Reproducing “rhetrickery” in online fertility marketing: harnessing the “rhetoric of the possible”

References

• Agarwal, Bina. 1997. “Environmental Action, Gender Equity and Women’s Participation.” Development and Change 28 (1): 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, Rene. 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Chris and Michael Wolff. 2010. “The Web is Dead. Long Live the Internet.” Wired, August 17.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1991. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by George Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood, Feona. 2014. Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualization of Western Culture. London and New York: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, Hester. 2016. “Redoing Feminism: Digital Activism, Body Politics, and Neoliberalism.” Feminist Media Studies 16 (1): 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M., and Holquist, Michael. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2001. “Consuming Life.” Journal of Consumer Culture 1 (1): 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzul, Jesse, and Heather Sykes. 2011. “The Secret Identity of a Biology Textbook: Straight and Naturally Sexed.” Cultural Studies of Scientific Education 6 (2): 265–286.
   Google Scholar
• Beare, Zachary. 2015. “It Gets Better … All in Good Time: Messianic Rhetoric and a Political Theology of Social Control.” Journal for Cultural Research 19 (4): 352–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Gay. 2000. The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. V. 2009. ““It’s Way Out of My League”: Low-income Women’s Experiences of Medicalized Infertility.” Gender & Society 23 (5): 688–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: BBC (Pelican).
   Google Scholar
• Blood, Rebecca. 2002. The Weblog Handbook: Practical Advice on Creating and Maintaining Your Blog. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, Harold P. 2013. “Picasso’s Prolonged Adolescence, Blue Period, and Blind Figures.” The Psychoanalytic Review 100 (2): 267–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogost, Ian. 2007. Persuasive Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bokek Cohen, Ya’arit. 2015. “How are Marketing Strategies of Genetic Material Used as a Mechanism for Biopolitical Governmentality?.” Consumption, Markets & Culture 19 (6): 534–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, Wayne C. 1961. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Wayne C. 2004. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Culture and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, Jill, and Brian Martin. 1985. “Science: A Masculine Disorder?” Science and Public Policy 12 (6): 308–316.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Danah. 2006. “A Blogger’s Blog: Exploring the Definition of a Medium.” Reconstruction 6 (4). http://reconstruction.eserver.org/064/boyd.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Brian, Kate. 2014. “Robert Winston: Send Me Your IVF Questions.” The Guardian, February 21.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, Collin G. 2009. Lingua Fracta. Toward a Rhetoric of New Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Jacqueline Johnson, and Peter H. Reingen. 1987. “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 14 (3): 350–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Joseph. 1973. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, E., A. Giwercman, N. Keiding, and N. E. Skakkebaek. 1992. “Evidence for Decreasing Quality of Semen During Past 50 Years.” British Medical Journal 305 (6854): 609–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballo, Rosario. 2017. “Passion or Data Points? Studying African American Women’s Experiences with Infertility.” Qualitative Psychology 4 (2): 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ceballo, R., E. T. Graham, and J. Hart. 2015. “Silent and Infertile: An Intersectional Analysis of the Experiences of Socioeconomically Diverse African American Women with Infertility.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 39 (4): 497–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, Seymour Benjamin. 1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corea, Gena. 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Corea, Gena, Renate Duelli Klein, Jalna Hanmer, Helen B. Holmes, Betty Hoskins, Madhu Kishwar, Janice Raymond, Robyn Rowland, and Roberta Steinbacher. 1987. Man-made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debord, Guy. 1967. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal, L. 2010. “The (In)Visible Body: Feminism, Phenomenology, and the Case of Cosmetic Surgery.” Hypatia 25 (2): 357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Susan, and Meredith Michaels. 2005. The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and how it has Undermined all Women. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, Barbara. 2014. “All This Fertility Paranoia Does Women No Good.” The Guardian, October 4.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2009. Nature. London: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Escalas, Jennifer E. 2007. “Self-referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation Versus Analytical Elaboration.” Journal of Consumer Research 33 (4): 421–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evernden, Lorne Leslie Neil. 1992. The Social Creation of Nature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyman, Douglas. 2007. Digital Rhetoric: Ecologies and Economies of Digital Circulation. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eyman, Douglas. 2015. Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faircloth, Charlotte, and Zeynep Gurtin. 2016. “Fertile Connections? Thinking Across Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Parenting Culture Studies.” Sociology 3 (4): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Firat, A. Fuat, and Alladi Venkatesh. 1995. “Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (3): 239–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisch, Harry, and Stephen Braun. 2005. The Male Biological Clock: The Startling News about Aging, Sexuality, and Fertility in Men. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Jane R. W., Gordon H. W. Baker, and Karin Hammarberg. 2010. “Long-term Health, Well-being, Life Satisfaction, and Attitudes Toward Parenthood in Men Diagnosed as Infertile: Challenges to Gender Stereotypes and Implications for Practice.” Fertility and Sterility 94 (2): 574–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Sarah. 2013. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Hadley. 2016. “From Shopping to Naked Selfies: How ‘Empowerment’ Lost its Meaning.” The Guardian, April 19.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, Greta. 2010. “Reproductive Technology, or Reproductive Justice? An Ecofeminist, Environmental Justice Perspective on the Rhetoric of Choice.” Ethics and the Environment 15 (2): 103–129.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thompson, R. 2002. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NWSA Journal 14 (3): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Genette, Gérard. 1972. Figures III. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Genette, Gérard. 1983. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Genette, Gérard. 1988. Narrative Discourse Revisited. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F. D., and R. Rapp. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, Jacob, Barak Libai, and Eitan Muller. 2001. “Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth.” Marketing Letters 12 (3): 211-223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, Jamie L., and Tomi-Ann Roberts. 2013. “The Beast within the Beauty: An Existential Perspective on the Objectification and Condemnation of Women.” In Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology, 71–85. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. A., and A. Richters. 2008. “Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women’s Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-determination.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4): 239–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamblin, James. 2014. “It’s Everywhere, the Clickbait.” The Atlantic, November 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Heidi I. 1981. “The Family as the Locus of Gender, Class, and Political Struggle: The Example of Housework.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 6 (3): 366–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, A. H. 1993. Reconstructing Illness: Studies in Pathography. Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, Susan C., L. A. Scheidt, E. Wright and S. Bonus. 2005. “Weblogs as a Bridging Genre.” Information Technology & People. 18 (2): 142–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Elizabeth C. 2007. “Metaphor in the Marketplace.” Marketing Theory 7 (3): 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Hohm, Carly, and Jeremy Snyder. 2015. “‘It was the Best Decision of My Life’: A Thematic Content Analysis of Former Medical Tourists’ Patient Testimonials.” BMC Medical Ethics 16 (8): 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houston, Rika. 2004. “Other Mothers: Framing the Cybernetic Construction(s) of the Postmodern Family.” Consumption, Markets & Culture 7 (3): 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, Heddy, Cynthia Janus, and Michael Fulmer. 2010. The Optimal Evaluation of the Infertile Male: AUA Best Practice Statement. Baltimore: American Urological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Iijima Hall, Christine C., and Matthew J. Crum. 1994. “Women and “Body-isms” in Television Beer Commercials.” Sex Roles 31 (5): 329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., R. Ceballo, and R. Nachtigal. 2009. “Marginalized, Invisible and Unwanted: American Minority Struggles with Infertility and Assisted Conception.” In Marginalized Reproduction: Ethnicity, Infertility and Assisted Technologies, edited by L. Culley, N. Hudson, and F. van Rooij, 181–197. London: Earthscan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., and P. Patrizio. 2015. “Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Gender, Reproductive Technologies and Global Movements in the 21st Century.” Human Reproduction Update 21 (4): 411–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., and F. Van Balen. 2002. Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kashanian, J. A., and R. E. Brannigan. 2015. “Male Infertility.” Journal of the American Medical Association 313 (17): 1770–1770.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Alison. 1985. “The Construction of Masculine Science.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 6 (2): 133–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Duelli. 1987. “What’s ‘New’ about the ‘New’ Reproductive Technologies?” In Man-made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women, edited by G. Corea, Renate Duelli Klein, Jalna Hanmer, Helen B. Holmes, Betty Hoskins, Madhu Kishwar, Janice Raymond, Robyn Rowland, Roberta Steinbacher, 64–73. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert. 1998. “On Netnography: Initial Reflections on Consumer Research Investigations of Cyberculture.” Advances in Consumer Research 25: 366–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert. 2015. Netnography Redefined. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, C. 2016. New Reproductive Technologies and Disembodiment: Feminist and Material Resolutions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, William, Stephen Kline, Jacqueline Botterill and Sut Jhally. 2005. Social Communication in Advertising: Consumption in the Mediated Marketplace. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Losh, Elizabeth. 2009. Virtualpolitik. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucie-Smith, Edward. 1991. Sexuality in Western Art. New York: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lauren Jade. 2010. “Anticipating Infertility: Egg Freezing, Genetic Preservation, and Risk.” Gender & Society 24 (4): 526–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies, Heather. 2000. “Cyberspace, Time and Infertility: Thoughts on Social Time and the Environment.” Time & Society 9 (1): 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskus, Mianna. 2015. “Agential Multiplicity in the Assisted Beginnings of Life.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 22 (1): 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, Marina, and Marlis Schweitzer. 2009. Testimonial Advertising in the American Marketplace: Emulation, Identity, Community. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, Laura. 1989. Visual and Other Pleasures. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, Michael, and Barbara Stern. 2003. “The Invisible Narrator: Attributes and Consumer Attitudes.” Advances in Consumer Research 31: 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Nagl-Docekal, H. 1999. “The Feminist Critique of Reason Revisited.” Hypatia 14 (1): 49–76.
   Google Scholar
• Negra, Diane. 2009. What a Girl Wants? Fantasizing the Reclamation of Self in Postfeminism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Jennifer. 2012. Airbrushed Nation: The Lure and Loathing of Women’s Magazines. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, Naomi, and Anne Woollett. 1983. The Experience of Infertility. London: Virago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, Diane. 2016. “Resisting the Male Gaze: Feminist Responses to the ‘Normatization’ of the Female Body in Western Culture.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 17 (1): 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Poot, Luke Terlaak. 2016. “On Cliffhangers.” MUSE 24 (1): 50–67.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Gerald. 1987. A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie, and Richard Eibach. 2008. “Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities.” Sex Roles 59 (4): 377–391.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, Howard. 2002. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. 1997. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, Matthieu, J. Le Moal, V. Wagner, D. Royère, J. De Mouzon. 2013. “Decline in Semen Concentration and Morphology in a Sample of 26,609 Men Close to General Population between 1989 and 2005 in France.” Human Reproduction 28 (2): 462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2012. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ross-Smith, A., and M. Kornberger. 2004. “Gendered Rationality? A Genealogical Exploration of the Philosophical and Sociological Conceptions of Rationality, Masculinity and Organization.” Gender, Work & Organization 11 (3): 280–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1986. The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. New York: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salecl, Renate. 2011. The Tyranny of Choice. London: Profile books.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., Ulla Christensen, and B. E. Holstein. 2005. “The Social Epidemiology of Coping with Infertility.” Human Reproduction 20 (4): 1044–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. E. 2002. Visual Consumption. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Jonathon, and Janet Borgerson. 1998. “Marketing Images of Gender: A Visual Analysis.” Consumption Markets & Culture 2 (2): 161–201.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M., and M. Moskowitz. 2009. Testimonial Advertising in the American Marketplace: Emulation, Identity, Community. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, V.R., with D. Heinecken. 2002. Measuring Up: How Advertising Affects Self-image. Philadephia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimp, Terence A., Stacy L. Wood, and Laura Smarandescu. 2007. “Self-Generated Advertisements: Testimonials and the Perils of Consumer Exaggeration.” Journal of Advertising Research 47 (4): 453–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, David, and Adrienne Massanari. 2006. Critical Cyberculture Studies. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sivulka, Juliann. 2012. Soap, Sex, and Cigarettes: A Cultural History of American Advertising. Reprint. Boston: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Stanzel, Franz K. 1971. Narrative Situations in the Novel: Tom Jones, Moby-Dick, The Ambassadors, Ulysses. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Barbara B. 1988. “How Does an Ad Mean? Language in Services Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 17 (2): 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Barbara B. 1992. ““Crafty Advertisers”: Literary Versus Literal Deceptiveness.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 11 (1): 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Barbara. 1998. Representing Consumers: Voices, Views and Visions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Barbara B. 2008. “Rhetrickery and Rhetruth in Soap Operas: Genre Conventions, Hidden Persuasions, and Vulnerable Audiences.” in Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, edited by E. F. McQuarrie and B. J. Phillips, 51–67. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Barbara B., Cristel Antonia Russell, Dale W. Russell. 2007. “Hidden Persuasions in Soap Operas: Damaged Heroines and Negative Consumer Effects.” International Journal of Advertising 26 (1): 9–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Barbara, Cristel Antonia Russell, and Dale W. Russell, 2005. “Vulnerable Women on Screen and at Home: Soap Opera Consumption.” Journal of Macromarketing 25 (2): 222–225.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, B. B., and J. E. Schroeder. 1994. “Interpretive Methodology from Art and Literary Criticism: A Humanistic Approach to Advertising Imagery.” European Journal of Marketing 28 (8/9): 114–132.
   Google Scholar
• Sum, Shima, R. Mark Mathews, Mohsen Pourghasem, and Ian Hughes. 2009. “Internet Use as a Predictor of Sense of Community in Older People.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (2): 235–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. 2008. “Self as Source: Agency and Customization in Interactive Media.” In Mediated Interpersonal Communication, edited by E. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, and S. Barnes, 58–74. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sunde, A. 2012. “Assisted Reproduction: What’s Next and Why?” Paper presented to the Gender and Reproduction Symposium, NTNU. Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Supriya, K. E. 1996. “Confessionals, Testimonials:Women’s Speech in/and Contexts of Violence.” Hypatia 11 (4): 92–106.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Craig J. 2004. “Marketplace Mythology and Discourses of Power.” Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1): 162–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valerius, K. 1997. “Genetic Essentialism: Race, Class and the Politics of Reproduction.” Consumption, Markets and Culture 1 (3): 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, José. 2009. “Users Like You? Theorizing Agency in User-generated Content.” Media, Culture, and Society 31 (1): 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoye, Greet, and Filip Lievens. 2007. “Investigating Web-based Recruitment Sources: Employee Testimonials vs. Word-of-Mouse.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment 15 (4): 372–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittadini, Nicoletta, and Francesca Pasquali. 2013. “Virtual Shadowing, Online Ethnographies, and Social Networking Studies.” In Audience Research Methodologies: Between Innovation and Consolidation, edited by Geoffroy, Patriarche, Helena Bilandzic, Jakob Linaa Jensen, and Jelena Jurišić, 160–174. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H. Jack, Hubert S. Feild, William F. Giles, Achilles A. Armenakis, and Jeremy B. Bernerth. 2009. “Displaying Employee Testimonials on Recruitment Web Sites: Effects of Communication Media, Employee Race, and Job Seeker Race on Organizational Attraction and Information Credibility.” Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (5): 1354–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, Harriet. 2008. Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: Harlem Moon.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, Robert. 2014. “Fertility Treatments Threaten our Humanity.” The Guardian, May 5.
   Google Scholar
• Zappen, James P. 2005. “Digital Rhetoric: Toward an Integrated Theory.” Technical Communication Quarterly 14 (3): 319–325.
   Google Scholar