Patient-specific acetabular shape modelling: comparison among sphere, ellipsoid and conchoid parameterisations

REFERENCES

• AndersonAE, EllisBJ, MaasSA, WeissJA. 2010. Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip. J Biomech. 43(7):1351–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellAL, PetersenDR, BrandRA. 1990. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech. 23:617–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeckM, KalhorM, LeunigM, GanzR. 2005. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87(7):1012–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlowersDH, ElsonR, KorleyE. 1972. An investigation of the sphericity of the human femoral head. Med Biol Eng. 10:762–775.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CamomillaV, CereattiA, VannozziG, CappozzoA. 2006. An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method. J Biomech. 39:1096–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CereattiA, CamomillaV, VannozziG, CappozzoA. 2007. Propagation of the hip joint centre location error to the estimate of femur vs pelvis orientation using a constrained or an unconstrained approach. J Biomech. 40:1228–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CereattiA, MargheritiniF, DonatiM, CappozzoA. 2010. Is the human acetabulofemoral joint spherical?J Bone Joint Surg Br. 92-B(2):311–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CerveriP, MarchenteM, ChemelloC, ManzottiA, ConfalonieriN, BaroniG. 2011. Advanced computational framework for the automatic analysis of the acetabular morphology from the pelvic bone surface for hip arthroplasty applications. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(11):2791–2806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CerveriP, PedottiA, BorgheseNA. 2001. Combined evolution strategies for dynamic calibration of video based measurement systems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 5(3):271–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De MomiE, LopomoN, CerveriP, ZaffagniniS, SafranMR, FerrignoG. 2009. In-vitro experimental assessment of a new robust algorithm for hip joint centre estimation. J Biomech. 42(8):989–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EcksteinF, von Eisenhart-RotheR, LandgrafJ, AdamC, LoeheF, Müller-Gerbl M, Putz R, 1997. Quantitative analysis of incongruity, contact areas and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint. Acta Anat (Basel). 158:192–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GanzR, ParviziJ, BeckM, LeunigM, NotzliH, SiebenrockKA. 2003. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteo-arthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 417:112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GovsaF, OzerMA, OzgurZ. 2005. Morphologic features of the acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 125(7):453–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuD, ChenY, DaiK, ZhangS, YuanJ. 2008. The shape of the acetabular cartilage surface: a geometric morphometric study using three-dimensional scanning. Med Eng Phys. 30(8):1024–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HellerMO, KratzensteinS, EhrigRM, WassilewG, DudaGN, TaylorWR. 2011. The weighted optimal common shape technique improves identification of the hip joint center of rotation in vivo. J Orthop Res. 29(10):1470–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ImamS, KhandujaV. 2011. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop. 35(10):1427–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KangMJ, SadriH, SternR, Magnenat-ThalmannN, HoffmeyerP, JiHS. 2011. Determining the location of hip joint centre: application of a conchoid's shape to the acetabular cartilage surface of magnetic resonance images. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14(1):65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KöhnleinW, GanzR, ImpellizzeriFM, LeunigM. 2009. Acetabular morphology: implications for joint-preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467(3):682–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LenaertsG, BartelsW, GelaudeF, MulierM, SpaepenA, VanderPerreG, JonkersI. 2009. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait. J Biomech. 42:1246–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MenschikF. 1997. The hip joint as a conchoid shape. J Biomech. 30:971–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakaharaI, TakaoM, SakaiT, NishiiT, YoshikawaH, SuganoN. 2011. Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips. J Orthop Res. 29(3):333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OtomaruI, KobayashiK, OkadaT, NakamotoM, KagiyamaY, TakaoM, SuganoN, TadaY, SatoY. 2009. Expertise modeling for automated planning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using combined bone and implant statistical atlases. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 12(Pt 1):532–539.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PiazzaSJ, ErdemirA, OkitaN, CavanaghPR. 2004. Assessment of the functional method of hip joint center location to reduced range of hip motion. J Biomech. 37:349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PramanikS, AgarwalAK, RaiKN. 2005. Chronology of total hip joint replacement and materials development. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 19(1):15–26.
   Google Scholar
• SaikkoV, CaloniusO. 2002. Slide track analysis of the relative motion between femoral head and acetabular cup in walking and in hip simulators. J Biomech. 35:455–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShepherdDE, SeedhomBB. 1999. Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Ann Rheum Dis. 58(1):27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SistonRA, DelpSL. 2006. Evaluation of a new algorithm to determine the hip joint center. J Biomech. 39:125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UrbanJE, WeaverAA, TheivendranK, StitzelJD. 2011. Acetabular rim profile measurement in femoroacetabular impingement patients. Biomed Sci Instrum. 47:118–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VicecontiM, LattanziR, AntoniettiB, PaderniS, OlmiR, SudaneseA, ToniA. 2003. CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med Eng Phys. 25:371–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeaverAA, GilmartinTD, AnzAW, StubbsAJ, StitzelJD. 2009. A method to measure acetabular metrics from three dimensional computed tomography pelvis reconstructions. Biomed Sci Instrum. 45:155–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WongKC, KumtaSM, LeungKS, NgKW, NgEWK, LeeKS. 2010. Integration of CAD/CAM planning into computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 15(4–6):65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XiJ, HuX, JinY. 2003. Shape analysis and parameterized modeling of hip joint. J Comput Inform Sci Eng. 3(3):260–265.
   Google Scholar