Three-dimensional macro-scale assessment of regional and temporal wall shear stress characteristics on aortic valve leaflets

References

• Atkins SK, Cao K, Rajamannan NM, Sucosky P. 2014. Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics induces abnormal medial remodeling in the convexity of porcine ascending aortas. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 13(6):1209–1225. doi:10.1007/s10237-014-0567-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balachandran K, Sucosky P, Yoganathan AP. 2011. Hemodynamics and mechanobiology of aortic valve inflammation and calcification. Int J Inflam. 2011:1–15. doi:10.4061/2011/263870.
   Google Scholar
• Barker AJ, Markl M, Bürk J, Lorenz R, Bock J, Bauer S, Schulz-Menger J, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F. 2012. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 5(4):457–466. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.973370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellhouse BJ, Talbot L. 1969. The fluid mechanics of the aortic valve. J Fluid Mech. 35(4):721–735. doi:10.1017/S0022112069001406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billiar KL, Sacks MS. 2000. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp – Part I: experimental results. J Biomech Eng. 122(1):23–30. doi:10.1115/1.429624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher JT, Simmons CA, Warnock JN. 2008. Mechanobiology of the aortic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 17:62–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra S, Rajamannan NM, Sucosky P. 2012. Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 11(7):1085–1096. doi:10.1007/s10237-012-0375-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran K, Rittgers S, Yoganathan A. 2007. Biofluid mechanics: the human circulation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dasi LP, Sucosky P, de Zelicourt D, Sundareswaran K, Jimenez J, Yoganathan AP. 2009. Advances in cardiovascular fluid mechanics: bench to bedside. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1161(1):1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04320.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hart J, Baaijens FP, Peters GW, Schreurs PJ. 2003. A computational structure interaction analysis of a fiber-reinforced stentless aortic valve. J Biomech. 36(5):699–712. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00448-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hart J, Peters GWM, Schreurs PJG, Baaijens FPT. 2000. A two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic valve. J Biomech. 33(9):1079–1088. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00068-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hart J, Peters GWM, Schreurs PJG, Baaijens FPT. 2003. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid–structure interaction in the aortic valve. J Biomech. 36(1):103–112. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00244-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donea J, Giuliani S, Halleux JP. 1982. An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid–structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 33(1–3):689–723. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(82)90128-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge L, Sotiropoulos F. 2010. Direction and magnitude of blood flow shear stresses on the leaflets of aortic valves: is there a link with valve calcification? J Biomech Eng. 132(1):014505. doi:10.1115/1.4000162.
   Google Scholar
• Grande KJ, Cochran RP, Reinhall PG, Kunzelman KS. 1998. Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: the role of anatomic asymmetry. Ann Biomed Eng. 26(4):534–545. doi:10.1114/1.122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoehn D, Sun L, Sucosky P. 2010. Role of pathologic shear stress alterations in aortic valve endothelial activation. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 1(2):165–178. doi:10.1007/s13239-010-0015-5.
   Google Scholar
• Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Wilkes AJ, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Yacoub MH. 2000. Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart. Nature. 404(6779):759–761. doi:10.1038/35008075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku DN. 1997. Blood flow in arteries. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 29(1):399–434. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz J, Renner J, Karlsson M. 2011. Wall shear stress in a subject specific human aorta – influence of fluid–structure interaction. Int J Appl Mech. 03(4):759–778. doi:10.1142/S1758825111001226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo HL, Dasi LP, Carberry J, Simon HA, Yoganathan AP. 2006. Fluid dynamic assessment of three polymeric heart valves using particle image velocimetry. Ann Biomed Eng. 34(6):936–952. doi:10.1007/s10439-006-9117-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marom G, Peleg M, Halevi R, Rosenfeld M, Raanani E, Hamdan A, Haj-Ali R. 2013. Fluid–structure interaction model of aortic valve with porcine-specific collagen fiber alignment in the cusps. J Biomech Eng. 135(10):101001–101006. doi:10.1115/1.4024824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merryman WD. 2010. Mechano-potential etiologies of aortic valve disease. J Biomech. 43(1):87–92. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missirlis YF, Chong M. 1978. Aortic valve mechanics – Part I: material properties of natural porcine aortic valves. J Bioeng. 2:287–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B, Dasi LP. 2014. Spatiotemporal complexity of the aortic sinus vortex. Exp Fluids. 55(7):1770. doi:10.1007/s00348-014-1770-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicosia MA, Cochran RP, Einstein DR, Rutland CJ, Kunzelman KS. 2003. A coupled fluid–structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root. J Heart Valve Dis. 12:781–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks MS, Yoganathan AP. 2007. Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci. 362(1484):1369–1391. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman C, Akingba AG, Sucosky P. 2014. Steady flow hemodynamic and energy loss measurements in normal and simulated calcified tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves. J Biomech Eng. 136(4)–11. doi:10.1115/1.4026575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman C, McNally A, Biddle S, Jankowski L, Sucosky P. 2015. Generation of simulated calcific lesions in valve leaflets for flow studies. J Heart Valve Dis. 24:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stalder AF, Frydrychowicz A, Russe MF, Korvink JG, Hennig J, Li K, Markl M. 2011. Assessment of flow instabilities in the healthy aorta using flow-sensitive MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 33(4):839–846. doi:10.1002/jmri.22512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturla F, Votta E, Stevanella M, Conti CA, Redaelli A. 2013. Impact of modeling fluid–structure interaction in the computational analysis of aortic root biomechanics. Med Eng Phys. 35(12):1721–1730. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucosky P. 2014. Hemodynamic mechanisms of bicuspid aortic valve calcification and aortopathy. In: Rajamannan N, editor. Molecular biology of valvular heart disease. London: Springer; p. 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Sucosky P, Balachandran K, Elhammali A, Jo H, Yoganathan AP. 2009. Altered shear stress stimulates upregulation of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in a BMP-4- and TGF-β1-dependent pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 29(2):254–260. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.176347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucosky P, Rajamannan NM. 2013. Bicuspid aortic valve disease: from bench to bedside. In: Rajamannan N, editor. Cardiac valvular medicine. London: Springer; p. 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sun L, Chandra S, Sucosky P, Aikawa E, Sun L, Chandra S, Sucosky P. 2012. Ex vivo evidence for the contribution of hemodynamic shear stress abnormalities to the early pathogenesis of calcific bicuspid aortic valve disease. PLoS One. 7(10):e48843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun L, Rajamannan NM, Sucosky P, Aikawa E, Sun L, Rajamannan N, Sucosky P. 2013. Defining the role of fluid shear stress in the expression of early signaling markers for calcific aortic valve disease. PLoS One. 8(12):e84433. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thubrikar M. 1990. The aortic valve. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vigmostad SC, Udaykumar HS, Lu J, Chandran KB. 2010. Fluid–structure interaction methods in biological flows with special emphasis on heart valve dynamics. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 26(3–4):435–470. doi:10.1002/cnm.1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg EJ, Kaazempur Mofrad MR. 2007. Transient, three-dimensional, multiscale simulations of the human aortic valve. Cardiovasc Eng. 7(4):140–155. doi:10.1007/s10558-007-9038-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinberg EJ, Schoen FJ, Mofrad MRK, Capogrossi M. 2009. A computational model of aging and calcification in the aortic heart valve. PLoS One. 4(6):e5960. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston MW, LaBorde DV, Yoganathan AP. 1999. Estimation of the shear stress on the surface of an aortic valve leaflet. Ann Biomed Eng. 27(4):572–579. doi:10.1114/1.199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap CH, Saikrishnan N, Tamilselvan G, Yoganathan AP. 2012. Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 11(1–2):171–182. doi:10.1007/s10237-011-0301-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap CH, Saikrishnan N, Yoganathan AP. 2012. Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the ventricular surface of the aortic valve leaflet. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 11(1–2):231–244. doi:10.1007/s10237-011-0306-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganathan AP, He Z, Casey Jones S. 2004. Fluid mechanics of heart valves. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 6(1):331–362. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YQ, Faerestrand S, Matre K, Birkeland S. 1993. Velocity distributions in the left ventricular outflow tract and the aortic anulus measured with Doppler colour flow mapping in normal subjects. Eur Heart J. 14(9):1179–1188. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/14.9.1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar