References
- AntigaL, Ene-IordacheB, CaverniL, CornalbaGP, RemuzziA. 2002. Geometric reconstruction for computational mesh generation of arterial bifurcations from CT angiography. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 26(4):227–235.
- BiasettiJ, GasserTC, AuerM, HedinU, LabrutoF. 2010. Hemodynamics of the normal aorta compared to fusiform and saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms with emphasis on a potential thrombus formation mechanism. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(2):380–390.
- BluesteinD, DumontK, De BeuleM, RicottaJ, ImpellizzeriP, VerheggheB, VerdonckP. 2009. Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm – FSI modelling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 12(1):73–81.
- BluesteinD, NiuL, SchoephoersterRT, DewanjeeMK. 1996. Steady flow in an aneurysm model: correlation between fluid dynamics and blood platelet deposition. J Biomech Eng. 118(3):280–286.
- BotaraCC, VasilebT, SfrangeubS, ClichicicS, AgachiaPS, BadeabR, MirceadP, CristeaaMV. 2010. Validation of CFD simulation results in case of portal vein blood flow. Comput Aided Chem Eng. 28:205–210.
- Chen C-Y, Antón R, Hung M-Y, Menon PG, Finol EA, Pekkan K. 2014. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm hemodynamics via stereoscopic PIV and CFD modeling. J Biomech Eng. 10.1115/1.4026160.
- Di MartinoES, GuadagniG, FumeroA, BalleriniG, SpiritoR, BiglioliP, RedaelliA. 2001. Fluid–structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Med Eng Phys. 23(9):647–655.
- DorfmannA, WilsonC, EdgarES, PeattieRA. 2010. Evaluating patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress based on flow-induced loading. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 9:127–139.
- FinolEA, AmonCH. 2002. Flow-induced wall shear stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms: Part II – pulsatile flow hemodynamics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 5(4):319–328.
- Fluent 12.1.2010. Fluent user manuals. Canonsburg, PA: Ansys, Inc.
- FrauenfelderT, LotfeyM, BoehmT, WildermuthS. 2006. Computational fluid dynamics: hemodynamic changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm after stent-graft implantation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 29:613–623.
- Gambit 2.4. 2010. Gambit manuals. Canonsburg, PA: Ansys, Inc.
- HarterLP, GrossBH, CallenRA, BarthRA. 1983. Ultrasonic evaluation of abdominal aortic thrombus. J Ultrasound Med. 1:315–318.
- LaunderBE, ReeceGJ, RodiW. 1975. Progress in the development of a Reynolds stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech. 68:537–566.
- LaunderBE, SpaldingDB. 1974. The numerical computations of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 3:269–289.
- NewmanAB, ArnoldAM, BurkeGL, O'LearyDH, ManolioTA. 2001. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults with small abdominal aortic aneurysms detected by ultrasonography: the cardiovascular health study. Ann Intern Med.134(3):182–190.
- O'RourkeMJ, McCulloughJP. 2010. An investigation of the flow field within patient-specific models of an abdominal aortic aneurysm under steady inflow conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 224(8):971–988.
- PeattieRA, RiehleTJ, BluthEI. 2004. Pulsatile flow in fusiform models of abdominal aortic aneurysms: flow fields, velocity patterns and flow-induced wall stresses. J Biomech Eng. 126:438–446.
- RodriguezJF, MartufiG, DoblareM, FinolEA. 2009. The effect of material model formulation in the stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng.37(11):2218–2221.
- SakalihasanN, LimetR, DefaweOD. 2005. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet.365(9470):1577–1589.
- SalsacAV, SparksSR, ChomazJM, LasherasJC. 2006. Evolution of the wall shear stresses during the progressive enlargement of symmetric abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Fluid Mech. 560:19–51.
- ScottiCM, FinolEA. 2007. Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a fluid–structure interaction study. Comput Struct. 85(11–14):1097–1113.
- ScottiCM, JimenezJ, MulukSC, FinolEA. 2008. Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid–structure interaction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 11(3):301–322.
- ScottiCM, ShkolnikAD, MulukSC, FinolEA. 2005. Fluid–structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness. Biomed Eng Online. 4:1–22.
- ShihT-S, LiouWW, ShabbirA, YangZ, ZhuJ. 1995. A new k–ϵ eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids. 4(3):227–238.
- ShumJ, Di MartinoES, GoldhammerA, GoldmanD, AckerL, PatelG, NgJH, MartufiG, FinolEA. 2010. Semi-automatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Phys. 37(2):638–648.
- ShumJ, MartufiG, Di MartinoES, WashingtonCB, GrisafiJ, MulukSC, FinolEA. 2011. Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(1):277–286.
- ShumJ, XuA, ChatnuntawechI, FinolEA. 2011. A framework for the automatic generation of surface topologies for abdominal aortic aneurysm models. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(1):249–259.
- SwillensA, LanoyeL, De BackerJ, StergiopulosN, VerdonckP, VermassenF, SegersP. 2008. Effect of an abdominal aortic aneurysm on wave reflection in the aorta. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 55(5):1602–1611.
- ThompsonMM. 2003. Controlling the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 90:897–898.
- WolfshteinM. 1969. The velocity and temperature distribution of one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 12:301–318.