The consequence of substrates of large-scale rigidity on actin network tension in adherent cells

References

• Barreto S, Clausen CH, Perrault CM, Fletcher DA, Lacroix D. 2013. A multi-structural single cell model of force-induced interactions of cytoskeletal components. Biomaterials 34(26):6119–6126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borau C, Kim T, Bidone T, García-Aznar JM, Kamm RD. 2012. Dynamic mechanisms of cell rigidity sensing: Insights from a computational model of actomyosin networks. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049174
   Google Scholar
• Deguchi S, Ohashi T, Sato M. 2006. Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomech. 39(14):2603–2610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Santis G, Lennon AB, Boschetti F, Verhegghe B, Verdonck P, Prendergast PJ. 2011. How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using cell tensegrity model. eCM 22:202–213.
   Google Scholar
• Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. 2005. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751):1139–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokukina IV, Gracheva ME. 2010. A model of fibroblast motility on substrates with different rigidities. Biophys J. 98(12):2794–2803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois F, Jean M. 2006. The non smooth contact dynamic method: recent LMGC90 software developments and application. In: Analysis and Simulation of Contact Problems. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics. 27:375–378.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Lai KWC. 2016. Modeling the mechanics of cells in the cell-spreading process driven by traction forces. Physical Review E93:042404.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Friedrich E, Hyman AA, Jülicher F, Müller DJ, Helenius J. 2014. Quantification of surface tension and internal pressure generated by single mitotic cells. Sci Rep. 4:6213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Wang YK, Yang MT, Desai RA, Yu X, Liu Z, Chen CS. 2010. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods. 7(9):733–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladilin E, Gonzalez P, Eils R. 2014. Dissecting the contribution of actin and vimentin intermediatefilaments to mechanical phenotype of suspended cells using highthroughput deformability measurements and computational modeling. J Biomech. 47(11):2598–2605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SJ, Bielawski KS, Ting LH, Rodriguez ML, Sniadecki NJ. 2012. Decoupling substrate stiffness, spread area, and micropost density: a close spatial relationship between traction forces and focal adhesions. Biophys J. 103(4):640–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Hwang W, Kamm RD. 2009. Computational analysis of a cross-linked actin-like network. Exp Mech. 49(1):91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legant WR, Miller JS, Blakely BL, Cohen DM, Genin GM, Chen CS. 2010. Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices. Nat Methods. 7(12):969–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmon CA, Sniadecki NJ, Ruiz SA, Tan JL, Romer LH, Chen CS. 2005. Shear force at the cell-matrix interface: enhanced analysis for microfabricated post array detectors. Mech Chem Biosyst. 2(1):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li B, Xie L, Starr ZC, Yang Z, Lin JS, Wang J. 2007. Development of micropost force sensor array with culture experiments for determination of cell traction forces. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 64(7):509–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livne A, Geiger B. 2016. The inner workings of stress fibers - from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back. J Cell Sci. 129(7):1293–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosli Y, Luginbuehl R, Snedeker JG. 2010. Cytoskeleton reorganization of spreading cells on micro-patterned islands: a functional model. Proc R Soc A. 368(1920):2629–2652.
   Google Scholar
• Mak M, Zaman MH, Kamm RD, Kim T. 2016. Interplay of active processes modulates tension and drives phase transition in self-renewing, motor-driven cytoskeletal networks. Nat Commun. 7:10323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manifacier I, Milan JL, Jeanneau C, Chmilewsky F, Chabrand P, About I. 2016. Computational tension mapping of adherent cells based on actin imaging. PLoS One. 11(1):e0146863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry JG, Prendergast PJ. 2004. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. eCM 7:27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meacci G, Wolfenson H, Liu S, Stachowiak MR, Iskratsch T, Mathur A, Ghassemi S, Gauthier N, Tabdanov E, Lohner J, et al. 2016. α-actinin links ECM rigidity sensing contractile units with periodic cell edge retractions. MBoC 27(22):3471–3479.
   Google Scholar
• Milan JL, Wendling-Mansuy S, Jean M, Chabrand P. 2007. Divided medium-based model for analyzing the dynamic reorganization of the cytoskeleton during cell deformation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 6(6):373–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan J-L, Lavenus S, Pilet P, Louarn G, Wendling S, Heymann D, Layrolle P, Chabrand P. 2013. Computational model combined with in vitro experiments to analyse mechanotransduction during mesenchymal stem cell adhesion. Eur Cell Mater. 25:97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan J-L, Manifacier I, Beussman KM, Han SJ, Sniadecki NJ, About I, Chabrand P. 2016. In silico CDM model sheds light on force transmission in cell from focal adhesions to nucleus. J Biomech. 49(13):2625–2634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parameswaran H, Lutchen KR, Suki B. 2014. A computational model of the response of adherent cells to stretch and changes in substrate stiffness. J Appl Physiol. 116(7):825–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak A, Chen CS, Evans AG, McMeeking RM. 2012. Structural mechanics based model for the force-bearing elements within the cytoskeleton of a cell adhered on a bed of posts. J Appl Mech. 79(6):061020–061020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivkin IV, Peng Z, Karniadakis GE, Buffet PA, Dao M, Suresh S. 2016. Biomechanics of red blood cells in human spleen and consequences for physiology and disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(28):7804–7809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rape AD, Guo WH, Wang YL. 2011. The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. Biomaterials 32(8):2043–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 9(7):671–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen S, Engler AJ, Discher DE. 2009. Matrix strains induced by cells: Computing how far cells can feel. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2(1):39–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soiné JRD, Brand CA, Stricker J, Oakes PW, Gardel ML, Schwarz US. 2015. Model-based traction force microscopy reveals differential tension in cellular actin bundles. PLoS Comput Biol. 11(3):e1004076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JL, Tien J, Pirone DM, Gray DS, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. 2003. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100(4):1484–1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tee SY, Fu J, Chen CS, Janmey PA. 2011. Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. Biophys J. 100(5):L25–L27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres PG, Bischofs IB, Schwarz US. 2012. Contractile network models for adherent cells. Phys Rev. E85:011913.
   Google Scholar
• Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE. 2009. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 10(1):75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar