Predicting changes in mechanical properties of trabecular bone by adaptive remodeling

References

• Adachi T, Tomita Y, Sakaue H, Tanaka M. 1997. Simulation of trabecular surface remodeling based on local stress nonuniformity. JSME Int J, Series C. 40:782–792.10.1299/jsmec.40.782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adachi T, Tanaka M, Tomita Y. 1998. Uniform stress state in bone structure with residual stress. J Biomech Eng. 120:342–348.10.1115/1.2798000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adachi T, Tsubota K, Tomita Y. 2000. Mechanical remodeling simulation for cancellous bone using digital image-based model. Trans JSME Series A (in Japanese). 66:1640–1647.10.1299/kikaia.66.1640
   Google Scholar
• Adachi T, Tsubota K, Tomita Y, Hollister SJ. 2001. Trabecular surface remodeling simulation for cancellous bone using microstructural voxel finite element models. J Biomech Eng. 123:403–409.10.1115/1.1392315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badilatti SD, Christen P, Levchuk A, Marangalou JH, van Rietbergen B, Parkinson I, Müller R. 2016. Large-scale microstructural simulation of load-adaptive bone remodeling in whole human vertebrae. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 15:83–95.10.1007/s10237-015-0715-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DR. 1984. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 36:S19–S24.10.1007/BF02406129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen P, Ito K, Müller R, Rubin MR, Dempster DW, Bilezikian JP, van Rietbergen B. 2012. Patient-specific bone modelling and remodelling simulation of hypoparathyroidism based on human iliac crest biopsies. J Biomechanics. 45:2411–2416.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Adachi JD, Clifton J, Griffith LE, Epstein RS, Juneper EF. 1993. Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 36:750–756.10.1002/(ISSN)1529-0131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowin SC. 1993. Bone stress adaptation models. ASME J Biomech Eng. 115:528–533.10.1115/1.2895535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowin SC, Moss-Salentijn L, Moss ML. 1991. Candidates for the mechanosensory system in bone. J Biomech Eng. 113:191–197.10.1115/1.2891234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM. 2003. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 33:744–750.10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00210-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett JC, Rogers MJ, Coxon FP, Hocking LJ, Helfrich MH. 2011. Bone remodelling at a glance. J Cell Sci. 124:991–998.10.1242/jcs.063032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamant I, Shahar R, Masharawi Y, Gefen A. 2007. A method for patient-specific evaluation of vertebral cancellous bone strength: in vitro validation. Clini Biomech. 22:282–291.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, Christiansen C, Delmas PD, Zanchetta JR, Stakkestad J, et al. 1999. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Ass. 282:637–645.10.1001/jama.282.7.637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldberg RE, Richards M, Caldwell NJ, Kuelske CL, Goldstein SA. 1997. Trabecular bone adaptation to variations in porous-coated implant topology. J Biomech. 30:147–153.10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00106-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homminga J, Weinans H, Gowin W, Felsenberg D, Huiskes R. 2001. Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution. Spine. 26:1555–1560.10.1097/00007632-200107150-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TF. 1987. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech. 20:1135–1150.10.1016/0021-9290(87)90030-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD. 2000. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature. 405:704–706.10.1038/35015116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Donnell P, Harrison N, Liebschner MA, Mc Hugh PE. 2009. Simulation of vertebral trabecular bone loss using voxel finite element analysis. J Biomechanics. 42:2789–2796.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullender MG, Huiskes R. 1997. Osteocytes and bone lining cells: which are the best candidates for mechano-sensors in cancellous bone? Bone. 20:527–532.10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00036-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers BS, Arbogast KB, Lobaugh B, Harper KD, Richardson WJ, Drezner MK. 1994. Improved assessment of lumbar vertebral body strength using supine lateral dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res. 9:687–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfitt AM. 1994. Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem. 55:273–286.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. 1998. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys. 20:92–102.10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruimerman R, Hilbers P, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R. 2005. A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. J Biomechanics. 38:931–941.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadegh AM, Luo GM, Cowin SC. 1993. Bone ingrowth: an application of the boundary element method to bone remodeling at the implant interface. J Biomech. 26:167–182.10.1016/0021-9290(93)90047-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte FA, Zwahlen A, Lambers FM, Kuhn G, Ruffoni D, Betts D, Webster DJ, Müller R. 2013. Strain-adaptive in silico modeling of bone adaptation – a computer simulation validated by in vivo micro-computed tomography data. Bone. 52:485–492.10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TS, Martin RB, Hubbard M, Bay BK. 1997. Surface remodeling of trabecular bone using a tissue level model. J Orthop Res. 15:593–600.10.1002/(ISSN)1554-527X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Adachi T. 2004. Changes in the fabric and compliance tensors of cancellous bone due to trabecular surface remodeling, predicted by a digital image-based model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 7:187–192.10.1080/10255840410001729524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsubota K, Adachi T. 2005. Spatial and temporal regulation of cancellous bone structure: characterization of a rate equation of trabecular surface remodeling. Med Eng Phys. 27:305–311.10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Adachi T. 2006. Simulation study on local and integral mechanical quantities at single trabecular level as candidates of remodeling stimuli. J Biomech Sci Eng. 1:124–135.10.1299/jbse.1.124
   Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Adachi T, Tomita Y. 2001. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering - 3: Simulation study on model parameters of trabecular surface remodeling model. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York. 129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Adachi T, Tomita Y. 2002. Functional adaptation of cancellous bone in human proximal femur predicted by trabecular surface remodeling simulation toward uniform stress state. J Biomechanics. 35:1541–1551.10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00173-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Suzuki Y, Yamada T, Hojo M, Makinouchi A, Adachi T. 2009. Computer simulation of trabecular remodeling in human proximal femur using large-scale voxel FE models: approach to understanding Wolff’s law. J Biomech. 42:1088–1094.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff J. 1986. The law of bone remodelling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-71031-5
   Google Scholar