Haemodynamic impact of stent–vessel (mal)apposition following carotid artery stenting: mind the gaps!

REFERENCES

• AppanaboyinaS, MutF, LohnerR, PutmanCA, CebralJR. 2008. Computational fluid dynamics of stented intracranial aneurysms using adaptive embedded unstructured grids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 57(5):475–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AuricchioF, TaylorRL, LublinerJ. 1997. Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 146(3–4):281–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AuricchioF, ContiM, De BeuleM, De SantisG, VerheggheB. 2011. Carotid artery stenting simulation: from patient-specific images to finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys. 33(3):281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BalossinoR, GervasoF, MigliavaccaF, DubiniG. 2008. Effects of different stent designs on local hemodynamics in stented arteries. J Biomech. 41(5):1053–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BangaloreS, KumarS, WetterslevJ, BavryAA, GluudC, CutlipDE, BhattDL. 2011. Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Arch Neurol. 68(2):172–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrottTG, HobsonRW, HowardG, RoubinGS, ClarkWM, BrooksW, MackeyA, HillMD, LeimgruberPP, SheffetAJ.2010. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. New Engl J Med. 363(1):11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarnelliD, PennatiG, VillaT, BaglioniL, ReimersB, MigliavaccaF.2011. Mechanical properties of open-cell, self-expandable shape memory alloy carotid stents. Artif Organs. 35(1):74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ContiM, van LooD, AuricchioF, De BeuleM, De SantisG, VerheggheB, PirrelliS, OderoA.2011. Impact of carotid stent cell design on vessel scaffolding: a case study comparing experimental investigation and numerical simulations. J Endovasc Ther. 18(3):397–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CosottiniM, MichelassiMC, BencivelliW, LazzarottiG, PicchiettiS, OrlandiG, ParentiG, PuglioliM. 2010. In stent restenosis predictors after carotid artery stenting. Stroke Res Treat. March 14. 10.4061/2010/864724.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De SantisG, MortierP, De BeuleM, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB.2010. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics: structured mesh generation from coronary angiography. Med Biol Eng Comput. 48(4):371–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De SantisG, De BeuleM, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB. 2011. Patient-specific computational haemodynamics: generation of structured and conformal hexahedral meshes from triangulated surfaces of vascular bifurcations. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14(9): 797–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De SantisG, De BeuleM, van CanneytK, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB.in press. Full-hexahedral structured meshing for image-based computational vascular modeling. Med Eng Phys.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EderleJ, DobsonJ, FeatherstoneRL, BonatiLH, van der WorpHB, de BorstGJ, LoTH, GainesP, DormanPJ, MacdonaldS, LyrerPA.2010. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (international carotid stenting study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 375(9719):985–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EnerRA, FissD, GeorgakisA, WolfNM, PanditN, PiegariGN.2008. Carotid artery in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting. J Invasive Cardiol. 20(6):286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GroschelK, RieckerA, SchulzJB, ErnemannU, KastrupA. 2005. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke. 36(2):367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeXJ, KuDN. 1996. Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 118(1):74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoldsworthDW, NorleyCJD, FrayneR, SteinmanDA, RuttBK. 1999. Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiol Measure. 20(3):219–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KarmonikC, BismuthJ, DaviesMG, ShahDJ, YounesHK, LumsdenAB.2011. A computational fluid dynamics study pre- and post-stent graft placement in an acute type B aortic dissection. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 45(2):157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimM, TaulbeeDB, TremmelM, MengH. 2008. Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 36(5):726–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KleinstreuerC, LiZ, FarberMA. 2007. Fluid–structure interaction analyses of stented abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 9:169–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KleinstreuerC, LiZ, BascianoCA, SeeleckeS, FarberMA. 2008. Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts. J Biomech. 41(11):2370–2378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaDisaJF, GulerI, OlsonLE, HettrickDA, KerstenJR, WarltierDC, PagelPS.2003. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Ann Biomed Eng. 31(8):972–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoye L. 2007. Fluid–structure interaction of blood vessels. [PhD thesis], Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• LarrabideI, KimM, AugsburgerL, Villa-UriolMC, RüfenachtD, FrangiAF.2010. Fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents: method and in vitro evaluation for intracranial aneurysmal stenting. Med Image Anal.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeS-W, SteinmanDA. 2007. On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 129(2):273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeS-W, AntigaL, SteinmanDA. 2009. Correlations among indicators of disturbed flow at the normal carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 131(6): 061013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiZH, KleinstreuerC. 2005. Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Med Eng Phys. 27(5):369–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MalekAM, AlperSL, IzumoS. 1999. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. J Am Med Assoc. 282(21):2035–2042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorbiducciU, GalloD, MassaiD, ConsoloF, PonziniR, AntigaL, BignardiC, DeriuMA, RedaelliA.2010. Outflow conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: implications for indicators of abnormal flow. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 132(9): 091005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorbiducciU, GalloD, PonziniR, MassaiD, AntigaL, MontevecchiFM, RedaelliA.2010. Quantitative analysis of bulk flow in image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: the influence of outflow conditions as test case. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(12):3688–3705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorbiducciU, GalloD, MassaiD, PonziniR, DeriuM, AntigaL, RedaelliA, MontevecchiFM.2011. On the importance of blood rheology for bulk flow in hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech. 44(13):2427–2438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MortierP, HolzapfelGA, De BeuleM, Van LooD, TaeymansY, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB.2010. A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(1):88–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlufsenMS. 1999. Structured tree outflow condition for blood flow in larger systemic arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 276(1):H257–H268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PantS, BressloffNW, ForresterAIJ, CurzenN. 2010. The influence of strut-connectors in stented vessels: a comparison of pulsatile flow through five coronary stents. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(5):1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParaskevasKI, MikhailidisDP, VeithFJ. 2010. Mechanisms to explain the poor results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in symptomatic patients to date and options to improve CAS outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 52(5):1367–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrendergastPJ, LallyC, DalyS, ReidAJ, LeeTC, QuinnD, DolanF.2003. Analysis of prolapse in cardiovascular stents: a constitutive equation for vascular tissue and finite-element modelling. Trans ASME. J Biomech Eng. 125(5):692–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RadaelliAG, AugsburgerL, CebralJR, OhtaM, RüfenachtDA, BalossinoR, BenndorfG, HoseDR, MarzoA, MetcalfeR, MortierP, MutF, ReymondP, SocciL, VerheggheB, FrangiAF.2008. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model – a report on the virtual intracranial stenting challenge 2007. J Biomech. 41(10):2069–2081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReymondP, MerendaF, PerrenF, RufenachtD, StergiopulosN. 2009. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 297(1):H208–H222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShahPK. 2003. Inflammation, neointimal hyperplasia, and restenosis – as the leukocytes roll, the arteries thicken. Circulation. 107(17):2175–2177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanigawaJ, BarlisP, Di MarioC. 2007. Do unapposed stent struts endothelialise? In vivo demonstration with optical coherence tomography. Heart. 93(3):378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WilliamsAR, KooBK, GundertTJ, FitzgeraldPJ, LaDisaJF. 2010. Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation. J Appl Physiol. 109(2):532–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar