NATO’s Two Percent Guideline: A Demand for Military Expenditure Perspective

References

• Angerer, J. 2019. “An Overview of the Stability and Growth Pact - September 2019” European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL-ECON_NT(2014)528745
   Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayuso-i-casals, J., D. G. Hernandez, L. Moulin, and A. Turrini. 2009. “Beyond the SGP - Features and Effects of EU National-level Fiscal Rules.” In Policy Instruments for Sound Fiscal Policies, edited by J. Ayuso-i-casals, S. Deroose, E. Flores, and L. Moulin. 204 - 240. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, R.-J., and P. Blenkinsop. 2017. “Development Aid Cannot Be Part of Defense Spending: NATO’s Stoltenberg”. Reuters, March 31. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nato-spending/development-aid-cannot-be-part-ofdefense-spending-natos-stoltenberg-idUSKBN172234
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. 2017. “The Correlates of Transatlantic Burden Sharing: Revising the Agenda for Theoretical and Policy Analysis.” Defense & Security Analysis 33 (2): 131–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2017.1311039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. 2019. “Accidental Rivals? EU Fiscal Rules, NATO, and Transatlantic Burden Sharing.” Journal of Peace Research 56 (5): 697–713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319829690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béraud-Sudreau, L., and B. Giegerich 2018. “Is Nato’s 2 per Cent Target Fit for Purpose?.” Prospect Magazine, March 6. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/world/isnatos-2-per-cent-target-fit-for-purpose
   Google Scholar
• Blum, J., and N. Potrafke. 2020. “Does a Change of Government Influence Compliance with International Agreements? Empirical Evidence for the NATO Two Percent Target.” Defence and Peace Economics 31 (7): 743–761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1575141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, D., and G. Tetlow 2018. “UK Missed 2% Defence Spending Target, Report Claims.” Financial Times, February 14. https://www.ft.com/content/c4005130-10dd11e8-8cb6-b9ccc4c4dbbb
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, D. 2018. “Vad Får Försvarsmakten Kosta 2019? [What Should the Armed Forces Cost in 2019?]” Folk och Försvar, December 3. https://folkochforsvar.se/content/vad-far-forsvarsmakten-kosta-2019
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, D. 2020. “Försvarsförhandlingarna – Vad Är Riksdagspartierna Villiga Att Betala? [Defense Negotiations - What are the Parliamentary Parties Willing to Pay?]” Folk och Försvar, June 11. https://folkochforsvar.se/content/forsvarsforhandlingarna-vad-ar-riksdagspartierna-villiga-att-betala
   Google Scholar
• Buck, T. 2018. “Germany Struggles to Find Ways of Spending Extra Cash on Defence” Financial Times, May 18. https://www.ft.com/content/43cf404c-59a4-11e8-bdb7f6677d2e1ce8
   Google Scholar
• Cermak, C., and G. Steingart 2017. “Sigmar Gabriel Enough Military, More Aid” Handelsblatt, November 9. https://www.handelsblatt.com/today/politics/sigmargabriel-enough-military-more-aid/23572160.html
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, M. 2015. “Defense Spending - beyond the 2 Percent Target?” Carnegie Europe, March 31. https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/59577
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, M. 2019. “The 2% Target: Spending Increases and the Russian Threat” Royal United Services Institute, November 8. https://rusi.org/publication/rusi-newsbrief/2-target-spending-increases-and-russian-threat
   Google Scholar
• Christie, E. H. 2019. “The Demand for Military Expenditure in Europe: The Role of Fiscal Space in the Context of a Resurgent Russia.” Defence and Peace Economics 30 (1): 72–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1373542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordesman, A. H. 2018. “The U.S., NATO, and the Defense of Europe: Underlying Trends” Center for Strategic and International Studies, June 27. https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-nato-and-defense-europe-underlying-trends
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. 2018. “France to Hike Defence Spending to 300 Billion Euros over 6 Years” Radio France Internationale, February 8. http://www.rfi.fr/en/20180208-france-hike-defence-spending-300billion-euros
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, J., Beger, H., and Jansen, D. 2004. ”Why has the Stability and Growth Pact Failed?” International Finance, 7(2): 235–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1367-0271.2004.00137.x
   Google Scholar
• Defense Committee (House of Commons Defense Committee). 2016. “Shifting the Goalpost? Defence Expenditure and the 2% Pledge” Accessed 20 January 2020. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmdfence/494/494.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deni, J. 2015. “Burden Sharing and NATO’s 2 Percent Goal” Carnegie Europe, April 14. https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/59767
   Google Scholar
• Department of State (U.S. Department of State). 2017. “NATO Foreign Ministerial Intervention Remarks – Remarks Rex W. Tillerson, Secretary of State” Accessed 6 December 2019. https://2017-2021.state.gov/nato-foreign-ministerial-intervention-remarks/index.html
   Google Scholar
• DI(Dagens Industri). 2019. ”Försvarsprofilerna: Inför Natos mål om 2 procent till försvaret [Defense profiles: Introduce NATO’s 2 percent guideline for the Armed Forces]” Accessed 28 November 2019. https://www.di.se/debatt/forsvarsprofilerna-infor-natos-mal-om-2-procent-till-forsvaret/ 
   Google Scholar
• Djurfeldt, G., and M. Barmark, eds. 2011. Statistisk Verktygslåda - Multivariat Analys [Statistical Toolbox - Multivariate Analysis]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Douch, M., and B. Solomon. 2014. “Middle Powers and the Demand for Military Expenditure.” Defence and Peace Economics25 (6): 605–618. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.861652.
   Google Scholar
• Dowdy, J. 2017. “More Tooth, Less Tail: Getting beyond NATO’s 2 Percent Rule” McKinsey & Company, November 29. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/more-tooth-less-tail-getting-beyond-natos-2-percent-rule#
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, J. P., E. Nikolaidou, and N. Mylonidis. 2003. “The Demand for Military Spending in the Peripheral Economies of Europe.” Defence and Peace Economics 14 (6): 447–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1024269032000085215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021a. “What Is the Economic and Monetary Union? (EMU)” Accessed 21 January 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/economic-and-monetary-union/what-economic-and-monetary-union-emu_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021b. “Stability and Growth Pact” Accessed 21 January 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/eu-economic-governance-monitoring-prevention-correction/stability-and-growth-pact_en
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (General Government gross debt. Accessed 19 August 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
   Google Scholar
• Federal Government (Federal Government of Germany). 2016. White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr. Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Fonte, G., and S. Scherer 2018. “Italy Hopeful of Imminent Budget Deal with EU” Reuters, December 17. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-italy-budgetleague/italy-hopeful-of-imminent-budget-deal-with-eu-idUSKBN1OF0WL
   Google Scholar
• Grundman, S. 2018. “NATO’s 2 Percent Guideline: What about the United States?” Atlantic Council, July 10. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/newatlanticist/nato-s-2-percent-guideline-what-about-the-united-states
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, C. K. 2019. “NATO Defense Funds Have Been Building for Years, but Trump Wants the Credit” Foreign Policy, December 3. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/03/nato-defense-funds-have-been-building-for-years-but-trump-wants-the-credit
   Google Scholar
• IMF (International Monetary Fund) (World Economic Outlook Database. October 2019. Accessed 23 January 2019. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/02/weodata/index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Kalnins, O. E. 2017. “Burden Sharing Revisted” NATO Parliamentary Assembly, https://www.nato-pa.int/document/2017-burden-sharing-revisited-kalnins-report-210-pc-17-e-bis
   Google Scholar
• Labra, R., and C. Torrecillas. 2018. “Estimating Dynamic Panel Data. A Practical Approach to Perform Long Panels.” Revista Colombiana De Estadistica 41 (1): 31–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.15446/rce.v41n1.61885.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, S., and N. Williams 2017. “NATO Defence Spending: The Irrationality of 2 %” European Leadership Network, https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/policy-brief/nato-defence-spending-the-irrationality-of-2
   Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, A. 2016. “Revisiting the Principles of NATO Burdening Sharing” Institute for European Studies, https://www.ies.be/files/Mattelaer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, A. 2017. “Sharing the Burden of Keeping Europe Whole, Free and at Peace” NATO, 5 May. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2017/05/05/sharing-the-burden-of-keeping-europe-whole-free-and-at-peace/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defense (Ministry of Defense for Belgium). 2016. “La Vision Strategique Pour La Defense (2016 – 2030)” [The strategic vision for the Armed Forces], https://www.mil.be/sites/mil.be/files/pdf/strategic-vision-belgian-defense-fr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defense (Ministry of Defense for Sweden). 2019. “The Swedish Defence Commission’s White Book on Sweden’s Security Policy and the Development of the Military Defence 2021-2025” Accessed 6 December 2019. https://www.government.se/articles/2019/05/the-swedish-defence-commission-presents-its-white-book-on-swedens-security-policy-and-the-development-of-its-military-defence
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defense (Ministry of Defense of the Netherlands). 2018. “Verslag Van De Bijeenkomst Van De NAVO-ministers Van Defensie Op, 14 En 15 Februari 2018 Te Brussel” [Report of the meeting of NATO defense ministers on 14 and 15 February 2018 in Brussels]. Accessed 20 January 2020. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2018/03/07/aanbiedingsbriefbij-verslag-bijeenkomst-navo-ministers-van-defensie-op-14-en-15-februari-2018
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance (Federal Ministry of Finance for Germany). 2016. “Draft 2017 Budget and Financial Plan to 2020: The Right Priorities, No New Debt” Accessed 21 January 2019. http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Standardartikel/Topics/PublicFinances/Articles/2016-07-07-Draft-2017-budget-and-financial-plan-2020.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance (Federal Ministry of Finance for Germany). 2018. “Draft 2019 Budget and Financial Plan to 2022: Forward Looking, Fair and Responsible” Accessed 20 January 2020. https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2018/2018-07-27-2019-budget.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance (Ministry of Finance for Sweden). 2019. “Budgetpropositionen För 2020.” [Draft budget for 2020], https://www.regeringen.se/rattsligadokument/proposition/2019/09/prop.-2019201
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2005. “Defence Ministers’ Meetings 8 Juni 2006” Accessed 5 December 2019. https://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2006/s060608m.htm
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2014. “Wales Summit Declaration” Accessed 5 December 2019. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2018. “Funding NATO” Accessed 6 December 2019. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm
   Google Scholar
• NATO (Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2013-2019), Press Release (2019)123. Accessed 29 November 2019. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_171356.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaidou, E. 2008. “The Demand for Military Expenditure: Evidence from the EU15 (1961-2005).” Defence and Peace Economics 19 (4): 273–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690802166533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odehnal, J., and J. Neubauerb. 2020. “Economic, Security, and Political Determinants of Military Spending in NATO Countries.” Defence and Peace Economics 31 (5): 517–553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2018.1544440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothier, F., and A. Vershbow 2017. “NATO and Trump: The Case for a New Transatlantic Bargain” Atlantic Council, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/nato-and-trump
   Google Scholar
• RFI (Radio France Internationale). 2017. “French MPs Back Macron’s Cost-cutting First Budget” Accessed 20 January 2020. https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20171122-french-mps-back-macrons-cost-cutting-first-budget
   Google Scholar
• SAFs (Swedish Armed Forces). 2019. “Ekonomisk Redovisning” [Financial accountability]. Swedish Armed Forces. Accessed 5 December 2019. https://www.forsvarsmakten.se/sv/om-forsvarsmakten/darfor-finns-forsvarsmakten/ekonomisk-redovisning
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L., IV 2018. “Germany ‘Not Fair’ on Defense Spending, Says Donald Trump.” Deutsche Welle, 8 March. https://www.dw.com/en/germany-not-fair-on-defensespending-says-donald-trump/a-42897851
   Google Scholar
• Shelter-Jones, P. 2017. “Does Europe Contribute Enough to NATO? The Truth about Defence Spending.” World Economic Forum, 16 March. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/03/nato-defence-spending-europe-america/
   Google Scholar
• SIPRI (SIPRI military expenditure database. 2020. Accessed 23 September 2020. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1995. “The Demand for Military Expenditure.” In Handbook of Defence Economics, edited by T. Sandler and K. Hartley. Vol. 1. 69-87.Oxford: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• SVT (Swedish Television). 2020. “Nytt Bråk Om Försvarspengar På Gång” [New fight about defense money going on]. Accessed 6 December 2019. https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/nytt-brak-om-forsvarspengar-pa-gang
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament. 2018. “Ett Starkt Försvar För Att Säkra Sverige [Stronger Armed Forces to Secure Sweden]” Accessed 6 December 2019. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/motion/ett-starkt-forsvar-foratt-sakra-sverige_H6022816/html
   Google Scholar
• Techau, J. 2015. “The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe” Carnegie Europe, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_252_Techau_NATO_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Viggo, P., and J. Ringsmose. 2017. “Burden Sharing in NATO – The Trump Effect Won’t Last” Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. https://www.nupi.no/en/Publications/CRIStin-Pub/Burden-sharing-in-NATO.-The-Trump-effect-won-t-last
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi, G., and H. Fouquet 2018. “France Defends Spending Push that Puts EU Deficit Limit at Risk” Bloomberg, 10 December. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-10/macron-urges-french-companies-to-pay-year-end-bonus-cuts-taxes
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 2013. “Determinants of Southeast Asian Military Spending in the post-Cold War Era: A Dynamic Panel Analysis.” Defence and Peace Economics 24 (1): 73–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2012.656944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wezeman, S. T. 2020. “Russia’s Military Spending: Frequently Asked Questions” SIPRI, April 27. https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2020/russias-military-spending-frequently-asked-questions
   Google Scholar