Physicochemical assessment of tailor made fibrous polyurethane scaffolds incorporated with turmeric oil for wound healing applications

References

• Gerstenhaber, J. A., R. Brodsky, R. B. Huneke, and P. I. Lelkes. 2014. Electrospun soy protein scaffolds as wound dressings: enhanced reepithelialization in a porcine model of wound healing. Wound. Med. 5:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, A., and M. Xing. 2012. Nanomaterials and nanotechnology for skin tissue engineering. Int. J. Burns. Trauma. 2:29–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enoch, S., H. Shaaban, and K. W. Dunn. 2005. Informed consent should be obtained from patients to use products (skin substitutes) and dressings containing biological material. J. Med. Ethics. 31:2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tur, K. 2009. Biomaterials and tissue engineering for regenerative repair of articular cartilage defects/eklem kikirdagi hasarlarinin yenilenme ile onarilmasinda biyomalzemeler ve doku muhendisligi. Turkish. J. Rheumatol. 24:206–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'brien, F. J. 2011. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today. 14:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer, S., R. Feiner, A. Shapira, J. Ji, X. Sui, H. D. Wagner, and T. Dvir. 2013. Springlike fibers for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomater. 34:8599–8606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallawi, M., E. Rosellini, N. Barbani, M. G. Cascone, R. Rai, G. Saint-Pierre, and A. R. Boccaccini. 2015. Boccaccini. Strategies for the chemical and biological functionalization of scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface. 12:20150254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, K. R., I. J. Domian, and K. K. Parker. 2008. Cardiogenesis and the complex biology of regenerative cardiovascular medicine. Science. 322:1494–1497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z. M., Y. Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna. 2003. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 63:2223–2253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai, R., R. Bachu, S. Boddu, and S. Bhaduri. 2019. Biomedical applications of electrospun nanofibers: drug and nanoparticle delivery. Pharm. 11:5.
   Google Scholar
• Subbiah, T., G. S. Bhat, R. W. Tock, S. Parameswaran, and S. S. Ramkumar. 2005. Electrospinning of nanofibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 96:557–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. C., W. H. Chang, G. C. Dong, K. Y. Chen, Y. S. Chen, and C. H. Yao. 2011. Cell adhesion and proliferation enhancement by gelatin nanofiber scaffolds. J. Bioact. Comp. Polym. 26:565–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, S., J. H. Wendorff, and A. Greiner. 2008. Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polym. 49:5603–5621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Z., D. Lu, Q. Li, Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhu. 2015. Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyurethane for hypopharyngeal tissue engineering. BioMed. Res. Int. 2015:11.
   Google Scholar
• Available at: https://polymerdatabase.com/polymer%20classes/Polyurethane%20type.html
   Google Scholar
• Mani, M. P., S. K. Jaganathan, and A. F. Ismail. 2018. Appraisal of electrospun textile scaffold comprising polyurethane decorated with ginger nanofibers for wound healing applications. J. Indus. Text. doi:10.1177/1528083718795911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, M. P., and S. K. Jaganathan. 2019. Physicochemical and blood compatibility characteristics of garlic incorporated polyurethane nanofibrous scaffold for wound dressing applications. J. Text. Ins. 110:1615–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, M. P., and S. K. Jaganathan. 2019. Fabrication and characterization of electrospun polyurethane blended with dietary grapes for skin tissue engineering. J. Indus. Text. doi:10.1177/1528083719840628.
   Google Scholar
• Agnes Mary, S., and V. R. Giri Dev. 2015. Electrospun herbal nanofibrous wound dressings for skin tissue engineering. J. Text. Ins. 106:886–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan, S. K., M. P. Mani, G. Nageswaran, N. P. Krishnasamy, and M. Ayyar. 2019. The potential of biomimetic nanofibrous electrospun scaffold comprising dual component for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 24:204–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan, S. K., M. P. Mani, P. Prabhakaran, E. Supriyanto, and A. F. Ismail. 2019. Production, blood compatibility and cytotoxicity evaluation of a single stage non-woven multicomponent electrospun scaffold mixed with sesame oil, honey and propolis for skin tissue engineering. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 24:457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asghari, G., A. Mostajeran, and M. Shebli. 2010. Curcuminoid and essential oil components of turmeric at different stages of growth cultivated in Iran. Res. Pharm. Sci. 4:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, P., and S. Dixit. 2009. Chemical composition of curcuma longa leaves and rhizome oil from the plains of Northern India. J. Young. Pharmacists. 1:312–312.
   Google Scholar
• Unnithan, A. R., N. A. Barakat, P. T. Pichiah, G. Gnanasekaran, R. Nirmala, Y. S. Cha, C. H. Jung, M. El-Newehy, and H. Y. Kim. 2012. Wound-dressing materials with antibacterial activity from electrospun polyurethane–dextran nanofiber mats containing ciprofloxacin HCl. Carbohydr. Polym. 90:1786–1793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnithan, A. R., P. T. Pichiah, G. Gnanasekaran, K. Seenivasan, N. A. Barakat, Y. S. Cha, C. H. Jung, A. Shanmugam, and H. Y. Kim. 2012. Emu oil-based electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for wound skin tissue engineering. Colloids. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 415:454–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnithan, A. R., G. Gnanasekaran, Y. Sathishkumar, Y. S. Lee, and C. S. Kim. 2014. Electrospun antibacterial polyurethane–cellulose acetate–zein composite mats for wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 102:884–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan, S. K., M. P. Mani, G. Nageswaran, N. P. Krishnasamy, and M. Ayyar. 2018. Single stage electrospun multicomponent scaffold for bone tissue engineering application. Polym. Test. 70:244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan, S. K., and M. P. Mani. 2019. Single-stage synthesis of electrospun polyurethane scaffold impregnated with zinc nitrate nanofibers for wound healing applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 136:46942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, M. P., S. K. Jaganathan, P. Prabhakaran, G. Nageswaran, and N. P. Krishnasamy. 2019. Fabrication and characterization of polyurethane patch loaded with palmarosa and cobalt nitrate for cardiac tissue engineering. Int. J. Polym. Analy. Charact. 24:399–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Y. Zheng, L. Zhang, M. P. Mani, and S. K. Jaganathan. 2019. In vitro blood compatibility and bone mineralization aspects of polymeric scaffold laden with essential oil and metallic particles for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Polym. Analy. Charact. 24:504–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan, S. K., and M. P. Mani. 2019. Enriched mechanical, thermal, and blood compatibility of single stage electrospun polyurethane nickel oxide nanocomposite for cardiac tissue engineering. Polym. Compos. 40:2381–2390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan, S. K., M. P. Mani, S. K. Palaniappan, and R. Rathanasamy. 2018. Fabrication and characterisation of nanofibrous polyurethane scaffold incorporated with corn and neem oil using single stage electrospinning technique for bone tissue engineering applications. J. Polym. Res. 25:146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, F., H. Hosseinkhani, M. Hosseinkhani, A. Khademhosseini, Y. Yokoyama, G. G. Estrada, and H. Kobayashi. 2008. Quantitative analysis of cell adhesion on aligned micro-and nanofibers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part. 84:291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Nandakumar, V., G. Suresh, S. Chittaranjan, and M. Doble. 2013. Synthesis and characterization of hydrophilic high glycolic acid–poly (dl-Lactic-co-Glycolic acid)/polycaprolactam/polyvinyl alcohol blends and their biomedical application as a ureteral material. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:751–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar