Reimagining the inevitable: how metaverse imaginaries construct understandings of privacy and surveillance

References

• Ahlberg, O., J. Hietanen, and T. Soila. 2021. “The Haunting Specter of Retro Consumption.” Marketing Theory 21 (2): 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593120966700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D., and C. Schneider. 2013. Qualitative Media Analysis. City Road, London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. 2014. “Big Data, Big Questions: The Big Data Divide.” International Journal of Communication 8: 1673–1689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. 2017. “Digital Citizenship and Surveillance: To Pre-Empt a Thief.” International Journal of Communication 11: 879–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., and K. Levy. 2019. “Privacy Dependencies.” Washington Law Review 95 (2): 555–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera, K. G., and D. Shah. 2023. “Marketing in the Metaverse: Conceptual Understanding, Framework, and Research Agenda.” Journal of Business Research 155: 113420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, S., M. D. de Jong, M. Junger, P. H. Hartel, and J. C. Roppelt. 2019. “Putting The Privacy Paradox to the Test: Online Privacy and Security Behaviors among Users with Technical Knowledge, Privacy Awareness, and Financial Resources.” Telematics and Informatics 41: 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. 2019. The Data Gaze: Capitalism, Power and Perception. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Beke, F. T., F. Eggers, P. C. Verhoef, and J. E. Wieringa. 2022. “Consumers’ Privacy Calculus: The PRICAL Index Development and Validation.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 39 (1): 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R., H. Weijo, and R. V. Kozinets. 2021. “Enchantment and Perpetual Desire: Theorizing Disenchanted Enchantment and Technology Adoption.” Marketing Theory 21 (1): 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593120961461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettany, S. M., and B. Kerrane. 2016. “The Socio-Materiality of Parental Style: Negotiating the Multiple Affordances of Parenting and Child Welfare within the New Child Surveillance Technology Market.” European Journal of Marketing 50 (11): 2041–2066. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleier, A., and M. Eisenbeiss. 2015. “The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising.” Journal of Retailing 91 (3): 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmi, E. 2021. “A Feminist Critique to Digital Consent.” Seminar.Net 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4291
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, M. J., D. Zwick, and B. Neville. 2016. “The Ideology of the Ethical Consumption gap.” Marketing Theory 16 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115595674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloarec, J. 2020. “The Personalization–Privacy Paradox in the Attention Economy.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161: 120299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 2013. “What Privacy Is For.” Harward Law Review 126 (7): 1904–1933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, S. 2014. “Power, Knowledge, and the Subjects of Privacy: Understanding Privacy as the Ally of Surveillance.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (10): 1250–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.918636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., and P. K. Armstrong. 1999. “Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation.” Organization Science 10 (1): 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmody, A., and D. Zwick. 2020. “Manipulate to Empower: Hyper-Relevance and the Contradictions of Marketing in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 205395172090411. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720904112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencik, L. 2018. “Surveillance Realism and the Politics of Imagination: Is There No Alternative?” Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 1: 31–43. https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.38.1.38829
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., A. Hintz, and J. Cable. 2016. “Towards Data Justice? The Ambiguity of Anti-Surveillance Resistance in Political Activism.” Big Data & Society 3 (2): 205395171667967. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, D. F. 1992. “Consumer Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Marketing Concept: A Macromarketing Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 9 (2): 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1992.tb00585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, N. A., and J. Turow. 2019. “The Corporate Cultivation of Digital Resignation.” New Media & Society 21 (8): 1824–1839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819833331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y. K., L. Hughes, Y. Wang, A. A. Alalwan, S. J. Ahn, J. Balakrishnan, S. Barta, and J. Wirtz. 2023. “Metaverse Marketing: How the Metaverse Will Shape the Future of Consumer Research and Practice.” Psychology & Marketing 40 (4): 750–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egliston, B., and M. Carter. 2022. “Oculus Imaginaries: The Promises and Perils of Facebook’s Virtual Reality.” New Media & Society 24 (1): 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820960411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. 2020. “Techno-Securitisation of Everyday Life and Cultures of Surveillance-Apatheia.” Science as Culture 29 (1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1561660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Hants, UK: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2017. “Group Privacy: A Defence and Interpretation.” In Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies, edited by L. Taylor, L. Floridi, and B. van der Sloot, 103–123. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., and K. Healy. 2017. “Seeing Like a Market.” Socio-economic Review 15 (1): 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freishtat, R. L., and J. A. Sandlin. 2010. “Shaping Youth Discourse About Technology: Technological Colonization, Manifest Destiny, and the Frontier Myth in Facebook’s Public Pedagogy.” Educational Studies 46 (5): 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2010.510408
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, M., and E. Veresiu. 2014. “Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity.” Journal of Consumer Research 41 (3): 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1086/677842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, Q., J. Cronin, and A. Skandalis. 2022. “High-fidelity Consumption and the Claustropolitan Structure of Feeling.” Marketing Theory 22 (1): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931211062637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, Q., J. Cronin, and A. Skandalis. 2023. “Futureless Vicissitudes: Gestural Anti-consumption and the Reflexively Impotent (Anti-)consumer.” Marketing Theory 23 (4): 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931231153193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horppu, J. 2023. “Sensing Privacy: Extending Consumer Privacy Research Through a Consumer Culture Theory Approach.” Marketing Theory 23 (4): 661–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931231175698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G. 2015. “Successful Failure: What Foucault Can Teach Us about Privacy Self-Management in a World of Facebook and Big Data.” Ethics and Information Technology 17 (2): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9363-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2015. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by S. Jasanoff, and K. Sang-Hyun, 1–33. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2020. ‘What Protective Measures Can You Think of so We Don’t Go Back to the Pre-Crisis Production Model’. Accessed 2 September 2023. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/853.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtiniemi, T. 2017. “Personal Data Spaces: An Intervention in Surveillance Capitalism?” Surveillance & Society 15 (5): 626–639. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i5.6424
   Google Scholar
• Lehtiniemi, T., and M. Ruckenstein. 2019. “The Social Imaginaries of Data Activism.” Big Data & Society 6 (1): 205395171882114. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718821146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucia, B., M. A. Vetter, and I. K. Adubofour. 2023. “Behold the Metaverse: Facebook’s Meta Imaginary and the Circulation of Elite Discourse.” New Media & Society, 14614448231184248. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231184249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2020. “”Not the Real Me”: Social Imaginaries of Personal Data Profiling.” Cultural Sociology 15 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520939779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. 2019. “Surveillance Capitalism, Surveillance Culture and Data Politics.” In Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights, edited by D. Bigo, E. Isin, and E. Ruppert, 64–77. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, A., and C. Katzenbach. 2021. “Future Imaginaries in the Making and Governing of Digital Technology: Multiple, Contested, Commodified.” New Media & Society 23 (2): 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K. D., and P. E. Murphy. 2017. “The Role of Data Privacy in Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45 (2): 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company. 2022. “Marketing in the Metaverse: An Opportunity for Innovation and Experimentation.” 24 May 2022. Accessed December 3, 2022. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/marketing-in-the-metaverse-an-opportunity-for-innovation-and-experimentation.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, D. K., P. M. Regan, and J. King. 2020. “The Fertile Dark Matter of Privacy Takes on the Dark Patterns of Surveillance.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 30 (4): 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg, P. A., D. R. Horne, and D. A. Horne. 2007. “The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions Versus Behaviors.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 41 (1): 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obar, J. A., and A. Oeldorf-Hirsch. 2018. “The Clickwrap: A Political Economic Mechanism for Manufacturing Consent on Social Media.” Social Media+ Society 4 (3): 2056305118784770. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118784770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, C., L. Whittaker, and S. Janes. 2022. “Choose Your Own Future: The Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Virtual Reality.” Journal of Marketing Management 38 (15–16): 1777–1795. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2112610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P. M. 1995. Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, B., and J. DeCew. 2023. “Privacy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, and Uri Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/privacy/.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. 2019. “When Data is Capital: Datafication, Accumulation, and Extraction.” Big Data & Society 6 (1): 205395171882054-. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpi, D., G. Pizzi, and S. Matta. 2022. “Digital Technologies and Privacy: State of the Art and Research Directions.” Psychology & Marketing 39 (9): 1687–1697. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. H., T. Dinev, and H. Xu. 2011. “Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review.” MIS Quarterly 35 (4): 989–1015. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solove, D. J. 2007. “‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy.” The San Diego Law Review 44 (4): 745–772.
   Google Scholar
• Sörum, N., and C. Fuentes. 2023. “How Sociotechnical Imaginaries Shape Consumers’ Experiences of and Responses to Commercial Data Collection Practices.” Consumption Markets & Culture 26 (1): 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2022.2124977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. 2023a. “Share of Internet Users Worldwide Who Would Like To Do More To Protect Their Digital Privacy as of January 2023, by Country” [Graph]. Accessed February 9, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1122408/internet-users-worldwide-looking-better-ways-protect-privacy/.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2023b. “Share of Internet Users Who Are Willing to Accept Online Privacy Risks for Convenience as of January 2023, by Country” [Graph]. Accessed February 9, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1023952/global-privacy-risks-accept-convenience-convenience.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W. 2017. “A Comment on Privacy.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45 (2): 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0504-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strycharz, J., and C. M. Segijn. 2022. “The Future of Dataveillance in Advertising Theory and Practice.” Journal of Advertising 51 (5): 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2109781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., L. Floridi, and B. van der Sloot. 2017. “Introduction: A New Perspective on Privacy.” In Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies, edited by L. Taylor, L. Floridi, and B. van der Sloot, 10–23. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
   Google Scholar
• Vlačić, B., L. Corbo, S. C. e Silva, and M. Dabić. 2021. “The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Marketing: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Business Research 128: 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. M. 2019. “Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy.” Business & Society 58 (1): 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, K. 2017. “‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a Mode of Regulation by Design.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar