Systolic fluid–structure interaction model of the congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: assessment of modelling requirements

References

• Al-AtabiM, EspinoDM, HukinsDWL. 2010. Computer and experimental modelling of blood flow through the mitral valve of the heart. J Biomech Sci Eng.5(1):78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Al-AtabiM, EspinoDM, HukinsDWL, BuchanKG. 2012. Biomechanical assessment of surgical repair of the mitral valve. Proc Inst Mech Eng H.226(4):275–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BahrasemanHG, HassaniK, KhosraviA, NavidbakhshM, EspinoDM, Kazemi-SalehD, FatouraeeN. 2013. Estimation of maximum intraventricular pressure: a three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction model. Biomed Eng Online. 12:122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BahrasemanHG, HassaniK, NavidbakhshM, EspinoDM, SaniZA, FatouraeeN. 2014a. Effect of exercise on blood flow through the aortic valve: a combined clinical and numerical study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin., in press. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/10255842.2013.771179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BahrasemanHG, HassaniK, KhosraviA, NavidbakhshM, EspinoDM, FatouraeeN, Kazemi-SalehD. 2014b. Combining numerical and clinical methods to assess aortic valve hemodynamics during exercise. Perfusion, in press. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1177/0267659114521103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BalguidA, DriessenNJB, MolA, SchmitzJPJ, VerheyenF, BoutenCVC, BaaijensFPT. 2008. Stress related collagen ultrastructure in human aortic valves – implications for tissue engineering. J Biomech.41(12):2612–2617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BauerM, SiniawskiH, PasicM, SchaumannB, HetzerR. 2006. Different hemodynamic stress of the ascending aorta wall in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. J Card Surg.21(3):218–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellhouseBJ. 1972. The fluid mechanics of heart valves. In: BergelDH, editor. Cardiovascular fluid dynamics. Vol. 1. London: Academic Press; p. 261–285.
   Google Scholar
• ButcherJT, NeremRM. 2007. Valvular endothelial cells and the mechanoregulation of valvular pathology. Phil Trans R Soc B.362(1484):1445–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaroCG, PedleyTJ, SchroterRC, SeedWA. 1978. The mechanics of the circulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ChenL, McCullochAD, May-NewmanK. 2004. Nonhomogeneous deformation in the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. Ann Biomed Eng.32(12):1599–1606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De HartJ, PetersGW, SchruersPJ, BaaijensFP. 2000. A two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic valve. J Biomech.33(9):1079–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De HartJ, PetersGW, SchreursPJ, BaaijensFP. 2003. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid–structure interaction in the aortic valve. J Biomech.36(1):103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoneaJ, GiulianiS, HalleuxJP. 1982. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng.33(1–3):689–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowellEH, HallKC. 2001. Modelling of fluid-structure interaction. Ann Rev Fluid Mech.33(1):445–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EspinoDM, ShepherdDET, HukinsDWL. 2013. Development of a transient large strain contact method for biological heart valve simulations. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng.16(4):413–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EspinoDM, ShepherdDET, HukinsDWL. 2014. Evaluation of a transient, simultaneous, Arbitrary Lagrange Euler based multi-physics method for simulating the mitral heart valve. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng.17(4):450–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FormaggiaL, NobileF. 1999. A stability analysis for the arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulation with finite elements. East-West J Numer Math.7(2):105–132.
   Google Scholar
• GohKL, HolmesDF, LuY, PurslowPP, KadlerKE, BechetD, WessTJ. 2012. Bimodal collagen fibril diameter distributions direct age-related variations in tendon resilience and resistance to rupture. J Appl Phys.113(6):878–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GohKL, HolmesDF, PurslowPP, WessTJ, HuHY, RichardsonS, KadlerKE. 2008. Ageing changes in the tensile properties of tendons: influence of collagen fibril volume fraction. J Biomech Eng.130(2):021011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GohKL, MeakinJR, AspdenRM, HukinsDWL. 2007. Stress transfer in collagen fibrils reinforcing connective tissues: effects of collagen fibril slenderness and relative stiffness. J Theor Biol.245(2):305–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrangerRA. 1985. Fluid mechanics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• GunzburgerMD. 1996. Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible flows: finite-element methods. In: PeyretR, editor. Handbook of computational fluid mechanics. London: Academic Press; p. 98–157.
   Google Scholar
• HagerA, KaemmererH, Rapp-BernhardtU, BlücherS, RappKM, BernhardtTM, GalanskiM, HessJ. 2002. Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.123(6):1060–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeathMT. 1997. Scientific computing – an introductory survey. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• LamasCC, EykynSJ. 2000. Bicuspid aortic valve a silent danger: analysis of 50 cases of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis.30(2):336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LevickJR. 1995. An introduction to cardiovascular physiology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• MillardL, EspinoDM, ShepherdDET, HukinsDWL, BuchanKG. 2011. Mechanical properties of chordae tendineae of the mitral heart valve: Young's modulus, structural stiffness and effects of aging. J Mech Med Biol.11(1):221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeskinCS. 1972. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys.10(2):252–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeskinCS. 1977. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J Comput Phys.25(3):220–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobertsWC. 1970. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: a study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol.26(1):72–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobicsekF, ThubrikarMJ, CookJW, FowlerB. 2004. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? why does it fail?Ann Thorac Surg.77(1):177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchoenFJ. 2005. Cardiac valves and valvular pathology: update on function, disease, repair, and replacement. Cardiovasc Pathol.14(4):189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SieversHH, SchmidtkeC. 2007. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.133(5):1226–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiuSC, SilversidesCK. 2010. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol.55(25):2789–2800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThieneG, BassoC. 2006. Pathology and pathogenesis of infective endocarditis in native heart valves. Cardiovasc Pathol.15(5):256–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TurekS. 1999. Lecture notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 6. Efficient solvers for incompressible flow problems: an algorithmic approach in view of computational aspects. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van de VosseFN, De HartJ, Van OijenCHGA, BessemsD, GuntherTWM, SegalA, WoltersBJBM, StijnenJMA, BaaijensFPT. 2003. Finite-element-based computational methods for cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction. J Eng Math.47(3–4):335–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ViscardiF, VergaraC, AntigaL, MerelliS, VenezianiA, PuppiniG, FaggianG, MazzuccoA, Battista-LucianiG. 2010. Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. Artif Organs. 34(12):1114–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WallW, GerstenbergerA, GamnitzerP, ForsterC, RammE. 2006. Large deformation fluid–structure interaction – advances in ALE methods and new fixed grid approaches. In: BungartzHJ, ShaferM, editors. Fluid–structure interaction. Berlin: Springer. p. 195–232.
   Google Scholar
• WallbyL, Janerot-SjöbergB, SteffensenT, BroqvistM. 2002. T lymphocyte infiltration in non-rheumatic aortic stenosis: a comparative descriptive study between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves. Heart. 88(4):348–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinbergEJ, Kaazempur-MofradMR. 2008. A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis. J Biomech.41(16):3482–3487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinslowAM. 1966. Numerical solution of the quasilinear Poisson equation in a nonuniform triangle mesh. J Comput Phys.1(2):149–172.
   Google Scholar