The use of XFEM to assess the influence of intra-cortical porosity on crack propagation

References

• Abaqus 6.12 documentation. 2012. Providence, RI: Simulia, Dassault Systemes.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Wahab AA, Maligno AR, Silberschmidt VV. 2012. Micro-scale modelling of bovine cortical bone fracture: analysis of crack propagation and microstructure using X-FEM. Comput Mater Sci. 52:128–135. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belytschko T, Black T. 1999. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 45:601–620. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601:AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besdo S, Vashishth D. 2012. Extended finite element models of intracortical porosity and heterogeneity in cortical bone. Comput Mater Sci. 64:301–305. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budyn É, Hoc T. 2007. Multiple scale modeling for cortical bone fracture in tension using X-FEM. Eur J Comput Mech Eur Mécanique Numér. 16:213–236. doi:10.3166/remn.16.213-236
   Google Scholar
• Budyn E, Hoc T, Jonvaux J. 2008. Fracture strength assessment and aging signs detection in human cortical bone using an X-FEM multiple scale approach. Comput Mech. 42:579–591. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0283-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler MJ. 2007. Molecular nanomechanics of nascent bone: fibrillar toughening by mineralization. Nanotechnology. 18:295102–295111. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/18/29/295102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriero A, Bruse JL, Oldknow kJ, Millán JL, Farquharson C, Shefelbine SJ. 2014. Reference point indentation is not indicative of whole mouse bone measures of stress intensity fracture toughness. Bone. 69:174–179. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriero A, Doube M, Vogt M, Busse B, Zustin J, Levchuk A, Schneider P, Müller R, Shefelbine SJ. 2014. Altered lacunar and vascular porosity in osteogenesis imperfecta mouse bone as revealed by synchrotron tomography contributes to bone fragility. Bone. 61:116–124. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2013.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriero A, Zimmermann EA, Paluszny A, Tang SY, Bale H, Busse B, Alliston T, Kazakia G, Ritchie RO, Shefelbine SJ. 2014. How tough is brittle bone? Investigating osteogenesis imperfecta in mouse bone. J Bone Miner Res. 29:1392–1401. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriero A, Zimmermann EA, Shefelbine SJ, Ritchie RO. 2014. A methodology for the investigation of toughness and crack propagation in mouse bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 39:38–47. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen D, Levchuk A, Schori S, Schneider P, Boyd SK, Müller R. 2012. Deformable image registration and 3D strain mapping for the quantitative assessment of cortical bone microdamage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 8:184–193. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson F, Ruffoni D, Schneider P, Levchuk A, Zwahlen A, Pankaj P, Müller R. 2014. Modeling microdamage behavior of cortical bone. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 13:1227–1242. doi:10.1007/s10237-014-0568-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feerick EM, Liu XC, McGarry P. 2013. Anisotropic mode-dependent damage of cortical bone using the extended finite element method (XFEM). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 20:77–89. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries T-P, Belytschko T. 2010. The extended/generalized finite element method: an overview of the method and its applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 84:253–304. doi:10.1002/nme.2914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Li S, Adel-Wahab A, Silberschmidt V. 2013. Effect of random microstructure on crack propagation in cortical bone tissue under dynamic loading. J Phys Conf Ser. 451:012033–012041. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/451/1/012033
   Google Scholar
• Gupta HS, Krauss S, Kerschnitzki M, Karunaratne A, Dunlop JWC, Barber AH, Boesecke P, Funari SS, Fratzl P. 2013. Intrafibrillar plasticity through mineral/collagen sliding is the dominant mechanism for the extreme toughness of antler bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 28:366–382. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haboussa D, Grégoire D, Elguedj T, Maigre H, Combescure A. 2011. X-FEM analysis of the effects of holes or other cracks on dynamic crack propagations. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 86:618–636. doi:10.1002/nme.3128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Du C, Gu C, Chen X. 2014. XFEM analysis of the effects of voids, inclusions and other cracks on the dynamic stress intensity factor of a major crack. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 37:866–882. doi:10.1111/ffe.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karihaloo BL, Xiao QZ. 2003. Modelling of stationary and growing cracks in FE framework without remeshing: a state-of-the-art review. Comput Struct. 81:119–129. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00431-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launey ME, Buehler MJ, Ritchie RO. 2010. On the mechanistic origins of toughness in bone. Annu Rev Mater Res. 40:25–53. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Abdel-Wahab A, Demirci E, Silberschmidt VV. 2013. Fracture process in cortical bone: X-FEM analysis of microstructured models. Int J Fract. 184:43–55. doi:10.1007/s10704-013-9814-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Abdel-Wahab A, Silberschmidt VV. 2013. Analysis of fracture processes in cortical bone tissue. Eng Fract Mech. 110:448–458. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischinski S, Ural A. 2011. Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone. J Appl Mech. 78:041016–041016. doi:10.1115/1.4003754
   Google Scholar
• Moës N, Belytschko T. 2002. Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech. 69:813–833. doi:10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. 1999. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 46:131–150. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131:AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalla RK, Kruzic JJ, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. 2005. Mechanistic aspects of fracture and R-curve behavior in human cortical bone. Biomaterials. 26:217–231. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien FJ, Taylor D, Clive Lee T. 2005. The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks. J Orthop Res. 23:475–480. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remmers JJC, de Borst R, Needleman A. 2003. A cohesive segments method for the simulation of crack growth. Comput Mech. 31:69–77. doi:10.1007/s00466-002-0394-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie RO, Buehler MJ, Hansma P. 2009. Plasticity and toughness in bone. Phys Today. 62:41–47. doi:10.1063/1.3156332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Florez N, Garcia-Tunon E, Mukadam Q, Saiz E, Oldknow kJ, Farquharson C, Millán JL, Boyde A, Shefelbine SJ. 2015. An investigation of the mineral in ductile and brittle cortical mouse bone. J Bone Miner Res. 30:786–795. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh IV, Mishra BK, Bhattacharya S. 2011. XFEM simulation of cracks, holes and inclusions in functionally graded materials. Int J Mech Mater Des. 7:199–218. doi:10.1007/s10999-011-9159-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukumar N, Moës N, Moran B, Belytschko T. 2000. Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modelling. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 48:1549–1570. doi:10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1549:AID-NME955>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Hazenberg JG, Lee TC. 2007. Living with cracks: damage and repair in human bone. Nat Mater. 6:263–268. doi:10.1038/nmat1866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull TL, Baumann AP, Roeder RK. 2014. Fatigue microcracks that initiate fracture are located near elevated intracortical porosity but not elevated mineralization. J Biomech. 47:3135–3142. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ural A, Vashishth D. 2014. Hierarchical perspective of bone toughness – from molecules to fracture. Int Mater Rev. 59:245–263. doi:10.1179/1743280414Y.0000000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene M, Porter A, Guillot P-V, Boyde A, Oyen M, Shefelbine S. 2012. Ultra-structural defects cause low bone matrix stiffness despite high mineralization in osteogenesis imperfecta mice. Bone. 50:1317–1323. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergani L, Colombo C, Libonati F. 2014. Crack propagation in cortical bone: a numerical study. Procedia Mater Sci. 3:1524–1529. doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.246
   Google Scholar
• Voide R, Schneider P, Stauber M, van Lenthe GH, Stampanoni M, Müller R. 2011. The importance of murine cortical bone microstructure for microcrack initiation and propagation. Bone. 49:1186–1193. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Gupta HS. 2011. Deformation and fracture mechanisms of bone and nacre. Annu Rev Mater Res. 41:41–73. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-095806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazid A, Abdelkader N, Abdelmadjid H. 2009. A state-of-the-art review of the X-FEM for computational fracture mechanics. Appl Math Model. 33:4269–4282. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2009.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeni YN, Brown CU, Wang Z, Norman TL. 1997. The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone. 21:453–459. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00173-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann EA, Gludovatz B, Schaible E, Busse B, Ritchie RO. 2014. Fracture resistance of human cortical bone across multiple length-scales at physiological strain rates. Biomaterials. 35:5472–5481. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann EA, Schaible E, Bale H, Barth HD, Tang SY, Reichert P, Busse B, Alliston T, Ager JW, Ritchie RO. 2011. Age-related changes in the plasticity and toughness of human cortical bone at multiple length scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi:10.1073/pnas.1107966108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar