Cross-bridge mechanism of residual force enhancement after stretching in a skeletal muscle

References

• Abbott BC, Aubert XM. 1952. The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length. J Physiol. 117:77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullimore SR, MacIntosh BR, Herzog W. 2008. Is a parallel elastic element responsible for the enhancement of steady-state muscle force following active stretch? J Exp Biol. 211:3001–3008.10.1242/jeb.021204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRuiter CJ, Didden WJM, Jones DA, de Haan A. 2000. The force-velocity relationship of human adductor pollicis muscle during stretch and the effects of fatigue. J Physiol. 526:671–681.10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00671.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edman KAP. 2012. Residual force enhancement after stretch in striated muscle. A consequence of increased myofilament overlap? J Physiol. 590:1339–1345.10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edman KA, Elzinga G, Noble  MI. 1978. Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 281:139–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edman KAP, Elzinga G, Noble MIM. 1982. Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibres. J Gen Physiol. 80:769–784.10.1085/jgp.80.5.769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edman KA, Tsuchiya T. 1996. Strain of passive elements during force enhancement by stretch in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 490:191–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg E, Hill TL. 1985. Muscle contraction and free energy transduction in biological systems. Science. 227:999–1006.10.1126/science.3156404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer JT, Simmons RM, Spudich JA. 1994. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometer steps. Nature. 368:113–119.10.1038/368113a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcinito M, Epstein M, Herzog W. 1998. Can a rheological muscle model predict force depression/enhancement? J Biomech. 31:1093–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford LE, Huxley AF, Simmons RM. 1981. The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 311:219–249.10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselgrove JC, Huxley HE. 1973. X-ray evidence for radial cross-bridge movement and for the sliding filament model in actively contracting muscle. J Mol Biol. 77:549–568.10.1016/0022-2836(73)90222-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog W, Leonard TR. 2002. Force enhancement following stretching of skeletal muscle: a new mechanism. J Exp Biol. 205:1275–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog W, Powers K, Johnston K, Duvall M. 2015. A new paradigm for muscle contraction. Front Physiol. 6:174. PMCID: PMC4461830.
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi H, Yanagida T, Goldman YE. 1995. Compliance of thin filaments in skinned fibers of rabbit skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 69:1000–1010.10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79975-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisey B, Leonard TM, Herzog W. 2009. Does residual force enhancement increase with increasing stretch magnitudes? J Biomech. 42:1488–1492.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes KC. 1997. The swinging lever-arm hypothesis of muscle contraction. Curr Biol. 7:R112–R118.10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00051-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley AF. 1957. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 7:255–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley HE, Kress M. 1985. Crossbridge behaviour during muscle contraction. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 6:153–161.10.1007/BF00713057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley AF, Simmons RM. 1971. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 233:533–538.10.1038/233533a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai M, Brandt PW. 1980. Sinusoidal analysis: a high resolution method for correlating biochemical reactions with physiological processes in activated skeletal muscle of rabbit, frog and crayfish. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1:279–303.10.1007/BF00711932
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitamura K, Tokunaga M, Esaki S, Iwane AH, Yanagida T. 2005. Mechanism of muscle contraction based on stochastic properties of single actomyosin motors observed in vitro. Biophysics. 1:1–19.10.2142/biophysics.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Kojima H, Ishijima A, Yanagida T. 1994. Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 91:12962–12966.10.1073/pnas.91.26.12962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E-J, Herzog W. 2008. Residual force enhancement exceeds the isometric force at optimal sarcomere length for optimized stretch conditions. J Appl Physiol. 105:457–462.10.1152/japplphysiol.01109.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard TR, DuVall M, Herzog W. 2010. Force enhancement following stretch in a single sarcomere. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 299:C1398–C1401.10.1152/ajpcell.00222.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linari M, Dobbie I, Reconditi M, Koubassova N, Irving M, Piazzesi G, Lombardi M. 1998. The stiffness of skeletal muscle in isometric contraction and rigor: The fraction of myosin heads bound to actin. Biophy J. 74:2459–2473.10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77954-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maréchal G, Plaghki L. 1979. The deficit of the isometric tetanic tension redeveloped after release of frog muscle at a constant velocity. J Gen Physiol. 73:453–467.10.1085/jgp.73.4.453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. 1990. New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening. 57:209–221.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. 1994. An explanation for residual increased tension in striated muscle after stretch during contraction. Exp Physiol. 79:831–838.10.1113/expphysiol.1994.sp003811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamachi E, Hirokawa N, Tamura Y. 1992. Muscle contraction simulation based on molecular potential theory: sliding motion of myosin. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng. 58A:1093–1099.10.1299/kikaia.58.1093
   Google Scholar
• Nakamachi E, Tsukamoto J, Tamura Y. 1994. Skeletal muscle contraction analyses based on molecular potential theory: contraction of sarcomere. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng. 60A:2464–2470.10.1299/kikaia.60.2464
   Google Scholar
• Nocella M, Bagni MA, Cecchi G, Colombini B. 2013. Mechanism of force enhancement during stretching of skeletal muscle fibres investigated by high time-resolved stiffness measurements. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 34(1):71–81.10.1007/s10974-012-9335-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocella M, Cecchi G, Bagni MA, Colombini B. 2014. Force enhancement after stretch in mammalian muscle fiber: no evidence of cross-bridge involvement. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 307:C1123–C1129.10.1152/ajpcell.00290.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskouei AE, Herzog W. 2005. Observations on force enhancement in submaximal voluntary contractions of human adductor pollicis muscle. J Appl Physiol. 98:2087–2095.10.1152/japplphysiol.01217.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinniger GJ, Cresswell AG. 2006. Residual force enhancement after lengthening is present during submaximal plantar flexion and dorsiflexion actions in humans. J Appl Physiol. 102:18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassier DE. 2012. The mechanisms of the residual force enhancement after stretch of skeletal muscle: non-uniformity in half-sarcomeres and stiffness of titin. Proc Biol Sci. 279:2705–2713. PMCID: PMC3367795.
   Google Scholar
• Rode C, Siebert T, Blickhan R. 2009. Titin-induced force enhancement and force depression: a ‘sticky-spring’ mechanism in muscle contractions? J Theor Biol. 259:350–360.10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schappacher-Tilp G, Leonard T, Desch G, Herzog W. 2015. A novel three-filament model of force generation in eccentric contraction of skeletal muscles. PLOS ONE. 10(3):e0117634. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0117634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugi H, Tsuchiya T. 1988. Stiffness changes during enhancement and deficit of isometric force by slow length changes in frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 407:215–229.10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Yasunaga T, Ohkura R, Wakabayashi T, Sutoh K. 1998. Swing of the lever arm of a myosin motor at the isomerization and phosphate-release steps. Nature. 396:380–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura Y, Ito A, Saito M. 2017. A model of muscle contraction based on the Langevin equation with actomyosin potentials. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 20:273–283.10.1080/10255842.2016.1215440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura Y, Saito M, Nagato R. 2005. A new motor model representing the stretch-induced force enhancement and shortening-induced force depression in skeletal muscle. J Biomech. 38:877–884.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong XT. 1974. Viscoelastic wave propagation and rheologic properties of skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 226:256–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyska MJ, Dupuis DE, Guilford WH, Patlak JB, Waller GS, Trybus KM, Warshaw DM, Lowey S. 1999. Two heads of myosin are better than one for generating force and motion. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 96:4402–4407.10.1073/pnas.96.8.4402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar