krajewski P, Gwozdziewicz P, Pantak M, Hojdys L, editors. Proceedings of fib Symposium 2019: concrete - innovations in materials, design and structures. Krakow, Poland: International Federation for Structural Concrete, 2019; p. 1643–1650.
   Google Scholar
• Sykora M, Botte W, Caspeele R, et al. Probabilistic models for resistance variables in fib model code 2020 for design and assessment (accepted for publication). Proceedings of International Probabilistic Workshop IPW 2022, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 8–9 September 2022; p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• SIA 269. Grundlagen der Erhaltung von Tragwerken. Zurich (Switzerland): Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architekten Verein; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Holicky M, Sykora M. Reliability approaches affecting the sustainability of concrete structures. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enevoldsen I. Experience with probabilistic-based assessment of bridges. Struct Eng Int. 2001;11(4):251–260. doi:10.2749/101686601780346814
   Google Scholar
• Cremona C. Structural performance: probability-based assessment. 2012. doi:10.1002/9781118601174
   Google Scholar
• Cremona C, Poulin B. Standard and advanced practices in the assessment of existing bridges. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2017;13(4):428–439. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1164731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor A, Pedersen C, Roldsgaard JH. Probability based assessment of motorway bridges in Denmark. IABSE Conference 2018; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Boros V. Reassessment of the partial safety factor for self weight of existing bridges. In: International Probabilistic Workshop 2019. 11–13 September, Edinburgh, UK, 2019. pp. 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Skokandić D, Mandić Ivanković A. Value of additional traffic data in the context of bridge service-life management. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2022;18:456–475. doi:10.1080/15732479.2020.1857795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak AS, Collins KR. Reliability of structures. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Melchers RE, Beck AT. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Boros V, Lenner R, O’Connor A, et al. Traffic loads for the assessment of existing bridges. IABSE Congress Ghent 2021; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Orcesi A, Boros V, Kušter Marić M, et al. Bridge case studies on the calibration of partial safety factors for the assessment of existing structures. 18th International Probabilistic Workshop, May 12 to 14, Guimarães; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1990:2002. Eurocode - basis of structural design; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Šavor Z, Šavor Novak M. Procedures for reliability assessment of existing bridges. Gradevinar. 2015;67(6):557–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykora M, Diamantidis D, Holicky M, et al. Target reliability for existing structures considering economic and societal aspects. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2017;13(1):181–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÖNORM. Austrian Standard: ÖNORM B 4008-2. Assessment of load capacity of existing structures – part 2: bridge construction, Vienna, Austria; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• prEN 1992-1-1:2021. Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures - part 1-1: general rules – rules for buildings, bridges and civil engineering structures; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Muttoni A. Background document to 4.3.3 and annex A, partial safety factors for materials, cEN/ TC250/ SC2/ WG1/ TG6 (report EPFL-IBETON 16-06-R11). EPFL Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Moccia F, Yu Q, Fernández Ruiz M, et al. Concrete compressive strength: from material characterization to a structural value. Struct Concr. 2021;22(S1):E634–E654. doi:10.1002/suco.202000211
   Google Scholar
• Bairán J-M, Casas JR. Safety factor calibration for a new model of shear strength of reinforced concrete building beams and slabs. Eng Struct. 2018;172:293–303. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomfors M, Larsson Ivanov O, Honfí D, et al. Partial safety factors for the anchorage capacity of corroded reinforcement bars in concrete. Eng Struct. 2019;181:579–588. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 1992-1-1:2004. Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• ECP. Eurocode 2 commentary. Brussels (Belgium): European Concrete Platform ASBL; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cervenka V, Cervenka J, Kadlec L. Model uncertainties in numerical simulations of reinforced concrete structures. Struct Concr. 2018;19:2004–2016. doi:10.1002/suco.201700287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen M, Hendriks MAN, Monti G, et al. Treatment of modelling uncertainty of NLFEA in fib model code 2020. Struct Concr. 2021;22:3202–3212. doi:10.1002/suco.202100420
   Google Scholar
• Gino D, Castaldo P, Giordano L, et al. Model uncertainty in non-linear numerical analyses of slender reinforced concrete members. Struct Concr. 2021;22(2):845–870. doi:10.1002/suco.202000600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien EJ, Enright B. Modeling same-direction two-lane traffic for bridge loading. Structural Safety. 2011;33(4-5):296–304. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprani CC. Probabilistic analysis of highway bridge traffic loading. University College of Dublin; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Spuy PF, Lenner R. Developing a new bridge live load model for South Africa. In: Powers N, Frangopol D, Al-Mahaidi R, Caprani C, editors. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management (IABMAS). Melbourne: Taylor & Francis, 2018; p. 1405–1410.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Spuy PF, Lenner R. Towards a new bridge live load model for South Africa. Struct Eng Int. 2019;29(2):292–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Spuy PF. Derivation of a traffic load model for the structural desig nof highway bridges in South Africa. [PhD thesis]. Stellenbosch University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Sifre S. Site specific traffic load factor approach for the assessment of existing bridges. [Ph.D. thesis]. Stellenbosch University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Meinen NE, Steenbergen RDJM. Reliability levels obtained by Eurocode partial factor design - a discussion on current and future reliability levels. Heron. 2018;63(3):243–301.
   Google Scholar
• JCSS. JCSS Comment on draft prEN1990:2017, Reliability Requirements in Annex C. February 2018; 2018, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• EN 13791:2019. Assessment of in-situ compressive strength in structures and pre-cast concrete components; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Haavisto J, Husso A, Laaksonen A. Compressive strength of core specimens drilled from concrete test cylinders. Struct Concr. 2021;22(S1):E683–E695.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett FM. Canadian standards association standard A23.3-04 resistance factor for concrete in compression. Can J Civ Eng. 2007;34:1029–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster SJ, Stewart MG, Sirivivatnanon V, et al. A re-evaluation of the safety and reliability indices for reinforced concrete structures designed to AS3600. UNICIV Report No. R-464, UNSW Sydney; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Foster SJ, Stewart MG, Loo M, et al. Calibration of Australian Standard AS3600 Concrete Structures: part I statistical analysis of material properties and model error. Aust J Struct Eng. 2016;17:242–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingwood B, Galambos TV, MacGregor JG, et al. Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication. Vol. 577. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Gulvanessian H, Calgaro J-A, Holický M. Designers’ guide to eurocode: basis of structural design: EN 1990. London: Thomas Telford Publishing, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Beeby A, Jackson P. Partial safety factor for reinforcement. Structures. 2016;5:101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARES. Results of data collected during the period March 2005 to September 2006, BS 4449 Grade B500 reinforcement. UK Certification Authority for Reinforcing Steels, 2008. [visited 29.10.2019]. https://www.ukcares.com/information.
   Google Scholar
• König G, Hosser D. The simplified level II method and its application on the derivation of safety elements for level I. CEB Bulletin no 147. Lausanne: International Federation for Structural Concrete; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Ana Mandić Ivanković, Dominik Skokandić, Aleš Žnidarič, Maja Kreslin. Bridge performance indicators based on traffic load monitoring. Struct and Infrastruct Eng. 2019;15(7):899–911. doi:10.1080/15732479.2017.1415941
   Google Scholar