A two way fully coupled fluid structure simulation of human ureter peristalsis

References

• Boyarsky S, Labay PC. 1971. Ureteral dimensions and specifications for bioengineering modeling. Urodynamics: Hydrodynamics of the Ureter and Renal Pelvis. 163.
   Google Scholar
• Burns J, Parkes T. 1967. Peristaltic motion. J Fluid Mech. 29(4):731–743.
   Google Scholar
• Capaldi FM. 2012. Continuum mechanics: constitutive modeling of structural and biological materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chow T. 1970. Peristaltic transport in a circular cylindrical pipe. J Appl Mech. 37(4):901–905.
   Google Scholar
• Duck FA. 2013. Physical properties of tissues: a comprehensive reference book. London, UK: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung Y, Fronek K, Patitucci P. 1979. Pseudoelasticity of arteries and the choice of its mathematical expression. Am J Physiol Heart Circul Physiol. 237(5):H620–H631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung Y, Yih C. 1968. Peristaltic transport. J Appl Mech. 35(4):669–675.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths D. 1989. Flow of urine through the ureter: a collapsible, muscular tube undergoing peristalsis. J Biomech Eng. 111(3):206–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffiths DJ. 1987. Dynamics of the upper urinary tract: I. peristaltic flow through a distensible tube of limited length. Phys Med Biol. 32(7):813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyton A, Hall J. 2006. Urine formation by the kidneys: I. glomerular filtration, renal blood flow, and their control. In Textbook of Medical Physiology. New York, NY: Elsevier, 1; p. 309.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW. 2000. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast Phys Sci Solids. 61(1–3):1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini G, Williams J, Avital EJ, Munjiza A, Xu D, Green JA. 2012. Computational simulation of urinary system. San Francisco, CA: Proc World Congress Eng Comput Sci.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez Lozano JN. 2009. Peristaltic flow with application to ureteral biomechanics [PhD thesis]. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Lykoudis PS, Roos R. 1970. The fluid mechanics of the ureter from a lubrication theory point of view. J Fluid Mech. 43(4):661–674.
   Google Scholar
• Marieb EN, Wilhelm PB and Mallatt JB. 2013. Human Anatomy. 7th Edition. Whiteplains, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Multiphysics C. 2015. COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.3. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi Z, Gautam P, Schwartz BF, Chandy AJ, Mahajan AM. 2016. Three-dimensional numerical simulations of peristaltic contractions in obstructed ureter flows. J Biomech Eng. 138(10):101002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi Z. 2015. Development of new treatment modalities for kidney/ureter stones [PhD thesis]. Akron, OH: The University of Akron.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlson L. 1989. Morphological dynamics of ureteral transport. II. Peristaltic patterns in relation to flow rate. Am J Physiol-Regul, Integr Comparative Physiol. 256(1):R29–R34.
   Google Scholar
• Rassoli A, Shafigh M, Seddighi A, Seddighi A, Daneshparvar H, Fatouraee N. 2014. Biaxial mechanical properties of human ureter under tension. Urol J. 11(3):1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose JG, Gillenwater J. 1973. Pathophysiology of ureteral obstruction. Am J Physiol–Legacy Content. 225(4):830–837.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro AH, Jaffrin MY, Weinberg SL. 1969. Peristaltic pumping with long wavelengths at low reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 37(4):799–825.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolis DP. 2012. Multiaxial mechanical behaviour of the passive ureteral wall: experimental study and mathematical characterisation. Computer Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 15(11):1145–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takaddus AT, Chandy AJ. 2018. A three-dimensional (3D) two-way coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) study of peristaltic flow in obstructed ureters. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. e3122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takaddus AT, Gautam P, Chandy AJ. 2016. Numerical simulations of peristalsis in unobstructed human ureters. In: ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Phoenix (AZ): ASME, pp. V003T04A024–V003T04A024.
   Google Scholar
• Takaddus AT, Gautam P, Chandy AJ. 2018. A fluid-structure interaction (FSI)-based numerical investigation of peristalsis in an obstructed human ureter. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 34(9):e3104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahidi B, Fatouraee N, Imanparast A, Moghadam AN. 2011. A mathematical simulation of the ureter: effects of the model parameters on ureteral pressure/flow relations. J Biomech Eng. 133(3):031004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahidi B, Fatouraee N. 2007. A numerical simulation of peristaltic motion in the ureter using fluid structure interactions. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007:1168–1171.
   Google Scholar
• Vahidi B, Fatouraee N. 2012. A biomechanical simulation of ureteral flow during peristalsis using intraluminal morphometric data. J Theoret Biol. 298:42–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mastrigt R, Tauecchio E. 1984. Bolus propagation in pig ureter in vitro. Urology. 23(2):157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin F, Fung Y. 1971. Mechanical properties of isolated mammalian ureteral segments. Am J Physiol. 221(5):1484–1493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin F, Fung YC. 1969. Peristaltic waves in circular cylindrical tubes. J Appl Mech. 36(3):579–587.
   Google Scholar