Numerical and experimental evaluation of TPMS Gyroid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

References

• 3D Systems. 2017. MultiJet Plastic Printers VisiJet ® M3 Advanced Plastics. Rock Hill, SC: 3D Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida HA, Bártolo PJ. 2014. Design of tissue engineering scaffolds based on hyperbolic surfaces: structural numerical evaluation. Med Eng Phys. 36:1033–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM International. 2002. ASTM D695 - 02a: standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Balabanian F, Sant’Ana da Silva E, Pedrini H. 2017. Image thresholding improved by global optimization methods. Appl Artif Intell. 31:197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabaschi GDG, Manoharan V. 2015. Engineering mineralized and load bearing tissues. Adv Exp Med Biol. 881:79–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanquer SBG, Werner M, Hannula M, Sharifi S, Lajoinie GPR, Eglin D, Hyttinen J, Poot AA, Grijpma DW. 2017. Surface curvature in triply-periodic minimal surface architectures as a distinct design parameter in preparing advanced tissue engineering scaffolds. Biofabrication. 9:025001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbert FSL, Lietaert K, Eftekhari AA, Pouran B, Ahmadi SM, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA. 2017. Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: A unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomater. 53:572–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccio A. 2011. Finite Element Method (FEM), Mechanobiology and Biomimetic Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering. Int J Biol Sci. 7:112–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos Marin A, Lacroix D. 2015. The inter-sample structural variability of regular tissue-engineered scaffolds significantly affects the micromechanical local cell environment. Interface Focus. 5:20140097–20140097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilho M, Pires I, Gouveia B, Rodrigues J. 2011. Structural evaluation of scaffolds prototypes produced by three-dimensional printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 56:561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro APG, Lacroix D. 2018. Micromechanical study of the load transfer in a polycaprolactone–collagen hybrid scaffold when subjected to unconfined and confined compression. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 17:531–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho PG, Hollister SJ, Flanagan CL, Fernandes PR. 2015. Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis. Med Eng Phys. 37:287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinis JC, Morais TF, Amorim PHJ, Ruben RB, Almeida HA, Inforçati PN, Bártolo PJ, Silva JVL. 2014. Open source software for the automatic design of scaffold structures for tissue engineering applications. Procedia Technol. 16:1542–1547.
   Google Scholar
• Eshraghi S, Das S. 2012. Micromechanical finite-element modeling and experimental characterization of the compressive mechanical properties of polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds prepared by selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 8:3138–3143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Fu J, Shang C, Lin Z, Li B. 2018. Porous scaffold design by solid T-splines and triply periodic minimal surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 336:333–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauvin R, Chen Y-C, Lee JW, Soman P, Zorlutuna P, Nichol JW, Bae H, Chen S, Khademhosseini A. 2012. Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials. 33:3824–3834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannitelli SM, Accoto D, Trombetta M, Rainer A. 2014. Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 10:580–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes JM, Kikuchi N. 1990. Preprocessing and postprocessing for materials based on the homogenization method with adaptive finite element methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 83:143–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister SJ, Flanagan CL, Morrison RJ, Patel JJ, Wheeler MB, Edwards SP, Green GE. 2016. Integrating image-based design and 3D biomaterial printing to create patient specific devices within a design control framework for clinical translation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2:1827–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister SJ, Murphy WL. 2011. Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 17:459–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapfer SC, Hyde ST, Mecke K, Arns CH, Schröder-Turk GE. 2011. Minimal surface scaffold designs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 32:6875–6882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos É, Magyar L, Bojtár I. 2014. Material properties of the mandibular trabecular bone. J Med Eng. 2014:470539.
   Google Scholar
• Lu T, Li Y, Chen T. 2013. Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 8:337–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchels FPW, Tonnarelli B, Olivares AL, Martin I, Lacroix D, Feijen J, Wendt DJ, Grijpma DW. 2011. The influence of the scaffold design on the distribution of adhering cells after perfusion cell seeding. Biomaterials. 32:2878–2884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazerian H, Davoodi E, Asadi-Eydivand M, Kadkhodapour J, Solati-Hashjin M. 2017. Porous scaffold internal architecture design based on minimal surfaces: a compromise between permeability and elastic properties. Mater Des. 126:98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyma A, Kang M, Kwon Y-K, Kim C-H, Kim J-M. 2012. A hybrid technique for medical image segmentation. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Waller MA, Yannas I V, Gibson LJ, Prendergast PJ. 2007. The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technol Heal Care. 15:3–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olivares AL, Lacroix D. 2012. Simulation of cell seeding within a three-dimensional porous scaffold: a fluid-particle analysis. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 18:624–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papantoniou I, Guyot Y, Sonnaert M, Kerckhofs G, Luyten FP, Geris L, Schrooten J. 2014. Spatial optimization in perfusion bioreactors improves bone tissue-engineered construct quality attributes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 111:2560–2570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahbari A, Montazerian H, Davoodi E, Homayoonfar S. 2016. Predicting permeability of regular tissue engineering scaffolds: scaling analysis of pore architecture, scaffold length, and fluid flow rate effects. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 5842:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan S, Robb RA. 2006. Schwarz meets Schwann: design and fabrication of biomorphic and durataxic tissue engineering scaffolds. Med Image Anal. 10:693–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues HC, Coelho PG, Fernandes PR. 2011. Multiscale modelling of bone tissue - remodelling and application to scaffold design. Comput Methods Appl Sci. 20:15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sochol RD, Sweet E, Glick CC, Venkatesh S, Avetisyan A, Ekman KF, Raulinaitis A, Tsai A, Wienkers A, Korner K, et al. 2016. 3D printed microfluidic circuitry via multijet-based additive manufacturing. Lab Chip. 16:668–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speirs M, Van Hooreweder B, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth JP. 2017. Fatigue behaviour of NiTi shape memory alloy scaffolds produced by SLM, a unit cell design comparison. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 70:53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco MA, Lancheros Y, Garzón-Alvarado DA. 2016. Geometric and mechanical properties evaluation of scaffolds for bone tissue applications designing by a reaction-diffusion models and manufactured with a material jetting system. J Comput Des Eng. 3:385–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana T, Biscaia S, Almeida HA, Bártolo PJ. 2013. Permeability evaluation of lay-down patterns and pore size of PCL scaffolds. Procedia Eng. 59:255–262.
   Google Scholar
• Webber MJ, Khan OF, Sydlik SA, Tang BC, Langer R. 2015. A perspective on the clinical translation of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 43:641–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wismer N, Grad S, Fortunato G, Ferguson SJ, Alini M, Eglin D. 2014. Biodegradable electrospun scaffolds for annulus fibrosus tissue engineering: effect of scaffold structure and composition on annulus fibrosus cells in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A. 20:672–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo DJ. 2014. Advanced porous scaffold design using multi-void triply periodic minimal surface models with high surface area to volume ratios. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 15:1657–1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar