Transcendence up for sale: cracking the onto-existential codes for Übermensch

References

• Adams, R., B. Reiss, and D. Serline. 2015. Keywords for Disability Studies. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akdevelioglu, D., S. Hansen, and A. Venkatesh. 2022. “Wearable Technologies, Brand Community and the Growth of a Transhumanist Vision.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (5-6): 569–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.2001559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. 2020. “Social Inequalities, Reproductive Bodies, and Technological Interventions.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (5-6): 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.2000234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A. 2009. “The Ethical Economy: Towards a Post-Capitalist Theory of Value.” Capital & Class 33 (1): 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680909700102.
   Google Scholar
• Badmington, N. 2001. Posthumanism. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. 2005. Liberation Biology: The Scientific and Moral Case for the Biotech Revolution. New York: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. I. 2014. “Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as ‘Standing Reserve’.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 24 (2): 44–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bajde, D. 2013. “Consumer Culture Theory (Re)Visits Actor-Network Theory: Flattening Consumption Studies.” Marketing Theory 13 (2): 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593113477887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. 2013. “Extended Self in a Digital World.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (October): 477–500.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. 2014. “Digital Consumption and the Extended Self.” Journal of Marketing Management 30 (11-12): 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.939217.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. 2016. “Anthropomorphism and Anthropocentrism.” In Advances in Consumer Research, edited by P. Moreau, and S. Puntoni, 42–47. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., M. Humayun, and A. Gopaldas. 2020. “Artificial Life.” Journal of Macromarketing 40 (2): 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146719897361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. 1998. What is Transhumanism? https://www.nickbostrom.com/old/transhumanism.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. 2001. “Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 9: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. 2005. “Transhumanist Values.” Review of Contemporary Philosophy 4: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N., and J. Savulescu. 2009. “Human Enhancement Ethics.” In Human Enhancement, edited by J. Savulescu, and N. Bostrom, 1–22. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Botez, A., J. Hietanen, and H. Tikkanen. 2020. “Mapping the Absence: A Theological Critique of Posthumanist Influences in Marketing and Consumer Research.” Journal of Marketing Management 36 (15-16): 1391–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1805491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botler, J. D. 2016. “Posthumanism.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, edited by K. B. Jensen, and R. T. Craig, 1556–1563. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2000. “Teratologies.” In Deleuze and Feminist Theory, edited by I. Buchanan, and C. Colebrook, 156–172. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2019. “A Theoretical Framework for Critical Posthumanities.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (6): 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick, D. 2013. “Trans and Post.” In The Transhuman Reader, edited by M. More and N. Vita-More, 430–437. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. 2002. Flesh and Machine: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., D. W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From Chance to Choice: Genetics & Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, N., A. O’Driscoll, and M. Saren. 2010. “The Posthuman: The End and the Beginning of the Human.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 9 (2): 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzidakis, A. 2015. “Guilt and Ethical Choice in Consumption: A Psychoanalytic Perspective.” Marketing Theory 15 (1): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114558533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheded, M., C. Liu, and G. Hopkinson. 2022. “Dead Metaphors and Responsibilised Bodies-in-Transsition: The Implications of Medical Metaphors for understanding the Consumption of Preventative Healthcare.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (5-6): 544–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.1996442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitakunye, P., and P. Maclaran. 2014. “Materiality and Family Consumption: The Role of the Television in Changing Mealtime Rituals.” Consumption Markets & Culture 17 (1): 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2012.695679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, G., and E. Regis. 2012. Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cluley, R., and S. Dunne. 2012. “From Commodity Fetishism to Commodity Narcissism.” Marketing Theory 12 (3): 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593112451395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. M. 1998. “Reconstructing Human-centered Technology: Lessons from the Hollywood Dream Factory.” AI & Society 12 (3): 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206196.
   Google Scholar
• Coskuner-Balli, G. 2020. “Citizen-Consumers Wanted: Revitalizing the American Dream in the Face of Economic Recessions, 1981-2012.” Journal of Consumer Research 47 (3): 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmody, A., and D. Zwick. 2020. “Manipulate to Empower: Hyper-Relevance and the Contradictions of Marketing in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720904112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLashmutt, M. W. 2006. “A Better Life Through Information Technology? The Techno-Theological Eschatology of Posthuman Speculative Science.” Zygon 41 (2): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00739.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1995. Negotiations 1972–1990, Trans. M. Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1999. “Hospitality, Justice and Responsibility: A Dialogue with Jacques Derrida.” In Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy, edited by R. Kearney, and M. Dooley, 65–83. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia, N., and A. F. Firat. 2019. “Markets, Consumers, and Society in the Age of Heteromation.” European Journal of Marketing 53 (8): 1504–1520. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin, R., and I. Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, T. 2016. “Moral Indeterminacy, Normative Powers and Convention.” Ratio 29(4) (4): 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellul, J. 1964. The Technological Society. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Epp, A., and L. L. Price. 2010. “The Storied Life of Singularized Objects: Forces of Agency and Network Transformation.” Journal of Consumer Research 36 (5): 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1086/603547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feathersone, M., and R. Burrows. 1995. Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2000. “Will the Real Post-Human Please Stand up! A Response to Elichirigoity.” Social Studies of Science 30 (1): 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030001008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2010. Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Armesto, F. 2004. So You Think You’re Human? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2012. “Towards a Posthumanist Methodology. A Statement.” Frame, Journal For Literary Studies 25(1): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2013. “Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Anthhumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms: Differences and Relations.” Existenz 8 (2): 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2016. “Humans Have Always Been Posthuman: A Spiritual Genealogy of the Posthuman.” In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, edited by D. Banerji, and M. R. Pranjape, 243–256. New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2019. Philosophical Posthumanism. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, B., and D. Scaraboto. 2016. “The System Creation of Value Through Circulation in Collaborative Consumer Networks.” Journal of Consumer Research 43 (4): 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firat, A. F., and M. Tadajewski. 2009. “Critical Marketing – Marketing in Critical Condition.” In The Sage Handbook of Marketing Theory, edited by P. Maclaran, M. Saren, B. Stern, and M. Tadajewski, 127–150. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2013. The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F.. 2004. “Transhumanism.” Foreign Policy 144 (Sep-Oct): 42–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/4152980.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Y. 2015. “Identity, Choice and Consumer Freedom – The New Opiates? A Psychoanalytic Interrogation.” Marketing Theory 15 (1): 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114558525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gane, N., and D. Haraway. 2006. “When we Have Never Been Human, What Is to be Done: Interview with Donna Haraway.” Theory, Culture and Society 23 (7-8): 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, K. 2018. “Transhumanism as the Dominant Ideology of the Fourth Industrial Evolution.” Journal International de Bioethique 29 (3): 189–203. https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.293.0189.
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, M. 2004. “Special Session Summary Consuming Cyborgs: Researching Posthuman Consumer Culture.” In NA - Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 31, edited by B. E. Kahn and M. F. Luce, 400–402. Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, M., and A. Venkatesh. 2005. “Reframing the Embodied Consumer as Cyborg a Posthumanist Epistemology of Consumption.” In NA - Advances in Consumer Research, edited by Geeta Menon, and Akshay R. Rao, 661–669. Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, M., and E. Veresiu. 2014. “Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity.” Journal of Consumer Research 41 (3): 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1086/677842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2020. “Challenging Transhumanism: Clutching a Straws and Assistive Technologies.” Balkan Journal of Philosophy 12 (1): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.5840/bjp20201212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E. L. 2002. Representations of the Post/Human: Monsters, Aliens and Others in Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunkel, D. 2018. “The Other Question: Can and Should Robots Have Rights?” Ethics and Information Technology 20 (2): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9442-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J., and I. Livingston. 1995. Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1985. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” Socialist Review 15: 65–107.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto.” In The Cybercultures Reader, edited by D. Bell, and B. M. Kennedy, 291–324. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2004. The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1927 [1996]. Being and Time. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1977. Basic Writings, edited by D. F. Krell. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, N. 2016. If Animals Have Rights, Should Robots? (November 20). The New Yorker.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., and T. P. Novak. 2018. “Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach.” Journal of Consumer Research 44 (6): 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, A. D., A. Humphreys, and S. J. S. Wilner. 2021. “The Politicization of Objects: Meaning and Materiality in the U.S. Cannabis Market.” Journal of Consumer Research 48 (1): 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. 2004. Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1993. Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 2008. “Aging: I Don’t Want to Be a Cyborg!.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (3): 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9096-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technosicence: The Peking University Lectures. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 2011. “Of Which Human are we Post?” In H+/-: Transhumanism and Its Critics, edited by Gregory R. Hansell, and William Grassie, 123–135. Philadelphia, PA: Metanexus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Julien, P. 1994. Jacques Lacan’s Return to Freud: The Real, the Symbolic, and the Imaginary. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. 2005. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Ai-Ling. 2012. “Cyborg as Commodity: Exploring Conception of Self-Identity, Body, and Citizenship with the Context of Emerging Transplant Technologies.” In NA – Advances in Consumer Research. 40, edited by Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, 386–394. Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2002. “Morality and Technology: The End of the Means.” Theory, Culture & Society 19 (5-6): 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Science Into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. 2019. The Transhumanism Handbook. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilley, S. 2013. Transhumanism and Society: The Social Debate Over Human Enhancement. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, V., L. Pessoa, and R. Belk. 2022. “The Promethean Biohacker: On Consumer Biohacking as a Labour of Love.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (5-6): 483–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2070239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P., and S. Quinton. 2018. “More-Than-Human Netnography.” Journal of Marketing Management 34 (3-4): 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1431303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCormack, P. 2016. Posthuman Ethics. Embodiment and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malapi-Nelson, A. 2017. The Nature of the Machine and the Collapse of Cybernetics: A Transhumanist Lesson for Emerging Technologies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Malapi-Nelson, A. 2019. “Classical Cybernetics and Transhumanism: A Reply to Richmond’s Review of The Nature of the Machine and the Collapse of Cybernetics.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 49 (1): 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393118811308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D., and J. W. Schouten. 2014. “Consumption-Driven Market Emergence.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (5): 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1086/673196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazarakis, J. 2016. “The Grand Narratives of Democratic and Libertarian Transhumanism: A Lyotardian Approach to Transhumanist Politics.” Confero 4 (2), https://doi.org/10.3384/confero.2001-4562.161217.
   Google Scholar
• Mcluhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mimoun, L., L. Trujillo-Torres, and F. Sobande. 2022. “Social Emotions and the Legitiamation of the Fertility Technology Market.” Journal of Consumer Research 48 (6): 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• More, M. 1990. “Transhumanism: Toward a Futurist Philosophy.” Extropy 6: 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• More, M. 2003. The Principles of Extropy. The Extropy Institute. www.extropy.org/prin-ciples.htm.
   Google Scholar
• More, M. 2011. “True Transhumanism: A Reply to Don Ihde.” In H(/- Transhumanism and Its Critics, edited by Gregory R. Hansell, and William Grassie, 136–146. Philadelphia, PA: Metanexus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• More, M. 2013. “The Philosophy of Transhumanism.” In The Transhuman Reader, edited by Max More, and Natasha Vita-More, 3–17. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• More, M., and N. Vita-More. 2013. The Transhumanist Reader. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. 2022. “Enacting Affirmative Ethics in Education: A Materialist/Posthumanist Framing.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (7): 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1907744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M. 2017. To Be a Machine: Adventures Among Cyborgs, Utopians, Hackers, and the Futurists Solving the Modest Problem of Death. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Pepperell, R. 2003. The Posthuman Condition: Consciousness Beyond the Brain. Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, H. 2020, August 4. Brave Users of Elon Musk’s ‘Neuralink’ Brain Implants Could Be Hacked by Crooks in Future, Cyber-Experts Suggest. The Sun. https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/12310746/elon-musk-neuralink-brain-implants-hacked/.
   Google Scholar
• Price, L. L., R. A. Coulter, Y. Strizhakova, and A. Schultz. 2018. “The Fresh Start Mindset: Transforming Consumers’ Lives.” Journal of Consumer Research 45 (1): 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinares-Lara, E., C. Olarte-Pascual, J. Pelegrin-Borondo, and G. Pino. 2016. “Nanoimplants that Enhance Human Capabilities: A Cognitive-Affective Approach to Access Individuals’ Acceptance of this Controversial Technology.” Psychology & Marketing 33 (9): 704–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riis, S. 2008. “The Symmetry Between Bruno Latour and Martin Heidegger.” Social Studies of Science 38 (2): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707081379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. 2005. “Stiegler Reading Derrida: The Prosthesis of Deconstruction in Technics.” Postmodern Culture 16 (1), https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2006.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. 2020. Bernard Stiegler: Nanjing Lectures 2016-2019. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. 2007. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J., and I. Persson. 2008. “The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3): 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, F., R. Belk, W. Jordan, and M. Ortner. 2019. “Servant, Friend or Master? The Relationships Users Build with Voice-Controlled Smart Devices.” Journal of Marketing Management 35 (7-8): 693–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1596970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selinger, E. 2006. Postphenomenology: A Critical Companion to Ihde. New York: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, J. F. 2000. “Place, Technology, and Representation.” Journal of Consumer Research 27 (2): 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1086/314325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, R. 2018. Donna Haraway: Staying with the Trouble. Book Review by Juan Guevara.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, A., M. Alvesson, and D. Kärreman. 2009. “Critical Performativity: The Unfinished Business of Critical Management Studies.” Human Relations 62 (4): 537–560. http://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, S., W. Sinnott-Armstrong, S. A. Huettel, C. Voegtlin, D. Robertson, and T. Maak. 2017. “Neuromarketing: Ethical Implications of its Use and Potential Misuse.” Journal of Business Ethics 144 (4): 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. 1998. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, G. 2002. Redesigning Humans: Choosing Our Children’s Gene. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tadajeweski, M. 2010. “Towards a History of Critical Marketing Studies.” Journal of Marketing Management 26 (9-10): 773–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672571003668954.
   Google Scholar
• Takhar, J., and H. R. Houston. 2021. “Forty Years of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs): The Evolution of a Marketplace Icon.” Consumption, Markets & Culture 24 (5): 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2019.1687088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegmark, M. 2017. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. T., L. L. Price, and H. J. Schau. 2013. “When Differences Unite: Resource Dependence in Heterogeneous Consumption Communities.” Journal of Consumer Research 39 (5): 1010–1033. https://doi.org/10.1086/666616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, K., P. Sautter, D. Fisher, S. Fischbach, C. Luna-Navarez, K. Boberg, J. Kroger, and R. Vann. 2014. “Transforming Health Care: Empowering Therapeutic Communities Through Technology-Enhanced Narratives.” Journal of Consumer Research 41 (2): 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/676311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsigdinos, P. M. 2022. “An IVF Survivor Unravels ‘Fertility’ Industry Narratives.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (5-6): 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.2003847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, A., E. Karababa, and G. Ger. 2002. “The Emergence of the Posthuman Consumer and the Fusion of the Virtual and the Real: A Critical Analysis of Sony = S Ad for Memory Sticktm.” In NA – Advances in Consumer Research. 29, edited by Susan M. Broniarczyk, and Kent Nakamoto, 446–452. Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. 2008a. “Cultivating Humanity: Towards a Non-Humanist Ethics of Technology.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, edited by Jan-Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan Selinger, and Soren Riis, 241–266. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. 2008b. “Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis.” Human Studies 31 (1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9079-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. 2011. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. 1989. War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Vita-More, N. 2020. Transhumanist Manifesto V4. Humanity +. https://transhumanist.vip/transhumanist-manifesto/.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, N. 2013. Cybernetics or, Control and Communication in the Animal and Machine. Mansfield, CT: Martino Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. 2006. Designer Evolution: A Transhumanist Manifesto. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 2006. How to Read Lacan. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 2014. Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Zoll, M., and P. Tsigdinos. 2013. “Selling the Fantasy of Fertility: Op-Ed.” The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, D. 2013. “Utopias of Ethical Economy: A Response to Adam Arvidsson.” Ephemera 13 (2): 393–405.
   Google Scholar