Quantitative underwater 3D motion analysis using submerged video cameras: accuracy analysis and trajectory reconstruction

References

• BarrosRML, MenezesRP, RussomannoTG, MisutaMS, BrandãoBC, FigueroaPJ, LeiteNJ, GoldensteinSK. 2010. Measuring handball players trajectories using an automatically trained boosting algorithm. Comput Method Appl M. 14(1):53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BouguetJ. 1999. Visual methods for three-dimensional modeling. PhD Thesis; Pasadena, CA.
   Google Scholar
• CerveriP, BorgheseNA, PedottiA. 1998. Complete calibration of a stereo photogrammetric system through control points of unknown coordinates. J Biomech. 31(10):935–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CeseracciuE, SawachaZ, FantozziS, CortesiM, GattaG, CorazzaS, CobelliC. 2011. Markerless analysis of front crawl swimming. J Biomech. 44(12):2236–2242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChiariL, CroceUD, LeardiniA, CappozzoA. 2005. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry, part 2 – instrumental errors. Gait Posture. 21(2):197–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorazzaS, MündermannL, ChaudhariAM, DemattioT, CobelliC, AndriacchiTP. 2006. A markerless motion capture system to study musculoskeletal biomechanics: visual hull and simulated annealing approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 34(6):1019–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elipot M, Dietrich G, Hellard PNH. 2010. Cinalysis: a new software for swimming races analysis. Paper presented at: ISEA 2010. 8th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association; Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Elipot M, Houel N, Hellard P, Dietrich G. 2008. Comparaison de méthodes de calibration de camera pour l'analyse du mouvement en conditions sous-marines. 4èmes journées spécialisées de notation Lille, France.
   Google Scholar
• FraserCS. 1997. Digital camera self-calibration. ISPRS J Photogram Rem Sens. 52:149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GourgoulisV, AggeloussisN, KasimatisP, VezosN, BoliA, MavromatisG. 2008. Reconstruction accuracy in underwater three-dimensional kinematic analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 11(2):90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HatzeH. 1988. High-precision three-dimensional photogrammetric calibration and object space reconstruction using a modified DLT-approach. J Biomech. 21(7):533–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon Y, Ables A, Pope P. 2002. Examination of different double-plane camera calibration strategies for underwater motion analysis. Paper presented at: ISBS 2002. 20th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport; Caceres, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• KwonYH, CaseboltJB. 2006. Effects of light refraction on the accuracy of camera calibration and reconstruction in underwater motion analysis. Sports Biomech. 5(2):315–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon Y, Lindley S. 2000. Applicability of the localized-calibration methods in underwater motion analysis. Paper presented at: ISBS 2000. 16th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports; Hong Kong, China.
   Google Scholar
• Lavest J, Rives G, Lapresté J. 2000. Underwater camera calibration. Paper presented at: ECCV 2000. 6th European Conference on Computer Vision; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• LavestJM, RivesG, LaprestéJT. 2003. Dry camera calibration for underwater applications. Mach Vision Appl. 13(5):245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machtsiras G, Sanders R. 2009. Accuracy of portable (ptz digital) camera system designed for aquatic three-dimensional analysis. Paper presented at: ISBS 2009. 27th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport; Limerick, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• MaglischoEW. 1993. Swimming even faster. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• MengY, ZhuangH. 2007. Autonomous robot calibration using vision technology. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf. 23(4):436–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MianaAN, PrudêncioMV, BarrosRML. 2009. Comparison of protocols for walking and running kinematics based on skin surface markers and rigid clusters of markers. Int J Sports Med. 30(11):827–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease D. 1999. Spotting technique faults- below & above the water. Paper presented at: ISBS 1999. 17th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport; Perth Australia.
   Google Scholar
• PersynU, ColmanV, Van TilborghL. 1992. Movement analysis of flat and undulating breaststroke patterns. In: MacLarenD, ReillyT, LeesA editors. Swimming Science VI (Biomechanics and medicine in swimming), London: E & FN SPON, 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Pribanić T, Sturm P, Cifrek M. 2008. Calibration of 3d kinematic systems using 2d calibration plate. Paper presented at: ISBS 2008. 26th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• SandersR. 2007. Kinematics, coordination, variability, and biological noise in the prone flutter kick at different levels of a learn-to-swim programme. J Sports Sci. 5(2):213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvatti AP, Telles T, Cerveri P, Barros RML. 2009. Non-linear camera calibration for 3D reconstruction using straight line plane object. Paper presented at: ISBS 2009. 27th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport; Limerick, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Silvatti AP, Telles T, Rossi MM, Dias FAS, Leite NJ, Barros RML. 2010. Underwater non-linear camera calibration: an accuracy analysis. Paper presented at: ISBS 2010.28th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport; Marquette, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• SturmP, MaybankS. 1999. On plane-based camera calibration: a general algorithm, singularities, applications. IEEE Comput Vis. Pattern Recognit :432–437.
   Google Scholar
• YanaiT, HayJG, GerotJT. 1996. Three-dimensional videography of swimming with panning periscopes. J Biomech. 29(5):673–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangZ. 2000. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 22(11):5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z. 2002. Camera calibration with one-dimensional objects. Paper presented at: ECCV 2002. 8th European Conference on Computer Vision; Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar