How art market actors experience market emergence in an unequal field: placing Brazilian contemporary art in the global art market

References

• ABACT. 2015. Sectoral Study. The Contemporary Art Market in Brazil. Fourth Edition. Accessed February 25, 2020. http://www.latitudebrasil.org/pesquisa-setorial/.
   Google Scholar
• Abolafia, M. Y. 1998. “Markets as Cultures: An Ethnographic Approach.” The Sociological Review 46 (1_suppl): 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Aspers, P. 2009. “Knowledge and Valuation in Markets.” Theory and Society 38 (2): 111–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, P. A. 2018. “The Rise of Africa in the Contemporary Auction Market: Myth or Reality?” Poetics 71: 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Basbaum, R. 2013. Manual do artista-etc. Rio de Janeiro: Beco do Azougue.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., and J. Glückler. 2014. “Institutional Change in Economic Geography.” Progress in Human Geography 38 (3): 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2009. “The Great Transformation of Embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the new Economic Sociology.” In Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today, edited by C. Hann and K. Hart, 38–55. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2010. “How do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets.” Organization Studies 31 (5): 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belting, H. 2013. “Contemporary art as Global art. A Critical Estimate.” In The Global Contemporary and the Rise of new art Worlds, edited by H. Belting, A. Buddensieg, and P. Weibel, 38–73. Karlsruhe, Germany: ZKM/Center for Art and Media; Cambridge, MA: London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandellero, A. 2015. “The Emergence of a Market for Art in Brazil.” In Cosmopolitan Canvases: The Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art, edited by Olav Velthuis and Stefano Baia Curioni, 215–237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandellero, A. 2020. “Inside and Outside the Market for Contemporary Art in Brazil, through the Experience of Artists and Gallerists.” Arts 9 (11): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Brandellero, A., and O. Velthuis. 2018. “Reviewing Art from the Periphery. A Comparative Analysis of Reviews of Brazilian Art Exhibitions in the Press.” Poetics 71: 55–70. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, L. 2016. “What is a Global Field? Theorizing Fields Beyond the Nation-State.” The Sociological Review 64 (2_suppl): 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, L. 2018. “Rethinking the Center-Periphery Model: Dimensions and Temporalities of Macro-Structure in a Global Field of Cultural Production.” Poetics 71: 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, L., and U. Wuggenig. 2005. Cultural Globalization Between Myth and Reality: The Case of the Contemporary Visual Arts. Art-e-Fact Strategies of Resistance, Glocalogue (04).
   Google Scholar
• Bulhões, M. A., B. Fetter, and N. Vargas da Rosa. 2018. Arte além da arte. Anais do primeiro simpósio internacional de relações sistêmicas da arte. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. https://1simposioirsablog.wordpress.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., C. Méadel, and V. Rabeharisoa. 2002. “The Economy of Qualities.” Economy and Society 31 (2): 194–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., S. Ferriani, and P. D. Allison. 2014. “Insiders, Outsiders, and the Struggle for Consecration in Cultural Fields: A Core-Periphery Perspective.” American Sociological Review 79 (2): 258–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, D. 2002. “Culture and Globalization: Theoretical Models and Emerging Trends.” In Global Culture: Media, Arts, Policy, and Globalization, edited by D. Crane, N. Kawashima, and K. Kawasaki, 1–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D. 2009. “Reflections on the Global art Market: Implications for the Sociology of Culture.” Sociedade e Estado 24 (2): 331–362.
   Google Scholar
• Currid, E. 2007. “How art and Culture Happen in New York: Implications for Urban Economic Development.” Journal of the American Planning Association 73 (4): 454–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P., P. F. Kelly, K. Olds, and H. Wai-Chung Yeung. 2001. “Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Towards a Relational Framework for Analysing the Global Economy.” Global Networks 1 (2): 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Research on Institutional Patterns: Culture and Environment, edited by L. G. Zucker, 3–21. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., and W. Powell. 1991. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’.” In The new Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, 63–82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, J. C. G. 1989. Arte, privilégio e distinção: artes plásticas, arquitetura e classe dirigente no Brasil, 1855/1985(Vol. 108). Editora Perspectiva.
   Google Scholar
• Fetter, B. W. 2016. Narrativas conflitantes e convergentes: as feiras nos ecossistemas contemporâneos da arte. Doctoral dissertation. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Instituto de Artes. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Artes Visuais.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, A. L. 2019. “Mercado de arte global, Sistema desigual.” Revista do Centro de Pesquisa e Formaçao 9: 8–41.
   Google Scholar
• Fioravante, C. 2001. O marchand como curador. São Paulo: Casa das Rosas.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 2001. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., and D. McAdam. 2011. “Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields.” Sociological Theory 29 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, M., and M. Roy-Valex. 2002. “Art contemporain et internationalisation: les galeries québécoises et les foires.” Sociologie et Sociétés 34 (2): 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., and R. R. Alford. 1991. “Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell, and P. J. DiMaggio, 223. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giuffre, K. 1999. “Sandpiles of Opportunity: Success in the art World.” Social Forces 77 (3): 815–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 2017. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. 2012. The Cultural Industries. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, K. K. 2018. “Risky Investments: How Local and Foreign Investors Finesse Corruption-Rife Emerging Markets.” American Sociological Review 83 (4): 657–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, S., G. Kuipers, and M. Verboord. 2008. “Cultural Globalization and Arts Journalism: The International Orientation of Arts and Culture Coverage in Dutch, French, German, and US Newspapers, 1955 to 2005.” American Sociological Review 73 (5): 719–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. 1996. Marketing Modernism in fin-de-siècle Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A., and J. Sherry. 2003. “Disentangling the Paradoxical Alliances Between art Market and art World.” Consumption, Markets and Culture 6 (3): 155–181.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A., and J. Sherry. 2004. “Framing Considerations in the PRC: Creating Value in the Contemporary Chinese art Market.” Consumption Markets & Culture 7 (4): 307–348. doi:10.1080/1025386042000316306.
   Google Scholar
• Juneja, M. 2011. “Global art History and the ‘Burden of Representation.” In Global Studies: Mapping Contemporary Art and Culture, edited by H. Belting and J. T. S. Binter, 274–297. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
   Google Scholar
• Kharchenkova, S. 2018. “The Market Metaphors: Making Sense of the Emerging Market for Contemporary art in China.” Poetics 71: 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, B., A. Fyall, and I. Jones. 2015. “The Nation Branding Opportunities Provided by a Sport Megae-Event: South Africa and the 2010 FIFA World Cup.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 4 (1): 46–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarova, N., and O. Velthuis. 2018. “Local Contexts as Activation Mechanisms of Market Development: Contemporary art in Emerging Markets.” Consumption Markets & Culture 21 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraeussl, R., and R. Logher. 2010. “Emerging art Markets.” Emerging Markets Review 11 (4): 301–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers, G. 2011. “Cultural Globalization as the Emergence of a Transnational Cultural Field: Transnational Television and National Media Landscapes in Four European Countries.” American Behavioral Scientist 55 (5): 541–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers, G. 2015. “How National Institutions Mediate the Global: Screen Translation, Institutional Interdependencies, and the Production of National Difference in Four European Countries.” American Sociological Review 80 (5): 985–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Leca, B., and P. Naccache. 2006. “A Critical Realist Approach to Institutional Entrepreneurship.” Organization 13 (5): 627–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizardo, O. 2012. “Culture and Stratification.” In Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by John R. Hall, Laura Grindstaff, and Ming-Cheng Lo, 305–315. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, F. 2009. A experiência Rex. “Éramos o time do Rei”. São Paulo: Alameda.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., C. Hardy, and T. B. Lawrence. 2004. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: Hiv/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (5): 657–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAndrew, C. 2012. TEFAF Art Market Report. Maastricht, TEFAF.
   Google Scholar
• Morais, F. 1996. “Petite Galerie.” In Petite Galerie. Uma visão da arte brasileira, edited by Paço Imperial, 49–55. Rio de Janeiro: Paço Imperial.
   Google Scholar
• Morgner, C. 2014a. “The Art Fair as Network.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 44 (1): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgner, C. 2014b. “The Evolution of the Art Fair.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 39 (3): 318–336.
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, M. A., and E. Fischer. 2021. “Working it: Managing Professional Brands in Prestigious Posts.” Journal of Marketing 85 (2): 110–128.
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, M. A., E. Fischer, and A. R. Reuber. 2013. “Positioning Person Brands in Established Organizational Fields.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41 (3): 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plattner, S. 1996. High art Down Home: An Economic Ethnography of a Local art Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. 1990. “On the Formation of Exchange Relations in Political Systems.” Rationality and Society 2 (3): 359–378.
   Google Scholar
• Power, D., and J. Jansson. 2008. “Cyclical Clusters in Global Circuits: Overlapping Spaces in Furniture Trade Fairs.” Economic Geography 84 (4): 423–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, C., and F. Kerrigan. 2015. “Multi-stakeholder Brand Narratives: An Analysis of the Construction of Artistic Brands.” Journal of Marketing Management 31 (11-12): 1207–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, C., F. Kerrigan, and D. O’Reilly. 2016. “Framing the Work: The Composition of Value in the Visual Arts.” European Journal of Marketing 50 (7/8): 1377–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quemin, A. 2013. “International Contemporary art Fairs in a ‘Globalized’art Market.” European Societies 15 (2): 162–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. 2011. A New Art from Emerging Markets. Surrey: Lund Humphries.
   Google Scholar
• Rodner, V. L., and C. Preece. 2016. “Painting the Nation: Examining the Intersection Between Politics and the Visual Arts Market in Emerging Economies.” Journal of Macromarketing 36 (2): 128–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodner, V. L., and E. Thomson. 2013. “The art Machine: Dynamics of a Value Generating Mechanism for Contemporary art.” Arts Marketing: An International Journal 3 (1): 58–72.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., A. M. Muñiz Jr, and E. J. Arnould. 2009. “How Brand Community Practices Create Value.” Journal of Marketing 73 (5): 30–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J. D., and M. Pryke. 2000. “The Strange Geographies of ‘Emerging Markets’.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25 (2): 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sooudi, O. K. 2015. “Morality and Exchange in the Mumbai Contemporary Art World.” In Cosmopolitan Canvases: The Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art, edited by O. Velthuis, and S. Baia Curioni, 264–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sooudi, O. K. 2016. “Making Mumbai's Emerging Art World Through Makeshift Practices.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 39 (1): 149–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbacka, K., and S. Nenonen. 2011. “Scripting Markets: From Value Propositions to Market Propositions.” Industrial Marketing Management 40 (2): 255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejo, C. 2018. Guia do artista visual: inserçao e internacionalizaçao. Brasília: UNESCO/Ministério da Cultura. http://www.cultura.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Guia-do-artista-visual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 801–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. [1899] 2007. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velthuis, O. 2007. Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velthuis, O. 2013. “Globalization of Markets for Contemporary art: Why Local Ties Remain Dominant in Amsterdam and Berlin.” European Societies 15 (2): 290–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velthuis, O., and S. Baia Curioni, eds. 2015. Cosmopolitan Canvases: The Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. C., and C. A. White. 1965. Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World: With a New Foreword and a New Afterword. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnberg, N. M., and G. Gemser. 2000. “Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts.” Organization Science 11 (3): 323–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogev, T., and T. Grund. 2012. “Network Dynamics and Market Structure: The Case of art Fairs.” Sociological Focus 45 (1): 23–40.
   Google Scholar