The use of functionally graded dental crowns to improve biocompatibility: a finite element analysis

References

• Abu Kasim NH, Madfa AA, Hamdi M, Rahbari GR. 2011. 3D-FE analysis of functionally graded structured dental posts. Dent Mater J. 30:869–880.10.4012/dmj.2010-161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. 2005. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 94:321–329.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budynas RG, Nisbett JK. 2011. Shigley’s Mechanical engineering design. 9th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. 2008. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. J Prosthet Dent. 99:131–140.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu G, Deng F, Wang L, Ren A. 2010. The three-dimension finite element analysis of stress in posterior tooth residual root restored with postcore crown. Dent Traumatol. 26:64–69.10.1111/edt.2009.26.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. 2005. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech. 38:2375–2389.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Lluch C, Pérez-González A. 2016. Analysis of the effect of design parameters and their interactions on the strength of dental restorations with endodontic posts, using finite element models and statistical analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 19:428–439.10.1080/10255842.2015.1034116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedia H. 2005. Design of functionally graded dental implant in the presence of cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 75B:74–80.10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichim I, Kuzmanovic D, Love R. 2006. A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root. Int Endod J. 39:443–452.10.1111/iej.2006.39.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, LongXing N. 2010. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 103:6–12.10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaleli N, Sarac D, Külünk S, Öztürk Ö. 2017. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katranji A, Misch K, Wang H-L. 2007. Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers. J Periodontol. 78:874–878.10.1902/jop.2007.060342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-L, Chang Y-H, Lin Y-F. 2008. Combining structural–thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration. J Dent. 36:626–636.10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-L, Chang W-J, Lin Y-S, Chang Y-H, Lin Y-F. 2009. Evaluation of the relative contributions of multi-factors in an adhesive MOD restoration using FEA and the Taguchi method. Dent Mater. 25:1073–1081.10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Swain M. 2010. Bone remodeling induced by dental implants of functionally graded materials. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 92:430–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madfa A, Abdullah A. 2011. Development of functionally graded composite for fabrication of dental post [dissertation]. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi M, Saidi AR, Amini P, Hashemipour MA. 2017. Influence of inhomogeneous dental posts on stress distribution in tooth root and interfaces: three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 118(6): 742–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrali M, Shirazi FS, Mehrali M, Metselaar HSC, Kadri NAB, Osman NAA. 2013. Dental implants from functionally graded materials. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 101:3046–3057.10.1002/jbm.a.v101.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson SJ. 2010. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 9th ed. Saint Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. 2002. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 23:2667–2682.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrzak G, Curnier A, Botsis J, Scherrer S, Wiskott A, Belser U. 2002. A nonlinear elastic model of the periodontal ligament and its numerical calibration for the study of tooth mobility. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 5:91–100.10.1080/10255840290032117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakaguchi R, Powers J. 2012. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13th ed. Philadelphi: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews W, Pashley DH. 1994. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res. 73:1205–1211.10.1177/00220345940730061201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Lee H, Lu C. 2007. Thermal–mechanical study of functionally graded dental implants with the finite element method. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 80A:146–158.10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Abdul MM, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. 2010. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat. 32:343–349.10.1007/s00276-009-0570-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel JK. 2004. The handbook of advanced materials: enabling new designs-p465. New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, Apicella A. 2006. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater. 22:1035–1044.10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. 2017. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017/05/01/;117:646-655.10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar