Impact of Aid for Trade on Trademarks Applications in Recipient-Countries

References

• Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. doi: 10.2307/1879431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, D. C., & Gallop, R. J. (2007). Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: A tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 726–735. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroncelli, E., Fink, C., & Javorcik, B. (2005). The global distribution of trademarks: Some Stylized facts. The World Economy, 28(6), 765–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroncelli, E., Krivonos, E., & Olarreaga, M. (2004). Trademark protection or protectionism? (Policy Research Working Paper No. 66629). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bearce, D. H., Finkel, S. E., Pérez-Liñán, A. S., Rodríguez-Zepeda, J., & Surzhko-Harned, L. (2013). Has the New Aid for trade Agenda been export Effective? Evidence on the impact of US AfT Allocations 1999–2008. International Studies Quarterly, 57, 163–170. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, D., & Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and Intellectual property: An empirical analysis of Large Australian firms. The Economic Record, 77(239), 323–337. doi: 10.1111/1475-4932.t01-1-00026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddelmeyer, H., Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E. (2010). Innovation and the determinants of Company survival. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(2), 261–285. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpp012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, M., Hoekstra, R., & Königer, J. (2012). The impact of Aid for trade Facilitation on the costs of trading. Kyklos, 65, 143–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2012.00531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calì, M., & TeVelde, D. (2011). Does aid for trade really improve trade performance? World Development, 39(5), 725–740. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cali, M., & Te Velde, D. W. (2008). Towards a quantitative assessment of Aid for trade. London: Overseas Development Institute (Unpublished paper).
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., & Trivedi, P. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29–54. doi: 10.1002/jae.3950010104
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., & Trivedi, P. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cirera, X., & Winters, L. A. (2014). Aid for trade and Structural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Commonwealth trade policy discussion Papers, No 2015/01. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Di Vita, G. (2013). The TRIPs agreement and technological innovation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(6), 964–977. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economides. (1988). The economics of trademarks. Trademark Reporter, 78, 523–539.
   Google Scholar
• European Patent Office (EPO) and Office for the Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM). (2013). Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union, September 2013, Joint project between the EPO and the OHIM.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, C., Javorcik, B. S., & Spatareanu, M. (2005). Income-related biases in international trade: What do trademark registration data tell us? Review of World Economics, 141(1), 79–103. doi: 10.1007/s10290-005-0016-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C., De Man, A. P., & Seip, M. (2015). Explaining the trademark-innovation linkage: The role of patents and trademark filing strategies, DRUID Society Conference 2015. Retrieved from http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/nv9r3f3sl6p5e0431rj6sxfblv4g.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flikkema, M. J., de Man, A. P., & Castaldi, C. (2014). Are trademark counts a valid indicator of innovation? Results of an in-depth study of new Benelux trademarks filed by SMEs. Industry and Innovation, 21(4), 310–331. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2014.934547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazal, R., & Zulkhibri, M. (2015). Determinants of innovation outputs in developing countries: Evidence from panel data negative binomial approach. Journal of Economic Studies, 42(2), 237–260. doi: 10.1108/JES-01-2013-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnangnon, S. K. (2018). Aid for trade and recipient countries’ export structure: Does trade policy liberalisation matter? Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 18(1), 56–85.
   Google Scholar
• Gnangnon, S. K. (2019). Aid for trade and export diversification in recipient-countries. The World Economy, 42(2), 396–418. doi: 10.1111/twec.12711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnangnon, S. K., & Roberts, M. (2017). Aid for trade, foreign direct investment and export upgrading in recipient countries. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 08(02), 1750010, 36 pages, doi: 10.1142/S1793993317500107
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. H. (2002). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. New York, NY: Person Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, C., & Longland, M. (2005). Running to stand still? – The value of R&D, patents and trademarks in innovating manufacturing firms. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(3), 307–328. doi: 10.1080/13571510500299326
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, C., & Rogers, M. (2006). Market Value of UK Intellectual Property: Manufacturing, Utility and Financial Service Firms. In D. Bosworth & E. Webster (Eds.), The management of intellectual property (Chap. 7). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, C., Rogers, M., Schautschick, P., & Sena, V. (2011). ‘Trade mark incentives’– report for the UK Intellectual Property Office.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, W., & Webster, E. (2006). Market valuation of Australian intellectual property. In D. Bosworth & E. Webster (Eds.), The Management of Intellectual property (Chap. 8). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with applications to the patents R and D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4), 909–938. doi: 10.2307/1911191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helble, M. C., Mann, C. L., & Wilson, J. S. (2012). Aid-for-trade facilitation. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 148(2), 357–376. doi: 10.1007/s10290-011-0115-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmers, C., & Rogers, M. (2010). Innovation and the survival of new firms in the UK. Review of Industrial Organization, 36(3), 227–248. doi: 10.1007/s11151-010-9247-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, C., & Grupp, H. (2005). Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research Policy, 34, 517–535. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hühne, P., Meyer, B., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2014). Who benefits from Aid for trade? Comparing the effects on recipient versus donor exports. Journal of Development Studies, 50(9), 1275–1288. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2014.903246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, W., & Holden, P. (2016). What future for the global aid for trade initiative? Towards an assessment of its achievements and limitations. Development Policy Review, 34(4), 593–619. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P., Webster, E., & Buddelmeyer, H. (2008). Innovation, technological Conditions and new firm survival. The Economic Record, 84(267), 434–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Kemp, A. W. (1993). Univariate discrete Distributions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide governance Indicators methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research No. 5430 (WPS5430). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (2003). A Guide to Econometrics (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. (1988). Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model. American Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 838–863. doi: 10.2307/2111248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes, W., & Posner, R. (1987). Trademark law: An economic perspective. Journal of Law and Economics, 30(2), 265–309. doi: 10.1086/467138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llerena, P., & Millot, V. (2013). Are trade marks and patents complementary or substitute protections for innovation. BETA WP No. 2013-01, UDS, Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for Categorical dependent variables using stata, (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lybbert, T. J., Zolas, N., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2014). An ‘algorithmic links with probabilities’ concordance for trademarks for disaggregated analysis of trademark and economic data (Economic Research Working Paper No. 14). WIPO Economics & Statistics Series.
   Google Scholar
• Mangani, A. (2007). Measuring variety and quality of products with trademarks. International Economic Journal, 21(4), 613–631. doi: 10.1080/10168730701699109
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, F., & Rehwald, K. (2016). Is aid for trade effective? A panel quantile regression approach. Review of Development Economics, 21(4), e175–e203. doi: 10.1111/rode.12322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. The Journal of Political Economy, 94, 796–821. doi: 10.1086/261408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., Kim, A. B., Roberts, J. M., Riley, B., & Whiting, T. (2017). 2017 Index of economic freedom, Institute for Economic Freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation. See online: http://www.heritage.org/index/download
   Google Scholar
• Millot, V. (2009). Trademarks as an indicator of product and marketing innovations (No. 2009/6). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Naghavi, A., & Strozzi, C. (2015). Intellectual property rights, diasporas, and domestic innovation. Journal of International Economics, 96(1), 150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/WTO. (2017). Aid for trade at a glance 2017: Promoting trade, inclusiveness and connectivity for sustainable development. Contributed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, WTO, Geneva/OECD. Paris: Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramello, G. B. (2006). What’s in a sign? Trademark law and economic theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 547–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandner, P., & Block, J. (2011). The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. Research Policy, 40(7), 969–985. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schautschick, P., & Greenhalgh, C. (2016). Empirical studies of trademarks: The existing economic literature. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(4), 358–390. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2015.1064598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. (2003). Service marks as novel innovation indicator. Research Evaluation, 12, 149–156. doi: 10.3152/147154403781776708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somaya, D., & Graham, S. (2006). Vermeers and Rembrandts in the same Attic: Complementarity between copyrights and trademarks leveraging strategies in software. Georgia Institute of Technology TIGER Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Vijil, M., & Wagner, L. (2012). Does Aid for trade enhance export performance? Investigating on the infrastructure channel. World Economy, 35(7), 838–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorukogly, M. (2000). Product vs. process innovations and economic fluctuations. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 52, 137–163. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2231(00)00020-8
   Google Scholar